1 |
BECKMAN R. ASEAN and the South China Sea Dispute//CHACHAVALPONGPUN P. Entering Uncharted Waters?: ASEAN and the South China Sea. SEAS Publishing, 2018: 15-35.
|
2 |
杨宇, 于宏源, 鲁刚, 等. 世界能源百年变局与国家能源安全. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(11): 2803-2820.
|
|
YANG Y, YU H, LU G. Interview on the unprecedented changes of energy geopolitics and national energy security. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(11): 2803-2820.
|
3 |
BALDWIN R E, KAY D A. International trade and international relations. International Organization, 1975, 29(1): 99-131.
|
4 |
MARTIN P, MAYER T, THOENIG M. The geography of conflicts and regional trade agreements. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2012, 4(4): 1-35.
|
5 |
POLACHEK S W. Conflict and trade. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1980, 24(1): 55-78.
|
6 |
GUPTA R, GOZGOR G, KAYA H, et al. Effects of geopolitical risks on trade flows: evidence from the gravity model. Eurasian Economic Review, 2019, 9(4): 515-530.
|
7 |
刘文革, 黄玉. 地缘政治风险与贸易流动:理论机理与实证研究. 国际经贸探索, 2020, 36(03): 46-59.
|
|
LIU W, HUANG Y. Geopolitical risks and trade flows: Theoretical mechanism and empirical research. International Economics and Trade Research, 2020, 36(03): 46-59.
|
8 |
EICHENGREEN B, MEHL A, CHIȚU L. Mars or Mercury redux: The geopolitics of bilateral trade agreements. The World Economy, 2021, 44(1): 21-44.
|
9 |
AZZIMONTI M. Does partisan conflict deter FDI inflows to the US? Journal of International Economics, 2019, 120: 162-178.
|
10 |
LI Q, VASHCHILKO T. Dyadic military conflict, security alliances, and bilateral FDI flows. Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(5): 765-782.
|
11 |
WITTE C T, BURGER M J, IANCHOVICHINA E I, et al. Dodging bullets: The heterogeneous effect of political violence on greenfield FDI. Journal of International Business Studies, 2017, 48(7): 862-892.
|
12 |
DEMIR E, GOZGOR G, PARAMATI S R. Do geopolitical risks matter for inbound tourism? Eurasian Business Review, 2019, 9(2): 183-191.
|
13 |
KIM H, LEE J, OTHERS. The economic costs of diplomatic conflict: Evidence from the South Korea--China THAAD Dispute. Korean Economic Review, 2021, 37: 225-262.
|
14 |
邢剑华, 张辉. 双边政治冲突事件多大程度影响到访游客人数?——基于2012年中日钓鱼岛事件的影响效应评估. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(6): 103-115.
|
|
XING J, ZHANG H. Do bilateral political conflicts affect visitor arrivals?—Empirical study of Sino-Japanese Diaoyu Islands dispute in 2012. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(6): 103-115.
|
15 |
LEE S H, LEE Y S, OTHERS. Political influence and trade uncertainty: Evidence from sanction threats and impositions. Economics Bulletin, 2018, 38(1): 367-372.
|
16 |
HEILMANN K. Does political conflict hurt trade? Evidence from consumer boycotts. Journal of International Economics, 2016, 99: 179-191.
|
17 |
KO J, SHIN M J. Not risky business? Nationalism and foreign direct investment. The Social Science Journal (Fort Collins), 2021: 1-16.
|
18 |
郭荣星, 杨书. 南海划界争端:迈向新的地缘政治与经济均衡. 经济地理, 2019, 39(10): 22-28.
|
|
GUO R, YANG S. The South China Sea disputes: toward a new geopolitical and economic equilibrium. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(10): 22-28.
|
19 |
彭飞, 李淑琴. 基于事件数据的南海周边主要国家地缘关系演化分析. 热带地理, 2022, 42(7): 1061-1072.
|
|
PENG F, LI S. Evolution of the geo-relations between major countries around the South China Sea based on event data analysis. Tropical Geography, 42(7): 1061-1072.
|
20 |
叶淑兰. 南海地缘战略逻辑演进与南海命运共同体建构. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(4): 687-699.
|
|
YE S. Evolution of geostrategic logic of the South China Sea and construction of a community of shared future in the South China Sea. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 687-699.
|
21 |
韩增林, 彭飞, 张耀光, 等. 海洋地缘政治研究进展与中国海洋地缘环境研究探索. 地理科学, 2015, 35(02): 129-136.
|
|
HAN Z, PENG F, ZHANG Y, et al. Updated progress of marine geopolitics and research of the marine geo-setting in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(02): 129-136.
|
22 |
贺良辉, 薛德升. 环中国南海周边国家及地区地缘经贸关系动态演化探析. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(03): 469-479.
|
|
HE L, XUE D. Evolution of geo-economic and trade relations among the countries and regions surrounding the South China Sea. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(3): 469-479.
|
23 |
王鑫静, 姜炎鹏, 马仁锋. 域外国家与南海周边地缘经济联系强度演化与态势评估. 地理研究, 2022, 41(3): 681-697.
|
|
WANG X, JIANG Y, MA R. The evolution and situation assessment of geo-economic linkages intensity between countries outside the region and the surrounding regions of the South China Sea. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(3): 681-697.
|
24 |
徐婧雅, 宋周莺. 海南自贸港与泛南海国家的地缘经济关系演变及其影响因素. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(04): 737-747.
|
|
XU J, SONG Z. The geo-economic relations between Hainan Free Trade Port and Pan-South China Sea countries and its impact factors. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 737-747.
|
25 |
WANG F. South China Sea territorial disputes and Sino-Philippine trade. Economic and Political Studies, 2015, 3(2): 85-111.
|
26 |
CAMBA A, MAGAT J. How do investors respond to territorial disputes? Evidence from the South China Sea and implications on Philippines economic strategy. Singapore Economic Review, 2020, 66(1): 243.
|
27 |
YU Z, XIAO Y, LI J. How does geopolitical uncertainty affect Chinese overseas investment in the energy sector? Evidence from the South China Sea Dispute. Energy Economics, 2021, 100: 105361.
|
28 |
STOREY I. Japan's maritime security interests in Southeast Asia and the South China Sea dispute. Political Science, 2013, 65(2): 135-156.
|
29 |
KOHL T. In and out of the penalty box: US sanctions and their effects on international trade. 2021.
|
30 |
DONG Y, LI C. Economic sanction games among the US, the EU and Russia: Payoffs and potential effects. Economic Modelling, 2018, 73: 117-128.
|
31 |
李曦光. 南海争端解决的法律对策研究. 长春:吉林大学, 2018.
|
|
LI X. Research on legal policies on solving the South China Sea dispute—reflections over the South China Sea Arbitration. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018.
|
32 |
ABADIE A. Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature, 2021, 59(2): 391-425.
|
33 |
ABADIE A, GARDEAZABAL J. The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. The American Economic Review, 2003, 93(1): 113-132.
|
34 |
ABADIE A, DIAMOND A, HAINMUELLER J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2010, 105(490): 493-505.
|
35 |
MAYER T, ZIGNAGO S. Notes on CEPII's distances measures: The GeoDist database. 2011.
|
36 |
KAUL A, KLÖßNER S, PFEIFER G, et al. Standard synthetic control methods: the case of using all preintervention outcomes together with covariates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2022, 40(3): 1362-1376.
|
37 |
ABADIE A, DIAMOND A, HAINMUELLER J. Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 2015, 59(2): 495-510.
|