主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 104-112.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2019.03.2018820

• 城市与区域 • 上一篇    下一篇

德国创新政策及其对区域发展的影响研究

张海娜1, 曾刚2, 朱贻文2   

  1. 1.华东师范大学社会发展学院,上海 200062
    2.华东师范大学城市发展研究院,上海 200062
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-08 修回日期:2018-07-20 出版日期:2019-06-15 发布日期:2019-08-13
  • 作者简介:张海娜(1980-),女,博士研究生,研究方向为城市社会学、城市地理,E-mail:hnzhang@admin.ecnu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    曾刚(1961-),男,教授,博导,研究方向为企业网络与产业集群、技术创新与技术扩散、区域发展与区域规划,E-mail: gzeng@re.ecnu.edu.cn

German innovation policy and its impact on regional development

ZHANG Haina1, ZENG Gang2, ZHU Yiwen2   

  1. 1.School of Social Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    2.The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2018-01-08 Revised:2018-07-20 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-08-13
  • Contact: 2019-06-15
  • About author:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(17JJD790006);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2018M641963)。

摘要: 创新逐步取代资本,成为新时代区域发展新动力。德国在科技创新方面一直领跑世界,区域系统发展优势明显。在了解德国创新发展的历史和现状的基础上,本文对德国的创新政策的特征加以归纳,一是在指导思想上,告别了“以邻为壑、以大为强、引外劳、降成本”的旧时代,开启了“以邻为伴、一致对外、创新为王、引人才”的新时代;二是在具体举措上,实施多种方式并举,提供科创资金支持;“自上而下”和“自下而上”相结合,推动创新集群发展;以科技中介服务机构为核心,激活技术扩散与创新活动。尽管中德两国所处的经济发展阶段不同,但是德国在创新的顶层设计、“门槛”研究和创新联盟的开放式区域创新系统建设等方面的经验值得我国借鉴。

Abstract: Innovation gradually replaces capital and becomes a new driving force for regional development in the new era. Germany has been leading the world in scientific and technological innovation, with obvious advantages in regional development system. On the basis of understanding the history and current situation of German innovation development, this paper combs the characteristics of German innovation policy. Firstly, in terms of guiding ideology, it bid farewell to the old era of beggaring neighbors, opened a new era of taking neighbors as companions and being consistent with the outside world, bid farewell to the old era of greater scale and opened a new era of innovation; The old era of cost reduction opens a new era of attracting talents; secondly, in specific measures, various ways should be taken simultaneously to provide scientific and technological capital support; ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ should be combined to promote the development of innovation clusters; and technological intermediary service institutions should be the core to activate technological diffusion and innovation activities. Although China and Germany are at different stages of economic development, Germany's experience in high level design of innovation, ‘threshold’ research, open regional innovation system and construction of innovation alliance deserves our reference.