世界地理研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 111-122.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.05.20222290
• 专栏:城市治理与区域协同 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2022-10-10
修回日期:
2023-02-02
出版日期:
2024-05-15
发布日期:
2024-05-30
通讯作者:
廖超超
作者简介:
游晨(1995—),男,讲师,研究方向为行政改革与地方治理,E-mail:youchen@zju.edu.cn。
基金资助:
Chen YOU1,2,3(), Chaochao LIAO4()
Received:
2022-10-10
Revised:
2023-02-02
Online:
2024-05-15
Published:
2024-05-30
Contact:
Chaochao LIAO
摘要:
行政区划是国家治理的空间基础,其改革实践则重塑区域政治经济格局,是国内外实务界与学术界共同关注的重要议题。但国内学界对国外行政区划改革的关注却相对不足。基于对英文文献的梳理,评述国外行政区划改革的实践进程与研究进展。研究发现,合并与拆分是国外行政区划改革的两种主要模式,改革的动因研究、影响因素及绩效研究是现有研究的三个核心议题,而精确评估改革绩效、扩展研究视角是未来研究的重点方向,同时国外行政区划改革的实践也可为当前中国的行政区划改革提供一定的参考。
游晨, 廖超超. 行政区划改革的国际实践与研究评述[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(5): 111-122.
Chen YOU, Chaochao LIAO. A review of foreign administrative division reform practices and research[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(5): 111-122.
中文 | 英文 |
---|---|
区划改革 | Territorial Reforms; Border Reforms; Redistricting; Gerrymandering; Realignment; Boundary Changes; Reorganization |
合并 | Amalgamations; Merger; Annexation; Consolidation; Incorporation |
拆分 | Split; Proliferation; Fragmentation; De-Amalgamation; De-Merger; Secession; Territorial Partition; Municipal Divorce |
表1 主要用于检索的关键词
Tab.1 The main keywords used for the search
中文 | 英文 |
---|---|
区划改革 | Territorial Reforms; Border Reforms; Redistricting; Gerrymandering; Realignment; Boundary Changes; Reorganization |
合并 | Amalgamations; Merger; Annexation; Consolidation; Incorporation |
拆分 | Split; Proliferation; Fragmentation; De-Amalgamation; De-Merger; Secession; Territorial Partition; Municipal Divorce |
1 | 朱建华,陈田,王开泳,等.改革开放以来中国行政区划格局演变与驱动力分析.地理研究,2015,34(2):247-258. |
ZHU J, CHEN T, WANG K, et al. Spatial pattern evolution and driving force analysis of administrative division in China since the reform and opening-up. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(2):247-258. | |
2 | 杨宇泽,叶林.发达国家城市合并的理论研究述评.公共管理与政策评论,2020,9(3):86-96. |
YANG Y, YE L. A literature review of theory and research on municipal amalgamation in developed countries public. Administration and Policy Review 9(3):86-96. | |
3 | 聂玉霞,宋明爽.国内外关于"村庄合并"研究述评.山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(1):73-78. |
NIE Y, SONG M. A review of domestic and foreign research on "village integration. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Social Science Edition),2015,17(1):73-78. | |
4 | 邓大才."合并浪潮":农村基本建制单元重组与民主争议——以发达国家农村基层建制单元为考察对象.山东社会科学,2019(1):61-68. |
DENG D. The tide of merging: Unit restructure and democratic debate of basic rural organizations--With the object of the basic rural units of developed countries. Shandong Social Sciences,2019(1):61-68. | |
5 | 王开泳,陈田.国外行政区划调整的经验及对我国的启示.世界地理研究,2011,20(2):57-64. |
WANG K, CHEN T. The experience reference of administrative division adjustment in abroad and the apocalypses for China. World Regional Studies,2011,20(2):57-64. | |
6 | 侯爱敏.美国市县合并的五个突出特征及其对我国区划调整的启示.国际城市规划,2018,33(6):43-48. |
HOU A. Five distinctive features of American city-county consolidation and lessons for China's administrative division adjustment in metropolitan areas. Urban Planning International,2018,33(6):43-48. | |
7 | LIESBET H, GARY M. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review,2003,97(2):233-243. |
8 | SHOBE W. Emerging issues in decentralized resource governance: Environmental federalism, spillovers, and linked socio-ecological systems. Annual Review of Resource Economics,2020,12(1):259-279. |
9 | HASSAN M, SHEELY R. Executive-legislative relations, party defections, and lower level administrative unit proliferation: Evidence from Kenya. Comparative Political Studies,2017,50(12):1595-1631. |
10 | GRIFFITHS R. Between dissolution and blood: How administrative lines and categories shape secessionist outcomes. International Organization,2015,69(3):731-751. |
11 | KRAXBERGER B. The geography of regime survival: Abacha's Nigeria. African Affairs,2004,103(412):413-430. |
12 | JACOBS A. Federations of municipalities: A practical alternative to local government consolidations in Japan? Governance,2004,17(2):247-274. |
13 | N-K HLEPAS. Incomplete Greek territorial consolidation: From the first (1998) to the second (2008-09) wave of reforms. Local Government Studies,2010,36(2):223-249. |
14 | BLESSE S, BASKARAN T. Do municipal mergers reduce costs? Evidence from a German federal state. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2016,59:54-74. |
15 | STREBEL M. Why voluntary municipal merger projects fail: Evidence from popular votes in Switzerland. Local Government Studies,2019,45(5):654-675. |
16 | WEESE E. Political mergers as coalition formation: An analysis of the Heisei municipal amalgamations. Quantitative Economics,2015,6(2):257-307. |
