长江中游城市群城市活力水平空间格局及影响因素

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.01.2018442

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

地理“大数据”的出现为研究城市问题提供了新的契机。基于兴趣点（POI）和位置服务（LBS）的地理“大数据”，采用空间计量模型、数理统计分析等方法，尝试探讨了长江中游城市群城市活力水平及其影响因素。结果表明：①长江中游城市群城市活力整体处于较低水平，武汉、南昌和长沙中心地位突出，城市群边缘形成片状活力“洼地”的空间格局；②长江中游城市群城市活力与经济发展水平存在耦合关系，低度耦合城市少，较高度耦合和高度耦合城市较多；③高校资源、经济密度、基础设施水平和信息化程度4个因素是影响长江中游城市群城市活力的主要因素，各因素的影响效应具有空间异质性。

关键词: 城市活力, 地理“大数据”, GWR模型, 长江中游城市群

Abstract:

The emergence of geographic “big data” provides a new opportunity to study urban issues. Based on the geographic “big data” of interest point (POI) and location service (LBS), spatial measurement model and mathematical statistics analysis are used to explore the urban vitality level and its influencing factors in the UAMRYR. The results show that: (1) the urban vitality of the urban agglomerations in the UAMRYR is at a low level, and the centers of Wuhan, Nanchang and Changsha are prominent, and the spatial pattern of flaky vitality is formed at the edge of the urban agglomeration. (2) There is a coupling relationship between urban vitality and economic development level in the UAMRYR, and there are few low-coupling cities. There are more cities with higher degrees of coupling and highly coupled cities.(3)The four factors of university resources, economic density, infrastructure level and informatization degree are the main factors affecting the urban vitality of the UAMRYR. The influence effect of each factor has spatial heterogeneity.

Key words: urban vitality, geographic “big data”, GWR model, UAMRYR

毛炜圣, 钟业喜. 长江中游城市群城市活力水平空间格局及影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(1): 86-95.

Weisheng MAO, Yexi ZHONG. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of urban vitality in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(1): 86-95.

图/表 6

参考文献 36

1	Lynch K. Good City Form. Boston:MIT press, 1984.
2	Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage press, 1992.
3	Montgomery J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of urban design, 1998, 3(1): 93-116.
4	Lang W, Chen T, Li X. A new style of urbanization in China: Transformation of urban rural communities. Habitat International, 2016, 55: 1-9.
5	Maas P R. Towards a Theory of Urban Vitality. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 1984.
6	Montgomery J. Urban vitality and the culture of cities. Planning Practice & Research, 1995, 10(2):101-110.
7	Yokohari M, Takeuchi K, Watanabe T, et al. Beyond greenbelts and zoning: A new planning concept for the environment of Asian mega-cities. Landscape and urban planning, 2000, 47(3-4): 159-171.
8	Still B, Simmonds D. Parking restraint policy and urban vitality. Transport reviews, 2000, 20(3): 291-316.
9	Bromley R D F, Thomas C J. Food shopping and town centre vitality: exploring the link. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 2002, 12(2): 109-130.
10	Smith T, Nelischer M, Perkins N. Quality of an urban community: a framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1997, 39(2-3): 229-241.
11	Martinez‐Fernandez C, Audirac I, Fol S, et al. Shrinking cities: Urban challenges of globalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2012, 36(2): 213-225.
12	Lopes M N, Camanho A S. Public green space use and consequences on urban vitality: An assessment of European cities. Social indicators research, 2013, 113(3): 751-767.
13	Marquet O, Miralles-Guasch C. Neighbourhood vitality and physical activity among the elderly: The role of walkable environments on active ageing in Barcelona, Spain. Social Science & Medicine, 2015, 135: 24-30.
14	Faria J R, Ogura L M, Sachsida A. Crime in a planned city: The case of Brasília. Cities, 2013, 32: 80-87.
15	Putnam S, Quinn A. Jane Jacobs and urban health. Journal of Urban Health, 2007, 84(1): 1-2.
16	金延杰.中国城市经济活力评价.地理科学，2007，27(1)：9-16.
	Jin Y.Study on urban economic vatality index in China.Geoscience，2007，27(1)：9-16.
17	刘黎，徐逸伦，江善虎，等.基于模糊物元模型的城市活力评价.地理与地理信息科学，2010，26(1)：73-77.
	Liu L, Xv Y, Jiang S,et al.Evaluation of urban vitality based on fuzzy matter-element model.Geography and Geo-Information Science,2010，26(1)：73-77.
18	汪胜兰，李丁，冶小梅，等.城市活力的模糊综合评价研究——以湖北主要城市为例.华中师范大学学报：自然科学版，2013，47(3)：440-445.
	Wang S, Li D, Ye X, et al.Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on the urban vitality——A case of the main cities in Hubei Province.Journal of Central China Normal University：Natural Science Edition,2013，47(3)：440-445.
19	程昌秀，史培军，宋长青，等.地理大数据为地理复杂性研究提供新机遇.地理学报,2018,73(8):1397-1406.
	Cheng C,SHI P,Song C,et al.Geographic big-data: A new opportunity for geography complexity study.The Geographical Journal, 2018,73 (8): 1397-1406.
20	Kim Y L. Seoul's Wi-Fi hotspots: Wi-Fi access points as an indicator of urban vitality. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2018,72: 13-24.
21	Jin X, Long Y, Sun W, et al. Evaluating cities' vitality and identifying ghost cities in China with emerging geographical data. Cities, 2017, 63: 98-109.
22	国家统计局城市社会经济调查司.中国城市统计年鉴2015. 北京:中国统计出版社,2015.
	National Bureau of Statistics.China City Statistical Yearbook,2015.Beijing:Chinese Statistics Press, 2015.
23	湖北省统计局.湖北统计年鉴2015. 北京:中国统计出版社,2015.
	Hubei Provincal Bureau of Statistics.Hubei Statistical Yearbook,2015.Beijing:Chinese Statistics Press, 2015.
24	湖南省统计局.湖南统计年鉴2015. 北京:中国统计出版社,2015.
	Hunan Provincal Bureau of Statistics.Hunan Statistical Yearbook,2015.Beijing:Chinese Statistics Press, 2015.
25	江西省统计局.江西统计年鉴2015. 北京:中国统计出版社,2015.
	Jiangxi Provincal Bureau of Statistics.Jiangxi Statistical Yearbook,2015.Beijing:Chinese Statistics Press, 2015.
26	Zeng C, Song Y, He Q, et al. Spatially explicit assessment on urban vitality: Case studies in Chicago and Wuhan. Sustainable Cities & Society, 2018, 40:296-306.
27	汪明峰，宁越敏，胡萍.中国城市的互联网发展类型与空间差异.城市规划，2007,238(10)：16-22.
	Wang M,Ning Y,Hu P.Internet cities in China: typology and spatial difference. The Journal of Urban Planning,2007,238(10)：16-22.
28	冯兴华，钟业喜，陈琳，等.长江经济带县域经济空间格局演变分析. 经济地理，2016,36(6)：18-25.
	Feng X, Zhong Y,Cheng L,et al. Evolution of spatial pattern of county regional economy in Yangtze River Economic Belt. Economic Geography,2016,36(6)：18-25.
29	陈明星，陆大道，张华.中国城市化水平的综合测度及其动力因子分析.地理学报，2009，64(4)：387-398.
	Chen M, Lu D, Zhang H. Comprehensive evaluation and the driving factors of China's urbanization. The Geographical Journal,2009，64(4)：387 - 398.
30	Fotheringham A S, Brunsdon C. Local Forms of Spatial Analysis. Geographical Analysis, 2010, 31(4):340-358.
31	李建新，钟业喜，黄洁，等.21世纪以来京汕低谷带经济发展差异研究.经济地理，2015，35(8)：10-18.
	Li J, Zhong Y, Huang J,et al.Economic development disparities of Jing-Shan Economic Trough Belt since 2000.Economic Geography,2015，35(8)：10-18.
32	孟德友，李小建，陆玉麒，等.长江三角洲地区城市经济发展水平空间格局演变.经济地理，2014，34(2)：50-57.
	Meng D, Li X,Lu Y, et al.Evolvement of spatial pattern of urban economic development in Yangtze River Delta. Economic Geography，2014，34(02)：50-57.
33	柯善咨，赵曜.产业结构、城市规模与中国城市生产率.经济研究，2014(4)：76-88.
	Ke S, Zhao Y. Industrial structure, city size and urban productivity in China. Economic Research Journal,2014(4)：76-88.
34	陈斌开，张川川.人力资本和中国城市住房价格.中国社会科学，2016，(5)：43-64.
	Chen B, Zhang C. Human capital and housing prices in Chinese cities. Social Sciences In China Press, 2016(5)：43-64.
35	夏怡然，陆铭. 城市间的“孟母三迁”——公共服务影响劳动力流向的经验研究.管理世界，2015(10)：78-90.
	Xia Y,Lu M.An empirical study on the influence of the public service of Meng Mu three relocation on the flow of labor force.Management World,2015(10)：78-90.
36	魏宗财，甄峰，席广亮，等.全球化、柔性化、复合化、差异化：信息时代城市功能演变研究.经济地理，2013,33(6)：48-52.
	Wei Z, Zhen F, Xi G,et al.Globalization, Flexibility, Composition, Differentiation: Study on the Evolution of Urban Functions. Economic Geography，2013,33(6)：48-52.

