主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

World Regional Studies ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 168-179.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.10.20230233

Previous Articles    

Tourism destination image and its influencing factors based on multi-source heterogeneous reviews:

Zehai HE(), Yuguo TAO(), Hongxia ZHANG   

  1. School of History Culture and Tourism, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
  • Received:2023-01-24 Revised:2023-07-20 Online:2024-10-15 Published:2024-10-24
  • Contact: Yuguo TAO

基于多源异构评论的旅游目的地形象及其影响因素

和泽海(), 陶玉国(), 张红霞   

  1. 江苏师范大学历史文化与旅游学院,徐州 221116
  • 通讯作者: 陶玉国
  • 作者简介:和泽海(1998—),女,硕士,研究方向为目的地形象、游客情感,E-mail:578479363@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(42071168);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新项目(KYCX22_2754)

Abstract:

Comments on both community-based and transaction-based platforms include tourism attractions, tourism services, and tourist emotions, but whether these two types will lead to similarities and differences in the overall image and segmented image is a proposition worth exploring. Based on the three-dimensional model of "cognition-emotion-integrity", Lijiang ancient city was used as the case area, Sina Weibo and Ctrip reviews representing community-based and transactional data respectively were used as the research data, combined with Python programming to call Baidu Sentiment Dictionary sentiment analysis method, used LDA to refine image themes, and constructed a co-occurrence relationship network map combining VOSviewer and Gephi to Analyze the similarities and differences between two types of data-driven overall image, cognitive image and emotional image and their influencing factors. The results show that 1) The overall image of destinations based on Sina Weibo's community-based and Ctrip's transaction-based reviews is mainly positive, with similar changes in annual image changes, and the distribution of emotional polarity is basically the same. 2) Although both community-based and transaction-based reviews can reflect cognitive and emotional image themes such as destination services, attractions, and environmental economy, the cognitive image theme score of the former is significantly higher than that of the latter, while the emotional image is the opposite. 3) There is little difference in the contribution rate of cognitive and emotional factors to the overall image of the destination driven by the two kinds of review data, while the effect of the economic price factor of the transaction type review is significantly higher than that of the community type review. The research provides a certain reference basis for using large-scale multi-source heterogeneous data to analyze destination image and tourism marketing work.

Key words: tourism destination image, multi-source data, sentiment analysis, LDA, the Old Town of Lijiang

摘要:

社区型和交易型平台的评论都包含旅游吸引物、旅游服务、游客情感等内容,但这两种类型是否会导致旅游目的地的整体形象和细分形象出现异同是一个值得探讨的命题。基于“认知-情感-整体”三维模型,以丽江古城为案例区,利用分别代表社区型和交易型数据的新浪微博和携程评论为研究数据,结合Python编程调用百度情感词典情感分析方法,利用LDA提炼形象主题,并构建VOSviewer与Gephi相结合的共现关系网络图谱,分析两类数据驱动的整体形象、认知形象和情感形象的异同及其影响因素。结果表明:1)基于新浪微博社区型和携程交易型评论的目的地整体形象都以正面为主,年度形象变化具有一定的相似性,情感极性分布基本一致。2)社区型和交易型评论虽都能体现出目的地服务、吸引物、环境经济等认知和情感方面的形象主题,但前者的认知形象主题评分明显高于后者,而情感形象则截然相反。3)认知和情感因素对两类评论数据驱动的目的地整体形象的贡献率总体相差较小,而交易型评论的经济价格因素所起的作用显著高于社区型评论。研究为利用大规模的多源异构数据分析目的地形象和旅游营销工作提供了一定的参考依据。

关键词: 旅游目的地形象, 多源数据, 情感分析, LDA, 丽江古城