主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 366-377.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2018551

• 产业与布局 • 上一篇    下一篇

资源型城市生态文明建设与旅游发展协调关系

杨承玥1(), 刘安乐1,2, 明庆忠2(), 秦趣1, 王艳梅2   

  1. 1.六盘水师范学院旅游与历史文化学院, 贵州 六盘水 650500
    2.云南财经大学旅游文化产业研究院, 昆明 650221
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-07 修回日期:2019-01-23 出版日期:2020-03-30 发布日期:2020-03-27
  • 通讯作者: 明庆忠
  • 作者简介:杨承玥(1989-),女,讲师,硕士,主要研究方向为区域交通与旅游管理,E-mail:674244284@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41961021);云南财经大学研究生创新基金项目(2019YUFEY034);贵州省教育科学规划课题(2017C038);云南省哲学社会科学重大项目(ZDZB201802);六盘水市科技创新团队计划(52020-2018-03-08)

Association mechanism between ecological civilization construction and tourism development of resource-based city

Chengyue YANG1(), Anle LIU1,2, Qingzhong MING2(), Qu QIN1, Yanmei WANG2   

  1. 1.School of tourism and historical culture, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui 553004
    2.Tourist Culture industry in Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China.
  • Received:2018-12-07 Revised:2019-01-23 Online:2020-03-30 Published:2020-03-27
  • Contact: Qingzhong MING

摘要:

资源型城市是国家生态文明建设的重要关注点,旅游是资源城市转型发展的重要方向,因此探究二者协调发展关系具有重要现实价值。从双向视角探究了资源型城市生态文明与旅游发展协调互动关系。选择典型资源型城市——六盘水市为研究案例,实证研究发现:1)2000—2017年六盘水市生态文明建设与旅游发展都呈现出阶段性增长态势,但旅游发展相对滞后,二者差异呈现出趋于同步——迅速扩大——缩小的发展态势;2)2000—2017年生态文明建设与旅游发展耦合度除2000年(0.614)外,其他年份均在0.85以上,表明六盘水市生态文明建设与旅游发展相互作用强度较高。3)从协调度上看,2000—2017年生态文明建设与旅游发展协调性整体呈现上升态势,协调程度从重度失调(0.1707)发展到优质协调(0.9891)。以2005、2011和2015年为临界点划分为失调、逐步改善、优化提升和协调发展四个阶段;4)六盘水市生态文明建设与旅游发展演化呈正相关关系且显著性极高,但旅游因子对生态文明建设的驱动作用(95.60%)高于生态文明建设对旅游发展的支撑力(90.37%),二者存在互馈耦合的一般特征且表现出明显的旅游产业发展对区域生态文明建设的优势支撑效应。建议从统筹生态文明与旅游发展步伐、促进生态文明建设与旅游发展部门协同合作等两方面促进二者协调发展。

关键词: 资源型城市, 生态文明建设, 旅游发展, 协调关系, 耦合态势, 六盘水市

Abstract:

After sorting out the basic concepts of resource-based cities, this paper analyzed the general characteristics of the Ecological Civilization Construction of Resource-based Cities from the multiple challenges and policy-driven. It is summarized from the bidirectional angle of Mutual travel mechanism between ecological civilization construction and tourism development of resource-based cities. Selecting a typical mountain resource city which is Liupanshui city as a research case, empirical research shows that:1) From 2000 to 2017, the construction of ecological civilization and tourism development in Liupanshui city showed a period of growth trend, but the development of tourism was relatively lagging behind, and the differences between them showed a trend of convergence, rapid expansion, and shrinking development.2) In 2000-2017, the coupling degree between ecological civilization construction and tourism development was above 0.85 (0.614) except in 2000 (0.614), indicating that the interaction between ecological civilization construction and tourism development in Liupanshui city is relatively high.3) From the perspective of coordination, the coordination of ecological civilization construction and tourism development in 2000-2017 showed an overall upward trend, and the degree of coordination developed from severe imbalance (0.1707) to high quality coordination (0.9891).Taking 2005, 2011 and 2015 as the dividing line, it can be divided into four stages: imbalance, gradual improvement, optimization and promotion, and coordinated development.4) The ecological civilization construction of Liupanshui city is positively correlated with the development of tourism and is highly significant, but the driving effects of tourism factor on ecological civilization construction (95.60%) is higher than the support of ecological civilization construction on tourism development (90.37%). The relationship between these two have showed the general characteristics of cross-feed coupling and the development of tourism industry have an obvious supporting effect on regional ecological civilization construction. It is suggested to promote the coordinated development in two aspects: the pace of ecological civilization and tourism development need to be coordinated; the collaboration between departments of ecological civilization construction and tourism development should be promoted.

Key words: resource-based cities, ecological civilization, tourism development, coordination relationship, coupling situation, Liupanshui