基于地理标记照片的城市旅游意象空间分异研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.01.2020211

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

城市旅游感知意象与投射意象的匹配程度是城市旅游形象建设与宣传效果的重要评价，景观尺度下旅游感知与投射意象的空间分异特征可以有效评估游客对城市旅游意象的感知偏差，以此把握旅游者的旅游动机与景观偏好，更好地提升旅游地形象建设。本研究以五大世界著名旅游城市为例，以Flickr网站的地理标记照片数据和政府旅游网站宣传的旅游信息为数据源，利用ArcGIS空间分析技术分析城市旅游感知意象与投射意象的要素构成和空间分异特征。结果表明，城市旅游感知与投射意象的差异既体现在要素构成的偏差上，也体现在空间分布特征的差异方面。除东京旅游感知与投射意象要素结构基本一致以外，其他城市均存在一定程度的偏差。局部空间聚集异常值可视化了五大城市旅游感知意象与投射意象的空间分布偏差，相比城市旅游投射意象的空间集聚，城市旅游感知意象的范围更为离散。同时，双变量空间自相关指数分析结果验证了五大城市旅游感知意象与投射意象均呈显著的空间正相关，但是相关程度和依赖度并不高，说明了从感知与投射视角进行旅游意象空间特征分析的重要性，应以需求为导向进行城市旅游景观规划与宣传。结合地理标记照片数据的空间分析方法为城市旅游感知意象与投射意象的空间分异研究提供了普适性的方法，以服务于城市可持续发展和旅游形象建设。

关键词: 旅游感知意象, 旅游投射意象, 空间分异, 地理标记照片, 旅游形象

Abstract:

The matching relationship of urban tourism perception image and projection image is an important evaluation of urban tourism image construction and publicity effect. The spatial differentiation characteristics of tourism perception and projection image at the landscape scale can effectively assess the perception deviation of tourists on urban tourism image, so as to grasp tourists' motives and landscape preferences and enhance the image construction of tourist destinations. This article took the five world famous tourist cities as examples, selected geotagging photo data on Flickr website and tourism information promoted by government tourism websites as data sources, and adopted ArcGIS spatial analysis technology to analyze the composition and spatial differentiation of urban tourism perception and projection image. The research results show that, the differences between urban tourism perception and projected image are reflected not only in the deviation of element composition, but also in the difference in spatial distribution characteristics. Except that the structure of Tokyo tourism perception and projection image is basically the same, there are certain deviations in other cities. The local spatial aggregation outliers visualize the spatial distribution deviation of the tourism perception and projection image in the five cities. Compared with the spatial aggregation of the tourism projection image, the spatial distribution of tourism perception image is more discrete. Secondly, the analysis of the bivariate spatial autocorrelation index (Bivariate Moran's I) verifies that the tourism perception image and projection image of the five cities are significantly spatially positively correlated, but the degree of correlation and dependence is not high. The spatial characteristics of tourism images need to be analyzed from the perspective of perception and projection, and the urban tourism landscape planning and publicity should be combined with market demand. The spatial analysis technology combined with geotagged photo data can be used as a general method for the spatial differentiation of urban tourism perception and projection images, to help the city's sustainable development and tourism image building.

Key words: tourism perception image, tourism projection image, spatial differentiation, geotagged photos, tourism image

邴振华, 唐思琪, 王瑞静, 黄和平. 基于地理标记照片的城市旅游意象空间分异研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(1): 64-75.

Zhenhua BING, Siqi TANG, Ruijing WANG, Heping HUANG. Exploring the spatial differentiation of urban tourism image based on geotagged photos[J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(1): 64-75.

图/表 10

参考文献 27

1	CROMPTON JL. An assessment of the image of Mexico as a vacation destination and the influence of geographical location upon that image. Journal of Travel Research, 1979,17(4): 18-23.
2	侯兵, 黄震方, 尚正永. 基于城市意象变迁的城市旅游形象塑造研究——以江苏省扬州市为例. 经济地理, 2009, 29(12):78-83.
	HOU B, HUANG Z, SHANG Z. Study on the construction of the image about urban tourism changes on the urban image—Take Yangzhou, Jiangsu for example. Economic Geography, 2009,29(12):78-83.
3	宋欢,喻学才. 城市旅游意象的解构与重构 ——兼论旅游形象与旅游意象的异同. 地域研究与开发, 2017, 36(1):91-96.
	SONG H, YU X. Deconstruction and reconstruction of city tourism image on the similarities and differences between tourism image and tourism imago. Areal Research and Development, 2017,36(1):91-96.
4	刘丹,李杰. 文化符号与空间价值:互联网思维下的城市形象传播与塑造. 西南民族大学学报, 2016, 37(6):154-158.
	LIU D, LI J. Cultural symbols and spatial values: Urban image transmission and shaping under the internet thinking. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities, 2016, 37(6): 154-158.
5	乌铁红,张捷,李文杰. 地域文化差异对旅游者的旅游地意象感知影响——以内蒙古自治区草原旅游地为例. 旅游学刊, 2010, 25(6):67-73.
	WU T, ZHANG J, LI W. The impact of regional cultural differences on tourist's perception of tourism destination image—A case study of tourists' perception of paririe image in Inner Mongolia autonomous region, Tourism Tribune, 2010, 25(6):67-73.
6	孟奕爽,邓森文,徐佳. 旅游目的地投射意象与游客感知意象差异分析——以平江石牛寨景区为例. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 12(3):67-73.
	MENG Y, DENG S, XU J. Study on the differences between projection image and tourist perception image of tourist destination: Case of Shiniuzhai scenic spot, Pingjiang. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Social Sciences), 2018, 12(3):67-73.
7	唐继刚,田逢军. 中部大城市居民港台旅游意象及其对旅游意愿的影响研究—以无港台旅游经历南昌市民为例. 世界地理研究, 2017, 26(5):166-176.
	TANG J, TIAN F. A study on residents' destination images of Hongkong and Taiwan and their influence on travel intentions. World Regional Studies, 2017,26(5):166-176.
8	徐美, 刘春腊, 陈建设,等. 旅游意象图:基于游客感知的旅游景区规划新设想. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(4): :21-27.
	XU M, LIU CH, CHEN J, et al. Tourism image map: A new scenic spot planning idea based on tourists' perception. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(4):21-27.
9	曹越皓, 龙瀛, 杨培峰. 基于网络照片数据的城市意象研究——以中国24个主要城市为例规划师, 2017(2):61-67.
	CAO Y, LONG Y, YANG P. City image study based on online pictures: 24 cities case. Planners, 2017(2): 61-67.
10	吴承照, 王婧. 基于游客感知的上海都市空间旅游意象研究. 现代城市研究, 2012(2): 82-87.
	WU C, WANG J. The study on tourism destination image of the metropolitan space of Shanghai. Modern Urban Research, 2012(2): 82-87.
11	徐国良, 万春燕, 甘萌雨. 福州市历史街区游客意象空间感知差异研究. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 29 (2): 94-98.
	XU G, WAN CH, GAN M. Research on tourists' image space perception differences in Sanfangqixia historical district of Fuzhou. Journal of Chongqing Norma University(Natural Science), 2012, 29(2): 94-98.
12	BUI T. Congruency between the projected and perceived tourism destination image of Vietnam. Journal of International Business Research, 2011, 10(2):17-23.
13	孟奕爽, 邓森文, 李艳芳. 基于认知地图的岳麓山景区旅游意象分析. 地域研究与开发, 2018, 37(5):120-124+148.
	MENG Y, DENG S, LI Y. Simulation analysis of land use change in rural industrialized areas based on geo SOS: Changyuan county, Henan province as a case. Areal Research and Development, 2018, 37(5):120-124+148.
14	董玥, 徐薛艳. 基于Web2.0图片交互平台的游客旅游意象分析——以枫泾古镇为例. 旅游论坛, 2017, 10(2):37-46.
	DONG Y, XU X. Analysis of tourist image based on Web2.0 interactive platform -- Taking Fengjing ancient town as an example. Tourism Forum, 2017, 10(2):37-46.
15	丁瑜, 李爽. 基于公众感知的广州花城广场意象研究. 世界地理研究, 2018, 27(6):65-76.
	DING Y, LI SH. Study on city square image based on public perception: A case of Guangzhou huacheng square. World Regional Studies, 2018, 27(6):65-76.
16	ZHANG K, CHEN Y, LI CH. Discovering the tourists' behaviors and perceptions in a tourism destination by analyzing photos' visual content with a computer deep learning model: The case of Beijing. Tourism Management, 2019(75):595-608.
17	TIESKENS K, ZANTEN V, BORIS T, et al. Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: An analysis of revealed preference in the dutch river landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018(177):128-137.
18	SONTER L, WATSON K, WOOD S, et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics and value of nature-based recreation, Estimated via social media. Plos One, 2016, 11 (9):e0162372.
19	KIM Y, KIM C, LEE D, et al. Quantifying nature-based tourism in protected areas in developing countries by using social big data. Tourism Management, 2018(72):249-256.
20	SESSIONS C, WOOD S, RABOTYAGOV S, et al. Measuring recreational visitation at U.S. national parks with crowd-sourced photographs. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016(183): 703-711.
21	李瑞. 城市旅游意象及其构成要素分析. 西北大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 34 (4): 494-498.
	LI R. Analysis of urban tourism image and its factors. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science). 2004, 34 (4): 494-498.
22	STEPCHENKOVA S, KIM H, KIRILENKO A. Cultural differences in pictorial destination images: Russia through the camera lenses of American and Korean tourists. Journal of Travel Research, 2014, 54 (6): 758-773.
23	蔡礼彬, 宋莉. 基于网络文本的城市旅游意象符号表征研究——以青岛市为例. 地域研究与开发, 2019(3): 78-83.
	CAI L. SONG L. A study on the symbol representation of urban tourism image based on internet text -- Taking Qingdao as an example. Areal Research and Development, 2019(3): 78-83.
24	THOMEE B, ELIZALDE B, SHAMMA D, et al. YFCC 100m: The new data in multimedia research. Communications of the ACM, 2016(59): 64-73.
25	孟斌, 王劲峰, 张文忠, 等. 基于空间分析方法的中国区域差异研究. 地理科学. 2005, 25(4): 393-400.
	MENG B, WANG J, ZHANG W, et al. Evaluation of regional disparity in China based on spatial analysis. Scientia Geographica Sinica. 2005, 25(4): 393-400.
26	FIGUEROAALFARO R, TANG ZH. Evaluating the aesthetic value of cultural ecosystem services by mapping geo-tagged photographs from social media data on Panoramio and Flickr. Journal of Environmental Planning Management, 2017(60): 266-281.
27	ANSELIN L, REY S. Modern Spatial Econometrics in Practice. Chicago: GeoDa Press LLC, 2014.

城市	人口/万人	行政区划	面积/km²	格网单元/个	旅游宣传网站
东京	1 374	23个特别区、26个市、5个町、8个村	2 155	3 008	https://www.gotokyo.org/cn/
纽约	851	5个区	1 214	1 708	https://www.nycgo.com/
北京	2 154	16个区	16 411	28 804	http://whlyj.beijing.gov.cn/
北京中心城区	1 110	6个区	1 381	2 486	http://whlyj.beijing.gov.cn/
伦敦	890	伦敦城和32个区	1 578	4 355	http://www.visitlondon.com
巴黎	224	20个区	105	284	https://zh.parisinfo.com/

城市	人口/万人	行政区划	面积/km²	格网单元/个	旅游宣传网站
东京	1 374	23个特别区、26个市、5个町、8个村	2 155	3 008	https://www.gotokyo.org/cn/
纽约	851	5个区	1 214	1 708	https://www.nycgo.com/
北京	2 154	16个区	16 411	28 804	http://whlyj.beijing.gov.cn/
北京中心城区	1 110	6个区	1 381	2 486	http://whlyj.beijing.gov.cn/
伦敦	890	伦敦城和32个区	1 578	4 355	http://www.visitlondon.com
巴黎	224	20个区	105	284	https://zh.parisinfo.com/

维度	内容	照片学习标签关键词
自然景观	地质地貌、气象景观、动植物景观	rock, snow, lake, river, costal, beach, sea, dune, forest, hill, foothill, grass, trees, animal, pond, sea, lawn，plant, flower, garden, waterfront, waterfall
文化景观	文化艺术景观、历史遗迹、宗教	temple, tower, statue, church, palace, architecture, museum, theatre, grave, cathedral, rampart, cenotaph, monuments, alter, pantheon, art gallery
社会景观	城市景观、场所、设施等	stadium, street, library, market, harbor, alley, amusement park, bridge, park, playground, ferry, marina, trail, path, yard, intersection, stadium, amphitheater, trestle, skyscraper, auditorium， bazaar

维度	内容	照片学习标签关键词
自然景观	地质地貌、气象景观、动植物景观	rock, snow, lake, river, costal, beach, sea, dune, forest, hill, foothill, grass, trees, animal, pond, sea, lawn，plant, flower, garden, waterfront, waterfall
文化景观	文化艺术景观、历史遗迹、宗教	temple, tower, statue, church, palace, architecture, museum, theatre, grave, cathedral, rampart, cenotaph, monuments, alter, pantheon, art gallery
社会景观	城市景观、场所、设施等	stadium, street, library, market, harbor, alley, amusement park, bridge, park, playground, ferry, marina, trail, path, yard, intersection, stadium, amphitheater, trestle, skyscraper, auditorium， bazaar

城市	照片数据				照片数据的地理单元总数/比例	含两类景观照片的地理单元总数	含三类景观照片的地理单元总数
城市	总量	文化景观	社会景观	自然景观	照片数据的地理单元总数/比例	含两类景观照片的地理单元总数	含三类景观照片的地理单元总数
东京	45 290	15 229	16 610	13 451	1097/36.47%	274	454
纽约	85 807	27 329	39 092	19 386	875/51.23%	171	450
北京	19 806	7 646	8 869	3 291	429/17.26%	115	157
伦敦	90 677	48 279	23 689	18 709	1919/44.06%	495	772
巴黎	51 349	28 851	15 959	6 539	250/88.03%	33	190