主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 61-72.

• 城市与区域 • 上一篇    下一篇

农户生计策略选择与转型动力机制研究——宁夏回族聚居区451户农户的调查数据

刘自强   

  1. 北方民族大学
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-13 修回日期:2017-07-05 出版日期:2017-12-15 发布日期:2017-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 刘自强
  • 基金资助:

    宁夏回族聚居区乡村发展对城市化的响应与转型模式研究

Household Strategies’ Choice and Transition Dynamic Mechanism Research from Farmers——The survey data from inhabited areas’ 451 farmers in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

  • Received:2017-04-13 Revised:2017-07-05 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2017-12-13

摘要: 在快速城市化影响下,农户的生计资本拥有量与结构配置发生了转变,影响着农户生计策略的选择,促进了生计方式的转型。宁夏回族呈现大杂居小聚居的特点,在其聚居区域选取22个乡村,451户农户进行调研,在对生计资本拥有量和结构进行测算的基础上,运用二元Logistic模型与多元Logistic模型对农户生计策略选择的影响因素与生计转型的动力进行分析,研究表明:(1)不同生计策略农户的生计资本组成结构有较大的差异,从反映其综合指数的多维发展能力来看,从高到低分别为二兼户、一兼户、非农户和纯农户;(2)自然资本对纯农户和一兼户的生计策略选择具有显著正向作用,金融资本、人力资本和社会资本对二兼户的生计策略选择具有显著正向作用,社会资本对非农户的生计策略选择具有显著正向作用;(3)从纯农户向一兼户转型的主要动力是金融资本,向二兼户转型的主要动力是人力资本与社会资本,向非农户转型的主要动力是社会资本,家庭综合劳动能力和社会交往多元化程度是农户生计转型的显著促进因子。从阻滞因子看,不同的转型方式差异较大。最后,针对不同生计策略的农户,提出了更有针对性的政策扶持。

Abstract: Under the influence of rapid urbanization, the shift is occurring between different types of livelihood capitals’ ownership and structure configuration from farmers, impacting on farmers household strategies’ choice, accelerating livelihood model’s transition. Ningxia Hui presents a characteristic of big area inhabited by several nationalities and little region inhabited by their own, selecting 22 villages’ 451 farmers to survey from it, based on calculation for farmers’ livelihood capitals ownership and structure, by applying binary logistic model and multi-logistic model to analyze the influence factors of farmers household strategies’ choice and the dynamic of livelihood transition. The research shows: (1) Farmers livelihood capitals’ composition of the different household strategies exists a big gap, in the multi-dimensional development capability from its composite index view, farmers are divided into households with being based on non-agriculture and supplemented by agriculture, households with being based on agriculture and supplemented by non-agriculture, non-farmer, pure peasant households respectively from highest to lowest; (2) Natural capital has an apparently positive effect on pure peasant households and households with being based on agriculture and supplemented by non-agriculture’s livelihood choice, however financial capital, human capital and social capital have a significantly positive impact on households with being based on non-agriculture and supplemented by agriculture’s livelihood choice, and social capital has a prominently influence on non-farmer; (3)The main dynamic is financial capital from pure peasant households to households with being based on agriculture and supplemented by non-agriculture, the major dynamic is human capital turning to households with being based on non-agriculture and supplemented by agriculture, and the chief dynamic is social capital toward non-farmer yet, the households comprehensive labor force and the social diversification degree are prominently promoter for farmers’ livelihood transition. Seeing from retardation factor, different types of transition modes exist a great difference. For household strategy of different farmers, policy support having pertinence was proposed finally.

中图分类号: