江苏省县域乡村地域功能转型与经济发展耦合协调的时空格局分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.04.2021490

世界地理研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 72-83.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.04.2021490

江苏省县域乡村地域功能转型与经济发展耦合协调的时空格局分析

魏璐瑶^a^,^b^,^c(), 陆玉麒^a^,^b^,^c(), 陈娱^a^,^b

^a.南京师范大学，地理科学学院，南京 210023
^b.南京师范大学，江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心，南京 210023
^c.南京师范大学，乡村振兴研究院，南京 210023

收稿日期:2021-07-04 修回日期:2021-10-31 出版日期:2023-04-15 发布日期:2023-05-19
通讯作者: 陆玉麒
作者简介:魏璐瑶（1992—），女，博士，讲师，主要研究方向为区域规划与城乡发展，E-mail： lmyxpeking@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42201212);教育部人文社会科学一般项目(22YJCZH185);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目(2022SJYB0248)

Temporal-spatial pattern and coupling characteristics of rural functions transformation and economic development in Jiangsu Province's county units

Luyao WEI^a^,^b^,^c(), Yuqi LU^a^,^b^,^c(), Yu CHEN^a^,^b

^a.School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
^b.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
^c.Rural Vitalization Research Institute, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2021-07-04 Revised:2021-10-31 Online:2023-04-15 Published:2023-05-19
Contact: Yuqi LU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

明晰乡村地域功能转型特征、发挥经济比较优势是积极响应乡村振兴战略的重要举措。基于江苏省县域尺度1997、2002、2007、2012、2017年5期截面数据，通过构建乡村转型度模型和耦合协调度模型，探究乡村地域功能转型水平与经济发展程度的时空耦合规律。结果表明：①研究期内，江苏省乡村地域功能转型水平先下降后逐渐回升，高速转型地域单元南部扩散趋势明显。研究末期苏北地区乡村地域功能中高速转型单元热点集聚，苏中地区乡村地域功能转型发展程度有待提升。②江苏省县域乡村经济增长空间集聚效应逐渐增强，苏北地区县域乡村经济加速增长成效显著，县域经济增长空间均衡化和辐射扩散趋势明显。③江苏省县域乡村地域功能转型与经济发展的耦合协调格局具有基本一致性，研究初期的高水平协同发展演化为研究中期的低水平耦合协调发展，研究末期再次形成有序优质协调发展。二者耦合协调作用形成6种空间协同类型，具体为经济滞后区、协同滞后区、经济提升区、转型提升区、优化升级区和先行发展区。

关键词: 乡村转型, 地域功能, 经济发展, 耦合协调关系, 发展路径, 江苏省

Abstract:

Exploring the temporal-spatial coupling rules between territorial functions transformation level and economic development degree under the reorganization of rural development factors is helpful to coordinate the human-land relationship and promote the integration of urban and rural development. On the basis of five cross-sectional data of the county scale of Jiangsu Province in 1997, 2002, 2007, 2012 and 2017, this paper discusses the characteristics of rural territorial functions transformation and its temporal-spatial correlation rule with economic development level by constructing rural transformation degree model and coupling coordination model. The results show that : (1) During the study period, the level of rural territorial functions transformation in Jiangsu Province gradually picked up after decrease, and the spread of high-speed transformation areas towards southern Jiangsu Province has become apparent. At the end of the study, the hot spots of rural territorialfunctions transformation with medium and high-speed in northern Jiangsu gathered, and the transformation degree in central Jiangsu needs to be improved. (2) The spatial agglomeration effect of rural economic growth in Jiangsu Province has gradually strengthened, and the effect of rural economic acceleration in northern Jiangsu was remarkable. The spatial balance and radiate diffusion trend of economic growth among counties became obvious. (3) The coupling and coordinated development pattern of rural territorial functions transformation and economic development in Jiangsu Province was basically consistent. The high-level coordinated development in the early stage of the study evolved into the low-level coordinated development in the middle stage, and finally formed the orderly and high-quality coordinated development again at the end of the study.According to the coupling and coordinated relationship between the rural territorial functions transformation and economic development, we further defined six types including economic lag zone, coordination lag zone, economic upgrading zone, transformation and upgrading zone, optimization and upgrading zone, and advanced development zone. We also further clarify the development direction and driving mechanism of various collaboration relationships.

Key words: rural transformation, economic development, time-frequency cycle, coupling and coordination relationship, development path, Jiangsu Province

魏璐瑶, 陆玉麒, 陈娱. 江苏省县域乡村地域功能转型与经济发展耦合协调的时空格局分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(4): 72-83.

Luyao WEI, Yuqi LU, Yu CHEN. Temporal-spatial pattern and coupling characteristics of rural functions transformation and economic development in Jiangsu Province's county units[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(4): 72-83.

图/表 10

图1 研究区示意图

Fig.1 Schematic map of study area

表1 乡村地域功能转型度评价指标体系

Tab.1 Evaluation index system of rural functions transformation level

目标层	指标层	性质	平均权重
生产功能转型（PF）	人均粮食产量变化率x₁	+	0.038
	人均耕地面积变化率x₂	+	0.016
	土地垦殖率变化率x₃	+	0.017
	第一产业产值占比变化率x₄	+	0.103
	第一产业就业率变化率x₅	+	0.102
	人均林牧渔产值变化率x₆	+	0.027
生活功能转型（VF）	农民人均纯收入变化率x₇	+	0.114
	人均固定资产投资变化率x₈	+	0.049
	农民受教育程度变化率x₉	+	0.116
	公路交通密度变化率x₁₀	+	0.033
	每万人拥有病床位数变化率x₁₁	+	0.103
	人均社会消费品零售总额变化率x₁₂	+	0.078
生态功能转型（EF）	地均农用化肥施用量变化率x₁₃	－	0.087
	地均农药使用量变化率x₁₄	－	0.028
	农用化肥施用强度变化率x₁₅	－	0.065
	归一化植被指数均值变化率x₁₆	+	0.024

表2 乡村地域功能转型与经济发展协调性评价分类判别标准

Tab.2 The classification criteria for evaluating the coordination of rural regional functional transformation and economic development

耦合度C	耦合阶段	耦合强度	协调度	协调区间	协调程度
0≤C<0.420	低水平耦合	极弱耦合	0≤D<0.385	失衡衰退区	严重失调
0.420≤C<0.480	拮抗阶段	低等耦合	0.385≤D<0.435	过渡协调区	轻度失调
0.480≤C<0.495	磨合阶段	中等耦合	0.435≤D<0.470	优化协调区	一般协调
0.495≤C<1	高水平耦合	高等耦合	0.470≤D<1	高度协调区	优质协调

图2 江苏省乡村地域功能转型的时空演化特征

Fig.2 Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of rural territorial functions transformation in Jiangsu Province

图3 江苏省经济发展的空间格局与演化特征

Fig.3 Spatial pattern and evolution characteristics of economic development in Jiangsu Province

图4 江苏省县域经济发展的主周期特征

Fig.4 The main cycle of economic development at county level in Jiangsu Province

表3 江苏省乡村地域功能转型与经济发展的非参数相关性

Tab.3 Nonparametric correlation between rural functions transformation and economic development in Jiangsu Province

研究时段	相关程度	显著性
1997—2002年	－0.326^*	0.037
2003—2007年	－0.485^**	0.001
2008—2012年	－0.349^*	0.025
2013—2017年	0.200	0.209

图5 江苏省乡村地域功能转型与经济发展的耦合特征

Fig.5 Coupling characteristics of rural territorial functions transformation and economic development in Jiangsu Province

图6 江苏省乡村地域功能转型与经济发展的协调特征

Fig.6 Coordination characteristics of rural territorial functions transformation and economic development in Jiangsu Province

图7 江苏省县域乡村地域功能转型与经济发展的空间协同类型

Fig.7 Spatial coordination types of rural territorial functions transformation and economic development at county level in Jiangsu Province

参考文献 29

1	刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略. 地理学报, 2019, 74: 2511-2528.
	LIU Y, ZHOU Y, LI Y. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74: 2511-2528.
2	房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨—超越"现代化"发展模式. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.
	FANG Y, LIU J. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.
3	樊立惠, 王鹏飞, 王成, 等. 中国农村空间商品化与乡村重构及其研究展望. 地理科学, 2019, 39(2): 316-324.
	Fan L, WANG P, WANG C, et al. Commodification of rural spaces and rural restructuring and their future research directions in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 316-324.
4	杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼, 等. 中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望—逻辑主线与内容框架. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(8): 1019-1030.
	YANG R, LIU Y, LONG H, et al. Research progress and prospect of rural transformation and reconstruction in China: paradigms and main content. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(8): 1019-1030.
5	MA W, JIANG G, ZHANG R, et al. Achieving rural spatial restructuring in China: A suitable framework to understand how structural transitions in rural residential land differ across peri-urban interface?. Land Use Policy,2018,75(6): 583-593.
6	TU S, LONG H, ZHANG Y, et al. Rural restructuring at village level under rapid urbanization in metropolitan suburbs of China and its implications for innovations in land use policy. Habitat International, 2018, 77(7): 143-152.
7	唐承丽, 贺艳华, 周国华, 等. 基于生活质量导向的乡村聚落空间优化研究. 地理学报, 2014, 69(10): 1459-1472.
	TANG C, HE Y, ZHOU G, et al. The research on optimization mode of spatial organization of rural settlements oriented by life quality. ActaGeographica Sinica, 2014, 69(10): 1459-1472.
8	YANG Y, LIU Y, LI Y, et al. Measure of urban-rural transformation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in the new millennium: Population-land-industry perspective. Land Use Policy, 2018, 79(10): 595-60.
9	马晓东, 李鑫, 顾晓波, 等. 城乡融合视角下淮海经济区城乡转型特征与路径. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1853-1866.
	MA X, LI X, GU X, et al. The charateristics and path of urban-rural transition in Huaihai Economic Zone from the perspective of urban-rural integration. Journal of Natrural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1853-1866.
10	王艳飞, 刘彦随, 李玉恒. 乡村转型发展格局与驱动机制的区域性分析. 经济地理, 2016, 36(5): 135-142.
	WANG Y, LIU Y, LI Y. The spatial disparity of rural transition development and regional characteristics of its driving forces. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(5): 135-142.
11	PINTO-CORREIA T, GUIOMAR N, GUERRA A, et al. Assessing the ability of rural areas to fulfill multiple societal demands. Land Use Policy, 2016, 53(4): 86-96.
12	HAN D, QIAO J, ZHU Q. Rural-spatial restructuring promoted by land-use transitions: A case study of Zhulin Town in Central China. Land, 2021, 10(3): 234.
13	胡书玲, 余斌, 王明杰. 乡村重构与转型: 西方经验及启示. 地理研究, 2019, 38(12): 2833-2845.
	HU S, YU B, WANG M. Rural restructuring and transformation: Western experience and its enlightenment to China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(12): 2833-2845.
14	DAVID K, PETER O, THOMPSON C. The urban-rural manufacturing shift in the European community. Urban Studies, 1983, 20(3): 405-418.
15	MICHAEL W. Precarious rural cosmopolitanism: Negotiating globalization, migration and diversity in Irish small towns. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018, 64(4): 164-176.
16	CAO Z, LIU Y, LI Y. Rural transition in the loess hilly and gully region: From the perspective of "flowing"cropland. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022(93):326-335.
17	曹智, 李裕瑞, 陈玉服. 城乡融合背景下乡村转型与可持续发展路径探析. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2560-2571.
	CAO Z, LI Y, CHEN Y. Approaches to rural transformation and sustainable development in the context of urban-rural integration. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2560-2571.
18	徐凯, 房艳刚. 乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别—以辽宁省78个区县为例. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 482-495.
	XU K, FANG Y. Spatial differentiation and type identification of rural territorial multi-functions in Liaoning Province. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 482-495.
19	卓蓉蓉, 余斌, 曾菊新, 等. 中国重点农区乡村地域功能演变及其影响机理—以江汉平原为例. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(1): 56-68.
	ZHUO R, YU B, ZENG J, et al. Change and mechanism of influence of rural territorial functions in major agricultural areas of China: A case study of the Jianghan Plain. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(1): 56-68.
20	辛修昌, 邵磊, 顾朝林, 等. 从"做什么"到 "不做什么":基于"多规融合"的县域空间管制体系构建. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(3): 15-21.
	XIN X, SHAO L, GU C, et al. From "what to do" to "what not to do": The construction of county spatial control system based on "multiple planning coordination". Urban development studies, 2016, 23(3): 15-21.
21	黄丽娟, 马晓东. 江苏省县域经济与乡村转型发展的空间协同型分析. 经济地理, 2018, 38(6): 151-159.
	HUANG L, MA X. Spatial coupling cooperative analysis of economic development and rural transformation in Jiangsu Province. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(6): 151-159.
22	李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 49-65.
	LI G, FANG C. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1): 49-65.
23	李婷婷, 龙花楼. 基于转型与协调视角的乡村发展分析—以山东省为例. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 531-541.
	LI T, LONG H. Rural development from viewpoints of transformation and coordination: A case of Shandong Province. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 531-541.
24	吕承超, 崔悦. 乡村振兴发展:指标评价体系、地区差距与空间极化. 农业经济问题, 2021(5): 20-32.
	LV C, CUI Y. Rural vitalization and development: Evaluation index system, regional disparity and spatial polarization. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021(5): 20-32.
25	闫周府, 吴方卫. 从二元分割走向融合发展—乡村振兴评价指标体系研究. 经济学家, 2019(6): 90-103.
	YAN Z, WU F. From binary segmentation to convergence development: A study on the evaluation index system of rural revitalization. Economist, 2019(6): 90-103.
26	陈洪海. 基于信息可替代性的评价指标筛选研究. 统计与信息论坛, 2016, 31(10): 17-22.
	CHEN H. Study of evaluation indices screening based on information substitutability. Journal of Statistics and Information, 2016, 31(10): 17-22.
27	魏璐瑶, 陈晓红.基于精明发展的城市绩效与生态环境耦合研究—以哈长城市群为例. 地理科学, 2017, 37(7): 1032-1039.
	WEI L, CHEN X. Coupling research between urban performance and ecological environment based on smart development: A case study of Harbin-Changchun City Group. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(7):1032-1039.
28	丛晓男. 耦合度模型的形式、性质及在地理学中的若干误用. 经济地理, 2019, 39(4): 18-25.
	CONG X. Expression and mathematical property of coupling model, and its misuse in geographical science. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(4): 18-25.
29	王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等. 国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 793-810.
	WANG S, KONG W, REN L, et al. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(3): 793-810.

