主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 856-866.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.04.2018457

• 文化与社会 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国休闲城市质量评价及实证研究

徐爱萍1,2(), 刘震2, 楼嘉军2   

  1. 1.上海第二工业大学经济与管理学院,上海,201209
    2.华东师范大学经济与管理学部,上海,200241
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-12 修回日期:2019-05-01 出版日期:2020-07-30 发布日期:2020-08-15
  • 作者简介:徐爱萍(1984-),女,讲师,研究方向为休闲产业经济,E-mail:xuaiping_2008@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题《上海建设全球卓越服务型城市的路径研究》(2018BCK001);上海第二工业大学校基金人文飞跃计划(EGD19XQD14)

Study on the quality of the leisure cities in China

Aiping XU1,2(), Zhen LIU2, Jiajun LOU2   

  1. 1.Economic & Management Faculty, Shanghai Polytechnic University, Shanghai 201209,China
    2.Economic & Management Faculty, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062,China
  • Received:2018-10-12 Revised:2019-05-01 Online:2020-07-30 Published:2020-08-15

摘要:

休闲城市质量是体现城市居民生活获得感和幸福感的重要指标。通过构建休闲城市质量评价体系,实证分析了2017年我国35个休闲城市质量现状及特点。结果显示:(1)我国休闲城市质量整体偏低,大多数城市处于中下游水平;(2)我国休闲城市质量呈现出“东西高,中部低”的洼地现象;(3)休闲城市质量各维度指标表现出显著的不均衡特点,休闲空间与环境、休闲生活与消费等维度成为休闲城市质量提升的短板;(4)休闲城市质量在空间上呈现出一定的集聚特点。在此基础上,探讨了未来休闲城市建设过程中应注意发展水平和质量提升的均衡、城市规模与人口密度适度发展以及区域发展差异等问题。

关键词: 休闲城市质量, 评价体系, 综合测度, 休闲化

Abstract:

The quality of leisure city is an important index to reflect the urban residents’ life quality and happiness.On the basis of understanding the concept of the quality of the leisure city, this article constructed the evaluation of the quality development of leisure cities, including five aspects: economic &industrial development, traffic &safety, leisure service & environment, leisure life & consumption.Different from previous studies, this indicator system tries to use the per capita and development efficiency to analyze the actual income level and quality of life gap between leisure cities. After analyzing the quality status of the domestic leisure cities in 2017, the results show that: (1) The highest quality is Guangzhou, followed by Shenzhen, Beijing and Shanghai. It is highly consistent with the geographical location, modernization development degree and urban influence of the four cities. (2) The overall quality of leisure cities in China is low, and most of them are in the middle and lower level; the quality of leisure city still has great development space.(3) The quality of leisure cities in China shows a low-lying phenomenon of “high in the East and West, low in the middle”.(4) The indicators of various dimensions of the quality of leisure cities show significant imbalances, and the dimensions of leisure space and environment, leisure life and consumption become the short board of the quality of leisure cities.(5) the quality of leisure cities presents the characteristics of spatial agglomeration, the high-quality cities are mostly concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta Economic Zone, while the low-quality cities are mostly concentrated in the Central Plains city cluster and the northeast old industrial city cluster. On this basis, the paper discuss the balance of development level and quality improvement, the appropriate development of urban scale and population density, and the regional development differences in the future leisure city construction.

Key words: quality of leisure cities, evaluation system, comprehensive measure, leisure