主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (03): 74-82.

• 城市与区域 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于文献数量的中国城市规模分布研究

古杰,周素红,闫小培   

  1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-03 修回日期:2014-01-23 出版日期:2014-09-15 发布日期:2014-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 古杰
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目

Study on China's urban scale hierarchy based on the literature number

  • Received:2014-01-03 Revised:2014-01-23 Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-09-11

摘要: 本文通过对中国知网(www.cnki.net)数据库中的论文进行题名检索,从而获取对不同城市进行研究或关注的论文数量,并通过论文的数量对中国地级及其以上的城市规模分布进行研究。本文的基本结论是基于文献数量的中国城市规模分布基本符合捷夫法则。具体结论如下:其一,由于对上海和北京进行研究的文献数量相差较小,中国城市文献规模分布呈现出较低的首位度,而习惯意义上的“北上广”处在两个完全不同的等级体系。其二,Zipf维数q整体水平小于1,表明学者对城市的研究较为分散。其三,Zipf维数q从2000年到2012年整体上呈现出不断下降的趋势,表明学者对城市的研究呈现逐步分散的过程。其四,中国地级及其以上城市文献规模的等级体系整体上呈现出从金字塔式向纺锥形结构演变,中等文献规模的城市在数量上占据多数。

Abstract: This paper gets the article number on urban through searching the name of urban in articles’ title in CNKI database(www.cnki.net). Whether or not urban hierarchical system based on numbers of articles comfort’s to Zipf’s law is studied. The basic conclusion is that China's urban literature hierarchy system is in line with Zipf’s law. There are four conclusions in detail in this paper. First, China’s urban hierarchical system presents a lower degree of primate city because the gap of papers’ number on Shanghai and Beijing is very small. The three cities “Beijing Shanghai and Guangzhou” are in two completely different hierarchies. Second, the q of Zipf is small and it suggests that the urban study dispersed over different size cities. Third, the q of Zipf from 2000 to 2012 as a whole presents the declining trend and it suggests that the dispersion degree of scholars’ studies on urban is higher and higher. Fourth, the hierarchical of China's urban literature presents from pyramid to spinning cone structure evolution, and the number of medium-sized cities is increasing.