情感治理与湾区融合

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.02.20220005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在粤港澳大湾区建设的背景下，如何使港澳青年融入国家发展大局成为备受关注的议题。港澳创新创业基地作为赴内地创业的港澳青年的活动载体，其被赋予着推动湾区融合的重任。本研究采用半结构式访谈、实地考察与网络文本分析的方法，以广州市港澳双创基地为研究对象，基于情感地理学理论，探讨港澳双创基地中的情感空间的构建过程，及其在湾区治理中的作用机制。研究发现：不同主体在港澳双创基地发展的过程中邂逅。通过基地物质景观的营造和各主体间的良好互动，基地被构建成一个积极正向的情感空间。伴随着港澳创业者在内地的流动、实践，情感空间实现尺度跃升。港澳创业者在内地积极的情感体验一方面增强其社会参与的热情，另一方面通过其在港澳本地的社会实践传递到当地，吸引更多港澳本地居民融入湾区发展，以一种柔性的、非正式的方式发挥着情感的力量。然而港澳创业者对内地的情感具有多元性，其对内地的归属感与其社会参与之间的关系也较为复杂，在内地的港澳创业者仍处于情感融入的状态；当前尚缺少关于如何发挥在内地的港澳创业者对港澳本地的辐射带动作用的顶层设计。上述结论丰富了湾区治理研究视角和尺度，揭示了当前湾区融合中存在的问题，也为湾区情感治理实践提供了有效思路。

关键词: 湾区融合, 港澳创新创业基地, 港澳青年创业者, 情感空间构建, 情感治理

Abstract:

Constructing the Entrepreneurship Base for Hong Kong and Macao Youths is an important measure to support Hong Kong and Macao's integration into the overall development of the country and to promote the social integration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area(GBA). Taking the Entrepreneurship Base for Hong Kong and Macao Youths as research objects, this study employed semi-structured interviews, field trips and online content analysis and based on the theory of emotional geography to explore the construction process of emotional space in the Entrepreneurship Base for Hong Kong and Macao Youths, and the mechanism of its influence on the governance of GBA. The study found that different actors encountered in the development process of the Entrepreneurship Base for Hong Kong and Macao Youths. Through the design of the material landscape of the hub and the interaction between the different actors, the hub was constructed as a positive emotional space. Then, entrepreneurs' daily life mobility and practices on the mainland enabled them to overcome the spatial constraints of the hubs, permitted them to integrate into the broad urban society. Entrepreneurs' identity of city-as-home and their sense of belonging to the Mainland China were gradually fostered through re-mapping of the emotional boundary of their living place. The positive emotional experience of Hong Kong and Macao entrepreneurs on the mainland, on the one hand, enhanced their enthusiasm for social participation, and on the other hand, it was passed on to Hong Kong and Macao through their social practices in local areas, and encouraged more local residents to integrate into the development of the GBA, which played a significant role in its social integration in an informal way with the power of emotion. However, entrepreneurs' emotions towards Mainland China were conflict, and the relationship between their sense of belonging to Mainland China and their social participation was also complicated. Entrepreneurs from Hong Kong and Macao had not completely integrated into the GBA psychologically. Government also lacked the top-level design to strengthen the radiating effect of Hong Kong and Macao entrepreneurs on Mainland China in promoting youth entrepreneurship of Hong Kong and Macao in the GBA. The contribution of this research is reflected in two aspects: This study has enriched the research perspective and research scale of related research in China; and, it provides an effective path for the practice of emotional governance of the GBA.

Key words: the integration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, the Entrepreneurship Base for Hong Kong and Macao Youths, Hong Kong and Macao young entrepreneurs, the construction of emotional space, emotional governance

张云菲, 陆芷晴, 韩雨晴, 黄悦华, 王敏. 情感治理与湾区融合[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(2): 176-188.

Yunfei ZHANG, Zhiqing LU, Yuqing HAN, Yuehua HUANG, Min WANG. Emotional governance and the integration of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A case study of the Entrepreneurship Base for Hong Kong and Macao Youths in Guangzhou[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(2): 176-188.