17 | SWIANIEWICZ P. From post-communist democratic laissez-faire to prevention of territorial fragmentation: Tightening the rules of municipal splits in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990. Miscellanea Geographica,2021,25(1):5-17. |
18 | KRECI V, YMERI B. The impact of territorial re-organizational policy interventions in the republic of Macedonia. Local Government Studies,2010,36(2):271-290. |
19 | SMITH R M, WALDNER L. Why majority-minority cities form: Non-White municipal incorporation in the United States,1990-2010. Urban Geography,2018,39(1):149-166. |
20 | Patronage GREEN E., creation district, and reform in Uganda. Studies in Comparative International Development,2010,45(1):83-103. |
21 | SWIANIEWICZ P, MIELCZAREK A. Georgian local government reform: State Leviathan redraws boundaries? Local Government Studies,2010,36(2):291-311. |
22 | ANDERSEN H. The emerging Danish government reform--Centralised decentralisation. Urban Research & Practice,2008,1(1):3-17. |
23 | LEWIS J. When decentralization leads to recentralization: Subnational state transformation in Uganda. Regional & Federal Studies,2014,24(5):571-588. |
24 | LELAND S, THURMAIER K. When efficiency is unbelievable: Normative lessons from 30 years of city-county consolidations. Public Administration Review,2005,65(4):475-489. |
25 | GIMÉNEZ V, PRIOR D. Long- and short-term cost efficiency frontier evaluation: Evidence from Spanish local governments. Fiscal Studies,2007,28(1):121-139. |
26 | DE CEUNINCK K, REYNAERT H, STEYVERS K, et al. Municipal amalgamations in the low countries: Same problems, different solutions. Local Government Studies,2010,36(6):803-822. |
27 | MIYAZAKI T. Municipal consolidation and local government behavior: Evidence from Japanese voting data on merger referenda. Economics of Governance,2014,15(4):387-410. |
28 | DIGDOWISEISO K, MURSHED S, BERGH S. What drives regional proliferation in Indonesia? Assessing the role of institutions. Lex localis- Journal of Local Self-Government,2022,20(1):27-54. |
29 | SWIANIEWICZ P. If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution?--Ten years later. Local Government Studies,2018,44(1):1-10. |
30 | KLAFF V, FUGUITT G. Annexation as a factor in the growth of U.S. cities,1950-1960 and 1960-1970. Demography,1978,15(1):1-12. |
31 | DURST N, CAI M, TILLISON-LOVE J, et al. The gerrymandering of cities and the politics of racial exclusion: Evidence from a spatial typology of municipal boundary changes. Journal of Urban Affairs,2021,45(9):1586-1607. |
32 | FITRANI F, HOFMAN B, KAISER K. Unity in diversity? The creation of new local governments in a decentralising Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies,2005,41(1):57-79. |
33 | MAVUNGU E. Frontiers of power and prosperity: Explaining provincial boundary disputes in postapartheid South Africa. African Studies Review,2016,59(2):183-208. |
34 | LAPOINTE S. "Love thy neighbour"? The effect of income and language differences on votes for municipal secessions. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2018,70:229-245. |
35 | KAISER C. Functioning and impact of incentives for amalgamations in a federal State: The Swiss case. International Journal of Public Administration,2014,37(10):625-637. |
36 | PIERSKALLA J.Splitting the difference? The politics of district creation in Indonesia. Comparative Politics,2016,48(2):249-268. |
37 | BRINK A. The break-up of municipalities: Voting behavior in local referenda. Economics of Governance,2004,5(2):119-135. |
38 | VRANGBÆK K. Structural reform in Denmark,2007-09: Central reform processes in a decentralised environment. Local Government Studies,2010,36(2):205-221. |
39 | BRUSIS M. Party Strategies and administrative-territorial reforms in Poland. West European Politics,2013,36(2):405-425. |
40 | VABO S, FIMREITE A, HOULBERG K. Why such a different choice of tools? Analysing recent local government reforms in Denmark and Norway. Local Government Studies,2023, 49(2):355-374. |
41 | MAHPUDIN M, INDRIYANY I, HIKMAWAN M. Between elites and society: The politics of territorial splits in a decentralizing era, case of Lebak district, Indonesia. Journal of Governance,2021,6(1):155-176. |
42 | KUHLMANN S, BOUCKAERT G. Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons. London: Palgrave Macmillan,2016. |
43 | CARR J, S-S BAE, LU W. City-county government and promises of economic development: A tale of two cities. State and Local Government Review,2006,38(3):131-141. |
44 | REDDING S, STURM D. The Costs of remoteness: Evidence from German division and reunification. American Economic Review,2008,98(5):1766-1797. |
45 | SWIANIEWICZ P, ŁUKOMSKA J. Is small beautiful? The quasi-experimental analysis of the impact of territorial fragmentation on costs in Polish local governments. Urban Affairs Review,2019,55(3):832-855. |
46 | HANSEN S, HOULBERG K, PEDERSEN L. Do municipal mergers improve fiscal outcomes? Scandinavian Political Studies,2014,37(2):196-214. |
47 | BLOM-HANSEN J, HOULBERG K, SERRITZLEW S.Size, democracy, and the economic costs of running the political system. American Journal of Political Science,2014,58(4):790-803. |
48 | HARJUNEN O, SAARIMAA T, TUKIAINEN J. Political representation and effects of municipal mergers. Political Science Research and Methods,2021,9(1):72-88. |
49 | REINGEWERTZ Y. Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics,2012,72(2-3):240-251. |
50 | HIROTA H, YUNOUE H. Evaluation of the fiscal effect on municipal mergers: Quasi-experimental evidence from Japanese municipal data. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2017,66:132-149. |
51 | RODRIGUES M, MEZA O. "Is there anybody out there?" Political implications of a territorial integration. Journal of Urban Affairs,2018,40(3):426-440. |
52 | ALLERS M, DE NATRIS J, RIENKS H, et al. Is small beautiful? Transitional and structural effects of municipal amalgamation on voter turnout in local and national elections. Electoral Studies,2021,70:102284. |
53 | SAARIMAA T, TUKIAINEN J. Local representation and strategic voting: Evidence from electoral boundary reforms. European Journal of Political Economy,2016,41:31-45. |
54 | GENDŹWIŁŁ A, KJAER U. Mind the gap, please! Pinpointing the influence of municipal size on local electoral participation. Local Government Studies,2021,47(1):11-30. |
55 | SAVITCH H, VOGEL R. Suburbs without a city: Power and city-county consolidation. Urban Affairs Review,2004,39(6):758-790. |
56 | ACUFF C. An empirical examination of representational equity in consolidated governments,1965-2002. Urban Affairs Review,2022,58(6):1523-1553. |
57 | YAMADA K, ARAI K. Do boundary consolidations alter the relationship between politicians and voters? The case of municipal mergers in Japan. Local Government Studies,2021,47(4):519-545. |
58 | JAKOBSEN M, KJAER U. Political representation and geographical bias in amalgamated local governments. Local Government Studies,2016,42(2):208-227. |
59 | KJAER U, HJELMAR U, LETH OLSEN A. Municipal amalgamations and the democratic functioning of local councils: The case of The Danish 2007 Structural Reform. Local Government Studies,2010,36(4):569-585. |
60 | SHIMIZU K. Electoral consequences of municipal mergers. Journal of East Asian Studies,2012,12(3):381-408. |
61 | SUZUKI K, HA H. Municipal merger and local democracy: An assessment of the merger of Japanese municipalities. Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government,2018,16(4):759-784. |
62 | FURUKAWA A. Efficient municipal consolidation and local public spending: A theoretical approach. Applied Economics Letters,2022,29(8): 746-749. |
63 | MCQUESTIN D, DREW J, DOLLERY B. Do municipal mergers improve technical efficiency? An empirical analysis of the 2008 Queensland municipal merger program. Australian Journal of Public Administration,2018,77(3):442-455. |
64 | GROSSMAN G, PIERSKALLA J, BOSWELL DEAN E. Government fragmentation and public goods provision. The Journal of Politics,2017,79(3):823-840. |
65 | LEWIS B. Does local government proliferation improve public service delivery? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Urban Affairs,2017,39(8):1047-1065. |
66 | PICKERING S, TANAKA S, YAMADA K. The impact of municipal mergers on local public spending: Evidence from remote-sensing data. Journal of East Asian Studies,2020,20(2):243-266. |
67 | BOURDIN S, TORRE A. The territorial big bang: Which assessment about the territorial reform in France? European Planning Studies,2021,29(11):1981-1998. |
68 | KONOPSKI M. The role of administrative borders in determining regional identity: The case of Podlasie, Poland. Moravian Geographical Reports,2021,29(1):53-70. |
69 | ZIMMERBAUER K, PAASI A. When old and new regionalism collide: Deinstitutionalization of regions and resistance identity in municipality amalgamations. Journal of Rural Studies,2013,30:31-40. |
70 | BURGESS R, HANSEN M, OLKEN B A, et al. The political economy of deforestation in the tropics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2012,127(4):1707-1754. |
71 | ALESINA A, GENNAIOLI C, LOVO S. Public goods and ethnic diversity: Evidence from deforestation in Indonesia. Economica,2019,86(341):32-66. |
72 | LIPSCOMB M, MOBARAK A. Decentralization and pollution spillovers: Evidence from the re-drawing of county borders in Brazil. The Review of Economic Studies,2017,84(1):464-502. |
[1] | 张战仁, 杨晓雪, 占正云. 全球研发网络分工的动力研究评述[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(6): 59-67. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||