主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 939-951.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.05.2019631

• 城市与区域 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国创新平台时空演变特征及影响因素

蔡丽茹1(), 杜志威2, 袁奇峰3   

  1. 1.广东省社会科学院改革开放与现代化研究所,广州 510635
    2.广州地理研究所,广州 510070
    3.华南理工大学建筑学院, 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室, 广州 510641
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-29 修回日期:2020-08-09 出版日期:2020-09-30 发布日期:2020-09-11
  • 作者简介:蔡丽茹(1983-),女,助理研究员,主要研究方向为城市创新和农村现代化,E-mail:liruchoi@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51878284);国家自然科学基金面上项目(41871107);广东省科学院实施创新驱动发展能力建设专项基金项目(2020GDASYL-20200104002)

Characteristics and influencing factors of tempo-spatial evolution of innovation platforms in China

Liru CAI1(), Zhiwei DU2, Qifeng YUAN3   

  1. 1.Institute of Reform, Opening Up and Modernization, Guangdong Academy of Social Sciences, Guangzhou 510635, China
    2.Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangzhou 510070, China
    3.School of Architecture, South China University of Technology, State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Architecture, Guangzhou 510641, China
  • Received:2019-11-29 Revised:2020-08-09 Online:2020-09-30 Published:2020-09-11

摘要:

通过对1984—2018年期间我国地级行政区高等级创新平台时空演变特征进行分析,得出创新平台发展经历了以下三个阶段:1)初步建成以基础理论类平台为主的阶段;2)以企业技术转化类平台为主体的阶段;3)以企业为主的多元化、开放式平台探索阶段。创新平台空间格局上呈现出:从北京单极化的点状布局,到向沿海沿江发达区域的线面发展以及中西部地区零星分布转变。目前形成了京津冀、长三角和珠三角三大国家级创新平台集聚区。从制度主义的视角出发,可以得出我国科技创新平台的发展正是国家创新政策演变轨迹的时空投影,其影响因素包括四个方面:创新主体地位转变与重新定位;密切产学研联系,促进市场导向型创新;培育和吸引高素质创新人才以及构建创新创业生态。

关键词: 科技创新平台, 空间布局, 制度演化, 影响因素

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of the high-level innovation platform of the prefecture level administrative regions in China from 1984 to 2017, the paper concludes that the development of the innovation platform has gone through the following three stages: 1) the initial stage of building a platform based on basic theory; 2) the stage of building a platform based on enterprise technology transformation; 3) the stage of exploring a diversified and open platform based on enterprise. The spatial pattern of innovation platforms show: The spatial distribution has transformed from the single polarized point in Beijing to the line- and surface-based development along coastal and riverside developed areas together with some sporadic areas in the central and western regions. At present, there are three national innovation platform clusters in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta. From the perspective of institutionalism, it can be concluded that the development of China's science and technology innovation platforms are just the temporal and spatial projection of the evolution track of national innovation policy, and its influencing factors include four aspects: the transformation and reorientation of the position of innovation subject; the close relationship between production, learning and research, the promotion of market-oriented innovation; the cultivation and attraction of high-quality innovation talents and the construction of innovation and entrepreneurship ecology.

Key words: scientific and technological innovation platform, spatial layout, institutional evolution, influencing factors