[1]	李在军, 胡美娟. 江苏省生态福利绩效时空演化及影响机制研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(3): 124-135.
[2]	薛明月. 黄河流域经济发展与生态环境耦合协调的时空格局研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(6): 1261-1272.
[3]	刘守威, 张玉玲, 刘菥雯. 中国省际空间经济发展关系动态演进分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(6): 1285-1297.
[4]	张筱娟, 汤琪凤, 廖紫薇. 江苏省研发企业空间格局演化及其影响因素分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(5): 1034-1045.
[5]	韩刚, 史修松, 唐乐, 刘志敏. 基于交通流的江苏省城市网络结构与空间格局形变[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(1): 85-95.
[6]	廖佶慧, 彭贤伟, 王权, 简萍, 吴清婷. 海峡西岸城市群城市土地利用效益评价及其耦合协调关系研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(3): 556-566.
[7]	张佳, 王琛. 电子商务对农村经济发展影响及其空间差异研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(5): 952-961.
[8]	王成, 王茂军, 樊立惠. 日企对华投资动机与地方区位要素禀赋耦合关系研判[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(1): 30-42.
[9]	郭忻怡. 基于DMSP/OLS与NDVI的江苏省碳排放的空间分布模拟[J]. 世界地理研究, 2016, (4): 102-110.
[10]	唐晓丹仇方道朱传耿张纯敏姚晓蔚. 江苏省经济与环境协调发展时空格局分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2015, 24(02): 68-77.
[11]	张荣天. 江苏省城市网络空间结构演化特征与驱动机制[J]. 世界地理研究, 2015, 24(01): 68-75.
[12]	张建伟，赵建吉，张战仁 . 江苏省研发产业空间差异演变研究 [J]. 世界地理研究, 2013, 22(15): 123-130.

江苏省县域乡村地域功能转型与经济发展耦合协调的时空格局分析

Temporal-spatial pattern and coupling characteristics of rural functions transformation and economic development in Jiangsu Province's county units

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 29

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics