城市更新中的绿地感知与社区治理

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.03.2020522

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着城市更新的开展，市民在项目推进中的空间感知及参与程度日渐成为学者和城市管理实践者关注的话题。在此背景下，本研究以更新项目实施阶段的广州市荔湾区的广钢新城为案例，通过遥感影像提取的绿地变化强度并结合深度访谈，试图探索广钢新城绿地建设的公众参与状况。研究发现：（1）广钢新城的绿地面积增加，空间可达性明显提升，然而与新进入居民的绿地空间感知没有呈现正相关联系；（2）随着更新项目的建设与空间主体的流变，建成区出现新的主体进入，而更新规划阶段主要以原有主体的意见开展，新旧主体公众参与程度参差不齐，从而造成空间使用的失序；（3）主体的变化是城市更新过程中应关注的动态要素，不同主体空间感知需要在社区治理过程中获得关注。本研究结合遥感及地理信息系统技术，以绿地效益的感知作为切入点探讨社区治理，以期为城市更新建设阶段的公众参与及协作范式提供一定的参考。

关键词: 城市更新, 社区治理, 空间感知, 绿地效益, 广钢新城

Abstract:

With the large-scale development of urban renewal across the country, the spatial perception and participation degree of citizens in the promotion of the project has become a topic of increasing concern in the academic circle. Meanwhile, public participation is also a way of community governance. Under the influence of humanism, community-scale urban renewal research is devoted to exploring the perception and participation of different resident groups in the process of renewal. Takeing Guanggang New Town during the implementation stage of the renewal project as the case, analyzes the current situation of green space construction, and tries to explore the public participation in green space construction of Guanggang New Town through the remote sensing of green space change and in-depth interview. The study found that :(1) the increase of green space area and spatial accessibility in the area of Guanggang New Town were significantly improved, but there was no positive correlation with the green space perception of new residents;(2) with the construction of the renewal project, new residents enter the built-up area, while the renewal planning stage is mainly carried out according to the opinions of the original subjects, and the degree of public participation of different subjects is uneven, resulting in the disorder of spatial fairness.(3) the change of the subject is a dynamic factor that should be paid attention to in the process of urban renewal. Spatial perception of different subjects needs to be paid attention to in the process of community governance. This study combines remote sensing and geographic information system technology, and takes the perception of low efficiency as the topic to discuss community governance, in order to provide some references for the public participation and collaboration paradigm in the stage of practicing of urban renewal projects.

Key words: urban renewal, community governance, spatial perception, green space benefits, Guanggang New Town

程国宇, 邓浩坤, 张隆龙, 付迎春, 黎键良. 城市更新中的绿地感知与社区治理[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(3): 572-581.

Guoyu CHENG, Haokun DENG, Longlong ZHANG, Yingchun FU, Jianliang LI. Green space perception and community governance in urban renewal[J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(3): 572-581.

图/表 5

参考文献 43

1	CRUZ C, BRITO J. Role of public administration in fostering urban housing rehabilitation. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2015, 141(4): 1-12.
2	YU J, KWON H. Critical success factors for urban regeneration projects in Korea. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(7): 889-899.
3	KLLEE G, HWCHAN E. Factors affecting urban renewal in high-density city: Case study of Hong Kong. Urban Insight, 2011, 134(3): 140-148.
4	CARMON N. Three generations of urban renewal policies-analysis and policy implications. Geoforum, 1999, 30(2): 145-158.
5	董玛力,陈田,王丽艳.西方城市更新发展历程和政策演变.人文地理,2009,24(5):42-46.
	DONG M, CHEN T, WANG L.Development course and policy evolution of urban renewal in western cities. Human Geography, 2009, 24(5): 42-46.
6	JOHN F. Planning in the face of power. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1982, 48(1): 67-80.
7	DAVIDOFF P. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 1965,31(4): 331-338.
8	ROBERTS P, et al. Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications, 2000.
9	彼得·马库塞, 等著. 贾荣香等译. 寻找正义之城:城市理论和实践中的辩论. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社,2016.
	PETER M, et al. Translated by Jia R,et al. Searching for a City of Justice: Debate in Urban Theory and Practice. Beijing: Social Science Literature Press, 2016.
10	尹海伟, 徐建刚. 上海公园空间可达性与公平性分析. 城市发展研究, 2009(6):71-76.
	YIN H, XU J. Spatial Accessibility and Equity of Parks in Shanghai. Urban Studies, 2009(6):71-76.
11	庄立峰, 江德兴. 城市治理的空间正义维度探究. 东南大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2015(4): 45-49.
	ZHUANG L, JIANG D. Spatial justice dimension of urban governance. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science), 2015(4): 45-49.
12	ARNSTEIN S. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4): 216-224.
13	SOJA E. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso, 1989: 76.
14	叶超. 社会空间辩证法的由来. 自然辩证法研究, 2012, 28(2): 56-60.
	YE C. The Origins of Socio-Spatial Dialectic. Studies In Dial Ectics of Nature, 2012, 28(2): 56-60.
15	SOJA E. Third Space: Journey to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1996.
16	保罗·诺克斯, 史蒂文·平奇. 城市社会地理学导论. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005.
	PAUL K, STEVEN P. Urban Social Geography. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2005.
17	卢衍衡, 钱俊希. 从"熟人社会"到"生人社会": 广场舞与中国城市公共性. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7): 1609-1624.
	LU Y, QIAN J. From "society of acquaintance" to "society of strangers": Square dance and publicness in urban China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(7): 1609-1624.
18	AMIN A. Re-thinking the urban social. City, 2007, 11(1): 100-114.
19	汉娜·阿伦特著.竺乾威, 等译. 人的条件. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1999.
	HANNAH A. Translated by ZHU Q,et al. The Human Condition. Shanghai: Shanghai People Press, 1999.
20	BARBOSA O, TRATALOS J, ARMSWORTH P, et al. Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2007, 83(2): 187-195.
21	QIAN J. Geographies of public space: Variegated publicness, variegated epistemologies. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(6): 1-22.
22	CHEN W, HUA J. Citizens' distrust of government and their protest responses in a contingent valuation study of urban heritage trees in Guangzhou, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015(155): 40-48.
23	PILE S. Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2010, 35(1): 5-20.
24	HADI Y, HEATH T, OLDFIELD P. Gardens in the sky: Emotional experiences in the communal spaces at height in the Pinnacle@ Duxton, Singapore. Emotion, Space and Society, 2018(28): 104-113.
25	BILLE M, BJERREGAARD P, SØRENSEN T. Staging atmospheres: Materiality, culture, and the texture of the in-between. Emotion, Space and Society, 2015(15): 31-38.
26	MASSUMI B. Politics of Affect. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
27	EITER S, VIK M. Public participation in landscape planning: Effective methods for implementing the European Landscape Convention in Norway. Land Use Policy, 2015(44): 44-53.
28	何盼, 陈蔚镇, 程强, 等. 国内外城市绿地空间正义研究进展. 中国园林, 2019, 35(5): 28-33.
	HE P, CHENG W, CHENG Q, et al. Research Progress of Chinese and International Spatial Justice in Urban Green Space. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(5): 28-33.
29	RUTT R, GULSRUD N. Green justice in the city: A new agenda for urban green space research in Europe. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016(19): 123-127.
30	唐子来, 顾姝. 上海市中心城区公共绿地分布的社会绩效评价:从地域公平到社会公平.城市规划学刊, 2015(2): 48-56.
	TANG Z, GU S. An evaluation of social performance in the distribution of urban parks in the central city of Shanghai: From spatial equity to social equity. Urban Planning Forum, 2015(2): 48-56.
31	唐子来, 顾姝. 再议上海市中心城区公共绿地分布的社会绩效评价:从社会公平到社会正义. 城市规划学刊, 2016(1):15-21.
	TANG Z, GU S. An evaluation of social performance in the distribution of urban parks in the central city of Shanghai: From social equity to social justice. Urban Planning Forum, 2016(1):15-21.
32	WANG J, XU C, PAULEIT S, et al. Spatial patterns of urban green infrastructure for equity: A novel exploration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 238: 1-28.
33	江海燕,周春山,肖荣波.广州公园绿地的空间差异及社会公平研究.城市规划,2010,34(4):43-48.
	JIANG H, ZHOU C, XIAO R. Spatial differentiation and social equity of public parks in Guangzhou.City Planning Review,2010,34(4): 43-48.
34	ZHAO L, CHEN W. Estimating urban green space production in the macroeconomy: From public goods to a profitable method of investment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 33: 16-26.
35	张博, 邓浩坤, 安宁, 等. 大数据背景下国内人文地理研究进展与方法审视. 人文地理, 2019, 34(3): 14-21+90.
	ZHANG B, DENG H, AN N, et al. The re-examination of human geography research and the research methods in the context of big data. Human Geography, 2019, 34(3): 14-21+90.
36	秦波, 苗芬芬. 城市更新中公众参与的演进发展:基于深圳盐田案例的回顾. 城市发展研究, 2015(3): 64-68+85.
	QIN B, MIAO F. Evolutional Development of Public Participation in Urban Renewal: A Review of Yantian Case in Shenzhen. Urban Development Studies, 2015(3): 64-68+85.
37	陈伊乔, 刘逸. 段义孚的人地情感研究对城乡规划的启示. 城市发展研究, 2019(8): 104-110.
	CHEN Y, LIU Y. Implication of the Human-Place Emotion Studies of Yifu Tuan to Urban-Rural Planning. Urban Development Studies, 2019(8): 104-110.
38	SMOYER T, HEWKO J, HODGSON M. Spatial accessibility and equity of playgrounds in Edmonton, Canada. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 2004, 48(3): 287-302.
39	沈静, 周楚平. 国外环境公正研究综述. 热带地理, 2019, 39(2): 298-308.
	SHENG J, ZHOU C. A Review of Foreign Research on Environmental Justice. Tropical Geography, 2019, 39(2): 298-308.
40	SOJA E .The political organization of space, resource paper No.8. Association of American Geographers. 1971: 1-54.
41	张隆龙,劳颖宜,程国宇,等.工业用地转型下地理想象与地方意义构建——广州广钢新城案例.热带地理,2019,39(1):101-109.
	ZHANG L, LAO Y, CHENG G, et al.Geographical imagination and the construction of place significance under the transformation of industrial landscape:A case study of Guanggang New Town,Guangzhou.Tropical Geography, 2019,39(1):101-109.
42	孙九霞.新时代背景下基于文化自信的文化传承与空间治理——"文化传承与空间治理"专栏解读. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1283-1289.
	SUN J. Cultural inheritance and spatial governance based on cultural confidence in the New Era: An introduction to the issue of "Cultural Inheritance and Spatial Governance". Geographical Research, 2019, 38(6): 1283-1289.
43	CERTOMA C, CHELLERI L, NOTTEBOOM B. The 'fluid governance' of urban public spaces. Insights from informal planning practices in Rome. Urban Studies, 2020, 57(5): 976-995.

