印度道路网的分形自组织与协同特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.01.20222284

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

道路网是大尺度空间的交通渠道和小尺度空间的社会联系桥梁，其时空复杂性涌现机制一直是多学科研究热点。分形是探索地理复杂性的重要工具之一。收集印度总人口数排名前200的县的道路网数据，挖掘各县道路网的几何与结构分形特征，分析几何与结构分形特征的统计相关性及空间异同配性。结果表明：（1）印度样本县道路网空间分布不均衡，保持南密北疏、沿海密度高于内陆的格局。南北方差异强于沿海-内陆差异，这与印度城市发展格局与城镇发展驱动力一致；（2）印度样本县道路网均具有显著的几何与结构分形特征。道路网盒覆盖几何分形维取值［1.229，1.857］，结构分形维取值［1.623，3.179］，体积和度体积结构分形维分别取值［1.941，3.539］和［2.410，3.822］，表明印度大部分县道路网建设以空间蔓延和稠化加密为主，立体化发展水平有待加强，特别是跨等级、多层连接的道路较有限；（3）高等级交通廊道区域联动效应较明显，有利于区域协同发展。

关键词: 道路网, 几何分形, 结构分形, 协同发展, 印度

Abstract:

The road network is a large-scale space transportation channel and a small-scale space social connection bridge, and its spatio-temporal complexity emerging mechanism has been a multi-disciplinary research hotspot. Fractal is one of the important tools to explore geographical complexity. This paper collects the road networks data of the top 200 districts in India's total population, excavates the geometric and structural fractal characteristics of the road networks in each district, and analyzes the statistical correlation and spatial similarities and differences of the geometric and structural fractal characteristics. The results show that:①The spatial distribution of the road network in the sample districts in India is uneven, maintaining the pattern of dense in the south and sparse in the north, with coastal density higher than inland. The difference between the north and the south is stronger than that between coastal and inland areas, which is consistent with the urban development pattern and the driving force of urban development in India;②The road network in all districts of India has significant geometric and structural fractal characteristics. The geometric fractal dimensions of the road networks box-covering [1.229,1.857], the structural fractal dimensions [1.623,3.179],and the fractal dimensions of the volume and degree volume structures [1.941,3.539] and [2.410,3.822], respectively, indicate that the road networks construction in most districts of India is dominated by spatial spread, thickening and densification, and three-dimensional development level needs to be strengthened, especially the cross grade and multi-layer roads are limited;③The regional linkage effect of high-grade traffic corridors is obvious, which is conducive to the coordinated development of space.Key words: road network; geometric fractal; structural fractal; coordinated development; India

刘采玮, 张红, 唐诗钰. 印度道路网的分形自组织与协同特征[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(1): 43-56.

Caiwei LIU, Hong ZHANG, Shiyu TANG. Fractal development and spatial synergy of urban road network: A case study of India[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(1): 43-56.

图/表 12

图1 印度行政区划及道路网分布注：文中所有地图均基于标准地图服务网站审图号为GS（2016）1760号标准地图绘制，底图无修改。

Fig.1 Distribution of administrative divisions and road networks in India

表1 道路网拓扑结构分析指标及含义

Tab.1 Analysis index and meaning of road network topology

指标名称		计算公式	变量含义	指标含义
中心性	度中心性	$k i = ∑ j = 1, i ≠ j n L i j$	$n$ ：节点总数； $L i j$ ：节点 $i$ 与节点 $j$ 之间的连边数量	路划的直接连通性
	中介中心性	$B i = ∑ s, t ∈ V, s, t ≠ i o (s, t i) o (s, t)$	$o (s, t i)$ ：节点 $s$ 和节点 $t$ 之间的最短路径经过节点 $i$ 的次数； $o s, t$ ：节点 $s$ 和节点 $t$ 之间的最短路径数	路划在网络中的桥介作用
	邻近中心性	$C i = n - 1 ∑ j = 1, i ≠ i n d i j$	$d i j$ ：节点 $i$ 到节点 $j$ 的最短路径； $n - 1$ ：节点 $i$ 的最大邻接数	路划的平均可达性
结构分形维	盒覆盖结构分形维	$D S = - l i m l B → 0 l n N (l) l n l$	$l$ ：网络直径； $N (l)$ ：覆盖网络所需的最少盒子数； $D S$ ：盒覆盖结构分形维	路划交叉连通方式的多样性
	体积结构分形维	$D V = - l i m r → 0 l n ∑ i n V i (r) n l n r$	$r$ ：拓扑半径；n：节点数； $V i (r)$ ：节点 $i$ 在拓扑距离内的节点个；数，即体积； $D V$ ：体积分形维	路划网络互通衔接能力
	度体积结构分形维	$D D = - l i m r → 0 l n ∑ i n V i D (r) n l n r$	$r$ ：拓扑半径； $n$ ：节点数； $V i D (r)$ ：节点 $i$ 拓扑距离内节点度值，即度体积； $D D$ ：度体积分形维	路划跨等级连接能力

表1 道路网拓扑结构分析指标及含义

Tab.1 Analysis index and meaning of road network topology

指标名称		计算公式	变量含义	指标含义
中心性	度中心性	$k i = ∑ j = 1, i ≠ j n L i j$	$n$ ：节点总数； $L i j$ ：节点 $i$ 与节点 $j$ 之间的连边数量	路划的直接连通性
	中介中心性	$B i = ∑ s, t ∈ V, s, t ≠ i o (s, t i) o (s, t)$	$o (s, t i)$ ：节点 $s$ 和节点 $t$ 之间的最短路径经过节点 $i$ 的次数； $o s, t$ ：节点 $s$ 和节点 $t$ 之间的最短路径数	路划在网络中的桥介作用
	邻近中心性	$C i = n - 1 ∑ j = 1, i ≠ i n d i j$	$d i j$ ：节点 $i$ 到节点 $j$ 的最短路径； $n - 1$ ：节点 $i$ 的最大邻接数	路划的平均可达性
结构分形维	盒覆盖结构分形维	$D S = - l i m l B → 0 l n N (l) l n l$	$l$ ：网络直径； $N (l)$ ：覆盖网络所需的最少盒子数； $D S$ ：盒覆盖结构分形维	路划交叉连通方式的多样性
	体积结构分形维	$D V = - l i m r → 0 l n ∑ i n V i (r) n l n r$	$r$ ：拓扑半径；n：节点数； $V i (r)$ ：节点 $i$ 在拓扑距离内的节点个；数，即体积； $D V$ ：体积分形维	路划网络互通衔接能力
	度体积结构分形维	$D D = - l i m r → 0 l n ∑ i n V i D (r) n l n r$	$r$ ：拓扑半径； $n$ ：节点数； $V i D (r)$ ：节点 $i$ 拓扑距离内节点度值，即度体积； $D D$ ：度体积分形维	路划跨等级连接能力

图2 道路网密度的统计与空间分布

Fig.2 Numerical and spatial distribution of road networks density

图3 道路网几何分形维频次与空间分布

Fig.3 Frequency and spatial distribution of geometric fractal dimension of road networks

图4 印度盒覆盖几何分形维排名前5的县道路网及其拓扑连通关系图

Fig.4 Road networks and topological connectivity graphs of the top five districts in terms of box-counting geometric fractal dimension

图5 道路网中心性数值分布

Fig.5 Centrality value distribution of road networks

图6 道路网结构分形维频次与空间分布

Fig.6 Frequency distribution and spatial distribution of the structural fractality of road networks

图7 印度结构分形维排名前5的县道路网及其拓扑连通关系图

Fig.7 Road networks and topological connectivity graphs of the top five districts in terms of structural fractal dimension

图8 几何分形维与结构分形维双变量映射地图

Fig.8 Bivariate map of geometric fractal dimension and structural fractal dimension

表2 分形维全局莫兰指数计算结果

Tab.2 Global Moran's I calculation results of fractal dimension

分形维	莫兰指数	预期指数	Z得分
盒覆盖几何分形维	0.427	－0.005	18.479
体积结构分形维	0.240	－0.005	10.469
度体积结构分形维	0.208	－0.005	9.104
盒覆盖结构分形维	0.092	－0.005	4.135

图9 聚类和异常值分析

Fig.9 Clustering and outlier analysis

图10 道路网几何分形维与结构分形维空间耦合

Fig.10 Spatial coupling between geometric fractal dimension and structural fractal dimension of road networks

参考文献 45

1	LYNCH K. The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT press, 1964.
2	ZHANG H, LI Z. Fractality and self-similarity in the structure of road networks. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2012, 102(2): 350-365.
3	MARSHALL S. Streets and Patterns. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.
4	ZHANG H, LAN T, LI Z. Fractal evolution of urban street networks in form and structure: A case study of Hong Kong. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2022, 36(6): 1100-1118.
5	JIANG B, CLARAMUNT C. Topological analysis of urban street networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 2004, 31(1): 151-162.
6	JIANG B. A topological pattern of urban street networks: Universality and peculiarity. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2007, 384(2): 647-655.
7	HUANG L, ZHU X, YE X, et al. Characterizing street hierarchies through network analysis and large-scale taxi traffic flow: A case study of Wuhan, China. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2016, 43(2): 276-296.
8	ZHANG H, LI Z. Weighted ego network for forming hierarchical structure of road networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2011, 25(2): 255-272.
9	LAN T, LI Z, ZHANG H. Urban allometric scaling beneath structural fractality of road networks. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2019, 109(3): 943-957.
10	HILLIER B. Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. London: Space Syntax, 2007.
11	COUTROT A, MANLEY E, GOODROE S, et al. Entropy of city street networks linked to future spatial navigation ability. Nature, 2022, 604(7904): 104-110.
12	陈文婕,吴小刚,肖竹.中国四大经济区域道路交通碳排放预测与减排潜力评估:基于私家车轨迹数据的情景模拟.经济地理,2022,42(7):44-52.
	CHEN W, WU X, XIAO Z. Carbon emission prediction and emission reduction potential assessment of road traffic in China's four major economic regions:Scenario simulation based on private vehicle trajectory data. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(7):44-52.
13	陈晓萍,周素红,李秋萍,詹文.广州城市道路网的社会分异:基于轨迹大数据的出行分布性别差异.地理研究,2021,40(6):1652-1666.
	CHEN X, ZHOU S, LI Q, et al. Research on social differentiation of urban road network in Guangzhou: Gender differences of travel distribution based on trajectory data. Geographical Research, 2021,40(6):1652-1666.
14	段德忠,刘承良,杜德斌,桂钦昌.基于二分网络的北京公交线路布局的空间依赖性.地理学报,2016,71(12): 2185-2198.
	DUAN D, LIU C, DU D, et al. Spatial dependency of bus-line distribution based on bipartite network: A case study of Beijing city. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(12): 2185-2198.
15	MANDELBROT B. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. science, 1967, 156(3775): 636-638.
16	陈彦光.城市形态的分维估算与分形判定.地理科学进展,2017,36(05): 529-539.
	CHEN Y. Approaches to estimating fractal dimension and identifying fractals of urban form. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(5): 529-539.
17	陈彦光. 分形城市系统:标度·对称·空间复杂性.北京:科学出版社, 2008.
	CHEN Y. Fractal Urban Systems Scaling Symmetry Spatial Complexity. Beiing: Science Press,2008.
18	刘承良. 城乡路网的空间复杂性.武汉:华中师范大学,2011.
	LIU C. Spatial complexity of urban-rural road network: A case of Wuhan metropolitan area. Wuhan: Doctoral Dissertation of Central China Normal University, 2011.
19	LU Z, ZHANG H, SOUTHWORTH F, et al. Fractal dimensions of metropolitan area road networks and the impacts on the urban built environment. Ecological indicators, 2016, 70: 285-296..
20	林青青,何依.分形理论视角下的克拉科夫历史空间解析和修补研究.国际城市规划,2020,35(1):71-78.
	LIN Q, HE Y. Historical space analysis and rehabilitation of Krakow from the perspective of fractal theory. Urban Planning International, 2020, 35(1): 71-78.
21	XIE F, LEVINSON D M. Coevolution of network and land use. Evolving Transportation Networks. Springer, New York, NY, 2011: 157-176..
22	BARTHELEMY M. The structure and dynamics of cities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
23	DING J X, QIN R K, GUO N, et al. Urban road network growth model based on RNG proximity graph and angle restriction. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 96(4): 2281-2292.
24	门洪华,汪婷.中印伙伴关系复杂性的战略分析.探索与争鸣,2021(9):32-43.
	MEN H, WANG T. A strategic analysis on the complexity of China-India cooperative partnership. Exploration and Free Views, 2021(9):32-43.
25	葛岳静,计晶韵,黄宇.多尺度视角下的印度地缘环境解析及对中国的启示.世界地理研究,2021,30(2):223-233.
	GE Y, JI J, HUANG Y.A multi-scale analysis of India's geo-setting and enlightenment to China.World Regional Studies,2021,30(2): 223-233.
26	杜德斌,马亚华.中国崛起的国际地缘战略研究.世界地理研究,2012,21(01):1-16.
	DU D, MA Y. Geography of containment and anti-containment of China's peaceful rise. World Regional Studies, 2012,21(01): 1-16.
27	秦大河,张国友,宋长青,等.今天的中国为什么比任何时候都需要世界地理学.世界地理研究,2020,29(1): 1-7.
	QIN D, ZHANG G, SONG C, et al.Why does China today need world geography more than ever.World Regional Studies,2020,29(1):1-7.
28	程佳佳,王成金,刘卫东.西北地区交通优势度格局及空间分异.地球科学进展,2016,31(2):192-205.
	CHEN J, WANG C, LIU W. Distribution configuration and spatial differentiation of transport superiority degree in northwest China. Advances in Earth Science. 2016, 31(2): 192-205.
29	THOMSON R C, RICHARDSON D E. A graph theory approach to road network generalization. Proceeding of the 17th international cartographic conference. 1995, 354: 1871-1880.
30	JIANG B, ZHAO S, YIN J. Self-organized natural roads for predicting traffic flow: A sensitivity study. Journal of statistical mechanics: Theory and experiment, 2008(7): P07008.
31	SONG C, GALLOS L K, HAVLIN S, et al. How to calculate the fractal dimension of a complex network: The box covering algorithm. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2007(03): P03006.
32	SHANKER O. Defining dimension of a complex network. Modern Physics Letters B, 2007, 21(06): 321-326.
33	WEI D, WEI B, HU Y, et al.A new information dimension of complex networks.Physics Letters A,2014,378(16-17): 1091-1094.
34	李佳洺,杨宇,樊杰,等.中印城镇化区域差异及城镇体系空间演化比较.地理学报,2017,72(06):986-1000.
	LI J, YANG Y, FAN J, et al. Comparative research on regional differences in urbanization and spatial evolution of urban systems between China and India. Acta Geographica Sinica,2017,72(06): 986-1000.
35	张红,邓雯,王艺.2000—2020年印度土地利用的时空演化及驱动因素分析.世界地理研究,2022,31(04):786-799.
	ZHANG H, DENG W, WANG Y. Analyses on the spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of land use in India during 2000—2020.World Regional Studies,2022, 31(04): 786-799.
36	GHANI E, GOSWAMI A G, KERR W R. Highway to success: The impact of the Golden Quadrilateral project for the location and performance of Indian manufacturing. The Economic Journal, 2016, 126(591): 317-357.
37	BENGUIGUI L, DAOUD M. Is the suburban railway system a fractal?. Geographical Analysis, 1991, 23(4): 362-368.
38	BATTY M, LONGLEY P A. Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press, 1994.
39	杨福平. 从道路分形透视城市异速生长.成都:西南交通大学,2020.
	YANG F. Urban allometric scaling beneath fractality of road networks. Chengdu: Master Dissertation of Southwest Jiaotong Univesity, 2020.
40	曾映敏. 多空间尺度道路网结构分形与自相似特性分析.成都:西南交通大学,2018.
	ZENG Y. Structural fractality and self-similarity of road network on multi-spatial scale. Chengdu: Master Dissertation of Southwest Jiaotong Univesity,2018.
41	肖燕,邹再超,刘清春.山东半岛蓝色经济区路网空间通达性研究.世界地理研究,2021,30(3):567-576.
	XIAO Y, ZOU Z, LIU Q. Study on spatial accessibility of road network in Shandong Peninsula Blue Economic Zone. World Regional Studies,2021,30(3):567-576.
42	GHANI E, GOSWAMI A G, KERR W R. Highway to success: The impact of the Golden Quadrilateral project for the location and performance of Indian manufacturing. The Economic Journal, 2016, 126(591): 317-357.
43	尹传忠,邱慧妍,柯媛定,等.区域主枢纽港多式联运网络协同优化.铁道科学与工程学报,2022,19(01):63-70.
	YIN C, QIU H, KE Y, et al. Collaborative optimization for multimodal transport network of regional main hub ports. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(01): 63-70.
44	王占中,任园园.基于协同理论的公路运输与国民经济适应性.吉林大学学报(工学版),2011,41(S1):101-105.
	WANG Z, REN Y. Adaptability of road transport and national economy based on compatibility theory. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition),2011,41(S1):101-105.
45	涂建军,况人瑞,毛凯,等.成渝城市群高质量发展水平评价.经济地理,2021,41(7):50-60.
	TU J, KUANG R, MAO K, et al. Evaluation on high-quality development of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration. Economic Geography. 2021, 41(7):50-60.

[1]	苏盼盼. 亚洲国家公园的建设实践及其启示[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(7): 160-168.
[2]	潘玥, 宋涛, 李富玉. 多尺度地缘政治要素推拉作用下的印度尼西亚迁都计划研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(11): 57-68.
[3]	张红, 邓雯, 王艺. 2000—2020年印度土地利用的时空演化及驱动因素分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(4): 786-799.
[4]	葛岳静, 计晶韵, 黄宇. 多尺度视角下的印度地缘环境解析及对中国的启示[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(2): 223-233.
[5]	Juwita Melda Ria, 汪涛, 江昕阳, Supriyadi Agus, AnsoriFaruq. 地方自治背景下印度尼西亚空间规划面临的挑战[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(1): 48-56.
[6]	张良兵, 骆华松, 洪菊花, 陆好健. 中印对尼泊尔地缘影响力的演变分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(1): 43-51.
[7]	梁甲瑞. 印度海上战略通道的新动向、动因及影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(1): 52-62.
[8]	赵蕾, 王国梁, 吴樱, 韦素琼. “一带一路”背景下中国在南亚的贸易格局分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(5): 44-53.
[9]	熊琛然, 王礼茂, 屈秋实, 方叶兵, 向宁. 地缘政治环境中的情景分析：中国的视角[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(3): 1-10.
[10]	贺正楚, 刘亚茹. 印度生物医药产业政策分析及启示[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(3): 135-145.
[11]	席宇斌张瑾. 印度旅华客源市场特征与拓展分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2017, 26(3): 157-166.
[12]	王雪孟广文隋娜娜. 印度自由经济区的发展类型及启示[J]. 世界地理研究, 2017, 26(1): 22-31.