世界地理研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 79-93.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.11.20230530
收稿日期:
2023-08-10
修回日期:
2023-11-26
出版日期:
2024-11-15
发布日期:
2024-11-27
通讯作者:
孙燕铭
作者简介:
段舒涵(1999—),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为区域创新与可持续发展,E-mail:dsh1169417351@163.com。
基金资助:
Shuhan DUAN1,2(), Yanming SUN1,2,3()
Received:
2023-08-10
Revised:
2023-11-26
Online:
2024-11-15
Published:
2024-11-27
Contact:
Yanming SUN
摘要:
房地产行业是国民经济的重要组成部分,涉及产业链环节众多,对经济体系的诸多领域产生影响。那么,房地产行业的快速发展是否会对企业技术创新产生影响?利用2011—2020年A股上市公司数据,考察了商品住房价格对企业创新投入和产出的影响,并将这种影响的实现分解为财政补贴、企业成本和企业投融资三种路径。研究发现,房价显著抑制了企业创新投入和产出,但在不同路径下房价对企业创新投入和产出的影响呈现出差异性。房价上涨带来的财政补贴的增加以及成本的上升会推动企业创新投入的增加,而房价上涨带来的企业投资方向的改变会对企业创新投入起到阻碍作用。从创新产出角度看,房价上涨只会通过企业投融资路径增加企业创新产出。房价对企业创新投入和产出的影响,在不同所有制企业、不同产业以及不同技术密集度的行业中存在显著差异。同时,创新型城市试点政策能够缓解房价对企业创新的挤出效应。 因此,在当下中国经济转型的关键时期,应继续遏制房价过快上涨,并加大对企业创新的财税支持力度,同时将创新型城市试点政策逐步推广,从而促进中国经济的高质量发展。
段舒涵, 孙燕铭. 高房价是否会挤出企业创新投入和产出?[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(11): 79-93.
Shuhan DUAN, Yanming SUN. Do high housing prices crowd out firm innovation inputs and outputs?[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(11): 79-93.
变量类型 | 变量符号 | 变量描述与说明 |
---|---|---|
被解释变量 | Pia | 企业发明专利申请数量加1取自然对数 |
Paa | 企业全部专利申请数量加1取自然对数 | |
Puda | 企业实用新型和外观设计专利申请数量加1取自然对数 | |
Rdp | 企业研发投入总额与营业收入之比 | |
Rd | 企业研发投入总额取自然对数 | |
解释变量 | Hp | 商品房平均销售价格的自然对数 |
企业层面控制变量 | Asset | 企业资产总计的自然对数 |
Age | 企业年龄的自然对数 | |
Ec | 前三名高管薪酬占比 | |
Oir | 营业收入增长率=本年营业收入增加额/上年营业收入总额*100% | |
Profit | 利润率=净利润/营业收入*100% | |
Roa | 资产收益率=净利润/资产总计*100% | |
Rs | 前十大股东持股比例 | |
城市层面控制变量 | Fin | 金融机构年末贷款余额占GDP比例 |
Gre | 城市(市辖区)建成区绿化覆盖率 | |
Gro | GDP增长率 | |
Inc | 城镇居民人均可支配收入取自然对数 | |
Sci | 科技支出占地方政府财政支出比例 | |
Stu | 普通高等教育在校学生数取自然对数 | |
Thi | 第三产业在GDP中所占比例 | |
中介变量 | Sub | 政府补贴取自然对数 |
Cost | 营业成本取自然对数 | |
Cf |
表1 变量定义与说明
Tab.1 Variable definition and description
变量类型 | 变量符号 | 变量描述与说明 |
---|---|---|
被解释变量 | Pia | 企业发明专利申请数量加1取自然对数 |
Paa | 企业全部专利申请数量加1取自然对数 | |
Puda | 企业实用新型和外观设计专利申请数量加1取自然对数 | |
Rdp | 企业研发投入总额与营业收入之比 | |
Rd | 企业研发投入总额取自然对数 | |
解释变量 | Hp | 商品房平均销售价格的自然对数 |
企业层面控制变量 | Asset | 企业资产总计的自然对数 |
Age | 企业年龄的自然对数 | |
Ec | 前三名高管薪酬占比 | |
Oir | 营业收入增长率=本年营业收入增加额/上年营业收入总额*100% | |
Profit | 利润率=净利润/营业收入*100% | |
Roa | 资产收益率=净利润/资产总计*100% | |
Rs | 前十大股东持股比例 | |
城市层面控制变量 | Fin | 金融机构年末贷款余额占GDP比例 |
Gre | 城市(市辖区)建成区绿化覆盖率 | |
Gro | GDP增长率 | |
Inc | 城镇居民人均可支配收入取自然对数 | |
Sci | 科技支出占地方政府财政支出比例 | |
Stu | 普通高等教育在校学生数取自然对数 | |
Thi | 第三产业在GDP中所占比例 | |
中介变量 | Sub | 政府补贴取自然对数 |
Cost | 营业成本取自然对数 | |
Cf |
变量 | 平均值 | 中位数 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paa | 31.370 6 | 6 | 185.694 3 | 0 | 10 618 |
Pia | 14.273 7 | 2 | 103.827 3 | 0 | 5 962 |
Puda | 17.096 9 | 2 | 91.608 3 | 0 | 4 729 |
Rdp | 4.950 9 | 3.700 0 | 5.365 4 | 0 | 98.390 0 |
Rd | 2.151 1 | 0.538 3 | 9.521 4 | 0 | 293.917 6 |
Hp | 14.955 7 | 10.755 0 | 11.209 2 | 2.286 0 | 55.889 0 |
Sub | 6.340 6 | 6.551 7 | 2.084 9 | -3.575 6 | 13.654 0 |
Cost | 11.773 9 | 11.621 0 | 1.581 8 | 5.983 2 | 19.115 0 |
Cf | -4.350 6 | -10.556 7 | 10.413 9 | -17.616 4 | 18.182 1 |
Asset | 3.617 1 | 3.412 3 | 1.278 6 | 0.660 4 | 10.215 8 |
Age | 2.794 6 | 2.833 2 | 0.336 3 | 1.098 6 | 4.127 1 |
Ec | 5.136 3 | 5.112 0 | 0.688 0 | 1.329 7 | 8.535 4 |
Oir | 15.760 9 | 11.200 7 | 35.002 1 | -86.395 8 | 678.433 6 |
Profit | 0.086 6 | 0.079 8 | 0.234 6 | -16.645 6 | 4.175 2 |
Roa | 4.493 1 | 4.280 0 | 6.228 2 | -124.010 0 | 54.150 0 |
Rs | 60.017 1 | 61.260 0 | 14.654 6 | 10.570 0 | 101.160 0 |
Fin | 0.016 0 | 0.016 3 | 0.006 2 | 0.002 8 | 0.053 0 |
Gre | 42.212 1 | 42.170 0 | 3.789 2 | 14.760 0 | 58.110 0 |
Gro | 8.848 5 | 8.910 9 | 4.675 2 | -43.156 2 | 61.459 7 |
Inc | 1.425 8 | 1.448 5 | 0.326 7 | 0.323 8 | 2.033 9 |
Sci | 4.258 0 | 4.348 4 | 2.361 9 | 0.124 9 | 14.027 5 |
Stu | 3.156 5 | 3.307 8 | 1.024 9 | 0.051 2 | 4.880 6 |
Thi | 55.650 9 | 52.810 0 | 19.022 8 | 19.220 0 | 83.870 0 |
表2 变量描述性统计
Tab.2 Descriptive statistics of variables
变量 | 平均值 | 中位数 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paa | 31.370 6 | 6 | 185.694 3 | 0 | 10 618 |
Pia | 14.273 7 | 2 | 103.827 3 | 0 | 5 962 |
Puda | 17.096 9 | 2 | 91.608 3 | 0 | 4 729 |
Rdp | 4.950 9 | 3.700 0 | 5.365 4 | 0 | 98.390 0 |
Rd | 2.151 1 | 0.538 3 | 9.521 4 | 0 | 293.917 6 |
Hp | 14.955 7 | 10.755 0 | 11.209 2 | 2.286 0 | 55.889 0 |
Sub | 6.340 6 | 6.551 7 | 2.084 9 | -3.575 6 | 13.654 0 |
Cost | 11.773 9 | 11.621 0 | 1.581 8 | 5.983 2 | 19.115 0 |
Cf | -4.350 6 | -10.556 7 | 10.413 9 | -17.616 4 | 18.182 1 |
Asset | 3.617 1 | 3.412 3 | 1.278 6 | 0.660 4 | 10.215 8 |
Age | 2.794 6 | 2.833 2 | 0.336 3 | 1.098 6 | 4.127 1 |
Ec | 5.136 3 | 5.112 0 | 0.688 0 | 1.329 7 | 8.535 4 |
Oir | 15.760 9 | 11.200 7 | 35.002 1 | -86.395 8 | 678.433 6 |
Profit | 0.086 6 | 0.079 8 | 0.234 6 | -16.645 6 | 4.175 2 |
Roa | 4.493 1 | 4.280 0 | 6.228 2 | -124.010 0 | 54.150 0 |
Rs | 60.017 1 | 61.260 0 | 14.654 6 | 10.570 0 | 101.160 0 |
Fin | 0.016 0 | 0.016 3 | 0.006 2 | 0.002 8 | 0.053 0 |
Gre | 42.212 1 | 42.170 0 | 3.789 2 | 14.760 0 | 58.110 0 |
Gro | 8.848 5 | 8.910 9 | 4.675 2 | -43.156 2 | 61.459 7 |
Inc | 1.425 8 | 1.448 5 | 0.326 7 | 0.323 8 | 2.033 9 |
Sci | 4.258 0 | 4.348 4 | 2.361 9 | 0.124 9 | 14.027 5 |
Stu | 3.156 5 | 3.307 8 | 1.024 9 | 0.051 2 | 4.880 6 |
Thi | 55.650 9 | 52.810 0 | 19.022 8 | 19.220 0 | 83.870 0 |
图2 房价和企业创新关系的时空格局演化趋势注:①基于自然资源部标准地图服务系统的地图(审图号:GS(2019)1837)绘制,底图无修改;②白色表示无数据区。
Fig.2 The evolutionary trend between housing price and firm innovation
变量 | Pia | Paa | Puda | Rdp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
Hp | -0.176 1** | -0.246 1*** | -0.139 1 | -0.183 6** | -0.128 5 | -0.148 7* | -0.666 3** |
(0.072 8) | (0.073 1) | (0.098 5) | (0.090 7) | (0.091 8) | (0.088 2) | (0.287 3) | |
Constant | 1.734 6*** | 2.559 4*** | 2.239 3*** | 3.257 9*** | 1.701 3 | 2.106 1* | 8.478 3*** |
