均衡发展背景下优质基础教育资源分布与住房价格的空间关联研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.06.20222022

世界地理研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 141-153.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.06.20222022

• 文化与社会 • 上一篇

均衡发展背景下优质基础教育资源分布与住房价格的空间关联研究

林伊婷¹^,²^,⁵(), 陈虹²(), 杨家文¹, 黄慧明³, 林雄斌⁴

^1.北京大学（深圳）研究生院城市规划与设计学院，深圳 518055
^2.华南师范大学地理科学学院，广州 510631
^3.广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院，广州 510060
^4.宁波大学地理与空间信息技术系，宁波 315211
^5.新南威尔士大学建成环境学院，悉尼 2052

收稿日期:2022-07-07 修回日期:2022-08-19 出版日期:2024-06-15 发布日期:2024-06-28
通讯作者: 陈虹
作者简介:林伊婷（1998—），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为公共服务空间研究，E-mail：670590544@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家社科重大项目(20ZDA036);国家自然科学基金项目(41401194)

Research on the spatial correlation between the high-quality basic education resources and housing prices to pursuing a balanced development: A case study of Guangzhou

Yiting LIN¹^,²^,⁵(), Hong CHEN²(), Jiawen YANG¹, Huiming HUANG³, Xiongbin LIN⁴

^1.School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University (Shenzhen) Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China
^2.School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
^3.Guangzhou Urban Planning and Design Survey Research Institute, Guangzhou 510060, China
^4.Department of Geography and Spatial Information Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
^5.School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia

Received:2022-07-07 Revised:2022-08-19 Online:2024-06-15 Published:2024-06-28
Contact: Hong CHEN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

促进优质基础教育覆盖率提高及均衡分布、控制大城市房价高涨是当前城市可持续发展和社会公平领域的讨论热点。以广州市街镇一级行政区划为案例研究单元，基于2018年包括POI在内的多源数据，探究学区化管理政策下不同类型优质基础教育资源分布与住房价格的空间关联性。研究发现：①决定二者空间关系的主要因素包括公共财政投入、教育改革、招生政策、人口、生源、街镇所处的市辖区历史及地方空间规划和发展功能定位等；②从不同学段来看，优质小学的分布密度与房价的相关性最高，其次是幼儿园、初中、高中依次递减；③从全市范围来看，基础教育资源的质量和房价分布在空间上均有“中心高-边缘低”的特征，街镇一级的优质学校密度越高，房价越高；④把城市划分为中心区、近郊区和远郊区三个圈层，发现中心区的学区房效应极高，各级各类的优质学校均与房价呈强关联；在近郊区，优质民办学校聚集的特征明显，其中市一级民办幼儿园与房价的关联性最强；而在远郊区，优质学校分布较少，房价也明显比中心区低，二者在街镇一级尺度的空间关系并不明显。研究建议未来应打破优质基础教育资源和住宅间的空间关联性，通过均衡选址规划名校校区，改善中心区与郊区基础教育资源分布不均的状况。

关键词: 优质基础教育, 房价, 空间关联, 均衡发展, 广州

Abstract:

The studies on balancing high-quality basic education development and controlling the increasing housing prices for sustainable development and social equity in big cities have drawn a huge academic attention. Taking Guangzhou's sub-districts as study areas, this research investigates the relationships of spatial distribution between housing prices and the high-quality schools with different grades and stages through examining point of interest (POI) data. The results show that: ① The public fiscal investment, educational reforms, enrollment changes, population numbers, applicant poll, as well as the local history, spatial planning and its functions are key factors that affect the spatial relationships between high-quality schools and housing prices. ② From the perspective of educational stages, high-quality elementary schools contribute the greatest correlation with housing prices, while sequentially the kindergartens, secondary schools and high schools are less related. ③ The general spatial correlation presents a "core-periphery" differentiation between the inner city and the suburban area from high to low in the municipality of Guangzhou; while in sub-districts level, the higher the density of high-quality schools, the more costly the housing it is. ④ There is a strong correlation relationship between the density of high-quality public schools and the high housing prices in city core, and there is a high agglomeration of high-quality private schools in the suburbs, especially the private kindergartens at the municipal level, contributes the greatest correlation with housing prices, while there is no correlation between the high quality schools and housing prices in the outskirts. The research calls for a reform to decrease the strong correlation between the high quality basic education and housing prices through rational planning by locating more better schools to suburban areas to change the imbalance of basic education distribution in Chinese cities.

Key words: high-quality basic education, housing price, spatial correlation, balanced development, Guangzhou

林伊婷, 陈虹, 杨家文, 黄慧明, 林雄斌. 均衡发展背景下优质基础教育资源分布与住房价格的空间关联研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(6): 141-153.

Yiting LIN, Hong CHEN, Jiawen YANG, Huiming HUANG, Xiongbin LIN. Research on the spatial correlation between the high-quality basic education resources and housing prices to pursuing a balanced development: A case study of Guangzhou[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(6): 141-153.

图/表 7

参考文献 37

1	张浩,李仲飞,邓柏峻.教育资源配置机制与房价——我国教育资本化现象的实证分析.金融研究,2014(5):193-206.
	ZHANG H, LI Z, DENG B.Education resource allocation mechanisms and housing prices:An empirical analysis of education capitalization in China.Journal of Financial Research,2014(5):193-206.
2	尹上岗,胡信,马志飞,等.基于教育公平视角的城市学区房价格时空效应——以南京主城区公办小学为例.经济地理,2019,39(9):82-93.
	YIN S, HU X, MA Z,et al.Spatial and temporal effects of housing price in urban school districts based on education equity:A case study of public primary school in the main urban area of Nanjing. Economic Geography,2019,39(9):82-93.
3	石忆邵. 从单中心城市到多中心城市——中国特大城市发展的空间组织模式.城市规划汇刊,1999(3):36-39.
	SHI Y. From a single center city to a multi center city: The spatial organization model of the development of China's mega cities. Urban Planning Forum, 1999(3):36-39.
4	薛二勇.基础教育名校办分校的政策分析——基于北京市基础教育均衡发展政策的调查研究.教育科学研究,2014(7):45-50.
	XUE E.Analysis of the policy of establishing branch schools of famous schools:Based on investigation of the balanced development policy of basic education in Beijing. Educational Science Research, 2014(7):45-50.
5	曲绍卫,袁东.论县域教育均衡发展的机制模式.教育理论与实践,2006(5):32-35.
	QU S, YUAN D.On the mechanism patterns of even educational development in the counties.Theory and Practice of Education,2006(5):32-35.
6	郭丹丹,郑金洲.学区化办学:预期、挑战与对策.教育研究,2015,36(9):72-77.
	GUO D, ZHENG J.District oriented school running: Anticipations,challenges and countermeasures.Educational Research,2015,36(9):72-77.
7	广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院. 新时期广州市基础教育设施专项规划探索实践.(2019-12-16)[2022-08-19]. .
	Guangzhou Urban planning and Design Survey Research Institute.Exploration and practice of special planning of basic education facilities in Guangzhou in the new period.(2019-12-16)[2022-08-19]. .
8	HARVEY D. Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold,1973.
9	LEFEBVRE H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell,1991.
10	RAWLS J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1971.
11	TIEBOUTI C. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 1956,64(5):416-424.
12	梁若冰,汤韵.地方公共品供给中的Tiebout模型:基于中国城市房价的经验研究.世界经济,2008(10):71-83.
	LIANG R, TANG Y.Tiebout Model in the supply of local public goods: An empirical study based on urban housing prices in china.The Journal of World Economy,2008(10):71-83.
13	NGUYEN-HOANG P, YINGER J. The capitalization of school quality into house values: A review. Journal of Housing Economics,2011,20(1):30-48.
14	ZHENG S, HU W, WANG R. How much is a good school worth in Beijing? Identifying price premium with paired resale and rental data. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2016,53(2):184-199.
15	FENG H, LU M. School quality and housing prices: Empirical evidence based on a natural experiment in Shanghai, China. Journal of Housing Economics,2013,22(4):291-307.
16	宋煜,崔娜娜,沈体雁."学区房"的教育溢价测度研究——以北京市为例.价格理论与实践,2018(2):37-40.
	SONG Y, CUI N, SHEN T.Research on the educational premium of school district housing: A case study of Beijing. Price: Theory & Practice,2018(2):37-40.
17	孙斌艺.住宅市场的微观结构:关于教育因素对上海住宅价格影响的计量经济分析.财贸经济,2008(9):114-118.
	SUN B.The microcosmic structure of housing market: An econometric analysis of the influence of education factors on housing prices in Shanghai. Finance & Trade Economics,2008(9):114-118.
18	杨林川,张衔春,洪世键,等.公共服务设施步行可达性对住宅价格的影响——基于累积机会的可达性度量方法.南方经济,2016(1):57-70.
	YANG L, ZHANG X, HONG S,et al.The impact of walking accessibility of public services on housing prices: Based on the cumulative opportunities measure. South China Journal of Economics,2016(1):57-70.
19	毛丰付,罗刚飞,潘加顺.优质教育资源对杭州学区房价格影响研究.城市与环境研究,2014,1(2):53-64.
	MAO F, LUO G, PAN J.The effect of elementary education on the price of Hangzhou school district housing. Urban and Environmental Studies,2014,1(2):53-64.
20	李从容,朱世见,葛鹏宇.南京市秦淮区学区房特征价格影响因素.地域研究与开发,2019,38(2):92-96.
	LI C, ZHU S, GE P.Influencing factors of housing hedonic price in the school district of Qinhuai District in Nanjing City. Areal Research and Development,2019,38(2):92-96.
21	温海珍,杨尚,秦中伏.城市教育配套对住宅价格的影响:基于公共品资本化视角的实证分析.中国土地科学,2013,27(1):34-40.
	WEN H, YANG S, QIN Z.The impact of educational facilities on housing price: An empirical analysis from the perspective of the capitalization for public goods. China Land Sciences,2013,27(1):34-40.
22	ZHANG J, LI H, LIN J, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between high quality basic education resources and housing prices. Land Use Policy, 2020(99):104843.
23	边艳,周春山,胡锦灿.基于住房需求意愿的广州市中产阶层住房区位选择.热带地理,2020,40(5):832-842.
	BIAN Y, ZHOU C, HU J.Characteristics and influence factors of middle-class's housing location choice behavior on residents' housing demand in Guangzhou, China. Tropical Geography,2020,40(5):832-842.
24	张周青,徐梦洁,庄舜尧.国内城市教育设施对周边住房价格影响的文献综述.现代城市研究,2015(8):2-6.
	ZHANG Z, XU M, ZHUANG S. A review on the impacts of educational facilities on neighboring housing price in China. Modern Urban Research,2015(8):2-6.
25	WEN H, ZHANG Y, ZHANG L. Do educational facilities affect housing price? An empirical study in Hangzhou, China. Habitat International, 2014(42):155-163.
26	张品.教育与城市空间生产——以天津市为例.天津:南开大学,2011.
	ZHANG P.Education and urban space production: A case study of Tianjin. Tianjin: Nankai University,2011.
27	赵丹.基础教育不平等的空间效应研究.南京:南京大学,2019.
	ZHAO D. Research on the spatial effect of inequality in basic education. Nanjing: Nanjing University,2019.
28	杭州城研中心."EOD"模式:破解教育发展痛点的探索.(2020-09-02)[2022-08-19]. .
	Hangzhou Urban Research Center. "EOD" mode: Exploring the key issues of education development.(2020-09-02)[2022-08-19]..
29	涂唐奇,陈江龙,魏也华,等.南京市基础教育设施空间结构及其演化.中国科学院大学学报,2018,35(1):66-74.
	TU T, CHEN J, WEI Y,et al.Spatial structure and evolution of basic education facilities in Nanjing in China.Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2018,35(1):66-74.
30	郑思齐,徐杨菲,谷一桢.如何应对"职住分离":"疏"还是"堵".学术月刊,2014,46(5):29-39.
	ZHENG S, XU Y, GU Y.Rethinking "jobs-housing balance":Providing more choices rather than imposing constraints.Academic Monthly,2014,46(5):29-39.
31	高军波,周春山,叶昌东.广州城市公共服务设施分布的空间公平研究.规划师,2010,26(4):12-18.
	GAO J, ZHOU C, YE C.The equitable distribution of public services in Guangzhou. Planners,2010,26(4):12-18.
32	School TALEN E.,community,and spatial equity : An empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in west Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,2001,91(3):465-486.
33	DHAR P, ROSS S. School district quality and property values: Examining differences along school district boundaries. Journal of Urban Economics,2012,71(1):18-25.
34	周远翔,宋旭光,张丽霞.教育财政投入、空间收敛与基础教育公平.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019(5):135-147.
	ZHOU Y, SONG X, ZHANG L.Educational finance investment,spatial convergence and basic education equity. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences),2019(5):135-147.
35	张旭,陈国华.19个重点大城市义务教育均衡发展监测与评价.现代教育管理,2017(2):43-49.
	ZHANG X, CHEN G.Monitoring and evaluation of the balanced development of compulsory education in 19 key large cities.Modern Education Management,2017(2):43-49.
36	赵金丽,宋金平.城市新增公共服务资源与新增住房的空间匹配性研究——基于北京市郊区化进程中相关问题的案例分析.城市问题,2020,(11):36-42.
	ZHAO J, SONG J.Research on spatial matching between new public service resources and new housing:Take the suburbs of Beijing as an example.Urban Problems,2020,(11):36-42.
37	彭岩.居住郊区化配套设施建设与可持续发展.广州大学学报(社会科学版),2011,10(8):60-62.
	PENG Y.Residence suburbanization: Ancillary facility construction and sustainable development.Journal of Guangzhou University(Social Science Edition),2011,10(8):60-62.

		中心区				近郊区			远郊区
辖区		越秀	天河	海珠	荔湾	白云	黄埔	番禺	南沙	花都	增城	从化
面积占全市比例/%		0.45	1.30	1.22	0.79	10.70	6.51	7.13	10.54	13.05	21.74	26.56
常住人口/万人		117.9	174.7	169.4	97.0	271.4	111.4	177.7	75.17	109.3	121.9	64.7
非户籍人口比例/%		0.08	46.23	37.65	23.15	61.93	52.64	44.32	41.56	28.39	21.91	1.89
适龄人口密度/（人/km²）		3 859.8	2 152.1	2 172.7	1 814.8	408.3	306.4	414.0	102.2	165.5	111.0	59.2
在校生/万人	幼儿园	3.07	4.66	4.19	2.7	9.06	3.05	8.63	2.7	3.34	5.69	2.74
	小学	7.03	11.46	8.89	6.26	16.12	6.76	14.8	4.73	14.31	10.19	5.3
	初中	3.23	3.55	3.06	2.41	4.49	2.31	4.77	1.66	4.4	3.28	1.88
	高中	2.63	1.38	1.33	1.53	1.66	0.75	2.46	0.64	1.32	1.62	1.05
总计学校/所		201	330	278	199	581	208	524	192	299	351	175
优质学校比例/%		47.26	23.94	24.10	28.64	13.25	19.71	21.95	20.31	17.39	12.54	22.86
平均房价/(万元/m²)		4.10	4.17	3.67	3.18	2.80	2.62	2.51	1.73	1.61	1.64	1.24

		中心区				近郊区			远郊区
辖区		越秀	天河	海珠	荔湾	白云	黄埔	番禺	南沙	花都	增城	从化
面积占全市比例/%		0.45	1.30	1.22	0.79	10.70	6.51	7.13	10.54	13.05	21.74	26.56
常住人口/万人		117.9	174.7	169.4	97.0	271.4	111.4	177.7	75.17	109.3	121.9	64.7
非户籍人口比例/%		0.08	46.23	37.65	23.15	61.93	52.64	44.32	41.56	28.39	21.91	1.89
适龄人口密度/（人/km²）		3 859.8	2 152.1	2 172.7	1 814.8	408.3	306.4	414.0	102.2	165.5	111.0	59.2
在校生/万人	幼儿园	3.07	4.66	4.19	2.7	9.06	3.05	8.63	2.7	3.34	5.69	2.74
	小学	7.03	11.46	8.89	6.26	16.12	6.76	14.8	4.73	14.31	10.19	5.3
	初中	3.23	3.55	3.06	2.41	4.49	2.31	4.77	1.66	4.4	3.28	1.88
	高中	2.63	1.38	1.33	1.53	1.66	0.75	2.46	0.64	1.32	1.62	1.05
总计学校/所		201	330	278	199	581	208	524	192	299	351	175
优质学校比例/%		47.26	23.94	24.10	28.64	13.25	19.71	21.95	20.31	17.39	12.54	22.86
平均房价/(万元/m²)		4.10	4.17	3.67	3.18	2.80	2.62	2.51	1.73	1.61	1.64	1.24

区位		中心区				近郊区			远郊区
辖区		越秀	天河	海珠	荔湾	白云	黄埔	番禺	南沙	花都	增城	从化
幼儿园	优质数/所	28	33	20	16	26	18	51	12	12	17	132
幼儿园	优质比例/%	23.93	15.79	12.58	14.81	7.88	16.51	15.94	11.32	10.34	8.95	15.85
小学	优质数/所	44	30	25	26	28	14	36	14	24	11	12
小学	优质比例/%	88.00	42.86	30.49	50.98	15.82	21.88	26.87	22.95	23.08	10.48	17.91
初中	优质数/所	26	16	22	14	21	9	24	14	18	119	14
初中	优质比例/%	78.79	31.37	62.86	35.90	31.82	25.71	37.50	56.00	23.68	22.45	56.00
高中	优质数/所	15	10	11	8	11	6	14	6	8	9	7
高中	优质比例/%	83.33	83.33	100.00	100.00	84.62	85.71	100.00	85.71	88.89	81.82	87.50
幼儿园	优质学校密度/（所/米²*10³）	887.57	290.67	221.24	287.65	32.67	35.11	100.01	15.31	12.37	9.9	6.58
小学		1 301.78	311.43	276.55	439.93	35.19	28.92	67.93	17.86	24.74	6.8	6.08
初中		236.69	62.29	121.68	101.52	15.08	6.2	26.42	8.93	8.25	4.33	4.05
高中		532.54	93.43	121.68	135.36	15.08	10.33	26.42	6.38	8.25	5.57	3.55

区位		中心区				近郊区			远郊区
辖区		越秀	天河	海珠	荔湾	白云	黄埔	番禺	南沙	花都	增城	从化
幼儿园	优质数/所	28	33	20	16	26	18	51	12	12	17	132
幼儿园	优质比例/%	23.93	15.79	12.58	14.81	7.88	16.51	15.94	11.32	10.34	8.95	15.85
小学	优质数/所	44	30	25	26	28	14	36	14	24	11	12
小学	优质比例/%	88.00	42.86	30.49	50.98	15.82	21.88	26.87	22.95	23.08	10.48	17.91
初中	优质数/所	26	16	22	14	21	9	24	14	18	119	14
初中	优质比例/%	78.79	31.37	62.86	35.90	31.82	25.71	37.50	56.00	23.68	22.45	56.00
高中	优质数/所	15	10	11	8	11	6	14	6	8	9	7
高中	优质比例/%	83.33	83.33	100.00	100.00	84.62	85.71	100.00	85.71	88.89	81.82	87.50
幼儿园	优质学校密度/（所/米²*10³）	887.57	290.67	221.24	287.65	32.67	35.11	100.01	15.31	12.37	9.9	6.58
小学		1 301.78	311.43	276.55	439.93	35.19	28.92	67.93	17.86	24.74	6.8	6.08
初中		236.69	62.29	121.68	101.52	15.08	6.2	26.42	8.93	8.25	4.33	4.05
高中		532.54	93.43	121.68	135.36	15.08	10.33	26.42	6.38	8.25	5.57	3.55

[1]	邹宇, 李禕. 广佛同城化发展背景下住房价格时空格局及机制研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(5): 136-149.
[2]	刘向杰, 王敏, 刘承良. 创业空间的微区位模式及影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(8): 73-87.
[3]	郑玉萍, 买欣, 王敏. 认知、认同与溢出：广州老年学习型空间的情感地理研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(6): 167-180.
[4]	刘望保, 李彤彤. 基于手机信令数据的广州市社区建成环境对居民通勤距离的影响研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(5): 79-90.
[5]	刘美新, 蔡晓梅, 朱竑. 跨国精英移民的日常生活实践与扎根的家：广州案例[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(4): 144-155.
[6]	王丽敏, 吴相利, 刘凡, 张少铎. CEO空间经历对中国民营企业500强总部区位选择影响分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(1): 67-79.
[7]	罗志伟, 林银斌, 王敏. 居民情感视角下的城市移民品牌化路径研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(6): 1215-1226.
[8]	孟德友, 高超, 陈层层. 郑州市主城区汽车服务业集聚及与交通的空间关联[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(5): 1021-1033.
[9]	张筱娟, 汤琪凤, 廖紫薇. 江苏省研发企业空间格局演化及其影响因素分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(5): 1034-1045.
[10]	林元城, 章佳茵, 李路华, 王敏. 城市情感地理与空间治理：广州市区宣传类户外广告案例[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 1083-1095.
[11]	陈菲, 周素红, 张琳. 生命周期视角下建成环境对居民休闲体力活动的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(5): 106-117.
[12]	何慧妍, 王敏. 基于视觉方法的历史街区“微改造”空间感知研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(4): 189-200.
[13]	李鹏, 叶卉悦, 黄逸恒. 中国大城市穆斯林女性移民的宗教空间实践[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(3): 183-193.
[14]	张海洲陆林朱其静. 广交会商务旅游者的空间行为模式与空间扩散[J]. 世界地理研究, 2018, 27(02): 131-142.
[15]	江荣灏刘佳玲林铭亮王敏程国宇. 族裔-文化经济和地方协商：广州建设六马路的跨国饮食景观研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2018, 27(02): 143-155.

均衡发展背景下优质基础教育资源分布与住房价格的空间关联研究

Research on the spatial correlation between the high-quality basic education resources and housing prices to pursuing a balanced development: A case study of Guangzhou

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics