World Regional Studies ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 826-838.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.04.2020124
Previous Articles Next Articles
Jun CAO1(), Zhengdong ZHANG1(), fengyan CUI1, Sonja CHEN1, Yang YANG2, Tengfei KUANG3, Yuchan CHEN4
Received:
2020-03-05
Revised:
2020-05-20
Online:
2021-07-30
Published:
2021-08-06
Contact:
Zhengdong ZHANG
曹君1(), 张正栋1(), 崔峰艳1, 陈宋佳1, 杨阳2, 匡腾飞3, 陈裕婵4
通讯作者:
张正栋
作者简介:
曹君(1997-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为景观格局与生态系统服务研究,E-mail: jun_xht@126.com。
基金资助:
Jun CAO, Zhengdong ZHANG, fengyan CUI, Sonja CHEN, Yang YANG, Tengfei KUANG, Yuchan CHEN. Response of ecosystem services to landscape pattern changes in the New York Bay Area from 1996 to 2015[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(4): 826-838.
曹君, 张正栋, 崔峰艳, 陈宋佳, 杨阳, 匡腾飞, 陈裕婵. 1996—2015年纽约湾区生态系统服务对景观格局变化的响应[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 826-838.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://sjdlyj.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.04.2020124
土地利用类型 | 生态系统服务价值系数 | 土地利用类型 | 生态系统服务价值系数 |
---|---|---|---|
耕地(Cropland) | 41753 | 湿地(Wetland) | 1051305 |
林地(Forestland | 40365 | 建设用地(Urban) | 49958 |
草地(Grassland) | 31245 | 未利用地(Unutilized land) | 0 |
水域(Water) | 93840 |
Tab.1 Ecosystem service value coefficients of land use type(yuan/hm2a)
土地利用类型 | 生态系统服务价值系数 | 土地利用类型 | 生态系统服务价值系数 |
---|---|---|---|
耕地(Cropland) | 41753 | 湿地(Wetland) | 1051305 |
林地(Forestland | 40365 | 建设用地(Urban) | 49958 |
草地(Grassland) | 31245 | 未利用地(Unutilized land) | 0 |
水域(Water) | 93840 |
类型 | 未利用地级 | 林、草、水用地级 | 农业用地级 | 城镇聚落用地级 |
---|---|---|---|---|
土地利用类型 | 未利用地或难利用地 | 林地、草地、湿地、水域 | 耕地、园地、人工草地 | 城镇、居民点、工矿用地、交通用地 |
分级指数 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Tab.2 The classification values of land use degree
类型 | 未利用地级 | 林、草、水用地级 | 农业用地级 | 城镇聚落用地级 |
---|---|---|---|---|
土地利用类型 | 未利用地或难利用地 | 林地、草地、湿地、水域 | 耕地、园地、人工草地 | 城镇、居民点、工矿用地、交通用地 |
分级指数 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
景观类型 | 1996年 | 2000年 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 1996—2015 变化量 /km2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | 面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | 面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | 面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | 面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | ||
耕地 | 168.14 | 0.45 | 162.65 | 0.44 | 156.48 | 0.42 | 146.67 | 0.39 | 143.91 | 0.39 | -24.23 |
林地 | 22902.90 | 61.57 | 22582.10 | 60.70 | 22306.30 | 59.96 | 21936.90 | 58.97 | 21711.70 | 58.36 | -1191.20 |
草地 | 7015.48 | 18.86 | 7042.35 | 18.93 | 7025.22 | 18.88 | 6977.36 | 18.76 | 6909.17 | 18.57 | -106.31 |
水域 | 1019.93 | 2.74 | 1028.84 | 2.77 | 1028.45 | 2.76 | 1037.09 | 2.79 | 1033.85 | 2.78 | 13.92 |
湿地 | 658.86 | 1.77 | 651.74 | 1.75 | 611.51 | 1.64 | 595.33 | 1.60 | 586.77 | 1.58 | -72.10 |
建设用地 | 5339.02 | 14.35 | 5637.65 | 15.15 | 5977.83 | 16.07 | 6412.79 | 17.24 | 6721.71 | 18.07 | 1382.69 |
未利用地 | 96.03 | 0.26 | 94.99 | 0.26 | 94.55 | 0.25 | 94.19 | 0.25 | 93.17 | 0.25 | -2.85 |
总值 | 37200.36 | 100 | 37200.32 | 100 | 37200.33 | 100 | 37200.34 | 100 | 37200.28 | 100 | -0.08 |
Tab.3 Land use area change of New York Bar Area from 1996 to 2015
景观类型 | 1996年 | 2000年 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 1996—2015 变化量 /km2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | 面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | 面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | 面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | 面积 /km2 | 占比 /% | ||
耕地 | 168.14 | 0.45 | 162.65 | 0.44 | 156.48 | 0.42 | 146.67 | 0.39 | 143.91 | 0.39 | -24.23 |
林地 | 22902.90 | 61.57 | 22582.10 | 60.70 | 22306.30 | 59.96 | 21936.90 | 58.97 | 21711.70 | 58.36 | -1191.20 |
草地 | 7015.48 | 18.86 | 7042.35 | 18.93 | 7025.22 | 18.88 | 6977.36 | 18.76 | 6909.17 | 18.57 | -106.31 |
水域 | 1019.93 | 2.74 | 1028.84 | 2.77 | 1028.45 | 2.76 | 1037.09 | 2.79 | 1033.85 | 2.78 | 13.92 |
湿地 | 658.86 | 1.77 | 651.74 | 1.75 | 611.51 | 1.64 | 595.33 | 1.60 | 586.77 | 1.58 | -72.10 |
建设用地 | 5339.02 | 14.35 | 5637.65 | 15.15 | 5977.83 | 16.07 | 6412.79 | 17.24 | 6721.71 | 18.07 | 1382.69 |
未利用地 | 96.03 | 0.26 | 94.99 | 0.26 | 94.55 | 0.25 | 94.19 | 0.25 | 93.17 | 0.25 | -2.85 |
总值 | 37200.36 | 100 | 37200.32 | 100 | 37200.33 | 100 | 37200.34 | 100 | 37200.28 | 100 | -0.08 |
景观类型 | 1996 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 研究期变化量 /亿元 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ||
耕地 | 7.02 | 0.32 | 6.79 | 0.31 | 6.53 | 0.30 | 6.12 | 0.28 | 6.01 | 0.28 | -1.01 |
林地 | 924.48 | 41.91 | 911.53 | 41.40 | 900.39 | 41.60 | 885.48 | 41.12 | 876.39 | 40.80 | -48.08 |
草地 | 219.20 | 9.94 | 220.04 | 9.99 | 219.50 | 10.14 | 218.01 | 10.12 | 215.88 | 10.05 | -3.32 |
水域 | 95.71 | 4.34 | 96.55 | 4.39 | 96.51 | 4.46 | 97.32 | 4.52 | 97.02 | 4.52 | 1.31 |
湿地 | 692.66 | 31.40 | 685.18 | 31.12 | 642.88 | 29.70 | 625.88 | 29.07 | 616.87 | 28.72 | -75.80 |
建设用地 | 266.73 | 12.09 | 281.65 | 12.79 | 298.64 | 13.80 | 320.37 | 14.88 | 335.80 | 15.63 | 69.08 |
未利用地 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
总值 | 2205.80 | 100 | 2201.73 | 100 | 2164.46 | 100 | 2153.18 | 100 | 2147.97 | 100 | -57.83 |
单位面积ESV值 | 59295.60 | 59186.16 | 58184.37 | 57881.21 | 57741.08 | -1554.52 |
Tab.4 The contribution rate and changes of ESV in land use types of New York Bar Area from 1996 to 2015
景观类型 | 1996 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 研究期变化量 /亿元 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ESV /亿元 | 贡献比例 /% | ||
耕地 | 7.02 | 0.32 | 6.79 | 0.31 | 6.53 | 0.30 | 6.12 | 0.28 | 6.01 | 0.28 | -1.01 |
林地 | 924.48 | 41.91 | 911.53 | 41.40 | 900.39 | 41.60 | 885.48 | 41.12 | 876.39 | 40.80 | -48.08 |
草地 | 219.20 | 9.94 | 220.04 | 9.99 | 219.50 | 10.14 | 218.01 | 10.12 | 215.88 | 10.05 | -3.32 |
水域 | 95.71 | 4.34 | 96.55 | 4.39 | 96.51 | 4.46 | 97.32 | 4.52 | 97.02 | 4.52 | 1.31 |
湿地 | 692.66 | 31.40 | 685.18 | 31.12 | 642.88 | 29.70 | 625.88 | 29.07 | 616.87 | 28.72 | -75.80 |
建设用地 | 266.73 | 12.09 | 281.65 | 12.79 | 298.64 | 13.80 | 320.37 | 14.88 | 335.80 | 15.63 | 69.08 |
未利用地 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
总值 | 2205.80 | 100 | 2201.73 | 100 | 2164.46 | 100 | 2153.18 | 100 | 2147.97 | 100 | -57.83 |
单位面积ESV值 | 59295.60 | 59186.16 | 58184.37 | 57881.21 | 57741.08 | -1554.52 |
纽约湾区 | PD | AREA_MN | FRAC_AM | COHESION | DIVISION | AI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESV总值 | 0.427* | 0.757** | 0.611** | 0.525** | -0.725** | 0.590** | |
耕地 | 0.947* | 0.975** | 0.941* | 0.963** | .c | 0.962** | |
林地 | -0.986** | 0.995** | 0.886* | 0.907* | -0.908* | 0.76 | |
草地 | -0.917* | 0.953* | 0.934* | 0.975** | -0.981** | 0.965** | |
水域 | -0.931* | 0.976** | 0.858 | 0.879* | -0.819 | 0.944* | |
湿地 | 0.974** | 0.943* | 0.994** | 0.972** | .c | 0.242 | |
建设用地 | 0.735 | -0.029 | 0.928* | 0.869 | -0.947* | -0.031 |
Tab.5 Correlation index between ESV and landscape pattern index
纽约湾区 | PD | AREA_MN | FRAC_AM | COHESION | DIVISION | AI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESV总值 | 0.427* | 0.757** | 0.611** | 0.525** | -0.725** | 0.590** | |
耕地 | 0.947* | 0.975** | 0.941* | 0.963** | .c | 0.962** | |
林地 | -0.986** | 0.995** | 0.886* | 0.907* | -0.908* | 0.76 | |
草地 | -0.917* | 0.953* | 0.934* | 0.975** | -0.981** | 0.965** | |
水域 | -0.931* | 0.976** | 0.858 | 0.879* | -0.819 | 0.944* | |
湿地 | 0.974** | 0.943* | 0.994** | 0.972** | .c | 0.242 | |
建设用地 | 0.735 | -0.029 | 0.928* | 0.869 | -0.947* | -0.031 |
年份 | Not Sigenificant | High-High | Low-Low | Low-High | High-Low | 全局Moran’I |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996年 | 9.19% | 3.59% | 63.11% | 19.52% | 4.59% | 0.081 |
2000年 | 9.30% | 3.71% | 62.04% | 20.48% | 4.47% | 0.084 |
2005年 | 9.10% | 3.74% | 61.51% | 21.41% | 4.25% | 0.086 |
2010年 | 8.80% | 3.77% | 60.78% | 22.45% | 4.21% | 0.087 |
2015年 | 8.72% | 3.81% | 60.11% | 23.21% | 4.15% | 0.087 |
变化趋势 | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ |
Tab.6 The proportion of plaques of each cluster type in New York Bay Area from 1996 to 2015
年份 | Not Sigenificant | High-High | Low-Low | Low-High | High-Low | 全局Moran’I |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996年 | 9.19% | 3.59% | 63.11% | 19.52% | 4.59% | 0.081 |
2000年 | 9.30% | 3.71% | 62.04% | 20.48% | 4.47% | 0.084 |
2005年 | 9.10% | 3.74% | 61.51% | 21.41% | 4.25% | 0.086 |
2010年 | 8.80% | 3.77% | 60.78% | 22.45% | 4.21% | 0.087 |
2015年 | 8.72% | 3.81% | 60.11% | 23.21% | 4.15% | 0.087 |
变化趋势 | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ |
1 | Costanza R,Arge R,De Groot R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260. |
2 | Costanza R,De Groot R,Sutton P,et al.Changes in the global value of ecosystem services.Global Environmental Change,2014,26(1):152-158. |
3 | Daily G C,Soderquist T,Aniyar S,et al.The value of nature and the nature of value.Science,2000,289(5478):395-396. |
4 | Sutton P C,Costanza R. Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery,land cover,and ecosystem service valuation.Ecological Economics,2002,41(3):509-527. |
5 | 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展.地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446. |
Fu B, Zhang L.Land-use change and ecosystem services: concepts,methods and progress. Progress in Geography,2014,33(4):441-446. | |
6 | Leemans H B J,Groot R S D.Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Physics Teacher,2003,34(9):534-534. |
7 | 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919. |
Xie G, Zhen L,Lu C,et al.Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources,2008,23(5):911-919. | |
8 | 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进. 自然资源学报,2015,30(8): 1243-1254. |
Xie G,Zhang C,Zhang L.Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area.Journal of Natural Resources,2015,30(8):1243-1254. | |
9 | 赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价. 自然资源学报,2004(4):480-491. |
Zhao T,Ouyang Z,Zheng H,et al.Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. Journal of Natural Resources,2004,19(4): 480-491. | |
10 | 刘兴元,龙瑞军,尚占环.草地生态系统服务功能及其价值评估方法研究. 草业学报,2011,20(01):167-174. |
Liu X,Long R,Shang Z.Evaluation method of ecological services function and their value for grassland ecosystems. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2011,20(01):167-174. | |
11 | 赵荣钦,黄爱民,秦明周,等.农田生态系统服务功能及其评价方法研究. 农业系统科学与综合研究,2003,19(04):267-270. |
Zhao R,Huang A,Qin M.Studay on farmland ecososyem service and it's valuation method. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture,2003,19(04):267-270. | |
12 | 江波,欧阳志云,苗鸿,等.海河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值评价. 生态学报,2011,31(08):2236-2244. |
Jiang B,Ouyang Z,Miao H, et al.Ecosystem services valuation of the Haihe River basin wetlands. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(08):2236-2244. | |
13 | 宋敏敏,张青峰,吴发启,等.黄土沟壑区小流域景观格局演变及生态服务价值响应. 生态学报, 2018,38(08):2649-2659. |
Song M, Zhang Q,Wu F.Landscape pattern changes and evaluation of ecological service values in a small watershed of the Loess Gully Region. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(08):2649-2659. | |
14 | 段瑞娟,郝晋珉,张洁瑕.北京区位土地利用与生态服务价值变化研究. 农业工程学报,2006,22(09):21-28. |
Duan R,Hao J, Zhang J.Land utilization and changes on eco-service value in different locations in Beijing. Transactions of the CSAE,2006,22(09):21-28. | |
15 | 王航,秦奋,朱筠,等.土地利用及景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响. 生态学报,2017,37(4):1286-1296. |
Wang H,Qin F,Zhu J.The effects of land use structure and landscape pattern change on ecosystem service values. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(04):1286-1296. | |
16 | 徐丽芬,许学工,罗涛,等.基于土地利用的生态系统服务价值当量修订方法——以渤海湾沿岸为例. 地理研究,2012,31(10):1775-1784. |
Xu L,Xu X,Luo T.Services based on land use: A case study of Bohai Rim. Geographical Research,2012,31(10):1775-1784. | |
17 | Zalasiewicz J,Williams M,Steffen W,et al.The new world of the anthropocene. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010. 44(7): 2228-223.. |
18 | Karen C, Seto, Michail, et al.A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS One, 2011,6(8): e23777. |
19 | Santos-Martin F,Zorrilla-Miras P,Palomo I,et al.Protecting nature is necessary but not sufficient for conserving ecosystem services: A comprehensive assessment along a gradient of land-use intensity in Spain. Ecosystem Services, 2019. 35(C): 43-51. |
20 | 吴健生,岳新欣,秦维.基于生态系统服务价值重构的生态安全格局构建--以重庆两江新区为例. 地理研究,2017,36(3):429-440. |
Wu J,Yue X,Qin W. The establishment of ecological security patterns based on the redistribution of ecosystem service value: A case study in the Liangjiang New Area, Chongqing. Geographical Research,2017,36(3):429-440. | |
21 | 邓楚雄,钟小龙,谢炳庚,等.洞庭湖区土地生态系统的服务价值时空变化. 地理研究,2019,38(04):844-855. |
Deng C,Zhong X,Xie B, et al. Spatial and temporal changes of land ecosystem service value in Dongting Lake area in 1995-2015. Geographical Research,2019,38(04):844-855. | |
22 | Arowolo A O,Deng X,Olatunji O A,et al.Assessing changes in the value of ecosystem services in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Nigeria. Science of The Total Environment,2018,636(2018):597-609. |
23 | 封建民,郭玲霞,李晓华.汉中市土地利用时空变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响. 水土保持研究,2020,27(01):275-282. |
Feng J,Guo L,Li X.Temporal and spatial variations of land uses and their influences on ecosystem service function values in Hanzhong City. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):275-282. | |
24 | 韩增林,赵文祯,闫晓露,等.基于生态系统服务价值损益的生态安全格局演变分析——以辽宁沿海瓦房店市为例. 生态学报,2019,39(22):8370-8382. |
Han Z,Zhao W,Yan X, et al.The evolution of ecological security pattern based on the profit and loss analysis of ecosystem services: taking Wafangdian County as a case. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(22):8370-8382. | |
25 | 李青圃,张正栋,万露文,等.基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化. 地理学报,2019,74(7):1420-1437. |
Li Q,Zhang Z,Wan L, et al.Landscape pattern optimization in Ningjiang River Basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment. Acta Geographica Sinica,2019,74(07):1420-1437. | |
26 | 王金凤,刘方,白晓永,等.西南地区生态系统服务价值时空演变及模拟预测. 生态学报,2019,39(19):7057-7066. |
Wang J,Liu F,Bai X.The spatial and temporal evolution and simulation forecast of ecosystem service values in southwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(19):7057-7066. | |
27 | 雷金睿,陈宗铸,吴庭天,等.海南岛东北部土地利用与生态系统服务价值空间自相关格局分析[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(07):2366-2377. |
Lei J,Chen Z,Wu T.Spatial autocorrelation pattern analysis of land use and the value of ecosystem services in northeast Hainan island. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(07):2366-2377. | |
28 | 黄木易,岳文泽,方斌,等.1970-2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制. 地理学报,2019,74(09):1904-1920.[Huang M,Yue W,Fang B.Scale response characteristics and geographic exploration mechanism of spatialdifferentiation of ecosystem service values in Dabie Mountain area,central China from 1970 to 2015[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2019,74(09):1904-1920.] |
29 | 张震.粤港澳大湾区产业结构变迁对经济协调发展的影响. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(07):48-55. |
Zhang Z.Analysis on the influence of industrial structure's change and the coordinated development of economy in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Bay Area. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2019,36(07):48-55. | |
30 | 田莉.纽约大都市区规划. 城市与区域规划研究,2012,5(01):179-195. |
Tian L.Greater New York planning. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning,2012,5(01):179-195. | |
31 | 庄大方,刘纪远.中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究. 自然资源学报,1997,12(2):10-16. |
Zhuang D, Liu J.Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China. Journal of Natural Resources,1997,12(2);10-16. | |
32 | Getis A,Ord J K.The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis,1992,24(3):189-206. |
33 | 林炳青,陈兴伟,陈莹,等.流域景观格局变化对洪枯径流影响的SWAT模型模拟分析. 生态学报,2014,34(07):1772-1780. |
Lin B,Chen X, Chen Y, et al.Simulations and analysis on the effects of landscape pattern change on flood and low flow based on SWAT model. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(07):1772-1780. | |
34 | 徐炫清,陈裕婵,李青圃,等.五华河流域景观格局演变对径流泥沙的影响. 水土保持研究,2018,25(01):231-236+242. |
Xu X,Chen Y,Li Q.Effects of landscape patterns on runoff and sediment in Wuhua River Basin. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):231-236+242. | |
35 | 刘永超,李加林,袁麒翔,等.中美港湾流域生态系统服务价值变化比较——以浙江象山港与佛罗里达坦帕湾为例. 地理研究,2019,38(02):357-368. |
Liu Y,Li J,Yuan Q.A comparative study on the changes of ecosystem services values in the bay basinbetween China and the USA: A case study on Xiangshangang Bay basin,Zhejiang andTampa Bay basin,Florida. Geographical Research,2019,38(02):357-368. | |
36 | 姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(9):249-256. |
Yao X,Zeng J,Li W.Spatial correlation characteristics of urbanization and land ecosystem service value in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2015,31(9):249-256. | |
37 | Anselin L.Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis,1995,27(2):93-115. |
38 | 沈哲,刘平养,黄劼.纽约市湿地保护对我国大中型城市的启示.环境保护,2012(19):76-78. |
Shen Z,Liu P,Huang H.New York City wetland conservation for China's large and medium-sized cities. Environmental Protection,2012(19):76-78. | |
39 | 王俊惠,侯西勇,张安定.美国本土海岸带土地利用变化特征研究. 世界地理研究,2018,27(3):19-29. |
Wang J, Hou X, Zhnag A. Study on the characteristics of land use change in American coastal zone. World Regional Studies, 2018,27(3):19-29. | |
40 | 秦大河,张国友,宋长青,等.今天的中国为什么比任何时候都需要世界地理学. 世界地理研究,2020,29(01):1-7. |
Qin D, Zhang G,Song C,et al.Why does China today need world geography more than ever. World Regional Studies,2020,29(1):1-7. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||