基于产业视角的中国西北五省（区）地级市对“一带一路”倡议的政策响应研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2018503

世界地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 346-357.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.02.2018503

基于产业视角的中国西北五省（区）地级市对“一带一路”倡议的政策响应研究

曹宛鹏¹(), 杨永春¹^,²(), 蒋小荣³, 李恩龙¹

^1.兰州大学资源环境学院，兰州 730000
^2.兰州大学西部环境教育部重点实验室，兰州 730000
^3.湖北文理学院资源环境与旅游学院，湖北襄阳 441053

收稿日期:2018-11-15 修回日期:2019-04-17 出版日期:2020-03-30 发布日期:2020-03-27
通讯作者: 杨永春
作者简介:曹宛鹏（1994-），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为城市与区域规划，E-mail：caowp17@lzu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41971198);兰州大学“一带一路”专项项目(2018ldbryb025)

The policy responses to the Belt and Road Initiative in five provinces (districts) of Northwest China based on industry perspective

Wanpeng CAO¹(), Yongchun YANG¹^,²(), Xiaorong JIANG³, Enlong LI¹

^1.College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
^2.Key Laboratory of Western China's Environmental Systems, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
^3.College of Resource and Tourism, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, China

Received:2018-11-15 Revised:2019-04-17 Online:2020-03-30 Published:2020-03-27
Contact: Yongchun YANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“一带一路”倡议对于引领经济全球化进程、深化改革开放、实现全面转型有重大意义。西部地区及其城市政府据此制定了相关的政策，不同程度地推动了地方经济转型及其开放度。以西北五省51个地级市（含自治州、地区）为研究对象，运用城市职能分类法等方法，对其响应“一带一路”倡议的地方政策进行分析。研究表明：1）2013~2017年，城市政府的平均政策响应累计得分持续增加，应答率由3.92%增加至100%。进行政策响应的产业种类逐年增多，且产业政策重心有多极化趋势。2）2017年，综合性、过渡性、单一性产业政策地级市分别为38个、6个、7个。突出产业政策主要分布在陕、甘两省，以第二、第三产业为主。产业政策类型可详细划分为6类，具有突出产业政策的综合性地级市数目最多，为25个，占比49.02%。

关键词: “一带一路”倡议, 政策响应, 时空特征, 产业政策, 西北五省（区）

Abstract:

The Belt and Road Initiative is of great significance for leading the process of economic globalization, deepening reform, and achieving overall transition. In this context, the western region and its urban governments have formulated related local policies, which have to varying degrees promoted transformation of local economy to be more open. Taking 51 prefecture-level cities (including autonomous prefecture and regions) of the five provinces in northwest China, as the research object, this article made quantification of the local policies, responding to the Belt and Road Initiative, from the three aspects, thus impact level, policy intensity, policy objectives and measures, made visual expression to analyze the overall characteristics of the policy responses to the Belt and Road Initiative that made by various prefecture-level cities, and made use of the classification of urban function method and other methods to classify the industrial policies. The results show that: (1) From 2013 to 2017, the mean value of cumulative score of the policy response made by urban governments, has increased from 0.0078 to 30.9951 and the response rate increased from 3.92% to100%. However, the gap in cumulative scores of policy responses among prefecture-level cities is more distinct. By 2017, the arrangement has formed that Shaanxi and Gansu provinces are the core response areas, Ningxia and Xinjiang provinces are the secondary response areas, and Qinghai province is the edge response area. The policy response primarily concentrates on industries like water conservancy, environment, public facilities management, culture, sports, entertainment, transportation, warehousing, postal, tourism and manufacturing. Moreover, the types of industries that respond to the policies have increased yearly, and the policy center of industries is in a multi-polar tendency. (2) In 2017, the number of the prefecture-level cities with comprehensive, transitional as well as single industrial policies is thirty-eight, six and seven respectively. The high-profile industrial policies mainly center on the secondary and the tertiary industries: The secondary industry is dominated by manufacturing and centered in Shanxi and Gansu provinces, but Shanxi Province is more focused on medium and high-end industries. The tertiary industry is distributed in all provinces (districts), but it has significant spatial heterogeneity. For example, Shanxi Province attaches greater importance to the scientific research and technical services, financial industry and so on, but Gansu Province to the tourism. Combined the comprehensive/single discrimination with the prominent industrial policy discrimination, the types of industrial policies could be divided into six categories in detail, and the comprehensive prefecture-level cities with outstanding industrial policies are the largest in number, which is twenty-five, accounting for 49.02%. However, the number of transitional prefecture-level cities with outstanding industrial policies, single prefecture-level cities with outstanding industrial policies and transitional prefecture-level cities without outstanding industrial policies is the least. The number is equally three, each accounting for 5.88%.

Key words: the Belt and Road Initiative, policy responses, temporal and spatial features, industrial policy, five northwestern provinces (districts)

曹宛鹏, 杨永春, 蒋小荣, 李恩龙. 基于产业视角的中国西北五省（区）地级市对“一带一路”倡议的政策响应研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(2): 346-357.

Wanpeng CAO, Yongchun YANG, Xiaorong JIANG, Enlong LI. The policy responses to the Belt and Road Initiative in five provinces (districts) of Northwest China based on industry perspective[J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(2): 346-357.

图/表 9

参考文献 24

1	Hughes S, Runfola D M, Cormier B. Issue proximity and policy response in local governments. Review of Policy Research,2018,35(2):192-212.
2	Opp S M, Saunders K L. Pillar talk local sustainability initiatives and policies in the United States—Finding evidence of the “Three E’s”: economic development, environmental protection, and social equity. Urban Affairs Review,2013,49(49):678-717.
3	Homsy G C, Warner M E. Cities and sustainability: polycentric action and multilevel governance. Urban Affairs Review,2014,51(1):46-73.
4	Krause R M. An Assessment of the impact that participation in local climate networks has on cities’ implementation of climate, energy, and transportation policies. Review of Policy Research,2012,29(5):585-604.
5	Krause R M. Political Decision-making and the local provision of public goods: the case of municipal climate protection in the US. Urban Studies,2016,49(11):2399-2417.
6	Gerber E R. Partisanship and local climate policy. Cityscape,2013,15(1):107-124.
7	Walker JL.The diffusion of innovations among the American States.American Political Science Review,1969,63(3):880-899.
8	Welch S, Thompson K. The impact of federal incentives on state policy innovation. American Journal of Political Science,1980,24(4):715-729.
9	Gray V. Innovation in the states: a diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 1973,67(4):1174-1185.
10	Shipan C R, Volden C. The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science,2008,52(4):840-857.
11	刘卫东,宋周莺,刘志高,等. “一带一路”建设研究进展. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):620-636.
	Liu W, Song Z, Liu Z, et al. Progress in research on the Belt and Road Initiative. Acta Geographica Sinica,2018,73(4):620-636.
12	刘卫东,Dunford Michael,高菠阳. “一带一路”倡议的理论建构——从新自由主义全球化到包容性全球化. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(11):1321-1331.
	Liu W, Dunford M, Gao B. Discursive construction of the Belt and Road Initiative: From neoliberal to inclusive globalization. Progress in Geography,2017, 36(11):1321-1331.
13	邹嘉龄,刘卫东. 2001～2013年中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易网络分析. 地理科学, 2016, 36(11):1629-1636.
	Zou J, Liu W. Trade network of China and countries along “Belt and Road Initiative” areas from 2001 to 2013. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2016,36(11):1629-1636.
14	郑蕾,刘志高. 中国对“一带一路”沿线直接投资空间格局. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(5):563-570.
	Zheng L, Liu Z. Spatial pattern of Chinese outward direct investment in the Belt and Road Initiative area. Progress in Geography,2015,34(5):563-570.
15	宋周莺,车姝韵,张薇. 我国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易特征研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(4):363-369.
	Song Z, Che S, Zhang W. Spatial-temporal characteristics of foreign trade between China and countries along the Silk Road. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(4):363-369.
16	Irshad M S, Qi X, Arshad H. One Belt and One Road: Dose China- Pakistan economic corridor benefit for Pakistan's economy?. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 2015,6(24):200-207.
17	Dadabaev T. “Silk Road” as foreign policy discourse: The construction of Chinese, Japanese and Korean engagement strategies in Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2017,9(1):30-41.
18	郑蕾,刘毅,刘卫东. 东北三省对外直接投资空间格局及影响因素. 地理科学, 2016, 36(9):1329-1337.
	Zheng L, Liu Y, Liu W. The spatial-temporal pattern evolution of Northeast China's outward direct investment. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2016,36(9):1329-1337.
19	伍琳,李丽琴. “一带一路”战略下福建投资东盟的产业选择——基于贸易的竞争性与互补性.福建论坛:人文社会科学版, 2015(12):186-191.
	Wu L, Li L. The industrial invest choice of Fujian Province on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations under the Belt and Road strategy-based on trade competitiveness and complementarity. Fujian Tribune: Humanities & Social Sciences Edition, 2015(12):186-191.
20	Libecap, G. Economic variables and the development of the law: The case of western mineral rights. The Journal of Economic History,1978,38(2):338-362.
21	纪陈飞,吴群. 基于政策量化的城市土地集约利用政策效率评价研究——以南京市为例. 资源科学, 2015, 37(11):2193-2201.
	Ji C, Wu Q. Evaluation of the efficiency of city land intensive utilization policy based on policy quantification in Nanjing City. Resources Science,2015,37(11):2193-2201.
22	周一星,R.布雷德肖. 中国城市(包括辖县)的工业职能分类——理论、方法和结果. 地理学报, 1988(4):3-14.
	Zhou Y, Bradshaw R. The classification of industrial function of Chinese cities (including attached counties)-Theory, Method and Results. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1988(4):3-14.
23	王伟,王成金,金凤君. 基于货物结构的中国沿海港口运输职能判别. 地理研究, 2018,37(3):527-538.
	Wang W, Wang C, Jin F. The classification of transportation function of China's coastal ports based on cargo structure. Geographical Research,2018,37(3):527-538.
24	成英文,张辉. 基于城市职能理论的中国旅游城市判定及分类研究. 现代城市研究, 2014(2):104-109.
	Cheng Y, Zhang H. The study of Chinese tourism city judgment and classification based on the theory of urban function. Modern Urban Research, 2014(2):104-109.

指标	得分	评判标准
影响程度I	1.00	“一带一路”、“丝绸之路”、“丝路”等作为关键词出现在政策文件的标题中
	0.75	“一带一路”、“丝绸之路”、“丝路”等作为关键词出现在政策文件的指导思想、指导思路中
	0.50	“一带一路”、“丝绸之路”、“丝路”等作为关键词出现在政策文件制定的机遇、优势中
	0.25	“一带一路”、“丝绸之路”、“丝路”等作为关键词出现在政策文件制定的背景中
政策力度P	1.00	市政府部门出台的地方性法规、政府令
	0.75	市政府部门出台的工作方案、实施方案、实施细则、规划、计划
	0.50	市政府部门出台的意见、建议
	0.25	市政府部门出台的通知、通告、通报
政策目标和措施G	1.00	具有“必须”、“明确”、“严禁”等最强最详细描述
	0.80	具有“不（得）低于”、“超过……以上”等强语气较详细描述
	0.60	具有“左右”、“可按不低于”等较强语气描述
	0.40	具有“完善”、“深化”、“争取”等一般性描述
	0.20	具有“基本达到”、“加强”、“增强”、“加快”等一般性描述

指标	得分	评判标准
影响程度I	1.00	“一带一路”、“丝绸之路”、“丝路”等作为关键词出现在政策文件的标题中
	0.75	“一带一路”、“丝绸之路”、“丝路”等作为关键词出现在政策文件的指导思想、指导思路中
	0.50	“一带一路”、“丝绸之路”、“丝路”等作为关键词出现在政策文件制定的机遇、优势中
	0.25	“一带一路”、“丝绸之路”、“丝路”等作为关键词出现在政策文件制定的背景中
政策力度P	1.00	市政府部门出台的地方性法规、政府令
	0.75	市政府部门出台的工作方案、实施方案、实施细则、规划、计划
	0.50	市政府部门出台的意见、建议
	0.25	市政府部门出台的通知、通告、通报
政策目标和措施G	1.00	具有“必须”、“明确”、“严禁”等最强最详细描述
	0.80	具有“不（得）低于”、“超过……以上”等强语气较详细描述
	0.60	具有“左右”、“可按不低于”等较强语气描述
	0.40	具有“完善”、“深化”、“争取”等一般性描述
	0.20	具有“基本达到”、“加强”、“增强”、“加快”等一般性描述

地市	M_j＞1的产业政策	地市	M_j＞1的产业政策	地市	M_j＞1的产业政策
西安	C；M；N；R	咸阳	J*；L	汉中	U*；C
铜川	C*；R；G；U	渭南	C；N；A01；M	榆林	G*；C
宝鸡	C；J；R*；G；U	延安	S**；G；I；R	安康	C***
商洛	N*；G；S；U
兰州	R*；U	天水	G**；R；U	酒泉	R***
嘉峪关	U*；C	定西	N**；A01；Q；S	庆阳	U***；Q
金昌	G**；A01；M；N	张掖	U***；G；R	武威	C；N；U*；A01；R
白银	N*；C；D；U	平凉	G**；A01；N；S	临夏	A01；C；G；I；J；L；M
陇南	N***；C；U	甘南	C；G；Q
西宁	G***；C	海北州	C；N；Q	海南州	C；N；R；U
海东	I*；C	黄南州	L***	海西州	D***；C；M；N
玉树	G**；I；J；N	果洛	C；H
银川	G*；L	吴忠	O；R；G	固原	N**；S
石嘴山	C*；D；N*	中卫	H；R；U*
乌鲁木齐	R*；C；F；L；N	阿克苏	C**；A01；A03	阿勒泰	C***
克拉玛依	P；U；B	喀什	R**；C	昌吉	G***
吐鲁番	G***；P	和田	B；D	博州	P***
哈密	S**；A01；C；N	塔城	B；C；N	巴州	C；N；A02
克州	G；J	伊犁	G***

地市	M_j＞1的产业政策	地市	M_j＞1的产业政策	地市	M_j＞1的产业政策
西安	C；M；N；R	咸阳	J*；L	汉中	U*；C
铜川	C*；R；G；U	渭南	C；N；A01；M	榆林	G*；C
宝鸡	C；J；R*；G；U	延安	S**；G；I；R	安康	C***
商洛	N*；G；S；U
兰州	R*；U	天水	G**；R；U	酒泉	R***
嘉峪关	U*；C	定西	N**；A01；Q；S	庆阳	U***；Q
金昌	G**；A01；M；N	张掖	U***；G；R	武威	C；N；U*；A01；R
白银	N*；C；D；U	平凉	G**；A01；N；S	临夏	A01；C；G；I；J；L；M
陇南	N***；C；U	甘南	C；G；Q
西宁	G***；C	海北州	C；N；Q	海南州	C；N；R；U
海东	I*；C	黄南州	L***	海西州	D***；C；M；N
玉树	G**；I；J；N	果洛	C；H
银川	G*；L	吴忠	O；R；G	固原	N**；S
石嘴山	C*；D；N*	中卫	H；R；U*
乌鲁木齐	R*；C；F；L；N	阿克苏	C**；A01；A03	阿勒泰	C***
克拉玛依	P；U；B	喀什	R**；C	昌吉	G***
吐鲁番	G***；P	和田	B；D	博州	P***
哈密	S**；A01；C；N	塔城	B；C；N	巴州	C；N；A02
克州	G；J	伊犁	G***

地市	M_j＞1的产业政策	地市	*M_j*＞1的产业政策	地市	M_j＞1的产业政策
西安	M*；C；N；R	延安	S**；I；P	榆林	G**；C
宝鸡	C；J；R*；G；U	汉中	U**；C	安康	C*
兰州	R**；U；I	天水	G***；J；R	酒泉	R*
嘉峪关	C；U	庆阳	U**；Q	武威	C；N；R；U*；I；A01
白银	N*；C；D；U	张掖	U***；G；R	平凉	G**；A01；N；Q；S
陇南	N***；C；J
西宁	G***；C；K	海东	I*
银川	L*；G；O	石嘴山	D*；B；C；N	固原	N*；S
乌鲁木齐	F；L；N；R	哈密	S**	博州	P
克拉玛依	P**；B	阿克苏	A03	巴州	A02*；C；M；N；P；Q
吐鲁番	G	塔城	B	克州	J*；G
伊犁	G***

基于产业视角的中国西北五省（区）地级市对“一带一路”倡议的政策响应研究

The policy responses to the Belt and Road Initiative in five provinces (districts) of Northwest China based on industry perspective

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

地市	突出产业政策	地市	突出产业政策	地市	突出产业政策
西安	C；M；N；R	延安	S；I	榆林	G；C
宝鸡	C；J；R；G；U	汉中	U；C	安康	C
兰州	R；U	天水	G；R	酒泉	R
嘉峪关	C；U	武威	C；N；R；U	庆阳	U；Q
白银	N；C；D；U	平凉	G；A01；N；S	张掖	U；G；R
陇南	N；C
西宁	G；C	海东	I
银川	G；L	石嘴山	C；D；N	固原	N；S
乌鲁木齐	R；F；L；N	哈密	S	博州	P
克拉玛依	P；B	阿克苏	A03	巴州	C；N；A02
吐鲁番	G	塔城	B	克州	G；J
伊犁	G

[1]	王运喆, 张国俊, 周春山. 中国城市群产业协同集聚的时空特征及影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(2): 104-114.
[2]	李安琪, 曹鑫, 崔喜红, 梁涵玮, 李强, 全振先, 张政. 基于GlobeLand 30的南亚各国人造地表变化时空特征分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(2): 23-35.
[3]	喻冰洁, 梁源, 杨林川. 波士顿共享单车出行与街区建成环境的关系研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(2): 48-58.
[4]	焦士兴, 王安周, 陈林芳, 张建伟, 赵荣钦, 李中轩, 尹义星. 中国省域三维水生态足迹及其驱动研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(5): 988-997.
[5]	吴丽君, 朱宇, 颜俊, 柯文前, 林李月. “一带一路”沿线国家或地区间人口迁移的空间格局及其演化特征[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(2): 249-258.
[6]	耿溪谣, 胡洋. 全球价值链视角下中国与印度信息产业国际竞争力的比较分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(2): 270-279.
[7]	冯晓兵. 中国民宿网络关注时空特征及影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(1): 154-165.
[8]	李聪, 卢明华. 中国跨境进口电商企业的时空特征及影响因素分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 937-947.
[9]	姚峪岩, 张翼飞, 金紫洋, 蒋烨. “一带一路”绿色贸易合作与竞争格局研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 792-801.
[10]	刘承良, 杜德斌, 李源. 服务“一带一路”的世界地理课程思政“金字塔”教学模式[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 873-881.
[11]	胡志丁, 葛岳静, 杜德斌, 刘玉立. 走向伟大复兴的中国地缘战略：国家周边论[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(3): 443-453.
[12]	胡建梅, 郝杰, 张意博, 张超. 中国对外援助的空间演化分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(3): 454-464.
[13]	陈伟, 翟国方, 沈志翔, 施益军. 1970—2015年中东地区恐怖袭击事件的时空特征分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(4): 659-668.
[14]	王海燕. “一带一路”视域下中国与中亚国家地缘经济合作比较研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(1): 18-29.
[15]	张晓平, 高珊珊, 陈明星, 刘卫东. 李希霍芬的中国考察及其当代人文-经济地理学价值刍议[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(1): 8-17.