城市治理视角下的高密度人居环境城市低效用地开发研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.05.20230528

世界地理研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 87-97.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.05.20230528

• 专栏：城市治理与区域协同 • 上一篇下一篇

城市治理视角下的高密度人居环境城市低效用地开发研究

张衔春¹(), 周子航²(), 胡映洁³

^1.浙江大学公共管理学院，杭州 310058
^2.香港中文大学地理与资源管理学系，香港 999077
^3.上海社会科学院应用经济研究所，上海 200020

收稿日期:2023-08-09 修回日期:2023-12-15 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-05-30
通讯作者: 周子航
作者简介:张衔春（1988—），男，研究员，博士，博士生导师，研究方向为城市与区域治理，E-mail：zhangxianchun@zju.edu.cn。
基金资助:
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题一般项目(23NDJC082YB);国家自然科学基金青年项目(42101187);国家自然科学基金项目(72074192)

Revisiting the land redevelopment in mega-cities of high-density human settlements from perspectives of urban governance

Xianchun ZHANG¹(), Zihang ZHOU²(), Yingjie HU³

^1.School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
^2.Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
^3.Insitute of Applied Economics, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200020, China

Received:2023-08-09 Revised:2023-12-15 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-05-30
Contact: Zihang ZHOU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从高密度人居环境的社会经济成因与物质空间需求出发，结合土地开发强度与土地租金之间的互耦关系，以香港为例讨论城市低效用地的再开发问题。通过访谈与文本分析法，对高密度人居环境的城市低效用地利用开展对比研究。结果表明：①在政府与资本高度互耦的城市土地再开发过程中，香港形成了由增长机器驱动的“财产型政府”机制。②尽管政府拥有土地开发的主导权，但受到多元利益主体的诉求干预，并不能充分实现政府规划意图。③棕地、政府官地等未能高效利用的城市土地将成为潜在增量土地资源，同时征得多方利益主体的发展目标一致是利用这类土地的关键。文章通过阐释香港特区政府解决土地再开发过程中所遇到的困难、采取的对策以及治理收效，旨在论证香港特区政府规划中存在的得失经验，以期对中国同类高密度人居环境城市提供案例借鉴。

关键词: 土地再开发, 高密度人居环境, 存量低效用地, 财产型政府, 香港

Abstract:

This article starts from the background of city-regionalism, analyzes the socioeconomic issues of compact city, and combines the urban governance toolkits that adopted by entrepreneurial government in land redevelopment. It takes Hong Kong as an empirical case to investigate land redevelopment. The results show that: ① The government is highly linked to business bodies in a paradigm of growth machine. ② Hong Kong is discovered to be a property state captured by speculative profits in such coalition, wherein government's planning intentions cannot be fulfilled. ③ Urban land that has not been utilized efficiently, i.e. brownfields and government land, will be adopted as potential land resources, wherein the key to utilizing such type of land is to obtain consistent development goals from multiple stakeholders. By explaining the planning strategies of the Hong Kong government to solve a high density of built environment, it puts forward analysis of brownfield, state-owned land and other land that has not been efficiently utilized. This research could be helpful to similar mega-cities which shares a compact feature in high density, for it provides a disputable case.

Key words: land redevelopment, high-density human settlements, low efficient land use, property state, Hong Kong

张衔春, 周子航, 胡映洁. 城市治理视角下的高密度人居环境城市低效用地开发研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(5): 87-97.

Xianchun ZHANG, Zihang ZHOU, Yingjie HU. Revisiting the land redevelopment in mega-cities of high-density human settlements from perspectives of urban governance[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(5): 87-97.

图/表 5

参考文献 34

1	WARD K, JONAS A. Competitive city-regionalism as a politics of space: A critical reinterpretation of the new regionalism. Environment and Planning A, 2004, 36(12) : 2119-2139.
2	WACHSMUTH D. Competitive multi-city regionalism: Growth politics beyond the growth machine. Regional Studies, 2016, 51(4) : 643-653.
3	MOOS M. From gentrification to youthification? The increasing importance of young age in delineating high-density living. Urban Studies, 2016, 53(14) : 2903-2920.
4	OSTROM E. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2010, 2(2) : 1-12.
5	LEE J, ZHU Y.Urban governance, neoliberalism and housing reform in China. The Pacific Review, 2006, 19(1) : 39-61.
6	NICHOLAS P, MIAO J. Varieties of urban entrepreneurialism. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2019, 10(1):304-321.
7	郭环,李世杰,周春山.广州民间金融街空间生产动力机制研究.世界地理研究,2015,24(2):49-58.
	GUO H, LI S, ZHOU C. Research on the dynamic mechanism of space production of Guangzhou civil finance street. World Regional Studies, 2015,24(2):49-58.
8	WU F. The state acts through the market: "State entrepreneurialism" beyond varieties of urban entrepreneurialism. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2020, 10(3) :326-329.
9	HE S. Urban entrepreneurialism 2.0? Financialization, cross-scale dynamics, and post-political governance. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2020, 10(3) :322-325.
10	STRANGE W. Information, holdouts, and land assembly. Journal of Urban Economics, 1995, 38(3) :317-332.
11	李晓玲,修春亮,孙平军.新型城镇化下中国城市土地集约利用格局与机理研究.世界地理研究,2015,24(1):60-67.
	LI X, XIU C, SUN P. Research on spatial pattern and mechanism of urban land intensive use in China in the period of new urbanization. World Regional Studies, 2015,24(1):60-67.
12	林坚,许超诣.土地发展权、空间管制与规划协同.城市规划,2014,38(1):26-34.
	LIN J, XU C. Land development rights, space control, and synergetic planning. City Planning Review, 2014, 38(1): 26-34.
13	XU J, YEH A, WU F. Land commodification: New land development and politics in China since the late 1990s. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2009, 33(4) : 890-913.
14	张衔春,胡国华,单卓然,等.中国城市区域治理的尺度重构与尺度政治.地理科学,2021,41(1):100-108.
	ZHANG X, HU G, SHAN Z, et al.Rescaling and politics of scale in China's city-regional governance.Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021,41(1):100-108.
15	HAILA A. Real estate in global cities: Singapore and Hong Kong as property states. Urban Studies,2000,37(12):2241-2256.
16	HAILA A. Urban Land Rent: Singapore as a Property State. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
17	POON A. Land and the Ruling Class in Hong Kong. Singapore: Enrich Professional, 2005.
18	张衔春,陈宇超,栾晓帆."以地谋发展"模式的空间重构:以浙江省山海协作工程为例.自然资源学报,2023,38(7):1730-1742.
	ZHANG X, CHEN Y, LUAN X. The spatial reconstruction of lland-driven development mode: The projects of cooperation between mountainous and coastal areas in Zhejiang Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(7): 1730-1742.
19	DONALD B, GLASMEIER A, GRAY M, et al. Austerity in the city: Economic crisis and urban service decline? Cambridge Journal Of Regions, Economy And Society, 2014, 7(1): 3-15.
20	香港特别行政区政府.行政长官2017年施政报告, 2017.
	The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.The Chief Executive's 2017 Policy Address, 2017.
21	ACUTO M, MORISSETTE M, TSOUROS A. City diplomacy: Towards more strategic networking? Learning with WHO Healthy Cities. Global Policy, 2017, 8(1): 14-22.
22	WU F. Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism. Urban Studies, 2018, 55(7) : 1383-1399.
23	香港特别行政区规划署.香港 2030+:跨越2030年的远景规划与策略(公众参与), 2016.
	The Development Bureau and the Planning Department, HKSAR. Hong Kong 2030+: Towards a planning vision and strategy transcending 2030 (public participation version), 2016..
24	本土研究社.隐藏选项——香港临时使用及闲置官地研究, 2018.
	Liber Research Community. Missing option: Reseach on temporary use and vacant government land in Hong Kong, 2018.
25	香港特别行政区规划署.香港 2030+:跨越2030年的远景规划与策略, 2021.
	The Development Bureau and the Planning Department. Hong Kong 2030+: Towards a planning vision and strategy transcending 2030, 2021.
26	NG M. Transformative urbanism and reproblematising land scarcity in Hong Kong. Urban Studies, 2020, 57(7): 1452-1468.
27	本土研究社.失棕罪——香港棕地现状报告 2021, 2021.
	Liber Research Community. Missing brownfields-Hong Kong brownfields report 2021, 2021.
28	香港特别行政区规划署.新界棕地使用及作业现状研究可行性研究, 2019.
	The Development Bureau and the Planning Department, HKSAR. Study on existing profile and operations of brownfield sites in the New Territories - Feasibility study, 2019.
29	LAUERMANN J. Municipal statecraft: Revisiting the geographies of the entrepreneurial city. Urban Studies, 2018, 42(2): 205-224.
30	CHEN A, XU K. Major Developers Own 20pc Farmland. (2019-09-16) [2023-09-18]. .
31	张衔春,唐承辉,岳文泽.地域重构视角下区域空间生产与治理——以深汕特别合作区为例.地理科学,2022,42(3):373-380.
	ZHANG X, TANG C, YUE W. Investigating the regional spatial production and regional governance from the perspective of territorial restructuring: A case study of Shenzhen-Shanwei Cooperation Zone. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2022, 42(3): 373-380.
32	刘芳,张宇,姜仁荣.深圳市存量土地二次开发模式路径比较与选择.规划师,2015,31(7):49-54.
	LIU F, ZHANG Y, JIANG R. Comparison and choice of redevelopment models of stock land. Planners, 2015, 31(7): 49-54.
33	周子航,施德浩,王雨.港深协同发展:香港北部都会区与前海合作区的跨界治理——基于新国家空间理论的考察.城市发展研究,2022,29(10):1-11.
	ZHOU Z, SHI D, WANG Y. Integrated relationships of Hong Kong and Shenzhen: Cross-border governance between Northern Metropolis and Qianhai. Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(10): 1-11.
34	周子航,张京祥,杨洁莹.风险社会视角下国家级新区治理格局检视——以南京江北新区为例.国际城市规划,2023,38(1):91-99.
	ZHOU Z, ZHANG J, YANG J. Governance modality of state-level new areas from the perspective of risk society: A case study of Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing. Urban Planning International, 2023, 38(1): 91-99.

行业门类	面积/公顷	面积占比/%	场地数目/个	数目占比/%	平均地块面积/m²
仓库及储物业	378.86	26.8	2 718	36.9	1 393.89
建筑业	367.39	26.0	1 558	21.1	2 358.09
物流业	186.14	13.2	560	7.6	3 323.93
车辆维修业	137.21	9.7	1 102	14.9	1 245.01
停车场	105.64	7.5	435	5.9	2 428.51
港口后勤业	87.96	6.2	152	2.1	5 786.84
废物回收业	85.27	6.0	441	6.0	1 933.56
乡郊工业	22.97	1.6	104	1.4	2 208.65
一般工业	21.68	1.5	176	2.4	1 231.82
拆车业	20.72	1.5	127	1.7	1 631.50

行业门类	面积/公顷	面积占比/%	场地数目/个	数目占比/%	平均地块面积/m²
仓库及储物业	378.86	26.8	2 718	36.9	1 393.89
建筑业	367.39	26.0	1 558	21.1	2 358.09
物流业	186.14	13.2	560	7.6	3 323.93
车辆维修业	137.21	9.7	1 102	14.9	1 245.01
停车场	105.64	7.5	435	5.9	2 428.51
港口后勤业	87.96	6.2	152	2.1	5 786.84
废物回收业	85.27	6.0	441	6.0	1 933.56
乡郊工业	22.97	1.6	104	1.4	2 208.65
一般工业	21.68	1.5	176	2.4	1 231.82
拆车业	20.72	1.5	127	1.7	1 631.50

分类	高	中	共计
分类	面积/公顷	面积/公顷	面积/公顷
工业及仓储地带	25	27	52
发展用途地带（住宅）	34	58	92
发展用途地带（其他）	68	82	150
绿化地带	16	51	67
农业地带	10	65	75
其他	6	5	11
总计	159	288	447

分类	高	中	共计
分类	面积/公顷	面积/公顷	面积/公顷
工业及仓储地带	25	27	52
发展用途地带（住宅）	34	58	92
发展用途地带（其他）	68	82	150
绿化地带	16	51	67
农业地带	10	65	75
其他	6	5	11
总计	159	288	447

[1]	胡晨晖, 姜海宁. 基于周星驰电影主创人员合作的区域空间网络结构特征[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(10): 173-184.
[2]	陈虹, 林伊婷, 刘云刚, 黄慧明, 陈祁琪, 刘仕影, 陈西雅. “一国两制”下香港居民跨境消费行为特征和影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 1024-1035.

城市治理视角下的高密度人居环境城市低效用地开发研究

Revisiting the land redevelopment in mega-cities of high-density human settlements from perspectives of urban governance

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 34

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics