World Regional Studies ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 87-97.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.06.2021166
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zefeng MI1a,1b(), Jingxuan FU1a,1b, Yuhui XIANG2, Zhenning ZHU1a,1b(), Zhixin QIU1a,1b
Received:
2021-03-11
Revised:
2021-05-22
Online:
2023-06-19
Published:
2023-08-07
Contact:
Zhenning ZHU
宓泽锋1a,1b(), 傅竞萱1a,1b, 项煜辉2, 朱振宁1a,1b(), 邱志鑫1a,1b
通讯作者:
朱振宁
作者简介:
宓泽锋(1991—),男,博士,讲师/特聘副研究员,研究方向为创新与区域发展,E-mail:mizefeng1991@163.com。
基金资助:
Zefeng MI, Jingxuan FU, Yuhui XIANG, Zhenning ZHU, Zhixin QIU. Research on the relationship between regional innovation integration and localization of emerging industries:[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(6): 87-97.
宓泽锋, 傅竞萱, 项煜辉, 朱振宁, 邱志鑫. 新兴产业区域创新一体化与地方化的关系探究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(6): 87-97.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://sjdlyj.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.06.2021166
模型 | 指标(缩写) | 类型 | 表征含义 | 单位 |
---|---|---|---|---|
模 型 1 | 城市内合作研发次数( | 被解释变量 | 合作研发的地方网络强度 | 次 |
合作研发中城市内部联系比重( | 被解释变量 | 合作研发的地方化程度 | % | |
城市间合作研发次数( | 核心解释变量 | 合作研发的区域一体化程度 | 次 | |
模 型 2 | 城市内部专利转让次数( | 被解释变量 | 专利转让的地方网络强度 | 次 |
专利转让中城市内部联系比重( | 被解释变量 | 专利转让的地方化程度 | % | |
城市间专利转让次数( | 核心解释变量 | 专利转让的区域一体化程度 | 次 | |
两 模 型 共 用 | 公共财政中教育支出经费( | 控制变量 | 教育投入 | 十亿元 |
公共财政中科技支出经费( | 控制变量 | 科技投入 | 十亿元 | |
城镇居民可支配收入( | 控制变量 | 地区发展水平 | 万元 | |
固定资产投资( | 控制变量 | 资金投入强度 | 千亿元 | |
外资企业工业产值( | 控制变量 | 外资企业力量 | 千亿元 |
Tab.1 Index selection results
模型 | 指标(缩写) | 类型 | 表征含义 | 单位 |
---|---|---|---|---|
模 型 1 | 城市内合作研发次数( | 被解释变量 | 合作研发的地方网络强度 | 次 |
合作研发中城市内部联系比重( | 被解释变量 | 合作研发的地方化程度 | % | |
城市间合作研发次数( | 核心解释变量 | 合作研发的区域一体化程度 | 次 | |
模 型 2 | 城市内部专利转让次数( | 被解释变量 | 专利转让的地方网络强度 | 次 |
专利转让中城市内部联系比重( | 被解释变量 | 专利转让的地方化程度 | % | |
城市间专利转让次数( | 核心解释变量 | 专利转让的区域一体化程度 | 次 | |
两 模 型 共 用 | 公共财政中教育支出经费( | 控制变量 | 教育投入 | 十亿元 |
公共财政中科技支出经费( | 控制变量 | 科技投入 | 十亿元 | |
城镇居民可支配收入( | 控制变量 | 地区发展水平 | 万元 | |
固定资产投资( | 控制变量 | 资金投入强度 | 千亿元 | |
外资企业工业产值( | 控制变量 | 外资企业力量 | 千亿元 |
被解释变量 | 合作研发网络 | 被解释变量 | 专利转让网络 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1-1 | 模型1-2 | 模型2-1 | 模型2-2 | ||
L.Cooperation | POC | L.Assignment | POA | ||
0.24*** | -0.10*** | 0.37*** | -0.02*** | ||
(0.09) | (0.03) | (0.12) | (0.00) | ||
0.01*** | 1.03e-03** | -1.72e-03 | 1.80e-04*** | ||
(0.001) | (4.19e-04) | (1.38e-03) | (3.25e-05) | ||
0.68*** | 0.03 | 1.65*** | 2.74e-03 | ||
(0.16) | (0.05) | (0.42) | (0.01) | ||
0.17** | -0.03** | 0.51*** | -9.01e-03** | ||
(0.08) | (0.01) | (0.19) | (4.55e-03) | ||
0.25 | 0.21*** | 1.92*** | 0.03** | ||
(0.20) | (0.07) | (0.51) | (0.01) | ||
1.42*** | 0.34*** | -1.13 | 0.06*** | ||
(0.30) | (0.10) | (0.76) | (0.02) | ||
1.36*** | 0.06** | 6.72*** | 0.05*** | ||
(0.17) | (0.03) | (0.42) | (0.01) | ||
常数项 | -1.07** | -0.02 | 常数项 | -1.77 | 0.38*** |
(0.44) | (0.22) | (1.10) | (0.04) | ||
观测量 | 738 | 738 | 观测量 | 738 | 738 |
样本数 | 41 | 41 | 样本数 | 41 | 41 |
Tab.2 Panel OLS regression results of the impact of technological innovation integration of new material industry on localization
被解释变量 | 合作研发网络 | 被解释变量 | 专利转让网络 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1-1 | 模型1-2 | 模型2-1 | 模型2-2 | ||
L.Cooperation | POC | L.Assignment | POA | ||
0.24*** | -0.10*** | 0.37*** | -0.02*** | ||
(0.09) | (0.03) | (0.12) | (0.00) | ||
0.01*** | 1.03e-03** | -1.72e-03 | 1.80e-04*** | ||
(0.001) | (4.19e-04) | (1.38e-03) | (3.25e-05) | ||
0.68*** | 0.03 | 1.65*** | 2.74e-03 | ||
(0.16) | (0.05) | (0.42) | (0.01) | ||
0.17** | -0.03** | 0.51*** | -9.01e-03** | ||
(0.08) | (0.01) | (0.19) | (4.55e-03) | ||
0.25 | 0.21*** | 1.92*** | 0.03** | ||
(0.20) | (0.07) | (0.51) | (0.01) | ||
1.42*** | 0.34*** | -1.13 | 0.06*** | ||
(0.30) | (0.10) | (0.76) | (0.02) | ||
1.36*** | 0.06** | 6.72*** | 0.05*** | ||
(0.17) | (0.03) | (0.42) | (0.01) | ||
常数项 | -1.07** | -0.02 | 常数项 | -1.77 | 0.38*** |
(0.44) | (0.22) | (1.10) | (0.04) | ||
观测量 | 738 | 738 | 观测量 | 738 | 738 |
样本数 | 41 | 41 | 样本数 | 41 | 41 |
变量 | 模型1-1 | 模型1-2 | 模型2-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
是否存在U形关系 | 不存在 | 正U形关系 | 正U形关系 | |||
极值点 | -9.945 7 | 48.326 5 | 57.942 6 | |||
界线 | Lower bound | Upper bound | Lower bound | Upper bound | Lower bound | Upper bound |
Interval | 0 | 75 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 109 |
Slope | 0.244 3 | 2.086 7 | -0.099 8 | 0.055 1 | -0.020 9 | 0.018 4 |
t-value | — | — | -3.707 3 | 1.334 7 | -7.368 3 | 3.837 7 |
P>∣t∣ | — | — | 0.000 1 | 0.091 5 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 |
Tab.3 U test of U-shaped relationship in model 1-1, 1-2 and 2-2
变量 | 模型1-1 | 模型1-2 | 模型2-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
是否存在U形关系 | 不存在 | 正U形关系 | 正U形关系 | |||
极值点 | -9.945 7 | 48.326 5 | 57.942 6 | |||
界线 | Lower bound | Upper bound | Lower bound | Upper bound | Lower bound | Upper bound |
Interval | 0 | 75 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 109 |
Slope | 0.244 3 | 2.086 7 | -0.099 8 | 0.055 1 | -0.020 9 | 0.018 4 |
t-value | — | — | -3.707 3 | 1.334 7 | -7.368 3 | 3.837 7 |
P>∣t∣ | — | — | 0.000 1 | 0.091 5 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 |
被解释变量 | 合作研发网络 | 被解释变量 | 专利转让网络 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1-1 | 模型1-2 | 模型2-1 | 模型2-2 | ||
L.Cooperation | POC | L.Assignment | POA | ||
0.24* | -0.10*** | 0.37*** | -0.02*** | ||
(0.13) | (0.03) | (0.14) | (0.00) | ||
0.01*** | 1.03e-03** | -1.72e-03 | 1.80e-04*** | ||
(0.00) | (4.03e-04) | (1.30e-03) | (3.35e-05) | ||
0.68*** | 0.03 | 1.65*** | 2.74e-03 | ||
(0.17) | (0.02) | (0.43) | (0.01) | ||
0.17** | -0.03** | 0.51*** | -9.01e-03** | ||
(0.08) | (0.01) | (0.16) | (4.14e-03) | ||
0.25 | 0.21** | 1.92*** | 0.03** | ||
(0.22) | (0.09) | (0.72) | (0.01) | ||
1.42** | 0.34*** | -1.13 | 0.06*** | ||
(0.58) | (0.09) | (1.18) | (0.02) | ||
1.36** | 0.06** | 6.72*** | 0.05*** | ||
(0.67) | (0.03) | (1.93) | (0.01) | ||
常数项 | -1.07** | -0.02 | 常数项 | -1.77 | 0.38*** |
(0.34) | (0.09) | (1.14) | (0.05) | ||
观测量 | 738 | 738 | 观测量 | 738 | 738 |
样本数 | 41 | 41 | 样本数 | 41 | 41 |
Tab.4 Robust regression results of the impact of technological innovation integration of new material industry on localization
被解释变量 | 合作研发网络 | 被解释变量 | 专利转让网络 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1-1 | 模型1-2 | 模型2-1 | 模型2-2 | ||
L.Cooperation | POC | L.Assignment | POA | ||
0.24* | -0.10*** | 0.37*** | -0.02*** | ||
(0.13) | (0.03) | (0.14) | (0.00) | ||
0.01*** | 1.03e-03** | -1.72e-03 | 1.80e-04*** | ||
(0.00) | (4.03e-04) | (1.30e-03) | (3.35e-05) | ||
0.68*** | 0.03 | 1.65*** | 2.74e-03 | ||
(0.17) | (0.02) | (0.43) | (0.01) | ||
0.17** | -0.03** | 0.51*** | -9.01e-03** | ||
(0.08) | (0.01) | (0.16) | (4.14e-03) | ||
0.25 | 0.21** | 1.92*** | 0.03** | ||
(0.22) | (0.09) | (0.72) | (0.01) | ||
1.42** | 0.34*** | -1.13 | 0.06*** | ||
(0.58) | (0.09) | (1.18) | (0.02) | ||
1.36** | 0.06** | 6.72*** | 0.05*** | ||
(0.67) | (0.03) | (1.93) | (0.01) | ||
常数项 | -1.07** | -0.02 | 常数项 | -1.77 | 0.38*** |
(0.34) | (0.09) | (1.14) | (0.05) | ||
观测量 | 738 | 738 | 观测量 | 738 | 738 |
样本数 | 41 | 41 | 样本数 | 41 | 41 |
1 | 张海娜, 曾刚, 朱贻文. 德国创新政策及其对区域发展的影响研究.世界地理研究, 2019, 28(3):104-112. |
ZHANG H, ZENG G, ZHU Y. German innovation policy and its impact on regional development. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(3):104-112. | |
2 | 陈帅飞. 经济转型升级背景下地方政府创新发展高新技术产业的路径选择. 科学管理研究, 2020, 38(2): 71-77. |
CHEN S. Path choice of the high-tech industry's innovative development by local government under the background of economic transformation and upgrading. Scientific Management Research, 2020, 38(2): 71-77. | |
3 | 中共中央,国务院. 长江三角洲区域一体化发展规划纲要. 人民日报, 2019-12-02(1). |
CPC Central Committee, Council State. Outline of the Yangtze River Delta regional integration development plan. People's Daily, 2019-12-02(1). | |
4 | 彭建强. 增强经济落后地区内在发展动力. 人民日报, 2016-09-26(19). |
PENG J. Enhance the internal development power of economically backward areas. People's Daily, 2016-09-26(19) | |
5 | 贺灿飞, 郭琪, 马妍, 等. 西方经济地理学研究进展. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1207-1223. |
HE C, GUO Q, MA Y, et al. Progress of economic geography in the West: A literature review. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1207-1223. | |
6 | THOMAS K. Creating regional cultures of innovation? The regional innovation strategies in England and Scotland. Regional Studies, 2000, 34(2): 190-198. |
7 | BERGMAN E M, MAIER G. Network central: Regional positioning for innovative advantage. Annals of Regional Science, 2009, 43(3): 615-644. |
8 | BOSCHMA R, BALLAND P, KOGLER D. Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2015(24): 223-250. |
9 | 宓泽锋, 曾刚. 创新松散型产业的创新网络特征及其对创新绩效的影响研究——以长江经济带物流产业为例. 地理研究, 2017, 36(9): 1653-1666. |
MI Z, ZENG G. The innovation network characteristics of innovation-loose industry and its impact on innovation performance: An empirical analysis on the logistics industry of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(9): 1653-1666. | |
10 | 司月芳,曾刚,曹贤忠,等.基于全球—地方视角的创新网络研究进展.地理科学进展, 2016,35(5):600-609. |
SI Y, ZENG G, CAO X, et al. Research progress of global innovation networks. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(5):600-609. | |