图/表 4

参考文献 44

1	何雪松.情感治理:新媒体时代的重要治理维度.探索与争鸣, 2016(11): 40-42.
	HE X. Emotional governance: An important dimension of governance in the new media era. Explore and Argue, 2016(11): 40-42.
2	田先红,张庆贺.城市社区中的情感治理:基础、机制及限度.探索, 2019(6): 160-172.
	TIAN X, ZHANG Q. Emotional governance in urban communities: Foundations, mechanisms, and limits. Probe, 2019(6): 160-172.
3	方木欢.港澳青年创业扶持政策实施的多源流分析.当代青年研究, 2020(6): 58-63.
	FANG M.The multiple-streams model to youth entrepreneurship's supporting policy of Hong Kong and Macao in the Greater Bay Area. Contemporary Youth Research, 2020(6): 58-63.
4	傅承哲, 杨爱平. 港澳青年跨境就业创业政策的心理融合效应及其认知机制——基于行为公共管理的视角. 学术论坛, 2020, 43(1): 79-89.
	FU C, YANG A. The psychological integration effect and cognitive mechanism of cross-border employment and entrepreneurship policies for young people in Hong Kong and Macao: Based on the perspective of behavioral public management. Academic Forum, 2020, 43(1): 79-89.
5	谢伟.港澳青年在内地创新创业的实践探索与路径优化——以广州市天河区为例.探求, 2021(1): 78-84.
	XIE W. The practical exploration and path optimization of innovation and entrepreneurship of Hong Kong and Macao youth in the mainland: A case study of Tianhe District, Guangzhou. Quest, 2021(1): 78-84.
6	谢宝剑."一国两制"背景下的粤港澳社会融合研究.中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 52(5): 194-200.
	XIE B. A study on the social integration of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao under the background of "One Country, Two Systems". Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Social Science Edition), 2012, 52(5): 194-200.
7	ANDERSON K, SMITH S J. Editorial: Emotional geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2001, 26(1): 7-10.
8	蹇嘉,甄峰,席广亮,等.西方情绪地理学研究进展与启示.世界地理研究,2016, 25(2): 123-136.
	JIAN J, ZHEN F, XI G,et al.A review on emotional geography:Its progress and enlightenment.World Regional Studies,2016,25(2): 123-136.
9	DAVIDSON J, BONDI L, SMITH M. Emotional Geographies. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 2007.
10	朱竑,高权.西方地理学"情感转向"与情感地理学研究述评.地理研究,2015,34(7): 1394-1406.
	ZHU H, GAO Q. Review on "emotional turn" and emotional geographies in recent western geography. Geographical Research.2015,34(7): 1394-1406.
11	SMITH M, DAVIDSON J, CAMERON L, et al. Emotion, Place and Culture. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
12	段义孚. 人文主义地理学之我见. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(2): 1-7.
	TUAN Y F. Humanistic geography: A personal view. Progress in Geography, 2006, 25(2): 1-7.
13	THRIFT N. Spatial Formations. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1996.
14	王敏,江荣灏,朱竑.新文化地理学中的非表征与再物质化研究进展.地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 153-163.
	WANG M, JIANG R, ZHU H. Non-representational, re-materializing and the research methods of new cultural geography. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(2): 153-163.
15	郭文,朱竑.社会文化地理知识生产的表征与非表征维度.地理科学, 2020, 40(7): 1039-1049.
	GUO W, ZHU H. Representational and non-representational dimensions of knowledge production in socio-cultural geography. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(7): 1039-1049.
16	Afterwords THRIFT N.. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2000, 18(2): 213-255.
17	THRIFT N. Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, 2004, 86(1): 57-78.
18	KOBAYASHI A, PRESTON V, MURNAGHAN A M. Place, affect, and transnationalism through the voices of Hong Kong immigrants to Canada. Social & Cultural Geography, 2011, 12(8): 871-888.
19	李凡,杨蓉,黄丽萍.怀旧消费空间地方建构的比较研究——以广州怀旧餐厅为例.地理科学进展, 2015, 34(4): 505-516.
	LI F, YANG R, HUANG L. A comparative research on local construction of space of nostalgia and consumption: A case study of nostalgic restaurants in Guangzhou. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(4): 505-516.
20	BILLE M, BJERREGAARD, SRENSEN T. Staging atmospheres: Materiality, culture, and the texture of the in-between. Emotion, Space and Society, 2015(15): 31-38.
21	王敏,林钿,江荣灏,等.传统节庆、身体与展演空间:基于人文地理学视觉量化方法的研究.地理学报,2017,72(4): 671-684.
	WANG M, LIN T, JIANG R, et al.Analysis of the traditional festival, body and performative space: A human geographies method from the perspective of visual quantitative research.Acta Geographical Sinica,2017,72(4): 671-684.
22	BRANDENBURG A M, MATTHEW M S. Your place or mine?: The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society & Natural Resources, 2008, 8(5): 381-398.
23	GERAINT E, JOHN B, CLIVE R. Many ways to say 'no', different ways to say 'yes': Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2007, 50(4): 517-551.
24	BRONWYN E. Young people's emotional geographies of citizenship participation: Spatial and relational insights. Emotion, Space and Society, 2013(9): 50-58.
25	MITCHELL E, VINCENT E. The shame of welfare? Lived experiences of welfare and culturally inflected experiences of shame. Emotion, Space and Society, 2021(41): 100847.
26	MARGRIT P. Space and emotion: Building to feel. History Compass, 2014, 12(7): 541-549.
27	MAVROUDI E. Feeling Greek, speaking Greek? National identity and language negotiation amongst the Greek diaspora in Australia. Geoforum, 2020, 116(6): 130-139.
28	HUANG X, LIN S, CUI Q. From "villages of longevity" to "villages of cancer"? The emotional geography of tourism development in Bama, China. Emotion, Space and Society, 2021, 40(1): 100813.
29	PILE S. Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2010, 35(1): 5-20.
30	THRIFT N. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge, 2008.
31	赵美婷, 王泳捷, 沈珺琳,等.非表征理论视角下的城市再生方式——广州创新创业空间案例. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(4): 834-844.
	ZHAO M, WANG Y, SHEN J, et al. The urban regeneration approach from perspective of non-representational theory: Taking Guangzhou creative start-up space as example. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(4): 834-844.
32	高权, 钱俊希."情感转向"视角下地方性重构研究——以广州猎德村为例. 人文地理, 2016, 31(4): 33-41.
	GAO Q, QIAN J. Negotiating place-restructuring from the perspective of emotional geographies: A case study of liede village, Guangzhou. Human Geography,2016, 31(4): 33-41.
33	ASKLAND H, BUNN M. Lived experiences of environmental change: Solastagia, power and place. Emotion, Space and Society, 2018(27): 16-22.
34	HO E L. Constituting citizenship through the emotions: Singaporean transmigrants in London. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2009, 99(4): 788-804.
35	朱志伟, 孙菲. 空间,结构与网络:社区情感治理的三重论域与实践路径. 贵州社会科学, 2020(5): 36-41.
	ZHU Z, SUN F. Space, structure and network: The threefold discourse and practice path of community emotional governance. Guizhou Social Sciences, 2020(5): 36-41.
36	HIRSCH A R.Nostalgia: A neuropsychiatric understanding. Advances in Consumer Research,1992, 19(1): 390-395.
37	GAO Q, YIN D, ZHU H. Urban regeneration and emotional politics of place in Liede Village, Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 2020(103):102199.
38	傅鹏."五乐计划"让港澳青年在广州圆梦. (2022-4-26)[2021-10-15]..
	FU P.The "Five Joys Plan" allows young people from Hong Kong and Macao to realize their dreams in Guangzhou.(2022-4-26)[2021-10-15]..
39	Mobility ADEY P.. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.
40	尹铎,钱俊希,朱竑.城市新区作为"家"的表征与实践——以鄂尔多斯康巴什新区为例.地理科学进展, 2016, 35(12): 1517-1528.
	YIN D, QIAN J X, ZHU H. The representation and practice of new urban district-as-home in China: A case study of Kangbashi New Town, Ordos. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(12): 1517-1528.
41	WARD C, KENNEDY A. Acculturation strategies, psychological adjustment, and sociocultural competence during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1994, 18(3): 329-343.
42	吴理财,解胜利.文化治理视角下的乡村文化振兴:价值耦合与体系建构.华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(1): 16-23.
	WU L, XIE S. The revitalization of rural culture from the perspective of cultural governance: Value coupling and system construction. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019(1): 16-23.
43	向德平,苏海."社会治理"的理论内涵和实践路径.新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014, 35(6): 19-25.
	XIANG D, SU H. Theoretic content and practical approach in"social governance". Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2014, 35(6): 19-25.
44	钱俊希,安宁.全球文化转变的理论背景与方法论框架——兼论中国文化的跨国实践.地理研究, 2021, 40(11): 3103-3117.
	QIAN J, AN N. Theoretical contexts and a methodological framework for understanding global cultural shift: Implications for China's transnational cultural practices. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(11): 3103-3117.

