从“观察者”到“参与者”：乌克兰地缘政治角色的转换与困境研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.09.20230057

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

全球战略博弈背景下，地缘政治因素是各国制定安全和对外政策的一项重要依据。它既为发达资本主义国家争夺地缘政治红利提供借口，也迫使发展中国家高度重视和防范地缘政治危机所带来的风险。为探讨大国地缘政治博弈背景下，被争夺国家扮演何种角色及“角色转换”困境等问题，选取频发地缘政治危机的乌克兰为研究案例，借鉴“角色理论”的分析框架，尝试将传统地缘政治理论与“角色理论”相融合，基于“观察者”与“参与者”角色转换的视角，采用“国内政治-国际政治”的比较分析方法，对比国际社会对乌克兰地缘政治角色的认知与评价，厘清乌克兰地缘政治角色转换的时空过程，阐释乌克兰地缘政治角色转换的效应，以期为发展中国家的地缘政治决策提供新的理论认知和实践剖析。

关键词: 地缘政治, 角色理论, 转换与困境, 乌克兰, 俄罗斯

Abstract:

In the context of the global strategic game, geopolitical factors are an important basis for countries to formulate security and foreign policies. It not only provides an excuse for capitalist countries to compete for geopolitical dividends, but also forces developing countries to pay high attention to and guard against risks brought by geopolitical crises. In order to explorethe role of the contested countries and the dilemma of "role transformation" in the geopoliticalgame between great powers, we select Ukraine, which has frequent geopolitical crises, as a case study, draws on the analytical framework of "role theory", and attempts to integrate traditional geopolitical theory with "role theory". Based on the perspective of "observer" and "participant" role transformation, we adopt the comparative analysis method of "domestic politics and international politics" to compare the international community's cognition and evaluation of Ukraine's geopolitical role, clarify the time-space process of Ukraine's geopolitical role transformation, and explain the effect of Ukraine's geopolitical role transformation, to provide new theoretical cognition and practical analysis for the geopolitical decision-making of developing countries.

Key words: geopolitics, role theory, transformation and dilemma, Ukraine, Russia

刘国菊, 李立望. 从“观察者”到“参与者”：乌克兰地缘政治角色的转换与困境研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(9): 82-93.

Guoju LIU, Liwang LI. From "observer" to "participant": Research on the transformation and dilemma of Ukraine's geopolitical roles[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(9): 82-93.

参考文献 51

1	冯玉军. 乌克兰危机多维视野下的深层透视. 国际问题研究, 2014(3):71-85.
	FENG Y. The institute of russian studies at china institutes of contemporary international relations. China International Studies, 2014(3): 71-85.
2	倪峰,达巍,冯仲平,等.俄乌冲突对国际政治格局的影响.国际经济评论, 2022(3):38-67.
	NI F, DA W, FENG Z, et al.Impact of Russia-Ukraine conflict on international political landscape. International Economic Review, 2022(3): 38-67.
3	崔守军,杨宇.俄罗斯与乌克兰冲突的地缘政治渊源与地缘战略逻辑.地理研究, 2022, 41(8): 2065-2075.
	CUI S, YANG Y.The geopolitical origins and geostrategic logics of Russia-Ukraine conflict. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(8): 2065-2075.
4	ДАРДЕН КИТ. Как спасти Украину: почему проблема заключается не в России. Россия в глобальной политике, 2014(2):140-145.[KEITH D.How to save Ukraine:Why is the problem not in Russia?Russia in Global Politics, 2014(2):140-145.]
5	ANGELA S, COLTON T J. Everyone loses: The Ukraine crisis and the ruinous contest for post-soviet eurasia. Journal of Cold War Studies, 2019, 20(4): 234-235.
6	赵会荣.美俄博弈与乌克兰之痛.当代世界, 2022(3):61-62.
	ZHAO H.The U.S.-Russian game and the pain of Ukraine. Contemporary World, 2022(3): 61-62.
7	MCCARTHY C.Support those impacted by global crises, including the war in Ukraine.Dean and Provost, 2022, 23(10): 7-8.
8	胡志丁, 王丰龙, 安宁, 等. 洋能否为中用?西方政治地理与地缘政治发展的借鉴与反思. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 217-231.
	HU Z, WANG F, AN N, et al. Can foreign theories be used in China? Reflections and references on the development of Western political geography and geopolitics. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(2): 217-231.
9	叶帅, 胡志丁, 葛岳静, 等.地缘战略交汇区类属的国别地缘环境解析——以乌克兰为例. 地理研究, 2021, 40(9): 2591-2605.
	YE S, HU Z, GE Y, et al. Analysis on the national geo-setting of geo-strategic intersection area: Take Ukraine as an example. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(9): 2591-2605.
10	冯绍雷. 从乌克兰危机看俄罗斯与金砖国家相互关系的前景. 国际观察, 2014(3): 30-43.
	FENG S. The prosperct of elations between Russia and BRICS from Ukraine crisis. International Review, 2014(3): 30-43.
11	HOLSTI K J.National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 1970(3): 233-309.
12	WISH N B.Foreign policy maker sand their national role conceptions.International Studies Quarterly, 1980, 24(4): 532-554.
13	WALKER S G. Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press, 1987.
14	宗华伟,谢喆平.中国在联合国机构的国际角色:一种自我与他者视角. 国际政治研究, 2022, 43(6): 52-75.
	ZONG H, XIE Z. China's international role in UN agencies:A perspective of self-others. The Journal of International Studies, 2022, 43(6): 52-75.
15	徐博, 威廉·瑞辛格. 国际关系角色理论视角下俄罗斯对中国能源外交决策探析. 东北亚论坛, 2019, 28(4): 98-111.
	XU B, REISINGER W M. Decision of Russia's energy diplomacy toward China in the perspective of role theory in international relations. Northeast Asia Forum, 2019, 28(4): 98-111.
16	CHAFETZ G R, ABRAMSON H, GRILLOT S. Role theory and foreign policy: Belarussian and Ukrainian compliance with the unclear nonproliferation regime. Political Psychology, 1996, 17(4): 727-757.
17	AGGESTAM L. Role Theory and European Foreign Policy: A Framework of Analysis. London: Routledge, 2006.
18	KAARBO, JULIET, CRISTIAN C. Role conflict in recent wars: Danish and Dutch debates over Iraq and Afghanistan. Cooperation and Conflict, 2013, 48(4): 465-483.
19	WEHNER L. Role expectations as foreign policy: South American secondary powers' expectations of Brazil as a regional power. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2015, 11(4): 223-224.
20	叶帅,胡志丁,陆好健,等.基于主体间性的乌克兰危机解读.世界地理研究, 2019, 28(2): 68-77.
	YE S, HU Z, LU H, et al. An interpretation of the Ukrainian crisis based on inter-subjectivity. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(2): 68-77.
21	MUNIRAH A S. A Malaysian perspective on foreign policy and geopolitics: Rethinking west-centric international relations theory. Global Studies Quarterly, 2021, 1(4): 1-11.
22	HARNISH S, Conceptualizing in the minefield: Role theory and foreign policy learning. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2012, 8(1): 47-69.
23	尹晓亮. 日本在东亚地缘政治变动中的外交逻辑——从认知结构角色构建到外交行为.日本学刊, 2018(2):32-59.
	YIN X. Japan's diplomatic logics in the context of east Asian geopolitical changes: Cognitive structure, role building and diplomatic behavior. Japanese Studies, 2018(2): 32-59.
24	谢尔希·浦洛基. 欧洲之门. 乌克兰2000年史. 北京:中信出版社, 2019.
	PLOKHY S. The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine. Beijing: Citic Press, 2000.
25	董晓阳, 李静杰. 乌克兰在欧亚大陆的地缘政治地位和地缘战略. 东欧中亚研究, 1996(1): 48-57.
	DONG X, LI J. Ukraine's geopolitical position and geostrategy in eurasia. East European&Central Asian Studies, 1996(1):48-57.
26	PIŁSUDSKI JÓZEF. Marzyciel i Strateg.Tom Pierwszy. ZYSK I SPÓŁKA, 2014.[BOHDANU.Jozef Pilsudski Marzyciel i Strateg.Zysk i S-ka, 2014: 13-15.].
27	LEBEDEV S V. The aristocracy of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania Sarmatism, pollination and "remembering" about its origin. European Scientific e-Journal, 2021, 7(13): 7-28.
28	SNYDER T.The Reconstruction of Nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569-1999.New Haven:Yale University Press, 2003.
29	葛汉文. 冷战后乌克兰的地缘政治思想. 俄罗斯研究, 2013(5): 3-22.
	GE H. Geopolitical thought in post-cold war Ukraine. Russian Studies, 2013(5): 3-22.
30	ДОНЦОВ ДМИТРО. Націоналізм.Київ: ФОП Стебеляк, 1966.[DMITROD.National Identity.Kyiv:FOP Stebelyak, 1966.]
31	КОЛОДЗИНСКИЙ МИХАИЛ. Українська воєнна доктрина.Український історичний, 2020(5):225-232.[MIKHAILK.Ukrainian military doctrine.History of Ukraine, 2020(5):225-232.]
32	КУЧМА ЛЕОНИД. Украина-не Россия.М.: Время, 2003.[KuchmaLeonid.Ukraine Is Not Russia.Moscow: Time, 2003.]
33	布热津斯基.大棋局.中国国际问题研究所,译.上海:上海人民出版社, 2010.
	BRZEZINSKI Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Translated by China International Issues Studies Institute. Shanghai: Shanghai Press, 2007.
34	何卫. 克里米亚的前世今生:俄罗斯欧盟与乌克兰危机. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2014(5):36-45.
	HE W. On the history and current situation of Crimea: Russia, EU and the Ukraine crisis. Frontiers, 2014(5): 36-45.
35	ЗЮГАНОВ Г А География победы, Основы российской геополитики.Санкт-Петербургская типография, 1997.[ZYUGANOVG A. Geography of victory, Fundamentals of Russian geopolitics.Saint Petersburg:St. Petersburg printing house: 1997.]
36	КОНДАКОВА ЕВГЕНИЯ. Куратор Киева: что Джо Байден говорил об Украине.(2020-11-08)[2021-06-30].
37	Д. БЕЛАЩЕНКО, В СИКИРАЖ.Украинский кризис в современных международных отношениях: уровни влияния.Россия и новые государства Евразии, 2022, 3(56): 29-43.[BELASHCHENKOD, SIKIRAZHV.The Ukrainian crisis in modern international relations: levels of influence.Russia and the New States of Eurasia, 2022, 3(56): 29-43.]
38	保罗•库比塞克. 乌克兰史. 颜震,译. 北京:中国大百科全书出版社, 2014.
	KUBICEK P. Ukraine History. Translated by Yan Z. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 2014.
39	РАБОТЯЖЕВ Н. В., СОЛОВЬЕВ Э.Г.Украинский кризисмежду политикой идентичности и геополитикой.Россия и новые государства Евразии, 2017, 5(10): 9-28.[RABOTYAZHEVN. V.,SOLOVYOVE.G.The Ukrainian crisis between identity politics and geopolitics.Russia and the New States of Eurasia, 2017, 5(10): 9-28.]
40	亨廷顿. 文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建. 周琪,刘绯,张立平,等,译. 北京: 新华出版社, 2015.
	HUNTINGTON S P, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Translated by ZHOU Q, LIU F, ZHANG L,et al. Beijing: Xinhua Press, 2015.
41	Д ИВАНОВИЧ. Геополитические Заметки По Русской Истории. Вопросы Истории, 1993.[IVANOVICHD. V. Geopolitical notes on Russian history. Moscow: Questions of History, 1993.]
42	СЛИВА А И.РРоссийско-Украинское Сотрудничество: Политика, Экономика, Культура, Наука, Образование.Москва:Инион Pан, 2013.[SLIVAA I. Russian-Ukrainian Cooperation: Politics, Economics, Culture, Science, Education. Moscow:Inion Ras, 2013.]
43	岳西宽. 乌克兰——世界四大权力中心地缘政治的角力场. 中国青年政治学院学报, 2014, 33(5): 106-111.
	YUE X. Ukraine: The geopolitical arena of the four major power centers in the world. Journal of China Youth University for Political Sciences, 2014, 33(5): 106-111.
44	钱文荣. 乌克兰危机对国际地缘政治的影响深远. 和平与发展, 2014(4): 87-89.
	QIAN W. The profound impact of Ukraine crisis on international geopolitics. Peace and Development, 2014(4): 87-93.
45	李永全.处于全球地缘政治博弈漩涡中的乌克兰.世界知识, 2016(9):71.
	LI Y. Ukraine in the whirlpool of the global geopolitical game. World Knowledge, 2016(9): 71.
46	罗伯特·吉尔平. 世界政治中的战争与变革.上海:上海人民出版社, 2019.
	GILPIN R. War and Change in World Politics. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2019.
47	杜哲元. 论美国的古典地缘政治观——基本内涵、战略影响与主要缺陷. 东北亚论坛,2022(3):108-126.
	DU Z. On the classical geopolitics notion of America:Basic connotation, strategy effect, and main defects. Northeast Asia Forum, 2022(3): 108-126.
48	索尔•科恩. 地缘政治学:国际关系的地理学. 严春松,译. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社, 2011.
	COHEN S B. Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations.Translated by YAN C.Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press, 2011.
49	赵云中. 乌克兰沉重的历史脚步. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2005.
	ZHAO Y. Ukraine: Difficult Steps in History. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2005.
50	AN N, ZHU H. Conceptual and theoretical debates in modern geopolitics and their implications for Chinese geopolitics. Area Development and Policy, 2018, 3(3): 368-382.
51	LEGVOLD, ROBERT. Everyone loses: The Ukraine crisis and the ruinous contest for Post-Soviet Eurasia. Foreign Affairs, 2017, 96(3): 167-168.

[1]	黄宇, 陈浩, 葛岳静. 当代中印边界问题的尺度解构[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(8): 14-26.
[2]	杨宇, 郭越. 地理学视角下的能源-社会互动格局与逻辑[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(8): 77-86.
[3]	丁嘉铖, 孔德明, 肖宸瑄, 郝丽莎. 产业链视角下全球光伏产业贸易格局演变特征研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(7): 1-17.
[4]	徐宏基, 刘云刚, 王丰龙. 超越国家中心主义：乌克兰去中心化改革中的尺度政治[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(6): 39-54.
[5]	赵昌, 马志香. 澳大利亚对亚洲地缘认知的时代变迁、演进逻辑与未来发展[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(6): 55-63.
[6]	王旭, 梁沁仪, 解其昌. 能源转型的地缘政治影响研究进展[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(5): 31-44.
[7]	杜树坤, 张晶, 韩志军, 王琳洁, 唐代红. 基于GDELT事件数据的东南亚国家地缘政治风险测度与分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(4): 13-23.
[8]	王春娟, 刘大海, 华玉婷, 李成龙. 北极航道地缘政治格局圈层结构及其竞合关系分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(3): 29-39.
[9]	王硕, 解楠楠. 塞尔维亚在乌克兰危机中的立场根源探析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(3): 70-78.
[10]	宫高杰, 王雪. “三海倡议”下中国-中东欧合作的困境与发展[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(1): 33-42.
[11]	曹开臣, 胡伟, 葛岳静, 富宁宁, 胡志丁, 李灿松, 叶帅, 胡渊. “21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线地缘环境及其对中国的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(6): 39-50.
[12]	初楠臣, 张平宇, 吴相利, 徐爽, 史晓楠. 俄罗斯新冠肺炎疫情的扩散：过程、格局与影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(3): 41-51.
[13]	宋周莺, 高珊珊. 21世纪俄罗斯对外贸易格局的时空演变态势[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(12): 1-17.
[14]	潘玥, 宋涛, 李富玉. 多尺度地缘政治要素推拉作用下的印度尼西亚迁都计划研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(11): 57-68.
[15]	解楠楠, 胡卫东. 欧盟邻近区域战略逻辑与趋向：从规范导向到安全导向[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(11): 69-81.