

世界地理研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 109-126.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2026.01.20240407
• 城市与产业 • 上一篇
收稿日期:2024-06-06
修回日期:2024-10-10
出版日期:2026-01-15
发布日期:2026-01-22
通讯作者:
丁铮
作者简介:陈铮衍(2000—),男,硕士生,主要研究方向为城乡环境价值评估,E-mail: 5221736001@fafu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
Zhengyan CHEN(
), Zheng DING(
), Yuanqin XIE
Received:2024-06-06
Revised:2024-10-10
Online:2026-01-15
Published:2026-01-22
Contact:
Zheng DING
摘要:
探究不同住区环境中居民的情绪感知差异与影响机制,对提升居民生活质量具有重要意义。本文以福州市主城区为例,基于图文并行的微博UGC数据,探讨了不同住区环境下居民的情绪感知差异及其环境影响效应,并结合长短期记忆和卷积神经网络(LSTM-CNN)情感分析方法、极度梯度提升树(XGBoost)模型和SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP)等机器学习方法,使用ArcMap软件,揭示不同住区环境对居民情绪的非线性影响与差异化作用特征。结果表明:①正式住区居民的积极情绪占比为68%,城中村居民的积极情绪占比为83%。正式住区的情绪空间分布聚集效应显著,冷热点过渡均匀;而城中村则具有扩散性,展现出较强的边界效应和空间异质性。②对城中村居民情绪具有显著正向贡献的指标为:铺装度、色彩复杂度和开阔度;而对正式住区居民情绪的正向贡献指标为:铺装度、视觉熵、空间活力和围合度。在不同住区环境中,铺装度和开阔度的影响差异最大。③过高的绿视率可能引发负面情绪。在城中村提高色彩复杂度、视觉熵和绿视率可以降低围合环境带来的负面情绪影响。同时,正式住区中空间活力和围合度在指标交互时可以产生更多的积极效应。研究结果为复杂住区环境的存量更新规划提供了数据基础,揭示了住区居民的情绪感知差异与环境对情绪的影响机制,为复杂住区环境品质的提升提供了可持续的规划建议。
陈铮衍, 丁铮, 谢源琴. 城中村及正式住区环境对居民情绪感知的影响差异分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2026, 35(1): 109-126.
Zhengyan CHEN, Zheng DING, Yuanqin XIE. Differential analysis of the influence of urban village and formal settlement environment on residents' emotional perception: Taking the main urban area of Fuzhou as an example[J]. World Regional Studies, 2026, 35(1): 109-126.
| 研究要素 | 研究指标 | 指标描述 | 量化方法 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 居民情绪 | 情绪指数 | 对应博文的情感指数 | LSTM-CNN |
| 住区活力 | 空间活力 | 住区的空间活力 | Python |
| 开阔度 | 图像中的天空占比 | Hrnet | |
| 蓝视率 | 图像中的水体元素占比 | Hrnet | |
| 景观感知要素 | 绿视率 | 图像中的绿植元素占比 | Hrnet |
| 铺装度 | 图像中的铺装元素占比 | Hrnet | |
| 围合度 | 图像中的建筑围合元素占比 | Hrnet | |
| 视觉质量 | 色彩复杂度 | 图像的色彩复杂度 | Matlab |
| 视觉熵 | 图像中的视觉复杂度 | Matlab |
表1 研究指标描述
Tab. 1 Description of research indicators
| 研究要素 | 研究指标 | 指标描述 | 量化方法 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 居民情绪 | 情绪指数 | 对应博文的情感指数 | LSTM-CNN |
| 住区活力 | 空间活力 | 住区的空间活力 | Python |
| 开阔度 | 图像中的天空占比 | Hrnet | |
| 蓝视率 | 图像中的水体元素占比 | Hrnet | |
| 景观感知要素 | 绿视率 | 图像中的绿植元素占比 | Hrnet |
| 铺装度 | 图像中的铺装元素占比 | Hrnet | |
| 围合度 | 图像中的建筑围合元素占比 | Hrnet | |
| 视觉质量 | 色彩复杂度 | 图像的色彩复杂度 | Matlab |
| 视觉熵 | 图像中的视觉复杂度 | Matlab |
| 指标 | 计算原理 |
|---|---|
| 开阔度 | 开阔度=图像中的天空占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 蓝视率 | 蓝视率=图像中的水体占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 绿视率 | 绿视率=图像中的绿植占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 铺装度 | 铺装度=图像中的地面铺装占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 围合度 | 围合度=图像中的建筑围合元素占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
表2 环境感知指标计算原理
Tab. 2 Principles of calculating environmental perception indicators
| 指标 | 计算原理 |
|---|---|
| 开阔度 | 开阔度=图像中的天空占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 蓝视率 | 蓝视率=图像中的水体占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 绿视率 | 绿视率=图像中的绿植占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 铺装度 | 铺装度=图像中的地面铺装占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 围合度 | 围合度=图像中的建筑围合元素占比/图像的总体像元大小*100% |
| 研究指标 | 城中村Moran's I | 城中村Z得分 | 城中村P值 | 正式住区Moran's I | 正式住区Z得分 | 正式住区P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 情绪指数 | 0.142 | 9.379 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 41.076 | <0.001 |
| 空间活力 | 0.111 | 7.421 | <0.001 | 0.226 | 207.206 | <0.001 |
| 开阔度 | 0.169 | 11.060 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 40.693 | <0.001 |
| 蓝视率 | 0.300 | 4.629 | <0.001 | 0.050 | 46.148 | <0.001 |
| 绿视率 | 0.089 | 5.939 | <0.001 | 0.049 | 45.834 | <0.001 |
| 铺装度 | 0.123 | 8.125 | <0.001 | 0.041 | 37.852 | <0.001 |
| 围合度 | 0.137 | 9.026 | <0.001 | 0.048 | 44.392 | <0.001 |
| 色彩复杂度 | 0.105 | 6.973 | <0.001 | 0.038 | 35.553 | <0.001 |
| 视觉熵 | 0.147 | 9.720 | <0.001 | 0.039 | 35.908 | <0.001 |
表3 空间自相关验证结果
Tab. 3 Spatial autocorrelation validation results
| 研究指标 | 城中村Moran's I | 城中村Z得分 | 城中村P值 | 正式住区Moran's I | 正式住区Z得分 | 正式住区P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 情绪指数 | 0.142 | 9.379 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 41.076 | <0.001 |
| 空间活力 | 0.111 | 7.421 | <0.001 | 0.226 | 207.206 | <0.001 |
| 开阔度 | 0.169 | 11.060 | <0.001 | 0.044 | 40.693 | <0.001 |
| 蓝视率 | 0.300 | 4.629 | <0.001 | 0.050 | 46.148 | <0.001 |
| 绿视率 | 0.089 | 5.939 | <0.001 | 0.049 | 45.834 | <0.001 |
| 铺装度 | 0.123 | 8.125 | <0.001 | 0.041 | 37.852 | <0.001 |
| 围合度 | 0.137 | 9.026 | <0.001 | 0.048 | 44.392 | <0.001 |
| 色彩复杂度 | 0.105 | 6.973 | <0.001 | 0.038 | 35.553 | <0.001 |
| 视觉熵 | 0.147 | 9.720 | <0.001 | 0.039 | 35.908 | <0.001 |
| [1] | CAO K, HARRIS R, LIU S, et al. How does urban renewal affect residential segregation in Shenzhen, China? A multi-scale study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 102: 105228. |
| [2] | ZHANG L. The political economy of informal settlements in post-socialist China: The case of chengzhongcun (s). Geoforum, 2011, 42(4): 473-483. |
| [3] | 冯革群. 全球化背景下非正规城市发展的状态. 规划师, 2007(11): 85-88. |
| FENG G. The state of unofficial city in the globalization context. Planners, 2007(11): 85-88. | |
| [4] | 甘欣悦. 非正规性视角下城市非正规住区与就业研究溯源与辨析. 现代城市研究, 2023(1): 96-102. |
| GAN X. Tracing and analyzing urban informal settlements and employment from the lens of informality. Modern Urban Research, 2023(1): 96-102. | |
| [5] | WANG Y, WANG Y, WU J. Urbanization and informal development in China: Urban villages in Shenzhen. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2009, 33(4): 957-973. |
| [6] | 林雄斌, 马学广, 李贵才. 快速城市化下城中村非正规性的形成机制与治理. 经济地理, 2014,34(6):162-168. |
| LIN X, MA X, LI G. Formation and governance of informality in urban village under the rapid urbanization process. Economic Geography, 2014,34(06):162-168. | |
| [7] | 陈飞, 梁同同, 程天, 等. 基于供需匹配的城市旧住区微基建理论内涵及实践案例研究. 现代城市研究, 2023(12): 86-93. |
| CHEN F, LIANG T, CHENG T, et al. Research on the theoretical connotation and practical case of micro-infrastructure in urban old residential areas based on the relationship between supply and demand. Modern Urban Research, 2023(12): 86-93. | |
| [8] | PAN W, DU J. Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China. Land Use Policy, 2021, 111: 105744. |
| [9] | MORRIS E, GUERRA E. Mood and mode: Does how we travel affect how we feel? Transportation, 2015, 42(1): 25-43. |
| [10] | ZHU J, FAN Y. Daily travel behavior and emotional well-being: Effects of trip mode, duration, purpose, and companionship. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 118: 360-373. |
| [11] | 夏哲一, 袁承程, 刘黎明, 等. 城市绿地生产性景观的居民价值感知特征研究——以北京"三山五园"地区稻田景观为例. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(7): 57-64. |
| XIA Z, YUAN C, LIU L, et al. Residents' value perception of productive landscape in urban green space: A case study of the paddy field of "three hills and five gardens" area in Beijing. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(7): 57-64. | |
| [12] | 吕丽辉, 王玉平. 山岳型旅游景区敬畏情绪对游客行为意愿的影响研究:以杭州径山风景区为例. 世界地理研究, 2017, 26(6): 131-142. |
| LV L, WANG Y. Research on the impact of tourists' behavior intention based on awe emotion in mountain resorts — A case study of Jingshan scenery area in Hangzhou. World Regional Studies, 2017, 26(6): 131-142. | |
| [13] | 戴代新, 陈语娴. 基于情感计算的城市历史公园更新改造文化服务感知评价——以鲁迅公园更新改造为例. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 33(3): 81-90. |
| DAI D, CHEN Y. An evaluation of the perception of cultural services of urban historical park renovation based on sentiment computing method:A case study of LuXun park. Journal of Tongji University Social Science Edition), 2022, 33(3): 81-90. | |
| [14] | 齐子吟, 李君轶, 贺哲, 等. 城市街道景观色彩对游客情感感知影响——基于街景图像的研究. 地球信息科学学报, 2024, 26(2): 514-529. |
| QI Z, LI J, HE Z, et al.The influence of urban streetscape color on tourists' emotional perception based on streetscape images. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2024, 26(2): 514-529. | |
| [15] | 刘嘉慧, 张天尧, 彭一升. 城中村不同改造模式下人居环境健康效应初探:基于广州猎德村与石牌村的对比分析. 南方建筑, 2023(9): 70-78. |
| LIU J, ZHANG T, PENG Y. Exploring the health effects of environment in urban villages revitalization: A comparative analysis of Liede and Shipai villages in Guangzhou. South Architecture, 2023(9): 70-78. | |
| [16] | 周晓丽, 高雅洁, 唐承财. 旅游者与乡村居民间的情感凝聚对旅游者乡村依恋的影响研究. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(8): 1623-1635. |
| ZHOU X, GAO Y, TANG C. Influence of emotional solidarity on visitors' place attachment in the context of China's rural tourism. Progress in Geography, 2023, 42(8): 1623-1635. | |
| [17] | RICHARDS D, LAVOREL S. Integrating social media data and machine learning to analyse scenarios of landscape appreciation. Ecosystem Services, 2022, 55: 101422. |
| [18] | 刘晓菲,王振波,宋静,等.住区环境对居民主观幸福感的影响机制研究:以深圳混合居住区为例.地理科学进展, 2022, 41(11): 2099-2107. |
| LIU X, WANG Z, SONG J, et al. The impact of residential environment on residents' subjective well-being: An example from mixed residential communities in Shenzhen.Progress in Geography,2022,41(11): 2099-2107. | |
| [19] | 张若诗, 颜夏悦, 王晨, 等. 多模态数据驱动的人与建成环境情感交互研究——以京张铁路遗址公园五道口段为例. 城市发展研究, 2022, 29(7): 55-66. |
| ZHANG R, YAN X, WANG C, et al. Research on emotional interaction between people and built environment driven by multi-modal data: Take Wudaokou Jingzhang railway park as an example. Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(7): 55-66. | |
| [20] | RUI J. Exploring the association between the settlement environment and residents' positive sentiments in urban villages and formal settlements in Shenzhen. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 98: 104851. |
| [21] | 张维亚, 汤澍, 陈玲玲, 等. 基于网络文本分析的文化遗产生态环境游客感知及其对遗产旅游形象影响研究——以南京明城墙为例. 生态经济, 2024, 40(6): 135-140. |
| ZHANG W, TANG S, CHEN L, et al. Research on the tourists' perception of cultural heritage ecological environment and its impact on heritage tourism image based on network text analysis: Taking Nanjing Ming City Wall as an example. Ecological Economy, 2024, 40(6): 135-140. | |
| [22] | 钟科, 李若楠, 刘倩倩, 等. 环保广告中面部表情与结果发生时间对亲环境行为意图的影响研究. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024(6):1-8. |
| ZHONG K, LI R, LIU Q, et al. A study on the influence of facial expressions and the timing of outcomes in environmental advertisements on pro-environmental behavior intention. Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences), 2024(6):1-8. | |
| [23] | 王薪宇, 李方正. 高密度街区建成环境对居民积极情绪的影响研究——以北京为例. 城市发展研究, 2023, 30(6): 89-96. |
| WANG X, LI F. The influence of built environment on residents'positive emotions in high-density urban blocks:A case study of Beiiing. Urban Development Studies, 2023, 30(6): 89-96. | |
| [24] | CHEN Z, YANG H, LIN Y, et al.Exploring the association between the built environment and positive sentiments of tourists in traditional villages in Fuzhou, China. Ecological Informatics, 2024, 80: 102465. |
| [25] | ZHANG Y, YAN S, LIU J, et al.Popularity influence mechanism of creative industry parks: A semantic analysis based on social media data. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 90: 104384. |
| [26] | 单卓然, 安月辉, 袁满, 等. 基于微博大数据的城市居民情绪时空分布特征及影响因素研究——以武汉市主城区为例. 城市发展研究, 2022, 29(8): 69-76. |
| SHAN Z, AN Y, YUAN M et al.Study on spatial and temporal distribution characteristics and influencing factors of urban residents' sentiment based on weibo data: A case study of the main urban area of Wuhan . Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(8): 69-76. | |
| [27] | CAO R, ZHU J, TU W, et al. Integrating aerial and street view images for urban land use classification. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(10): 1553. |
| [28] | 蒋源, 于儒海, 曹塽, 等. 基于网络社交数据的城市情绪地图及空间优化探索——以成都市为例. 规划师, 2023, 39(9): 56-62. |
| JIANG Y, YU R, CAO S, et al.A study on urban emotional map and spatial improvement based on social networking data: Take Chengdu city as an example. Planners, 2023, 39(9): 56-62. | |
| [29] | 刘晔, 潘卓林, 冯嘉旋, 等. 中国大城市保障房居民情绪幸福感影响因素:以广州市为例. 热带地理, 2019, 39(2): 180-187. |
| LIU Y, PAN Z, FENG J, et al.Factors influencing residents' emotional well-being in the affordable housing communities of China's big city: A case study of Guangzhou.Tropical Geography, 2019, 39 (2): 180-187. | |
| [30] | LIN L, WEI Y. Patterns and determinants of location change in migrants' residential mobility: A case study of Fuzhou. Transactions in Planning and Urban Research, 2023, 2(4): 459-477. |
| [31] | 福州市人民政府. 2022年福州市行政区划情况. 2023. |
| The people's government of Fuzhou, administrative divisions of Fuzhou city in 2022. 2023. | |
| [32] | CHEN Z, YU S, YOU X, et al. New nighttime light landscape metrics for analyzing urban-rural differentiation in economic development at township: A case study of Fujian province, China. Applied Geography, 2023, 150: 102841. |
| [33] | 黄竞雄, 梁嘉祺, 杨盟盛, 等. 基于街景图像的旅游地街道空间视觉品质评价方法. 地球信息科学学报, 2024,26(02):352-366. |
| HUANG J, LIANG J, YANG M, et al. Street space visual quality evaluating method of tourism sites based on street view images. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2024,26(2):352-366. | |
| [34] | HA J, CHOI D, DARLING L. Is the spatial distribution of urban green space associated with crime in Chicago? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2024, 95: 128282. |
| [35] | ZHENG Y, LIN T, N HAMM et al. Quantitative evaluation of urban green exposure and its impact on human health: A case study on the 3–30–300 green space rule. Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 924: 171461. |
| [36] | BIERNACKA M, KRONENBERG J. Classification of institutional barriers affecting the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 36: 22-33. |
| [37] | TJIA D, COETZEE S. Geospatial information needs for informal settlement upgrading – A review. Habitat International, 2022, 122: 102531. |
| [38] | 仝照民, 安睿, 刘耀林. 建成环境对居民通勤方式选择的影响——以武汉市城中村为例. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(12): 2048-2060. |
| TONG Z, AN R, LIU Y. Impact of the built environment on residents'commuting mode choices: A case study of urban village in Wuhan City. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(12): 2048-2060. | |
| [39] | LIU R, YAN X, LIN X, et al. Urban spontaneous plant richness in response to the 2D/3D building and green space patterns in a highly urbanized area. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 154: 110852. |
| [40] | KANURI V, HUGHES C, HODGES B. Standing out from the crowd: When and why color complexity in social media images increases user engagement. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2023: S0167811623000599. |
| [41] | SOSA P. Twitter sentiment analysis using combined LSTM-CNN Models. Eprint Arxiv, 2017, 2017: 1-9. |
| [42] | 甄峰, 王波, 陈映雪. 基于网络社会空间的中国城市网络特征——以新浪微博为例. 地理学报, 2012, 67(8): 1031-1043. |
| ZHEN F, WANG B, CHEN Y. China's city network characteristics based on social network space: An empirical analysis of sina micro-blog. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(8): 1031-1043. | |
| [43] | 罗霖, 崔叙, 喻冰洁, 等. 人本视角下轨道交通中心型站点街道活力特征及影响因素研究:以成都、重庆为例. 现代城市研究, 2024(3): 86-95. |
| LUO L, CUI X, YU B, et al. Research on street vitality characteristics and influencing factors of metro-center stations under humanistic perspective: Chengdu,Chongqing as an example.Modern Urban Research, 2024(3): 86-95. | |
| [44] | SUN K, ZHAO Y, JIANG B, et al. High-resolution representations for labeling pixels and regions. arXiv, 2019. |
| [45] | WU C, YE Y, GAO F, et al. Using street view images to examine the association between human perceptions of locale and urban vitality in Shenzhen, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 88: 104291. |
| [46] | 窦燕,孔令富,王柳锋.基于视觉熵的视觉注意计算模型.光学学报,2009,29(9):2511-2515. |
| DOU Y, KONG L, WANG L.A computational model of visual attention based on visual entropy. Acta Optica Sinica, 2009, 29(9): 2511-2515. | |
| [47] | ZHOU B, XU S, YANG X. Computing the color complexity of images//2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD). Zhangjiajie, China: IEEE, 2015: 1898-1902. |
| [48] | MORAN P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 1950, 37(1/2): 17-23. |
| [49] | GETIS A, ORD J. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 1992, 24(3): 189-206. |
| [50] | CHEN T, GUESTRIN C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system//proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016: 785-794. |
| [51] | WANG H, LIANG Q, HANCOCK J, et al. Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods. Journal of Big Data, 2024, 11(1): 44. |
| [52] | 叶裕民, 田光明, 仝德.中国式现代化与超大特大城市城中村改造.规划师, 2024, 40(3): 152-159. |
| YE Y, TIAN G, TONG D.Chinese modernization and the redevelopment of urban villages in megacities.Planners,2024,40(3): 152-159. | |
| [53] | HUAI S, CHEN F, LIU S, et al. Using social media photos and computer vision to assess cultural ecosystem services and landscape features in urban parks. Ecosystem Services, 2022, 57: 101475. |
| [54] | TANG Y, ZHANG J, LIU R, et al. Exploring the impact of built environment attributes on social followings using social media data and deep learning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2022, 11(6): 325. |
| [55] | KONG L, LIU Z, PAN X, et al. How do different types and landscape attributes of urban parks affect visitors' positive emotions? Landscape and Urban Planning, 2022, 226: 104482. |
| [56] | TABATABAIE S, LITT J, MULLER B H. Sidewalks, trees and shade matter: A visual landscape assessment approach to understanding people's preferences for walking. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2023, 84: 127931. |
| [57] | CHEN Z, YANG H, YE P, et al. How does the perception of informal green spaces in urban villages influence residents' complaint sentiments? A Machine learning analysis of Fuzhou City, China. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 166: 112376. |
| [58] | 许扬, 李君轶. 城市建成环境对游客情感体验及行为意向的影响——以西安市为例. 地域研究与开发, 2022, 41(2): 107-112. |
| XU Y, LI J. Effects of urban built environment on tourists'emotional experience and behavioral intention: A case study in Xi'an city. Areal Research and Development, 2022, 41(2): 107-112. | |
| [59] | HUAI S, CHEN F, LIU S, et al. Using social media photos and computer vision to assess cultural ecosystem services and landscape features in urban parks. Ecosystem Services, 2022, 57: 101475. |
| [1] | 刘清, 薛德升, 高权. 世界半导体产业集群的研究进展与展望[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(7): 69-82. |
| [2] | 秦萧, 张一鸣, 甄峰, 李民健. 基于多源大数据的城市安全感评价与优化策略[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(9): 118-132. |
| [3] | 胡晨晖, 姜海宁. 非洲留学生空间流动网络变化特征研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(7): 46-58. |
| [4] | 庄诺亚, 华芳琳, 刘羿滢, 黄俞菱, 刘晔. 美国传染病暴发脆弱性的空间分异格局与影响机制研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(9): 40-54. |
| [5] | 马林靖, 李培速, 伍亚红. 城镇化发展如何影响非正规就业?[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(6): 1273-1284. |
| [6] | 王鑫静, 程钰. 城镇化对碳排放效率的影响机制研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(3): 503-511. |
| [7] | 雷金容 王晓文. 跨国连锁餐饮企业空间扩散过程及机理研究——以福州市麦当劳和肯德基餐厅为例[J]. 世界地理研究, 2018, 27(05): 93-104. |
| [8] | 黄偎 祁新华. 地铁对福州主城区空间格局的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2017, 26(5): 86-95. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||