编号	基地位置	基地名称	成立时间	运营性质
1	天河区	广州市天河区港澳青年之家总部	2019年10月	天河区政府提供场地、非政府组织筹资建设运营
2		专创·众创空间	2016年8月	私人企业建设、运营
3		TIMETABLE精品联合办公空间	2018年11月	私人企业建设、运营
4		七客联创（中信）国际社区	2019年4月	私人企业建设、运营
5	南沙区	“创汇谷”粤港澳青年文创社区	2018年9月	私人企业建设运营、南沙团区委指导
6	增城区	“侨梦苑”华侨华人创新产业聚集区	2015年12月	国有企业建设、运营
7	黄埔区	广州区块链国际创新中心	2018年11月	私人企业建设、运营
8	白云区	广州市港澳青年创新创业服务中心	2021年1月	团市委直属事业单位建设、运营

编号	基地位置	基地名称	成立时间	运营性质
1	天河区	广州市天河区港澳青年之家总部	2019年10月	天河区政府提供场地、非政府组织筹资建设运营
2		专创·众创空间	2016年8月	私人企业建设、运营
3		TIMETABLE精品联合办公空间	2018年11月	私人企业建设、运营
4		七客联创（中信）国际社区	2019年4月	私人企业建设、运营
5	南沙区	“创汇谷”粤港澳青年文创社区	2018年9月	私人企业建设运营、南沙团区委指导
6	增城区	“侨梦苑”华侨华人创新产业聚集区	2015年12月	国有企业建设、运营
7	黄埔区	广州区块链国际创新中心	2018年11月	私人企业建设、运营
8	白云区	广州市港澳青年创新创业服务中心	2021年1月	团市委直属事业单位建设、运营

编号	性别	身份	编号	性别	身份
A01	女	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B06	女	健康产品创业者
A02	女	港澳创新创业基地秘书长	B07	女	室内设计创业者
A03	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B08	男	服装搭配平台创业者
A04	女	港澳创新创业基地客服	B09^*	男	迷你仓创业者
A05	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B10^*	男	科技公司创业者
A06	女	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B11^*	女	心理咨询机构创业者
A07	男	港澳创新创业基地主任	B12^*	男	宠物智能平台创业者
A08	男	港澳创新创业基地工作人员	B13^*	男	共享充电宝平台创业者
A09	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B14^*	男	虚拟直播系统创业者
A10	女	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B15	男	影视广告创业者
A11	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B16^*	男	保险培训机构创业者
A12	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B17^*	男	课程编程创业者
A13	女	港澳创新创业基地工作人员	B18	女	企业服务创业者
B01^*	男	留学教育创业者	B19^*	女	公益项目创业者
B02^*	女	咖啡创业者	B20^*	男	贸易公司创业者
B03	女	广告公司创业者	B21^*	男	教育科技公司创业者
B04	男	留学中介创业者	B22^*	男	南沙产业管理局公职人员
B05^*	男	自媒体创业者	B23^*	男	甜品店创业者

编号	性别	身份	编号	性别	身份
A01	女	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B06	女	健康产品创业者
A02	女	港澳创新创业基地秘书长	B07	女	室内设计创业者
A03	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B08	男	服装搭配平台创业者
A04	女	港澳创新创业基地客服	B09^*	男	迷你仓创业者
A05	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B10^*	男	科技公司创业者
A06	女	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B11^*	女	心理咨询机构创业者
A07	男	港澳创新创业基地主任	B12^*	男	宠物智能平台创业者
A08	男	港澳创新创业基地工作人员	B13^*	男	共享充电宝平台创业者
A09	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B14^*	男	虚拟直播系统创业者
A10	女	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B15	男	影视广告创业者
A11	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B16^*	男	保险培训机构创业者
A12	男	港澳创新创业基地负责人	B17^*	男	课程编程创业者
A13	女	港澳创新创业基地工作人员	B18	女	企业服务创业者
B01^*	男	留学教育创业者	B19^*	女	公益项目创业者
B02^*	女	咖啡创业者	B20^*	男	贸易公司创业者
B03	女	广告公司创业者	B21^*	男	教育科技公司创业者
B04	男	留学中介创业者	B22^*	男	南沙产业管理局公职人员
B05^*	男	自媒体创业者	B23^*	男	甜品店创业者