(0.1798) | (0.9041) | (0.2430) | (1.1665) | (0.2266) | (1.1050) | (2.8911) | |
控制变量 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 是 |
时间固定效应 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
企业固定效应 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
行业固定效应 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
观测个数 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 |
R2 | 0.783 0 | 0.784 2 | 0.797 0 | 0.798 0 | 0.788 9 | 0.789 6 | 0.834 8 |
表3 房价对企业创新的影响
Tab.3 Influence of housing price on firm innovation
变量 | Pia | Paa | Puda | Rdp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
Hp | -0.176 1** | -0.246 1*** | -0.139 1 | -0.183 6** | -0.128 5 | -0.148 7* | -0.666 3** |
(0.072 8) | (0.073 1) | (0.098 5) | (0.090 7) | (0.091 8) | (0.088 2) | (0.287 3) | |
Constant | 1.734 6*** | 2.559 4*** | 2.239 3*** | 3.257 9*** | 1.701 3 | 2.106 1* | 8.478 3*** |
(0.1798) | (0.9041) | (0.2430) | (1.1665) | (0.2266) | (1.1050) | (2.8911) | |
控制变量 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 是 |
时间固定效应 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
企业固定效应 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
行业固定效应 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
观测个数 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 355 |
R2 | 0.783 0 | 0.784 2 | 0.797 0 | 0.798 0 | 0.788 9 | 0.789 6 | 0.834 8 |
变量 | 全样本 | 截尾1% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pia(1) | Rdp(2) | Pia(3) | Rdp(4) | |
Hp | -0.228 0*** | -0.630 5** | ||
(-3.160 6) | (-2.169 5) | |||
Hptir | -0.509 2*** | -2.050 0*** | ||
(0.157 2) | (-4.310 2) | |||
Constant | 2.475 2*** | 8.675 4*** | 2.222 5** | 7.115 7** |
(0.887 4) | (2.894 4) | (2.488 8) | (2.364 3) | |
观测个数 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 147 | 12 147 |
R2 | 0.784 1 | 0.834 9 | 0.787 1 | 0.836 9 |
表4 稳健性检验 (Robustness test)
Tab.4
变量 | 全样本 | 截尾1% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pia(1) | Rdp(2) | Pia(3) | Rdp(4) | |
Hp | -0.228 0*** | -0.630 5** | ||
(-3.160 6) | (-2.169 5) | |||
Hptir | -0.509 2*** | -2.050 0*** | ||
(0.157 2) | (-4.310 2) | |||
Constant | 2.475 2*** | 8.675 4*** | 2.222 5** | 7.115 7** |
(0.887 4) | (2.894 4) | (2.488 8) | (2.364 3) | |
观测个数 | 12 355 | 12 355 | 12 147 | 12 147 |
R2 | 0.784 1 | 0.834 9 | 0.787 1 | 0.836 9 |
变量 | 国有企业 | 非国有企业 | 高技术产业 | 非高技术产业 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pia(1) | Rdp(2) | Pia(3) | Rdp(4) | Pia(5) | Rdp(6) | Pia(7) | Rdp(8) | |
Hp | -0.281 6** | -0.350 7 | -0.227 4*** | -0.745 5* | -0.150 8 | -0.937 3 | -0.223 4** | -0.441 3* |
(0.129 3) | (-0.682 6) | (0.089 2) | (-1.945 2) | (0.149 0) | (-1.213 4) | (0.088 7) | (-1.815 3) | |
Constant | 4.645 2*** | 5.118 2 | 1.565 3 | 8.170 7* | -0.792 9 | 7.059 2 | 3.407 6*** | 7.574 4*** |
(1.245 8) | (1.310 4) | (0.973 2) | (1.932 7) | (1.616 2) | (0.901 3) | (1.088 5) | (3.567 8) | |
观测个数 | 3 346 | 3 346 | 8 976 | 8 976 | 3 860 | 3 860 | 8 487 | 8 487 |
R2 | 0.869 7 | 0.907 8 | 0.736 3 | 0.818 3 | 0.777 4 | 0.815 4 | 0.786 8 | 0.792 0 |
表5 房价对不同所有和不同技术密集度企业创新投入和创新产出的影响
Tab.5 Effects of housing price on innovation input and output of firms under different ownership structure and in different levels of technology intensity
变量 | 国有企业 | 非国有企业 | 高技术产业 | 非高技术产业 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pia(1) | Rdp(2) | Pia(3) | Rdp(4) | Pia(5) | Rdp(6) | Pia(7) | Rdp(8) | |
Hp | -0.281 6** | -0.350 7 | -0.227 4*** | -0.745 5* | -0.150 8 | -0.937 3 | -0.223 4** | -0.441 3* |
(0.129 3) | (-0.682 6) | (0.089 2) | (-1.945 2) | (0.149 0) | (-1.213 4) | (0.088 7) | (-1.815 3) | |
Constant | 4.645 2*** | 5.118 2 | 1.565 3 | 8.170 7* | -0.792 9 | 7.059 2 | 3.407 6*** | 7.574 4*** |
(1.245 8) | (1.310 4) | (0.973 2) | (1.932 7) | (1.616 2) | (0.901 3) | (1.088 5) | (3.567 8) | |
观测个数 | 3 346 | 3 346 | 8 976 | 8 976 | 3 860 | 3 860 | 8 487 | 8 487 |
R2 | 0.869 7 | 0.907 8 | 0.736 3 | 0.818 3 | 0.777 4 | 0.815 4 | 0.786 8 | 0.792 0 |
变量 | 第二产业 | 第三产业 | 创新试点政策城市 | 非创新试点政策城市 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pia(1) | Rdp(2) | Pia(3) | Rdp(4) | Pia(5) | Rdp(6) | Pia(7) | Rdp(8) | |
Hp | -0.331 7*** (0.088 1) | -0.553 7* (-1.723 2) | -0.029 2 (0.183 6) | -0.668 6 (-0.972 4) | -0.193 5** (0.086 8) | -0.714 1** (-2.425 9) | -0.634 0*** (0.213 3) | 0.148 9 (0.406 8) |
Constant | 2.477 0** (1.221 6) | 7.391 5*** (2.860 9) | 1.539 2 (3.300 6) | 13.609 2 (0.744 7) | 1.841 7* (1.008 6) | 5.598 7 (1.462 5) | 2.859 1 (2.743 0) | 6.570 4 (1.025 0) |
观测数 | 9 808 | 9 808 | 2 394 | 2 394 | 10 490 | 10 490 | 1 863 | 1 863 |
R2 | 0.782 6 | 0.820 9 | 0.771 1 | 0.862 0 | 0.785 4 | 0.833 7 | 0.784 1 | 0.840 0 |
表6 房价对不同产业和不同试点政策城市的创新投入和创新产出的影响
Tab.6 Effects of housing price on innovation input and output of firms in different industries and different pilot policy cities
变量 | 第二产业 | 第三产业 | 创新试点政策城市 | 非创新试点政策城市 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pia(1) | Rdp(2) | Pia(3) | Rdp(4) | Pia(5) | Rdp(6) | Pia(7) | Rdp(8) | |
Hp | -0.331 7*** (0.088 1) | -0.553 7* (-1.723 2) | -0.029 2 (0.183 6) | -0.668 6 (-0.972 4) | -0.193 5** (0.086 8) | -0.714 1** (-2.425 9) | -0.634 0*** (0.213 3) | 0.148 9 (0.406 8) |
Constant | 2.477 0** (1.221 6) | 7.391 5*** (2.860 9) | 1.539 2 (3.300 6) | 13.609 2 (0.744 7) | 1.841 7* (1.008 6) | 5.598 7 (1.462 5) | 2.859 1 (2.743 0) | 6.570 4 (1.025 0) |
观测数 | 9 808 | 9 808 | 2 394 | 2 394 | 10 490 | 10 490 | 1 863 | 1 863 |
R2 | 0.782 6 | 0.820 9 | 0.771 1 | 0.862 0 | 0.785 4 | 0.833 7 | 0.784 1 | 0.840 0 |
变量 | Sub(1) | Rd(2) | Pia(3) | Cost(4) | Rd(5) | Pia(6) | Cf(7) | Rd(8) | Pia(9) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hp | 0.426 3*** (0.152 3) | 0.118 2*** (0.045 1) | -2.006 5** (0.912 7) | ||||||
Sub | 0.015 2*** (0.004 9) | -0.001 9 (0.007 3) | 0.296 6*** (0.042 4) | -0.019 1 (0.030 7) | 0.001 5*** (0.000 5) | -0.001 7** (0.000 8) | |||
Constant | 1.878 6 (1.472 0) | 5.437 9*** (0.663 8) | 2.157 9** (0.935 8) | 7.462 2*** (0.645 2) | 3.205 8*** (0.660 2) | 2.299 3** (0.918 3) | 1.129 2 (9.608 7) | 5.480 5*** (0.666 4) | 2.149 2** (0.932 4) |
R2 | 0.687 8 | 0.922 7 | 0.783 9 | 0.976 2 | 0.925 1 | 0.783 9 | 0.350 4 | 0.922 7 | 0.784 0 |
表7 政府补贴机制、企业成本机制、企业投融资机制下房价对企业创新投入和产出的影响
Tab.7 Effects of housing price on firm innovation input and output under government subsidy mechanism、the firm cost mechanism and the firm investment and financing mechanism
变量 | Sub(1) | Rd(2) | Pia(3) | Cost(4) | Rd(5) | Pia(6) | Cf(7) | Rd(8) | Pia(9) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hp | 0.426 3*** (0.152 3) | 0.118 2*** (0.045 1) | -2.006 5** (0.912 7) | ||||||
Sub | 0.015 2*** (0.004 9) | -0.001 9 (0.007 3) | 0.296 6*** (0.042 4) | -0.019 1 (0.030 7) | 0.001 5*** (0.000 5) | -0.001 7** (0.000 8) | |||
Constant | 1.878 6 (1.472 0) | 5.437 9*** (0.663 8) | 2.157 9** (0.935 8) | 7.462 2*** (0.645 2) | 3.205 8*** (0.660 2) | 2.299 3** (0.918 3) | 1.129 2 (9.608 7) | 5.480 5*** (0.666 4) | 2.149 2** (0.932 4) |
R2 | 0.687 8 | 0.922 7 | 0.783 9 | 0.976 2 | 0.925 1 | 0.783 9 | 0.350 4 | 0.922 7 | 0.784 0 |
1 | ZHANG H, LI L, CHEN T, et al. Where will China's real estate market go under the economy's new normal? Cities, 2016, 55: 42-48. |
2 | YIN Y, ZENG X, ZHONG S, et al. How real estate shocks affect manufacturing value chain upgrading: Evidence from China. Buildings, 2022, 12(5): 546. |
3 | YANG Z, YANG H. The influence of real estate market on enterprise R&D investment. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(1): 153-160. |
4 | YU Q, CHEN Y, LIANG F. Housing market speculation and firm productivity: Evidence from China. China & World Economy, 2021, 29(5): 148-174. |
5 | 刘建江,石大千.高房价对企业创新的影响:是挤出还是挤入?——基于双边随机前沿模型的测算.中国软科学,2019(9):150-165. |
LIU J, SHI D. High housing prices and enterprise innovation: Crowding in or crowding out? Measurement and calculation based on bilateral stochastic frontier model. China Soft Science, 2019(9): 150-165. | |
6 | WEN H, GOODMAN A. Relationship between urban land price and housing price: Evidence from 21 provincial capitals in China. Habitat International, 2013, 40: 9-17. |
7 | 王丰龙,刘云刚.中国城市建设用地扩张与财政收入增长的面板格兰杰因果检验.地理学报,2013,68(12):1595-1606. |
WANG F, LIU Y. Panel granger test on urban land expansion and fiscal revenue growth in China's prefecture-level cities. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(12): 1595-1606. | |
8 | WU Q, LI Y, YAN S. The incentives of China's urban land finance. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42: 432-442. |
9 | GYOURKO J, SHEN Y, WU J, et al. Land finance in China: Analysis and review. China Economic Review, 2022, 76: 101868. |
10 | 张戎捷,孙伟增,李昊,等.土地财政、企业税收补贴与招商引资.经济学报,2021,8(4):57-86. |
ZHANG R, SUN W, LI H, et al. Land financing, corporate tax subsidy, and investment attraction. China Journal of Economics, 2021, 8(4): 57-86. | |
11 | BRONZINI R, PISELLI P. The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 2016, 45(2): 442-457. |
12 | CZARNITZKI D, EBERSBERGER B, FIER A. The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2007, 22(7): 1347-1366. |
13 | FELDMAN M, KELLEY M. The ex-ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. Research Policy, 2006, 35(10): 1509-1521. |
14 | MEULEMAN M, DE MAESENEIRE W. Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs' access to external financing? Research Policy, 2012, 41(3): 580-591. |
15 | 李玉龙.土地财政抑制了企业创新吗?——基于信贷错配视角的分析.财经理论与实践,2019,40(1):111-117. |
LI Y. Does land finance inhibit firm innovation?--Analysis from the perspective of credit misalloction. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2019, 40(1), 111-117. | |
16 | GLAESER E, GYOURKO J. The economic implications of housing supply. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018, 32(1): 3-29. |
17 | LIANG W, LU M, ZHANG H. Housing prices raise wages: Estimating the unexpected effects of land supply regulation in China. Journal of Housing Economics, 2016, 33: 70-81. |
18 | 陈艳如,谷跃,宋伟轩.中国城市房价、收入与房价收入比的时空分异格局.地理研究,2021,40(9):2442-2458. |
CHEN Y, GU Y, SONG W. The spatiotemporal differentiation pattern of Chinese urban housing price, income and housing price-to-income ratio. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(9):2442-2458. | |
19 | ZHANG X, XU L. Rising house price and financing costs for SMEs: Evidence from a survey data in Jiangsu province. China Soft Science, 2020(4): 35-45. |
20 | LI J, SHAN Y, TIAN G, et al. Labor cost, government intervention, and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2020, 64: 101668. |
21 | 邹小芃,杨芊芊,何雨阳.汇率变动影响企业创新的地区间差异.经济地理,2016,36(12):37-43. |
ZOU X, YANG Q, HE Y. Regional differences about the impact of exchange rate movement on enterprise innovation. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(12): 37-43. | |
22 | 贺建风,张晓静.劳动力成本上升对企业创新的影响.数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(8):56-73. |
HE J, ZHANG X. The influence of rising labor cost on enterprise innovation. Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2018, 35(8): 56-73. | |
23 | FRANK M, SHEN T. Investment and the weighted average cost of capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 119(2): 300-315. |
24 | LI D. Financial constraints, R&D investment, and stock returns. Review of Financial Studies, 2011, 24(9): 2974-3007. |
25 | GROSSMAN G, YANAGAWA N. Asset bubbles and endogenous growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1993, 31(1): 3-19. |
26 | KING I, FERGUSON D. Dynamic inefficiency, endogenous growth, and ponzi games. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1993, 32(1): 79-104. |
