主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (04): 100-107.

• 城市与区域 • 上一篇    下一篇

丝绸之路经济带背景下中亚五国投资环境比较研究

刘二虎,陈瑛   

  1. 陕西师范大学
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-20 修回日期:2017-08-13 出版日期:2018-08-15 发布日期:2018-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈瑛
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省软科学研究计划项目“一带一路战略下陕西对中亚五国直接投资的区域和产业选择研究

The research of investment environmental comparison in Central Asian under the Background of The Silk Road Economic Belt

  • Received:2017-04-20 Revised:2017-08-13 Online:2018-08-15 Published:2018-08-20

摘要: 基于熵权理论,从政治因素、经济因素、基础设施以及生产因素四方面,对中亚国家的投资环境进行了综合评价,并对中亚五国的投资环境与吸收FDI(Foreign Direct Investment,外商直接投资)的关联性进行了简要分析,以期为丝绸之路经济带背景下中国对中亚国家直接投资提供参考建议。结论如下:(1)哈萨克斯坦的整体投资环境最为优越,乌兹别克斯坦、土库曼斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦处于中等,而塔吉克斯坦的整体投资环境较差;(2)从经济、政治、基础设施和生产因素方面出发,哈萨克斯坦投资环境在各项指标中均表现突出,其他四国的优势则不尽相同;(3)中亚五国投资环境的优劣对吸收COFDI(China Outward Foreign Direct Investment,中国对外直接投资)和全球FDI都有着明显的影响。

Abstract: Based on the theory of entropy, from political factors, economic factors, infrastructure as well as factors of production, it conducted a comprehensive evaluation to investment environment of Central Asian countries and brief analysis of the relationship between the five Central Asian countries investment environment and the absorption of FDI (Foreign Direct Investment).In background of The Silk Road Economic Belt,in order to provide reference for China direct investment in Central Asian countries. Results showed that:(1) Kazakhstan's overall investment environment is superior, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan is in the Middle, and Tajikistan’s the overall investment environment is poor;(2) From the economic, political, infrastructure and production factors, the in-vestment environment in Kazakhstan has been outstanding in every index, other four advantage is not the same ;(3) The advantages and disadvantages of the investment environment in the five Central Asian countries has evidently influence to absorption of COFDI and Global FDI.

中图分类号: