主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 905-918.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.05.2021393

• 世界政治与经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

中西方地缘经济研究的进展与展望

杨文龙1(), 史文天2()   

  1. 1.上海社会科学院世界经济研究所,上海 200020
    2.上海商学院酒店管理学院,上海 201400
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-28 修回日期:2021-09-24 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2022-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 史文天
  • 作者简介:杨文龙(1991-),男,助理研究员,博士,研究方向为世界地理和地缘战略研究,E-mail: yangwenlong_pt@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42001135)

The progress and prospect of geo-economic research in China and the West

Wenlong YANG1(), Wentian SHI2()   

  1. 1.Institute of World Economy, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200020, China
    2.Department of Hospitality Management, Shanghai Business School, Shanghai 201400, China
  • Received:2021-05-28 Revised:2021-09-24 Online:2022-09-15 Published:2022-09-15
  • Contact: Wentian SHI

摘要:

在科技革命重塑世界政经版图、区域集团化推动全球治理调整、大国博弈带来国际体系变革的背景下,梳理地缘经济研究脉络对于提升地缘经济理论品质具有重大意义。本文在厘清地缘经济思潮发展的基础上,借助Web of Science和CNKI数据库,运用知识可视化工具探究中西方地缘经济知识图谱的演进过程,研究结果如下:①在学术思潮发展层面,中西方地缘经济思潮经历了“萌芽期—发展期—回溯期”,萌芽期存在现实政治逻辑,发展期转向自由主义思潮,回溯期再度涌现国家政治内涵。②在时空演进层面,近年来西方地缘经济研究强度远高于国内,西方作者主要分布在美国、俄罗斯、英国和意大利,国内学者主要集中在中国科学院、云南师范大学、复旦大学等高校和科研机构。③在知识网络层面,地缘经济存在较强的学科交叉属性,拥有明确的知识基础,高被引文献源于政治学或地理学,形成以权力为逻辑基础、空间为逻辑起点、经济为逻辑主轴的知识架构,热点议题演进与学术思潮发展高度耦合,科技竞争将成为当前乃至未来很长一段时间的研究重点。最后,本文认为国内地缘经济研究应突破西方的理论桎梏,构建以合作共赢、开放发展为核心的理论体系,在方法论上应强化定量分析和实证研究。

关键词: 地缘经济, 学术思潮, 知识图谱, 演进过程, CiteSpace

Abstract:

Under the reshaping of the world political and economic map, regional grouping promoting the adjustment of global governance, and the change of international system brought about by the game of great powers, it is relevant to sort out the historical context of geo-economics. Based on the clarification of the geo-economic academic thought, this paper selected WOS and CNKI as the literature retrieval library, and used CiteSpace to sketch out the knowledge map of geo-economic research. The results of this study are as follows. Firstly, the geo-economic academic trend of China and the West has experienced the "greening period -development period - backtracking period". The budding period still exists in realistic political logic. The development period is liberal. The backtracking period re-emerged the national political connotation. Secondly, in recent years, the intensity of geo-economic research in the West is much higher than in China. The western authors are mainly distributed in the US, Russia, UK and Italy. The domestic scholars are mainly concentrated in the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan Normal University and East China Normal University. Thirdly, geo-economic literatures have a clear knowledge base and knowledge network, and the highly cited literatures are derived from the works of geography or political science. Geo-economics forms a knowledge structure based on power, and space as the logical starting point, economy as the logical spindle. The evolution process of hot topics is highly coupled with the development of academic thought. Competition in science and technology will become the focus of geo-economics research in the future. This paper suggests that geo-economic research should build a geo-economic theory with win-win cooperation and open development, and strengthen empirical research.

Key words: geo-economics, academic thoughts, knowledge domain, evolution, CiteSpace