空间视角下传统村落与非物质文化遗产的联通格局及整合策略

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.12.20222526

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以金沙江流域传统村落和非物质文化遗产为研究对象，运用最邻近指数、核密度估计、灰色关联度模型和景观空间关联指数等方法，分析二者的空间联通格局，进而从整体性视角提出整合开发策略。研究表明：金沙江流域传统村落与非物质文化遗产在功能上具有密切互补性，在空间上具有交叠性和复合性。基于空间结构、空间分布以及空间关系三个维度审视二者的空间格局，表现为“空间结构差异显著、空间分布集聚明显、空间关系紧密联结”的联通格局，天然具备一体化建设、联动整合开发的优势。据此，在二者地理空间协调相连的基础上，以“旅游+”融合发展为落脚点，基于“人-地-业”一体化产业生态认知，形成“联盟主体推动+要素空间重构+特色产业发展”的整合开发策略，发挥“由点串线及面联网”的空间扩散效应，以期促进金沙江流域传统村落与非遗要素整合与资源集聚，进而以特色产业开发模式为主题，助力区域文旅产业高质量发展和全面推进乡村振兴。

关键词: 金沙江流域, 传统村落, 非物质文化遗产, 空间联通, 人-地-业要素

Abstract:

Taking the traditional villages and intangible cultural heritage in Jinsha River Basin as the research object, this paper analyzes the spatial connectivity pattern of the two by using the nearest neighbor index, kernel density estimation, grey correlation model and landscape spatial correlation index, and then puts forward the idea strategy of integrated development from the holistic perspective. The research shows that the traditional villages in the Jinsha River Basin and the intangible cultural heritage are closely complementary in function, overlapping and compound in space. Based on the three dimensions of spatial structure, spatial distribution and spatial relationship, the spatial pattern of the two is examined, which is manifested as the connectivity pattern of "significant spatial structure difference, obvious spatial distribution agglomeration and close spatial relationship", which naturally has the advantages of integrated construction and linkage integrated development. Based on this, on the basis of the coordination and connection of the two geospatial spaces, taking the "tourism +" integrated development as the foothold, based on the "human-land-industry" integrated industrial ecological cognition, the integrated development strategy of "alliance subject promotion + factor space reconstruction + characteristic industry development" is formed, and the spatial diffusion effect of "point string line and surface networking" is brought into play, in order to promote the integration and resource agglomeration of traditional villages and intangible cultural heritage elements in the Jinsha River Basin, and take the development of characteristic industry model as the theme to help the high-quality development of regional cultural tourism industry and comprehensively promote rural revitalization.

Key words: Jinsha River Basin, traditional village, intangible cultural heritage, space connectivity, man-land-property elements

王克岭, 谭心, 何洁丽. 空间视角下传统村落与非物质文化遗产的联通格局及整合策略[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(12): 163-175.

Keling WANG, Xin TAN, Jieli HE. The interconnection pattern and integration strategy of traditional villages and intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of space: Taking Jinsha River Basin as an example[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(12): 163-175.

图/表 8

图1 框架思路图

Fig.1 Study framework

图2 研究区域图

Fig.2 Study area map

图3 金沙江流域非遗和传统村落数量区域对比图

Fig.3 Regional comparison of the number of intangible cultural heritage and traditional villages in the Jinsha River Basin

图4 金沙江流域传统村落与非遗结构类型分类

Fig.4 Classifying the structure types of intangible cultural heritage and traditional villages in the Jinsha River Basin

表1 金沙江流域传统村落与非遗最邻近指数

Tab.1 Index value of nearest neighbors of intangible cultural heritage and traditional villages in the Jinsha River Basin

区域	传统村落				非物质文化遗产
区域	平均观测距离/m	预期平均距离/m	最邻近指数	P值	平均观测距离/m	预期平均距离/m	最邻近指数	P值
青海	476.449 7	38 315.655 2	0.012 4	0.000 0	16 388.041 6	45 298.881 2	0.361 8	0.000 0
西藏	62 186.728 1	93 671.157 3	0.663 9	0.000 1	16 517.663 3	54 081.067 9	0.305 4	0.000 0
四川	4 715.026 4	19 101.436 2	0.246 8	0.000 0	17 434.416 7	28 180.093 1	0.618 7	0.000 0
云南	1 493.846 8	11 796.592 9	0.126 6	0.000 0	13 901.937 5	26 066.890 1	0.533 3	0.000 0
全部	4 010.946 5	24 294.893 9	0.165 1	0.000 0	15 547.642 6	37 965.039 1	0.409 5	0.000 0

图5 金沙江流域传统村落及非遗核密度图

Fig.5 Kernel density maps of intangible cultural heritage and traditional villages in the Jinsha River Basin

图6 金沙江流域传统村落和非遗样方分解图

Fig.6 Sample plot decomposition diagram of intangible cultural heritage and traditional villages in the Jinsha River Basin

图7 传统村落与非遗联动开发模式

Fig.7 Reconstruction mechanism of traditional villages and intangible cultural heritage

参考文献 32

1	傅才武,程玉梅.文旅融合在乡村振兴中的作用机制与政策路径:一个宏观框架.华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,60(6):69-77.
	FU C, CHENG Y. Dynamic mechanism and policy path of the integration of culture and tourism in rural revitalization: A macro framework.Journal of Central China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2021,60(6):69-77.
2	黄震方,黄睿.城镇化与旅游发展背景下的乡村文化研究:学术争鸣与研究方向.地理研究,2018,37(2):233-249.
	HUANG Z, HUANG R.Research progress on rural culture in the context of rapid urbanization and tourism development:Academic debate and future research prospects.Geographical Research,2018,37(2):233-249.
3	周锦,赵正玉.乡村振兴战略背景下的文化建设路径研究.农村经济,2018(9):9-15.
	ZHOU J, ZHAO Z.Research on the path of cultural construction under the background of rural revitalization strategy.Rural Economy,2018(9):9-15.
4	鲁可荣,程川.传统村落公共空间变迁与乡村文化传承——以浙江三村为例.广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,38(6):22-29.
	LU K, CHENG C.Change of traditional rural public space and inheritance of rural culture:A case study of three villages in Zhejiang Province.Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2016,38(6):22-29.
5	王克岭.古驿道文化资源活化利用模式选择的国内外经验及启示.企业经济,2022,41(6):5-14.
	WANG K.Domestic and foreign experience and enlightenment on mode choices of activation and utilization of cultural resources in ancient courier routes.Enterprise Economy,2022,41(6):5-14.
6	卢松,张小军.徽州传统村落旅游开发的时空演化及其影响因素.经济地理,2019,39(12): 204-211.
	LU S, ZHANG X. Temporal-spatial distribution characteristics and impact factors of traditional villages in Huizhou area.Economic Geography,2019,39(12):204-211.
7	唐承财,万紫微,刘蔓,等.基于多主体的传统村落文化遗产保护传承感知及提升模式.干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(2):198-204.
	TANG C, WAN Z, LIU M,et al. Perception and improvement of the protection and inheritance of traditional village cultural heritage based on multi-agent.Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2021,35(2):198-204.
8	李江苏,王晓蕊,李小建.中国传统村落空间分布特征与影响因素分析.经济地理,2020,40(2):146-156.
	LI J, WANG X, LI X.Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of Chinese traditional villages.Economic Geography,2020,40(2):146-156.
9	李伯华,李珍,刘沛林,等.湘江流域传统村落景观基因变异及其分异规律.自然资源学报,2022,37(2):88-103.
	LI B, LI Z, LIU P,et al.Landscape gene variation and differentiation law of traditional villages in Xiangjiang River Basin.Journal of Natural Resources,2022,37(2):88-103.
10	康璟瑶,章锦河,胡欢,等.中国传统村落空间分布特征分析.地理科学进展,2016,35(7):49-60.
	KANG J, ZHANG J, HU H,et al.Analysis on the spatial distribution characteristics of Chinese traditional villages.Progress in Geography,2016,35(7):49-60.
11	何艳冰,乔旭宁,王同文,等.传统村落文化景观脆弱性测度及类型划分——以河南省为例.旅游科学,2021,35(3):28-45.
	HE Y, QIAO X, WANG T,et al.On dividing the classification and assessment of the vulnerability of cultural landscape of traditional villages:A case study of Henan Province.Tourism Science,2021,35(3):28-45.
12	王瑞光.乡村文化振兴与非物质文化遗产的价值呈现.济南大学学报(社会科学版),2021,31(2):37-43.
	WANG R.Integration and interaction between the protection and inheritance of intangible cultural heritage and the construction of rural culture.Journal of University of Jinan(Social Science Edition),2021,31(2):37-43.
13	张魏.云南少数民族非物质文化遗产保护与旅游开发的良性互动模式研究.广西民族研究,2020,155(5):132-138.
	ZHANG W.A study on the positive interaction mode between protection and tourism development regarding minorities intangible cultural heritage in Yunnan.Guangxi Ethnic Studies,2020,155(5):132-138.
14	陈炜,杨连娇.青海省非物质文化遗产空间分异及旅游开发模式研究.青海民族研究,2020,31(1):73-79.
	CHEN W, YANG L.Research on the spatial differentiation of intangible cultural heritage and tourism development model in Qinghai Province.Qinghai Journal of Ethnology,2020,31(1):73-79.
15	王克岭,谭心,龚异.金沙江流域非物质文化遗产旅游廊道构建.西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,43(9):35-43.
	WANG K, TAN X, GONG Y.Construction of intangible cultural heritage tourism corridor in Jinsha River Basin.Journal of Southwest Minzu University(Humanities and Social Science),2022,43(9):35-43.
16	张希月,虞虎,陈田,等.非物质文化遗产资源旅游开发价值评价体系与应用——以苏州市为例.地理科学进展,2016,35(8):997-1007.
	ZHANG X, YU H, CHEN T,et al.Evaluation of tourism development value of intangible culture heritage resources:A case study of Suzhou City.Progress in Geography,2016,35(8):997-1007.
17	阚如良,王桂琴,周军,等.主题村落再造:非物质文化遗产旅游开发模式研究.地域研究与开发,2014,33(6):108-112.
	KAN R, WANG G, ZHOU J,et al.Theme village reconstruction:A case study of tourism development mode about intangible cultural heritage.Areal Research and Development,2014,33(6):108-112.
18	KIM S, WHITFORD M, ARCODIA C. Development of intangible cultural heritage as a sustainable tourism resource: The intangible cultural heritage practitioners' perspectives. Journal of Heritage Tourism,2019:1-14.
19	IO M. Understanding the core attractiveness of performing arts heritage to international tourists. Tourism Geographies,2019(4):687-705.
20	王秋玉."非物质文化遗产+旅游"对农村经济增长的驱动与实施.农业经济,2022(8):57-59.
	WANG Q.The driving and implementation of "intangible cultural heritage+tourism" to rural economic growth.Agricultural Economy,2022(8):57-59.
21	张建忠,温娟娟,刘家明,等.山西省非物质文化遗产时空分布特征及旅游响应.地理科学,2017,37(7):1104-1111.
	ZHANG J, WEN J, LIU J,et al.Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics and tourism response of intangible cultural heritage in Shanxi Province.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2017,37(7):1104-1111.
22	高彩霞,刘家明,高岩,等.京津冀非物质文化遗产资源的空间格局及旅游开发研究.地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(3):103-108.
	GAO C, LIU J, GAO Y,et al.Research on spatial pattern and tourism development of intangible cultural heritages in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region.Geography and Geo-Information Science,2021,37(3):103-108.
23	田小波,胡静.甘肃省非物质文化遗产时空格局及旅游利用研究.华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,55(6):1073-1082.
	TIAN X, HU J.Spatio-temporal patterns and exploitation of intangible cultural heritage tourism resources in Gansu Province.Journal of Central China Normal University(Natural Sciences), 2021,55(6):1073-1082.
24	赵悦,石美玉.非物质文化遗产旅游开发中的三大矛盾探析.旅游学刊,2013,28(9):84-93.
	ZHAO Y, SHI M.An analysis of the three contradictions in the tourism development of intangible cultural heritage.Tourism Tribune,2013,28(9):84-93.
25	汪欣.传统村落与非物质文化遗产保护研究——以徽州传统村落为个案.北京:知识产权出版社,2014.
	WANG X.Protection of Traditional Villages and Intangible Cultural Heritage:A Case Study on Huizhou Traditional Villages. Beijing: Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2014.
26	王世良.非物质文化遗产与其传承村落共生保护研究.西安:西安建筑科技大学,2017.
	WANG S. Research on the symbiotic protection of intangible cultural heritage and its heritage villages.Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology,2017.
27	李如友,石张宇.黄河流域传统村落与非物质文化遗产的空间关系及形成机理.经济地理,2022,42(8):205-212.
	LI R, SHI Z. Spatial relationship and formation mechanism of traditional villages and intangible cultural heritage in the Yellow River Basin.Economic Geography,2022,42(8):205-212.
28	张朝枝,林诗婷.遗产内涵的政府话语分析.旅游论坛,2017,10(1):1-9.
	ZHANG C, LIN S.The discourse analysis of heritage connotation of government documents.Tourism Forum,2017,10(1):1-9.
29	吴清,李细归,张明.中国不同类型非物质文化遗产的空间分布与成因.经济地理,2015,35(6):177-185.
	WU Q, LI X, ZHANG M.The spatial distribution and relevant factors of China's different types intangible cultural heritages. Economic Geography,2015,35(6):177-185.
30	崔蓉,李国锋.中国互联网发展水平的地区差距及动态演进:2006-2018.数量经济技术经济研究,2021,38(5):4-21.
	CUI R, LI G.Regional differences and distributional dynamics of Internet level in China:2006～2008.Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics,2021,38(5):4-21.
31	刘怡,周凌云,耿纯.京津冀产业协同发展评估:基于区位熵灰色关联度的分析.中央财经大学学报,2017,364(12):121-131.
	LIU Y, ZHOU L, GENG C.Evaluation of coordinated industrial development in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan circle: Evidence from the grey relational analysis of location quotient.Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics,2017,364(12):121-131.
32	黄松,李燕林,李如友.桂西地区地质遗迹与民族文化资源的空间关系及成因机理.地理学报,2015,70(9):1434-1448.
	HUANG S, LI Y, LI R.Spatial relationship and formation mechanism of geological relics and ethnic cultural resources in western Guangxi,China.Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(9):1434-1448.

[1]	张晓瑶, 陆林, 虞虎, 张潇, 邓洪波. 中国传统村落分布特征与成因机制研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(4): 132-143.
[2]	刘畅, 冯雨乔. 中国非物质文化遗产在欧洲传播空间分布特征研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(4): 867-874.
[3]	孔翔, 吴栋, 张纪娴. 社区参与模式下的传统村落旅游空间生产及影响初探[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(6): 156-165.
[4]	韩禹文, 唐承财, 杨春玉, 吕宁. 中国传统村落旅游研究的知识图谱分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(5): 200-209.