世界地理研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 126-138.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.08.2021202
• 文化与社会 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2021-03-22
修回日期:
2021-09-23
出版日期:
2023-08-15
发布日期:
2023-09-07
通讯作者:
赵自强
作者简介:
颜琪(1996—),女,硕士,主要研究方向为会计理论与实务,E-mail:yyanqi1996@163.com。
基金资助:
Received:
2021-03-22
Revised:
2021-09-23
Online:
2023-08-15
Published:
2023-09-07
Contact:
Ziqiang ZHAO
摘要:
企业在履行社会责任披露时,会受到来自各方利益相关者的压力。而企业的地理位置反映了企业所在地区的社会政治和经济状况,这一定程度上影响了当地利益相关者的构成和规模。地理位置邻近于金融中心的企业具有独特的制度环境,这对企业履行社会责任相关活动具有多重影响。基于2013年至2018年中国在沪、深交易所上市的公司数据,运用ArcGIS软件和面板数据模型,分析地理位置可能会给企业带来的压力,从而探讨其对公司进行社会责任披露所产生的影响。结果表明:(1)公司与北京、上海、深圳三处金融中心的临近程度对企业社会责任信息的披露有积极影响,企业受到金融中心的溢出效应从而产生对企业社会责任活动与披露的压力,并进一步影响公司政策行为;(2)与非国有企业、非交叉上市的企业相比,具备国有性质或交叉上市的企业对社会责任活动的披露具有更强的地理邻近偏好;(3)企业所处的行业竞争程度在地理位置对企业披露社会责任的影响中起强化作用而非替代作用,即企业所处的行业竞争程度越激烈,会强化地理位置带来的社会责任披露压力。
颜琪, 赵自强. 地理位置对企业社会责任披露的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(8): 126-138.
Qi YAN, Ziqiang ZHAO. The impact of geographical location on the corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from A-share listed companies[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(8): 126-138.
维度 | 项目关键词 | 维度 | 项目关键词 |
---|---|---|---|
企业标准 | 是否有单独社会责任报告 | 社会 | 员工离职率 |
是否遵循GRI标准 | 劳动合同签订率 | ||
环境 | 温室气体排放 | 雇员总人数 | |
废弃物总量 | 人均培训课时 | ||
废弃物/废纸回收量 | 工伤率 | ||
总能源消耗 | 医保覆盖率 | ||
废水污水排放量 | 客户投诉数量 | ||
环保超标或其他违规次数 | 客户满意度 | ||
公司治理 | 董事会规模 | 供应商数量 | |
女性员工比例 | 志愿服务时长 |
表1 企业社会责任披露项目关键词
Tab.1 Key words of corporate social responsibility disclosure
维度 | 项目关键词 | 维度 | 项目关键词 |
---|---|---|---|
企业标准 | 是否有单独社会责任报告 | 社会 | 员工离职率 |
是否遵循GRI标准 | 劳动合同签订率 | ||
环境 | 温室气体排放 | 雇员总人数 | |
废弃物总量 | 人均培训课时 | ||
废弃物/废纸回收量 | 工伤率 | ||
总能源消耗 | 医保覆盖率 | ||
废水污水排放量 | 客户投诉数量 | ||
环保超标或其他违规次数 | 客户满意度 | ||
公司治理 | 董事会规模 | 供应商数量 | |
女性员工比例 | 志愿服务时长 |
变量类型 | 变量名称 | 变量定义 |
---|---|---|
被解释变量 | 企业社会责任评级得分,RKS评级得分 | |
企业社会责任评级得分,构建指数得分 | ||
解释变量 | 总公司位置距离最近的金融中心的距离,单位公里 | |
调节变量 | 产权性质,国有企业为1,非国有企业为0 | |
交叉上市,企业在A股和B股或A股和H股实现挂牌上市,则为1,否则为0 | ||
行业竞争程度,用赫芬达尔指数衡量 | ||
控制变量 | 公司规模,以公司总资产衡量,当大于样本中位数时取1,否则取0 | |
企业年龄,以企业存续年限的自然对数表示 | ||
市盈率,公司年末的股票价格/每股收益 | ||
总资产报酬率,息税前利润/资产平均总额×100% | ||
资产负债率,负债总额/资产总额×100% | ||
股权集中度,以第一大股东持股比例衡量 | ||
年份 | ||
行业,依据证监会行业划分标准 |
表2 变量定义
Tab.2 Variable definition
变量类型 | 变量名称 | 变量定义 |
---|---|---|
被解释变量 | 企业社会责任评级得分,RKS评级得分 | |
企业社会责任评级得分,构建指数得分 | ||
解释变量 | 总公司位置距离最近的金融中心的距离,单位公里 | |
调节变量 | 产权性质,国有企业为1,非国有企业为0 | |
交叉上市,企业在A股和B股或A股和H股实现挂牌上市,则为1,否则为0 | ||
行业竞争程度,用赫芬达尔指数衡量 | ||
控制变量 | 公司规模,以公司总资产衡量,当大于样本中位数时取1,否则取0 | |
企业年龄,以企业存续年限的自然对数表示 | ||
市盈率,公司年末的股票价格/每股收益 | ||
总资产报酬率,息税前利润/资产平均总额×100% | ||
资产负债率,负债总额/资产总额×100% | ||
股权集中度,以第一大股东持股比例衡量 | ||
年份 | ||
行业,依据证监会行业划分标准 |
变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIST | -0.002*** | -0.002*** | -0.003*** | -0.002*** | -0.003*** | |
(0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | ||
DIST×SOE | -0.487** | -0.552*** | ||||
(0.200) | (0.198) | |||||
DIST×CL | -1.767*** | -1.811*** | ||||
(0.238) | (0.238) | |||||
DIST×HHI | -0.337** | -0.387** | ||||
(0.169) | (0.167) | |||||
SOE | -0.863* | -0.908* | -0.820* | -0.909* | -0.915* | -0.817* |
(0.489) | (0.488) | (0.489) | (0.483) | (0.488) | (0.483) | |
CL | 7.628*** | 7.228*** | 7.119*** | 5.793*** | 7.200*** | 5.601*** |
(0.586) | (0.590) | (0.591) | (0.616) | (0.590) | (0.617) | |
HHI | 3.049** | 3.043** | 2.946* | 2.784* | 2.870* | 2.469 |
(1.526) | (1.521) | (1.520) | (1.507) | (1.523) | (1.507) | |
SIZE | 6.320*** | 6.334*** | 6.256*** | 6.418*** | 6.309*** | 6.305*** |
(0.506) | (0.504) | (0.505) | (0.499) | (0.504) | (0.499) | |
AGE | -0.364 | -0.730 | -0.608 | -0.713 | -0.587 | -0.409 |
(0.998) | (0.998) | (0.999) | (0.986) | (1.000) | (0.990) | |
PE | 0.000 | 0.031 | 0.033 | 0.016 | 0.032 | 0.020 |
(0.211) | (0.210) | (0.210) | (0.208) | (0.210) | (0.208) | |
ROA | 0.020 | 0.019 | 0.019 | 0.024 | 0.018 | 0.022 |
(0.039) | (0.039) | (0.039) | (0.038) | (0.039) | (0.038) | |
LEVERAGE | 0.013 | 0.016 | 0.018 | 0.017 | 0.016 | 0.019 |
(0.014) | (0.014) | (0.014) | (0.014) | (0.014) | (0.014) | |
OC | 0.072*** | 0.064*** | 0.062*** | 0.060*** | 0.063*** | 0.057*** |
(0.015) | (0.015) | (0.015) | (0.015) | (0.015) | (0.015) | |
_cons | 24.829 | 27.345 | 26.854 | 27.435 | 27.121 | 26.624 |
(3.783) | (3.810) | (3.812) | (3.773) | (3.810) | (3.773) | |
IndDum | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
YearDum | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
N | 2 766 | 2 766 | 2 766 | 2 766 | 2 766 | 2 766 |
R2 | 0.234 0 | 0.239 7 | 0.241 3 | 0.254 6 | 0.240 8 | 0.258 2 |
Adj R2 | 0.225 9 | 0.231 3 | 0.232 7 | 0.246 2 | 0.232 2 | 0.249 2 |
F | 28.82 | 28.74 | 28.05 | 30.13 | 27.97 | 28.81 |
表3 地理位置因素对社会责任披露回归结果
Tab.3 Geographic proximity and CSRDI
变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIST | -0.002*** | -0.002*** | -0.003*** | -0.002*** | -0.003*** | |
(0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | ||
DIST×SOE | -0.487** | -0.552*** | ||||
(0.200) | (0.198) | |||||
DIST×CL | -1.767*** | -1.811*** | ||||
(0.238) | (0.238) | |||||
DIST×HHI | -0.337** | -0.387** | ||||
(0.169) | (0.167) | |||||
SOE | -0.863* | -0.908* | -0.820* | -0.909* | -0.915* | -0.817* |
(0.489) | (0.488) | (0.489) | (0.483) | (0.488) | (0.483) | |
CL | 7.628*** | 7.228*** | 7.119*** | 5.793*** | 7.200*** | 5.601*** |
(0.586) | (0.590) | (0.591) | (0.616) | (0.590) | (0.617) | |
HHI | 3.049** | 3.043** | 2.946* | 2.784* | 2.870* | 2.469 |
(1.526) | (1.521) | (1.520) | (1.507) | (1.523) | (1.507) | |
SIZE | 6.320*** | 6.334*** | 6.256*** | 6.418*** | 6.309*** | 6.305*** |
(0.506) | (0.504) | (0.505) | (0.499) | (0.504) | (0.499) | |
AGE | -0.364 | -0.730 | -0.608 | -0.713 | -0.587 | -0.409 |
(0.998) | (0.998) | (0.999) | (0.986) | (1.000) | (0.990) | |
PE | 0.000 | 0.031 | 0.033 | 0.016 | 0.032 | 0.020 |
(0.211) | (0.210) | (0.210) | (0.208) | (0.210) | (0.208) | |
ROA | 0.020 | 0.019 | 0.019 | 0.024 | 0.018 | 0.022 |
(0.039) | (0.039) | (0.039) | (0.038) | (0.039) | (0.038) | |
LEVERAGE | 0.013 | 0.016 | 0.018 | 0.017 | 0.016 | 0.019 |
(0.014) | (0.014) | (0.014) | (0.014) | (0.014) | (0.014) | |
OC | 0.072*** | 0.064*** | 0.062*** | 0.060*** | 0.063*** | 0.057*** |
(0.015) | (0.015) | (0.015) | (0.015) | (0.015) | (0.015) | |
_cons | 24.829 | 27.345 | 26.854 | 27.435 | 27.121 | 26.624 |
(3.783) | (3.810) | (3.812) | (3.773) | (3.810) | (3.773) | |
IndDum | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
YearDum | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
N | 2 766 | 2 766 | 2 766 | 2 766 | 2 766 | 2 766 |
R2 | 0.234 0 | 0.239 7 | 0.241 3 | 0.254 6 | 0.240 8 | 0.258 2 |
Adj R2 | 0.225 9 | 0.231 3 | 0.232 7 | 0.246 2 | 0.232 2 | 0.249 2 |
F | 28.82 | 28.74 | 28.05 | 30.13 | 27.97 | 28.81 |
变量 | (7) 国有企业组 | (8) 非国有企业组 | (9) 交叉上市组 | (10) 非交叉上市组 |
---|---|---|---|---|
DIST | -0.003*** | -0.001 | -0.010*** | -0.001 |
(0.001) | (0.001) | (0.002) | (0.000) | |
SOE | -3.122* | -0.228 | ||
(1.667) | (0.482) | |||
CL | 6.491*** | 11.848*** | ||
(0.687) | (1.314) | |||
HHI | 4.312** | 1.701 | 3.094 | 2.456 |
(1.974) | (2.469) | (4.360) | (1.550) | |
SIZE | 5.028*** | 3.926*** | 9.582*** | 6.181*** |
(0.628) | (0.823) | (1.561) | (0.502) | |
AGE | 1.962 | -2.126 | 5.128* | 0.672 |
(1.290) | (1.648) | (3.007) | (1.043) | |
PE | 0.000 | 0.001 | -0.008 | 0.001 |
(0.002) | (0.003) | (0.005) | (0.001) | |
ROA | 0.103* | 0.000 | 0.110 | 0.018 |
(0.057) | (0.052) | (0.137) | (0.038) | |
LEVERAGE | 0.058*** | -0.012 | 0.197*** | -0.017 |
(0.018) | (0.024) | (0.050) | (0.014) | |
OC | 0.092*** | 0.024 | 0.062 | 0.062*** |
(0.019) | (0.025) | (0.047) | (0.015) | |
_cons | 32.559*** | 30.535*** | 27.557** | 22.581 |
(6.011) | (5.793) | (10.750) | (3.873) | |
IndDum | YES | YES | YES | YES |
YearDum | YES | YES | YES | YES |
N | 1 812 | 954 | 432 | 2 334 |
R2 | 0.251 2 | 0.237 5 | 0.453 4 | 0.156 5 |
Adj R2 | 0.240 5 | 0.215 3 | 0.425 4 | 0.145 9 |
F | 23.06 | 10.68 | 16.19 | 14.75 |
表4 地理位置因素分样本回归结果
Tab.4 Results of classified samples
变量 | (7) 国有企业组 | (8) 非国有企业组 | (9) 交叉上市组 | (10) 非交叉上市组 |
---|---|---|---|---|
DIST | -0.003*** | -0.001 | -0.010*** | -0.001 |
(0.001) | (0.001) | (0.002) | (0.000) | |
SOE | -3.122* | -0.228 | ||
(1.667) | (0.482) | |||
CL | 6.491*** | 11.848*** | ||
(0.687) | (1.314) | |||
HHI | 4.312** | 1.701 | 3.094 | 2.456 |
(1.974) | (2.469) | (4.360) | (1.550) | |
SIZE | 5.028*** | 3.926*** | 9.582*** | 6.181*** |
(0.628) | (0.823) | (1.561) | (0.502) | |
AGE | 1.962 | -2.126 | 5.128* | 0.672 |
(1.290) | (1.648) | (3.007) | (1.043) | |
PE | 0.000 | 0.001 | -0.008 | 0.001 |
(0.002) | (0.003) | (0.005) | (0.001) | |
ROA | 0.103* | 0.000 | 0.110 | 0.018 |
(0.057) | (0.052) | (0.137) | (0.038) | |
LEVERAGE | 0.058*** | -0.012 | 0.197*** | -0.017 |
(0.018) | (0.024) | (0.050) | (0.014) | |
OC | 0.092*** | 0.024 | 0.062 | 0.062*** |
(0.019) | (0.025) | (0.047) | (0.015) | |
_cons | 32.559*** | 30.535*** | 27.557** | 22.581 |
(6.011) | (5.793) | (10.750) | (3.873) | |
IndDum | YES | YES | YES | YES |
YearDum | YES | YES | YES | YES |
N | 1 812 | 954 | 432 | 2 334 |
R2 | 0.251 2 | 0.237 5 | 0.453 4 | 0.156 5 |
Adj R2 | 0.240 5 | 0.215 3 | 0.425 4 | 0.145 9 |
F | 23.06 | 10.68 | 16.19 | 14.75 |
变量 | CSRDI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(11) | (12) | (13) | (14) | (15) | |
DIST | -0.002*** | -0.002*** | -0.003*** | -0.002*** | |
(0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | ||
DIST×SOE | -0.646*** | ||||
(0.250) | |||||
DIST×CL | -1.617*** | ||||
(0.333) | |||||
DIST×HHI | -0.273 | ||||
(0.262) | |||||
Dum_DIST | 3.728*** | ||||
(0.534) | |||||
SOE | -0.104 | -0.010* | -0.033 | -0.080 | 0.412 |
(0.580) | (0.580) | (0.577) | (0.580) | (0.452) | |
CL | 10.019*** | 9.928*** | 9.018*** | 10.025*** | 6.570*** |
(0.672) | (0.672) | (0.699) | (0.672) | (0.596) | |
HHI | 2.843 | 2.920 | 2.730 | 2.408 | 2.557* |
(1.898) | (1.896) | (1.888) | (1.943) | (1.514) | |
SIZE | 6.678*** | 6.564*** | 6.669*** | 6.673*** | 5.881*** |
(0.630) | (0.631) | (0.627) | (0.630) | (0.502) | |
AGE | -2.206** | -2.197** | -2.202** | -2.203** | -0.692 |
(1.053) | (1.052) | (1.048) | (1.053) | (0.991) | |
PE | 0.112 | 0.110 | 0.106 | 0.115 | 0.000 |
(0.254) | (0.254) | (0.253) | (0.254) | (0.001) | |
ROA | 0.089** | 0.091** | 0.097** | 0.088** | 0.045 |
(0.038) | (0.038) | (0.038) | (0.038) | (0.038) | |
LEVERAGE | 0.050*** | 0.053*** | 0.053*** | 0.051*** | 0.021 |
(0.017) | (0.017) | (0.017) | (0.017) | (0.014) | |
OC | -0.005 | -0.009 | -0.012 | -0.006 | 0.052*** |
(0.018) | (0.018) | (0.018) | (0.018) | (0.014) | |
_cons | 19.552 | 19.087 | 19.699 | 19.912 | 25.632 |
(4.507) | (4.505) | (4.484) | (4.520) | (3.908) | |
IndDum | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
YearDum | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
N | 2 242 | 2 242 | 2 242 | 2 242 | 2 766 |
R2 | 0.301 2 | 0.303 3 | 0.308 5 | 0.301 5 | 0.248 |
Adj R2 | 0.291 0 | 0.292 9 | 0.298 2 | 0.291 1 | 0.240 |
F | 29.75 | 29.12 | 29.85 | 28.88 | 30.13 |
表5 稳健性检验
Tab.5 Results of robustness test
变量 | CSRDI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(11) | (12) | (13) | (14) | (15) | |
DIST | -0.002*** | -0.002*** | -0.003*** | -0.002*** | |
(0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | ||
DIST×SOE | -0.646*** | ||||
(0.250) | |||||
DIST×CL | -1.617*** | ||||
(0.333) | |||||
DIST×HHI | -0.273 | ||||
(0.262) | |||||
Dum_DIST | 3.728*** | ||||
(0.534) | |||||
SOE | -0.104 | -0.010* | -0.033 | -0.080 | 0.412 |
(0.580) | (0.580) | (0.577) | (0.580) | (0.452) | |
CL | 10.019*** | 9.928*** | 9.018*** | 10.025*** | 6.570*** |
(0.672) | (0.672) | (0.699) | (0.672) | (0.596) | |
HHI | 2.843 | 2.920 | 2.730 | 2.408 | 2.557* |
(1.898) | (1.896) | (1.888) | (1.943) | (1.514) | |
SIZE | 6.678*** | 6.564*** | 6.669*** | 6.673*** | 5.881*** |
(0.630) | (0.631) | (0.627) | (0.630) | (0.502) | |
AGE | -2.206** | -2.197** | -2.202** | -2.203** | -0.692 |
(1.053) | (1.052) | (1.048) | (1.053) | (0.991) | |
PE | 0.112 | 0.110 | 0.106 | 0.115 | 0.000 |
(0.254) | (0.254) | (0.253) | (0.254) | (0.001) | |
ROA | 0.089** | 0.091** | 0.097** | 0.088** | 0.045 |
(0.038) | (0.038) | (0.038) | (0.038) | (0.038) | |
LEVERAGE | 0.050*** | 0.053*** | 0.053*** | 0.051*** | 0.021 |
(0.017) | (0.017) | (0.017) | (0.017) | (0.014) | |
OC | -0.005 | -0.009 | -0.012 | -0.006 | 0.052*** |
(0.018) | (0.018) | (0.018) | (0.018) | (0.014) | |
_cons | 19.552 | 19.087 | 19.699 | 19.912 | 25.632 |
(4.507) | (4.505) | (4.484) | (4.520) | (3.908) | |
IndDum | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
YearDum | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
N | 2 242 | 2 242 | 2 242 | 2 242 | 2 766 |
R2 | 0.301 2 | 0.303 3 | 0.308 5 | 0.301 5 | 0.248 |
Adj R2 | 0.291 0 | 0.292 9 | 0.298 2 | 0.291 1 | 0.240 |
F | 29.75 | 29.12 | 29.85 | 28.88 | 30.13 |
1 | 沈洪涛. 公司特征与公司社会责任信息披露——来自我国上市公司的经验证据. 会计研究, 2007(3): 9-16. |
SHEN H. Corporate characteristics and social disclosure--Evidence from listed companies in China. Accounting Research, 2007(3): 9-16 | |
2 | 王建明. 环境信息披露、行业差异和外部制度压力相关性研究——来自我国沪市上市公司环境信息披露的经验证据. 会计研究, 2008(6): 54-62. |
WANG J. Research on the correlation among environmental information disclosure, industry differences and supervisory system. Accounting Research, 2008(6): 54-62. | |
3 | DELGADO M, PORTER M, STERN S. Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 2010,10(4): 495-518. |
4 | MOLINE-MORALES F, GARCIA-VILLAVERD P, PARRA-REQUENA G. Geographical and cognitive proximity effects on innovation performance in SMEs: A way through knowledge acquisition. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2014(10): 231-251 |
5 | 金龙, 丁志国, 丁垣竹,等. 地理溢出效应对中国上市企业投资决策影响的实证研究. 经济地理, 2020, 40(4): 65-74. |
JIN L, DING Z, DING Y, et al. The impact of geographic spillovers on investment decisions of chinese listed enterprises: An empirical study. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(4): 65-74. | |
6 | PANDEJ C, PORNSIT J, NAPATSORN J, et al. Estimating the effect of corporate social responsibility on firm value using geographic identification. Asia Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 2017, 46(2): 276-304. |
7 | EL-GHOUL S, GUEDHAMI O, KWOK C, et al. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 2011, 35(9): 2388-2406. |
8 | BRYAN W, IVAN M, PETRA C. Effects of local legitimacy on certification decisions to global and national CSR standards by multinational subsidiaries and domestic firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 2016, 47(3): 382-397 |
9 | HUSTED B, JAMALI D, SAFFAR W. Near and dear? The role of location in CSR engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(10): 2050-2070. |
10 | DEROUICHE I, JAAFAR K, ZEMZEM A. Firm geographic location and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2016(37-38): 29-47. |
11 | 唐亮, 林钟高, 郑军,等. 非正式制度压力下的企业社会责任抉择研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据. 中国软科学, 2018(12): 165-177. |
TANG L, LIN Z, ZHENG J, et al. Corporation's choice of social responsibility under informal institutional pressure--evidence from Chinese listed companies. China Soft Science. 2018(12): 165-177. | |
12 | 王腾, 周海炜, 田鸣. 企业地理位置对企业社会责任的合法化作用机制研究. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 21(4): 66-73. |
WANG T, ZHOU H, TIAN M. Research on the legitimation mechanism of corporate geo-location to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2019,21(4): 66-73. | |
13 | DIMAGGIO J, POWELL W. The iron cage revisited-institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Association, 1983, 48: 147-160. |
14 | 沈洪涛, 苏亮德. 企业信息披露中的模仿行为研究——基于制度理论的分析. 南开管理评论, 2012, 15(3): 82-90. |
SHEN H, SU L. A study on the imitation in corporate information disclosure: Based on institutional theory. Nankai Business Review, 2012, 15(3): 82-90. | |
15 | GELDES C, FELZENSZTEIN C, TURKINA E, et al. How does proximity affect inter firm marketing cooperation? A study of an agribusiness cluster. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(2): 263-272. |
16 | DU X, CHANG Y, ZENG Q, et al. Corporate environmental responsibility (CER) weakness, media coverage, and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2016, 33(2): 551-581. |
17 | SAEED A, BELGHITAR Y, YOUSAF A. Firm-level determinants of gender diversity in the boardrooms: Evidence from some emerging markets. International Business Review, 2016, 25(5): 1076-1088. |
18 | MICEK G. Understanding Innovation in Emerging Economic Spaces: Global and Local Actors, Networks and Embeddedness. London and New York: Routledge, 2016. |
19 | 张可云, 何大梽. 城市收入分化提高了全要素生产率吗?——基于中国工业企业数据的实证分析. 中国人民大学学报, 2020, 34(6): 93-105. |
ZHANG K, HE D. Does urban income differentiation improve total factor productivity: Empirical analysis based on the data of Chinese industrial enterprises. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2020, 34(6): 93-105. | |
20 | ZHAN S, ZHANG L, WANG D. Determining factors of the development of a national financial center: The case of China. Geoforum, 2004, 35(5): 577-592. |
21 | MARANO V, TASHMAN P, KOSTOVA T. Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 2016, 48(3): 386-408. |
22 | 全晶晶, 李志远. 产权性质、机构投资者持股与企业社会责任投资. 投资研究, 2020, 39(2): 147-158. |
QUAN J, LI Z. Property rights, institutional investors ownership and corporate social responsibility. Review of Investment Studies, 2020, 39(2): 147-158. | |
23 | 姚圣, 梁昊天. 政治关联、地方利益与企业环境业绩——基于产权性质分类的研究. 财贸研究, 2015, 26(04): 141-149. |
YAO S, LIANG H. Political connections, local benefit, and enterprise's environmental performance: A study based on ownership classification. Finance and Trade Research, 2015, 26(04): 141-149. | |
24 | 李维安, 邱艾超, 阎大颖. 企业政治关系研究脉络梳理与未来展望. 外国经济与管理, 2010, 32(05): 48-55. |
LI W, QIU A, YAN D. The thread of corporate political relations research and future prospects. Foreign Economics & Management, 2010, 32(05): 48-55. | |
25 | 王士红. 所有权性质、高管背景特征与企业社会责任披露——基于中国上市公司的数据. 会计研究, 2016(11): 53-60. |
WANG S. A study of the influence of management background characteristics on corporate social responsibility--empirical evidence from Chinese a share listed companies. Accounting Research, 2016(11): 53-60. | |