27 | MIAO J, WANG P. Sectoral bubbles, misallocation, and endogenous growth. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2014, 53: 153-163. |
28 | CHANEY T, SRAER D, THESMAR D. The collateral channel: How real estate shocks affect corporate investment. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(6): 2381-2409. |
29 | RONG Z, NI J. How do housing cycles influence listed firms' R&D investment: Evidence from the collateral channel. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2020, 29(3): 287-312. |
30 | MAO Y. Managing innovation: The role of collateral. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2021, 72(1): 29. |
31 | LI S, GAO N. Housing price and enterprise financing: Does mortgage effect exist? China Finance Review International, 2019, 9(1): 137-152. |
32 | RONG Z, WANG W, GONG Q. Housing price appreciation, investment opportunity, and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Housing Economics, 2016, 33: 34-58. |
33 | 李汝资,刘耀彬,王文刚,等.中国城市土地财政扩张及对经济效率影响路径.地理学报,2020,75(10):2126-2145. |
LI R, LIU Y, WANG W, et al. China's urban land finance expansion and the transmission routes to economic efficiency. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(10): 2126-2145. | |
34 | 冯根福, 郑明波, 温军, 等. 究竟哪些因素决定了中国企业的技术创新——基于九大中文经济学权威期刊和A股上市公司数据的再实证 . 中国工业经济, 2021(1): 17-35. |
FENG G, ZHENG M, WEN J, et al. What determines the Chinese firms technological innovation——A re-empirical investigation based on the previous empirical literature of nine Chinese economics top journals and a-share listed company data. China Industrial Economics, 2021(1): 17-35. | |
35 | 黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响.经济研究,2016,51(4):60-73. |
LI W, ZHENG M. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation?--Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-firms' innovation. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(4): 60-73. | |
36 | 吴非,杜金岷,杨贤宏.财政R&D补贴、地方政府行为与企业创新.国际金融研究,2018(5):35-44. |
WU F, DU J, YANG X. Government financial R&D subsidy, local government behavior and enterprise innovation. Financial Theory & Policy, 2018(5): 35-44. | |
37 | BROWN J, FAZZARI S, PETERSEN B. Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. Journal of Finance, 2009, 64(1): 151-185. |
38 | WU X, HUA Y, LU H. The influence mechanism of different cash flow availability on R&D investment: Evidence from China. Complexity, 2022: 1-14 |
39 | 徐明东,陈学彬.中国上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性估计.金融研究,2019(8):113-132. |
XU M, CHEN X. Estimating the sensitivity of listed firms' investments to the cost of capital in China. Journal of Financial Research, 2019(8): 113-132. |
[1] | 林伊婷, 陈虹, 杨家文, 黄慧明, 林雄斌. 均衡发展背景下优质基础教育资源分布与住房价格的空间关联研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(6): 141-153. |
[2] | 邹宇, 李禕. 广佛同城化发展背景下住房价格时空格局及机制研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(5): 136-149. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||