11 | BATHELT H, MALMBERG A, MASKELL P. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 2004, 28(1): 31-56. |
12 | 叶琴, 曾刚. 经济地理学视角下创新网络研究进展. 人文地理, 2019, 34(3):13-19. |
YE Q, ZENG G. Research progress in Innovation Network: A perspective from economic geography. Human Geography, 2019, 34(3):13-19. | |
13 | 谭文柱. 地理空间与创新:理论发展脉络与思考. 世界地理研究, 2012, 21(3):94-100. |
TAN W. Geographic space and innovation: Theoretical development and thinking. World Regional Studies, 2012, 21(3):94-100. | |
14 | 曹贤忠, 曾刚, 司月芳,等. 企业创新网络与多维邻近性关系研究述评. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(5):165-171. |
CAO X, ZENG G, SI Y, et al. Research progress on firm innovation networks and multi-dimensional proximity from the perspective of economic geography. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(5):165-171. | |
15 | FUKUGAWA N. Knowledge spillover from university research before the national innovation system reform in Japan: localisation, mechanisms, and intermediaries. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2016, 24(1): 100-122. |
16 | 邬爱其, 田传浩. 浙江省企业跨区域成长意愿及其影响因素实证分析. 浙江社会科学, 2005(4): 200-206. |
WU A, TIAN C. An empirical analysis on the interregional growth willingness of enterprises in Zhejiang Province and its influencing factors. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 2005(4): 200-206. | |
17 | 朱华友, 李涵, 代泽娟,等. 动态外部性视角的企业再地方化效应及地区影响——以皖江产业承接示范区为例. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8):1246-1255. |
ZHU H, LI H, DAI Z, et al. Enterprises relocalization and its influence on regional transformation and development based on the spatial externality: A case of the industrial transfer demonstration region in cities along the Yangtze River of Anhui. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(8):1246-1255. | |
18 | 马双, 曾刚. 网络视角下中国十大城市群区域创新模式研究. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6):905-911. |
MA S, ZENG G. Regional innovation models of China's ten major urban agglomerations from the perspective of network. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(6):905-911. | |
19 | 马双, 曾刚. 多尺度视角下中国城市创新网络格局及邻近性机理分析. 人文地理, 2020, 35(1):95-103. |
MA S, ZENG G. Analysis of China's urban innovation network pattern and its proximity mechanism from a multi-scale perspective. Human Geography, 2020, 35(1):95-103. | |
20 | 殷德生, 吴虹仪, 金桩. 创新网络、知识溢出与高质量一体化发展——来自长江三角洲城市群的证据. 上海经济研究, 2019(11):30-45. |
YIN D, WU H, JIN Z. Innovation network, knowledge spillover and high-quality integrated development: An empirical study based on the urban agglomeration of the Yangtze River Delta. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2019(11):30-45. | |
21 | 胡艳, 潘婷, 张桅. 一体化国家战略下长三角城市群协同创新的经济增长效应研究. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 51(5):99-106. |
HU Y, PAN T, ZHANG W. On the economic growth effect of the coordinated innovation of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration under the integrated national strategy. Journal of East China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2019, 51(5):99-106. | |
22 | 李士梅, 胡续楠. 新材料产业全要素生产率变化率测算及影响因素. 财经问题研究, 2019(5):41-48. |
LI S, HU X. Measurement of the rate of change of total factor productivity in new materials industry and its influencing factors. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2019(5):41-48. | |
23 | 林兰, 曾刚, 吕国庆. 基于创新"二分法"的中国装备制造业创新网络研究. 地理科学, 2017, 37(10): 1469-1477. |
LIN L, ZENG G, LV G. Innovation network of the chinese equipment manufacturing industry: Based on the dichotomy of innovation. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(10):1469-1477. | |
24 | 杨丽君. 技术引进与自主研发对经济增长的影响——基于知识产权保护视角. 科研管理, 2020, 41(6):9-16. |
YANG L. Influence of technology import and independent R&D on economic growth—A study based on the perspective of intellectual property protection. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(6):9-16. | |
25 | 马海涛. 知识流动空间的城市关系建构与创新网络模拟. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4):708-721. |
MA H. The theoretical construction and network simulation of intercity innovative relationships in knowledge flow space. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4):708-721. | |
26 | 李左峰. 创新型企业创新投入要素的产出弹性估计. 管理世界, 2013(2):176-177. |
LI Z. Estimation of output elasticity of innovation input factors in innovative enterprises. Management World, 2013(2):176-177. | |
27 | 宓泽锋, 周灿, 尚勇敏, 等. 本地知识基础对新兴产业创新集群形成的影响——以中国燃料电池产业为例. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7):1478-1489. |
MI Z, ZHOU C, SHANG Y, et al. The impact of local knowledge base on the formation of innovation clusters in emerging industries: The case study of China's fuel cell industry. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(7):1478-1489. | |
28 | 盛彦文, 苟倩, 宋金平. 城市群创新联系网络结构与创新效率研究——以京津冀、长三角、珠三角城市群为例. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1831-1839. |
SHENG Y, GOU Q, SONG J. Innovation linkage network structure and innovation efficiency in urban agglomeration: A case of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(11):1831-1839. | |
29 | 查婷俊, 杨锐. 技术创新本地化壁垒与突破路径研究. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(23): 1-8. |
ZHA T, YANG R. Research on the localization barriers and breakthrough paths of technological innovation. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2015, 32(23):1-8. |
[1] | Zezhou SHEN, Chengyun WANG. Shanghai's position in global science and technology innovation network: [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(2): 93-103. |
[2] | Jingjing BAI, Junfeng LI. Correlation of innovation network and innovation performance of enterprises in industrial cluster: A case study of cable industry cluster of Gaogou Town, Anhui Province [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(1): 157-166. |
[3] | Xianzhong CAO, Gang ZENG, Yuefang SI, Haina ZHANG. Research progress on firm innovation networks and multi-dimensional proximity from the perspective of economic geography [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 165-171. |
[4] | . Study on the Path and Mode of IKEA Spatial Diffusion in the Globalization Context [J]. WRS, 2015, 24(04): 30-38. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||