26 | 张祺瑞, 李根强. 制度趋同压力、组织身份对企业社会责任信息披露的影响研究. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 47(1): 37-47. |
ZHANG Q, LI G. Research on the impact of the pressure of system convergence and organizational status on the disclosure of corporate social responsibility information. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 47(1): 37-47. | |
27 | 卢文莹. 跨境上市与公司治理相关性研究. 上海证券交易所研究报告, 2003. |
LU W. Research on the correlation between cross-border listing and corporate governance. Shanghai Stock Exchange Research Report, 2003. | |
28 | 余威, 宁博. 交叉上市、投资者关注与企业创新——基于沪深A股上市公司的实证研究. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(01):50-63. |
YU W, NING B. Cross-listing, investor attention and corporate innovation: empirical study based on Chinese A-share listed companies. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(01): 50-63. | |
29 | BOUBAKRI N, EL-GHOUL S, WANG H, et al. Cross-listing and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2016, 41: 123-138. |
30 | 潘镇, 杨柳, 殷华方. 中国企业国际化的社会责任效应研究. 经济管理, 2020, 42(09): 27-48. |
PAN Z, YANG L, YIN H. The effect of Chinese enterprises internationalization on corporate social responsibility. Business Management Journal, 2020, 42(09): 27-48. | |
31 | 毛志宏, 金龙, 邵坤元. 行业竞争程度、企业社会责任与会计稳健性. 税务与经济, 2016(5): 42-49. |
MAO Z, JIN L, SHAO K. Degree of industry competition, social responsibility of enterprises and accounting conservatism. Taxation and Economy, 2016(5): 42-49. | |
32 | CHEN K, CHEN G. The rise of international financial centers in mainland China. Cities, 2016, 47: 10-22. |
33 | 李伟军, 李婷, 吴义东. 中国三大城市群金融集聚:空间网络及结构分化.经济体制改革, 2020(2): 38-45. |
LI W, LI T, WU Y. Financial Agglomeration of China's Three Major Urban Agglomerations: Spatial Correlation and Structural Differentiation. Reform of Economic System, 2020(2): 38-45. | |
34 | 张柴. 论股权结构对企业社会责任的影响. 财经问题研究, 2016(S2): 92-94. |
ZHANG C. Research on the influence of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2016(S2):92-94. | |
35 | GAMERSCHLAG R, MOLLER K, VERBEETEN F. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 2011, 5(2): 233-262. |
36 | 秦续忠, 王宗水, 赵红. 公司治理与企业社会责任披露——基于创业板的中小企业研究. 管理评论, 2018, 30(03): 188-200. |
QIN X, WANG Z, ZHAO H. Corporate governance and csr disclosures——Evidence from the SMEs of ChiNext Board. Management Review, 2018, 30(03): 188-200. | |
37 | FARAH Z, ABUBAKR S. Location matters: Impact of geographical proximity to financial centers on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2020, 37(1): 263-295. |
38 | DAVIS J, HENDERSON J. The agglomeration of headquarters. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2008, 38(5): 445-460. |
[1] | 潘峰华, 刘宇帆. 全球金融科技产业的分布及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 696-707. |
[2] | 朱邦耀, 白雪, 李国柱, 石丹. 中国创业板上市公司分布时空格局演变[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(3): 113-122. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||