欧洲经济地理学区域创新政策研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.02.2020249

世界地理研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 259-269.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.02.2020249

欧洲经济地理学区域创新政策研究进展

陈奕嘉¹(), 谭俊涛²^,³()

^1.广东省科学院广州地理研究所，广东省遥感与地理信息系统应用重点实验室/广东省地理空间信息技术与应用公共实验室，广州 510070
^2.江苏师范大学，地理测绘与城乡规划学院，徐州 221116
^3.江苏师范大学，城乡融合发展研究院，徐州 221116

收稿日期:2020-04-27 修回日期:2020-06-29 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-03-22
通讯作者: 谭俊涛
作者简介:陈奕嘉（1986-），男，助理研究员，博士，研究方向为演化经济地理，E-mail： ethan.yjchen@qq.com。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学基金项目(20YJCZH143);江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2020SJA1024)

A review of regional innovation policy in European economic geography

Yijia CHEN¹(), Juntao TAN²^,³()

^1.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, Guangdong Open Laboratory of Geospatial Information Technology and Application, Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China
^2.a School of Geography, Geomatics and Planning,
^3.b Urban-Rural Integration Development Research Institute, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China

Received:2020-04-27 Revised:2020-06-29 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-03-22
Contact: Juntao TAN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

区域创新政策对创新驱动增长和经济结构转型升级至关重要。20世纪90年代以来，基于对新古典主义经济学“空间中性”的创新政策的反思，欧洲经济地理学提出“基于空间”的区域创新政策，至今已被欧盟委员会和经济合作与发展组织等组织所采用。本文对这一时期欧洲经济地理学区域创新政策的发展背景、主要任务、理论基础和政策建议等方面进行梳理，研究发现：第一，欧洲经济地理学区域创新政策的主流框架有3个，分别是区域创新系统、精明专业化和可持续转型地理理论；第二，3个框架各有侧重，区域创新系统侧重解决系统失灵问题，精明专业化聚焦优先发展领域的选择问题，可持续转型地理理论则强调转型失灵问题；第三，针对上述问题，3个框架均给出“基于空间”的区域创新政策建议，其中，区域创新系统和精明专业化是基于区域资源禀赋差异的视角，可持续转型地理理论则从技术的空间粘性角度出发。最后，提出中国经济地理学未来区域创新政策研究的几个重点研究方向。

关键词: 欧洲经济地理学, 区域创新政策, 区域创新系统, 精明专业化, 可持续转型地理理论

Abstract:

Regional innovation policies are critical to innovation-driven growth and economic structural transformation. Based on criticizing the neoclassical economics' space-neutral innovation policy, economic geographies proposed the place-based regional innovation policy, which has been adopted by the European Commission and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. This paper reviews the background, main tasks, theoretical basis and policy recommendations of the regional innovation policy. The findings are as follows. First, there are three mainstream frameworks of regional innovation policy in European economic geography, namely, regional innovation system, smart specialization, and sustainability transition studies. Second, each framework has their own focus point, that is, the regional innovation system focuses on fixing the system failure, the smart specialization on the direction of priority, and the sustainable transformation studies on fixing the transformation failure. Third, the policy recommendations in each framework are summarized. Finally,several promising avenues for the future regional innovation policy research of Chinese economic geography are proposed.

Key words: economic geography in the Europe, regional innovation policy, regional innovation system, smart specialization, the geography of sustainability transition

陈奕嘉, 谭俊涛. 欧洲经济地理学区域创新政策研究进展[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(2): 259-269.

Yijia CHEN, Juntao TAN. A review of regional innovation policy in European economic geography[J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(2): 259-269.

图/表 1

参考文献 60

1	周一星.人文地理研究能为制订国家政策作贡献: 以城市发展方针研究为例.人文地理,2001,16(1): 1-5.
	ZHOU Y. Human geography studies can contribute to the formulation of national policies: A case of the research on national urban growth policy. Human Geography, 2001, 16(1): 1-5.
2	贺灿飞,郭琪,马妍, 等. 西方欧洲经济地理学研究进展.地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1207-1223.
	HE C, GUO Q, MA Y, et al. Progress of economic geography in the West: A literature review. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1207-1223.
3	范帅邦,郭琪,贺灿飞. 西方欧洲经济地理学的政策研究综述——基于CiteSpace的知识图谱分析. 经济地理, 2015, 35(5): 15-24.
	FAN S, GUO Q, HE C. A review of policy analysis in economic geography based on CiteSpace, Economic Geography, 2015, 35(5): 15-24.
4	UYARRA E, FLANAGAN K, MAGRO E, et al. Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning. 2017, 35(4): 559-568.
5	SCHOT J, STEINMUELLER W E. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 2018, 47(9): 1554-1567.
6	SAMUELSON P. Economics (9th ed). Tokyo: McGraw Hill Kogakusha, 1973.
7	VARIAN H. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (5th ed). New York: WW Norton & Company, 1996.
8	EDLER J, FAGERBERG J.Innovation policy:What, why, and how.Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2017,33(1): 2-23.
9	LARANJA M, UYARRA E, FLANAGAN K. Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research Policy, 2008, 37(5): 823-835.
10	LUNDVALL B Å. National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.
11	NELSON R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
12	AUTIO E. Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 1998, 6(2): 131-140.
13	BRACZYK H J, COOKE P N, HEIDENREICH M. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World. London: UCL Press, 1998.
14	COOKE P. Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001, 10(4): 945-974.
15	TÖDTLING F, TRIPPL M. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 2005, 34(8): 1203-1219.
16	UYARRA E, FLANAGAN K. From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2010, 28(4): 681-695.
17	EDQUIST C. Systems of Innovation Approaches-Their Emergence And Characteristics. In Edquist C. Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organisations. London: Pinter: 1-35,1997.
18	COOKE P, SCHIENSTOCK G. Structural competitiveness and learning regions.Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2000, 1(3): 265-280.
19	WOOLTHUIS R K, LANKHUIZEN M, GILSING V. A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 2005, 25(6): 609-619.
20	TÖDTLING F, TRIPPL M. Regional innovation policies for new path development–beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 2018, 26(9): 1779-1795.
21	BOSCHMA R. Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 2017, 51(3): 351-364.
22	GRILLITSCH M. Place-based entrepreneurship and innovation policy for industrial diversification.Papers in Innovation Studies, 2018(3): 1-21.
23	GRILLITSCH M, ASHEIM B, TRIPPL M. Unrelated knowledge combinations: the unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2018, 11(2): 257-274.
24	贺灿飞. 区域产业发展演化: 路径依赖还是路径创造? 地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1253-1267.
	HE C. Regional industrial development and evolution: Path dependence or path creation? Geographical Research, 2018, 37(7): 1253-1267.
25	ZHU S, HE C, ZHOU Y. How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space. Journal of Economic Geography, 2017,17(3): 521-545.
26	胡晓辉, 张文忠.制度演化与区域经济弹性——两个资源枯竭型城市的比较.地理研究,2018,37(7): 1308-1319.
	HU X, ZHANG W. Institutional evolution and regional economic resilience: A comparison of two resource-exhausted cities in China. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(7):1308-1319.
27	胡晓辉,朱晟君, Hassink Robert. 超越"演化":老工业区重构研究进展与范式反思. 地理研究,2020, 39(5): 1028-1044.
	HU X, ZHU S, HASSINK R. Beyond the "evolutionary approach": A critical review and paradigmatic reflections on the restructuring of old industrial areas . Geographical Research, 2020, 39(5): 1028-1044.
28	GRILLITSCH M, TRIPPL M. Innovation policies and new regional growth paths: A place-based system failure framework. Papers in Innovation Studies, 2016(26): 1-23.
29	TRIPPL M, GRILLITSCH M, ISAKSEN A. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(5): 687-705.
30	CHEN Y, HASSINK R. Multi-scalar knowledge bases for new regional industrial path development:Toward a typology. European Planning Studies. (Forthcoming).
31	JENSEN M B, JOHNSON B, LORENZ E, et al. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 2007, 36(5): 680-693
32	FORAY D, DAVID P A, HALL B. Smart specialisation – The concept. (2009-06-09)[2019-02-09]., 2009.
33	Parliament European. Smart specialisation: The concept and its application to EU cohesion policy. (2016-10-04)[2019-02-09]., 2016.
34	FORAY D, GOENAGA X. The goals of smart specialization. (2013-05-31)[2019-02-09]. .
35	Commission European. Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations. (2012-05-15) [2019-02-09]. .
36	McCANN P, ORTEGA-ARGILÉS R. Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(8): 1291-1302.
37	HESS M. 'Spatial' relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 2004 (2): 165-186.
38	HIDALGO C, BALLAND P A, BOSCHMA R, et al. The principle of relatedness. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 2018, 18(30): 1-4.
39	FRENKEN K, OORT F VAN, VERBURG T. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth . Regional Studies, 2007, 41(5): 685-697.
40	NEFFKE F, HENNING M, BOSCHMA R. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 2011, 87(3): 237-265.
41	SASSEN S. Global Networks, Linked Cities. London: Routledge, 2002.
42	MCCANN P, ORTEGA-ARGILÉS R. Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2013, 6(2), 187-216.
43	BARZOTTO M, CORRADINI C, FAI F M, et al. Enhancing innovative capabilities in lagging regions: an extra-regional collaborative approach to RIS3. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2019, 12(2): 213-232.
44	OECD. Innovation Driven-Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation. (2013-12-11)[2019-02-09]. , 2013.
45	Commission European. Regional diversification opportunities and smart specialization strategies. (2017-07-26) [2019-02-09]. .
46	BALLAND P A, BOSCHMA R, CRESPO J, et al. Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 2019, 53(9): 1252-1268.
47	MARKARD J, TRUFFER B. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework . Research policy, 2008, 37(4): 596-615.
48	COENEN L, BENNEWORTH P, TRUFFER B. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 2012, 41(6): 968-979.
49	BINZ C, TRUFFER B, COENEN L. Why space matters in technological innovation systems—Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 2014, 43(1): 138-155.
50	BINZ C, TRUFFER B, COENEN L. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 2016, 92(2): 172-200.
51	BERGEK A, JACOBSSON S, CARLSSON B, et al. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 2008, 37(3):407-429.
52	HEKKERT M, SUURS R, NEGRO S, et al. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change . Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74(4): 413-432.
53	WEBER K M, ROHRACHER H. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive 'failures' framework. Research Policy, 2012, 41(6): 1037-1047.
54	BINZ C., TRUFFER B. Global innovation systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts . Research Policy, 2017, 46(7): 1284-1298.
55	JEANNERAT H., Knowledge KEBIR L., resources and markets : what economic system of valuation?. Regional Studies, 2016, 50(2): 274-288.
56	JENSEN M. B., JOHNSON B., LORENZ E., et al. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 2007, 36(5): 680-693.
57	张炜,巩键.中国区域创新模式测度及其创新政策再设计.科研管理, 2020,41(4):85-92.
	ZHANG W, GONG J. Measurement of China's regional innovation patterns and their redesign of innovation policies. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(4):85-92.
58	陈桂秋,马猛,温春阳,等.特色小镇特在哪.城市规划,2017,41(2):68-74.
	CHEN G, MA M, WEN C, et al. What Are The Features of Feathered Towns City Planning Review2017,41(2):68-74.
59	陈奕嘉.欧盟精明专业化政策对特色小镇建设的启示.小城镇建设,2018(5):25-31+90.
	CHEN Y. Smart Specialization and Its Reference for Characteristic Town. Development of Small Cities & Towns, 2018(5):25-31+90.
60	张韵,钟书华.国外"区域创新政策有效性"研究综述.科学管理研究, 2019,37(2):157-160.
	ZHANG Y, ZHONG S. An overseas literature review of the effectiveness of regional innovation policies. Scientific Management Research, 2019, 37(2):157-160.