研究方法与过程	研究对象	研究目的
遥感影像提取与识别	更新前后绿地空间	获取绿地与居住区图层
Arcgis空间可达性测量	公共绿地与居住区的连通性	分析公共绿地可达性
半结构式访谈	相关主体	了解不同主体的感知
结构式访谈	新居民为主	了解公众参与渠道的偏好

研究方法与过程	研究对象	研究目的
遥感影像提取与识别	更新前后绿地空间	获取绿地与居住区图层
Arcgis空间可达性测量	公共绿地与居住区的连通性	分析公共绿地可达性
半结构式访谈	相关主体	了解不同主体的感知
结构式访谈	新居民为主	了解公众参与渠道的偏好

地区	2013年	2017年	2013—2017变化
地区	面积/万m²	面积/万m²	面积/万m²	变化强度/%
全城	18.38	33.20	14.82	20.16
广钢旧厂一带	1.32	9.20	7.88	149.24
鹤洞村	1.70	1.78	0.08	1.17
西塱村	3.70	7.50	3.8	25.68
西塱花围一带	0.00	1.83	1.83	45.75
东塱村	3.86	3.04	-0.82	-5.31
东沙经济工业园区	6.71	8.62	1.91	7.12

地区	2013年	2017年	2013—2017变化
地区	面积/万m²	面积/万m²	面积/万m²	变化强度/%
全城	18.38	33.20	14.82	20.16
广钢旧厂一带	1.32	9.20	7.88	149.24
鹤洞村	1.70	1.78	0.08	1.17
西塱村	3.70	7.50	3.8	25.68
西塱花围一带	0.00	1.83	1.83	45.75
东塱村	3.86	3.04	-0.82	-5.31
东沙经济工业园区	6.71	8.62	1.91	7.12

[1]	党云晓, 张文忠, 吴绍华, 邱乐丰. 流动人口居住-就业变动对其幸福感的影响研究——以北京为例[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(2): 59-69.
[2]	孙洁, 宋伟轩. 国外商业绅士化研究进展及其对本土研究的启示[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 1096-1105.
[3]	吴小凡, 林广. 从市区到市郊：二战后联邦政府主导下的美国郊区化运动[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(1): 77-85.
[4]	梁坤, 罗爽. 布达拉宫旅游商业化的社区治理研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(5): 191-199.
[5]	何慧妍, 王敏. 基于视觉方法的历史街区“微改造”空间感知研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(4): 189-200.