区域	城市活力指数	排名	区域	城市活力指数	排名	区域	城市活力指数	排名
武汉	8.292	1	潜江	0.653	12	黄冈	0.354	23
南昌	3.917	2	株洲	0.612	13	咸宁	0.352	24
长沙	3.497	3	荆州	0.609	14	娄底	0.336	25
湘潭	1.291	4	孝感	0.602	15	岳阳	0.313	26
鄂州	1.012	5	鹰潭	0.532	16	常德	0.278	27
新余	0.958	6	九江	0.498	17	益阳	0.260	28
宜春	0.937	7	襄阳	0.457	18	上饶	0.255	29
黄石	0.913	8	天门	0.444	19	抚州	0.187	30
萍乡	0.759	9	衡阳	0.429	20	吉安	0.167	31
仙桃	0.669	10	宜昌	0.395	21
景德镇	0.653	11	荆门	0.368	22

区域	城市活力指数	排名	区域	城市活力指数	排名	区域	城市活力指数	排名
武汉	8.292	1	潜江	0.653	12	黄冈	0.354	23
南昌	3.917	2	株洲	0.612	13	咸宁	0.352	24
长沙	3.497	3	荆州	0.609	14	娄底	0.336	25
湘潭	1.291	4	孝感	0.602	15	岳阳	0.313	26
鄂州	1.012	5	鹰潭	0.532	16	常德	0.278	27
新余	0.958	6	九江	0.498	17	益阳	0.260	28
宜春	0.937	7	襄阳	0.457	18	上饶	0.255	29
黄石	0.913	8	天门	0.444	19	抚州	0.187	30
萍乡	0.759	9	衡阳	0.429	20	吉安	0.167	31
仙桃	0.669	10	宜昌	0.395	21
景德镇	0.653	11	荆门	0.368	22

等级	划分标准	城市个数	平均水平	所占比例（%）	累计占比（%）
高活力水平	1.292~8.292	3	5.236	9.68	9.68
中等活力水平	0.760~1.291	5	1.022	16.13	25.81
较低活力水平	0.458~0.759	9	0.621	29.03	54.84
低活力水平	0.167~0.457	14	0.328	45.16	100

等级	划分标准	城市个数	平均水平	所占比例（%）	累计占比（%）
高活力水平	1.292~8.292	3	5.236	9.68	9.68
中等活力水平	0.760~1.291	5	1.022	16.13	25.81
较低活力水平	0.458~0.759	9	0.621	29.03	54.84
低活力水平	0.167~0.457	14	0.328	45.16	100

[1]	孙启翔, 李百岁, 田桐羽, 许晔晖, 赵洪朴. 内蒙古的城市活力时空格局及影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(3): 101-111.
[2]	杨人懿, 钟昌标, 杨子生, 刘凤莲, 彭海英. 西南喀斯特石漠化深度贫困县的贫困影响因素分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(6): 1298-1309.
[3]	郭细根. 都市区视角下长江中游城市群发展的思考[J]. 世界地理研究, 2016, (3): 80-87.
[4]	王涛刘承良. 长江中游城市群城市竞争力的空间演化[J]. 世界地理研究, 2014, 23(03): 92-101.