参数	创新政策
参数	新古典主义	区域创新系统	精明专业化	可持续转型地理
流行时间	1950s—1980s	1990s至今	2009年至今	2012年至今
发展背景	二战后经济发展黄金时代	区域发展不平衡；经济发展趋同没有发生	欧盟竞争力下降；投资地理分散和产业重叠	可持续发展问题日益严重
理论基础	新古典主义经济学	区域创新系统/ 区域新产业路径发展	嵌入性、关联性、连接性、创业式探索	技术创新系统
主要问题	市场失灵	系统失灵	优先发展领域的选择	转型失灵
空间性	空间中性	基于空间	基于空间	基于空间
政策建议	对基础研究进行公共投资，补贴企业研发，加强知识产权保护	针对三类资源禀赋不同的区域（组织厚且多样化、组织厚但单一化、组织薄的区域创新系统），给出产业发展路径和系统失灵修复的建议	针对四类资源禀赋不同的区域（核心区、高新区、老工业区和边缘区），对其优先发展领域给出方向建议	针对四类空间粘性不同的技术（空间粘性型、生产锚定型、市场锚定型、无导向随意型的技术），给出相应的政策建议

参数	创新政策
参数	新古典主义	区域创新系统	精明专业化	可持续转型地理
流行时间	1950s—1980s	1990s至今	2009年至今	2012年至今
发展背景	二战后经济发展黄金时代	区域发展不平衡；经济发展趋同没有发生	欧盟竞争力下降；投资地理分散和产业重叠	可持续发展问题日益严重
理论基础	新古典主义经济学	区域创新系统/ 区域新产业路径发展	嵌入性、关联性、连接性、创业式探索	技术创新系统
主要问题	市场失灵	系统失灵	优先发展领域的选择	转型失灵
空间性	空间中性	基于空间	基于空间	基于空间
政策建议	对基础研究进行公共投资，补贴企业研发，加强知识产权保护	针对三类资源禀赋不同的区域（组织厚且多样化、组织厚但单一化、组织薄的区域创新系统），给出产业发展路径和系统失灵修复的建议	针对四类资源禀赋不同的区域（核心区、高新区、老工业区和边缘区），对其优先发展领域给出方向建议	针对四类空间粘性不同的技术（空间粘性型、生产锚定型、市场锚定型、无导向随意型的技术），给出相应的政策建议

欧洲经济地理学区域创新政策研究进展

A review of regional innovation policy in European economic geography

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 60

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics