主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 1113-1124.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.06.2019174

• 世界政治与经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

对欧亚非大陆自由主义民主格局演变的 批判性分析

麻洪川1(), 郗笃刚1, 刘建忠2(), 张晶3, 丁梓越3   

  1. 1.31009部队,北京 100088
    2.郑州大学地球科学与技术学院,郑州 450052
    3.信息工程大学地理空间 信息学院,郑州 450052
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-25 修回日期:2019-07-14 出版日期:2020-11-16 发布日期:2021-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 刘建忠
  • 作者简介:麻洪川(1990-),男,博士,主要研究方向为政治地理与地缘环境分析,E-mail:williamma119@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41301125)

A critical analysis on spatial evolution of liberal democracy pattern in Afro-Eurasia

Hongchuan MA1(), Dugang XI1, Jianzhong LIU2(), Jing ZHANG3, Ziyue DING3   

  1. 1.31009 Troops, Beijing 10088, China
    2.School of Geo-Science & Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
    3.School of Data and Target Engineering, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
  • Received:2019-04-25 Revised:2019-07-14 Online:2020-11-16 Published:2021-01-12
  • Contact: Jianzhong LIU

摘要:

自由主义民主作为西方谋求世界霸权而肆意输出的意识形态,以批判性话语剖析欧亚非大陆自由主义民主状况,对揭露西方民主输出的真实目的意义重大。探究欧亚非大陆“自由”等级格局演变特征,搭建“自由”等级格局演变影响因子体系,并揭示其演变影响机制。研究发现:①“自由”国家数量总体显著增长,从欧洲南部、西部、北部,亚洲南部、东北部扩散至欧洲东部、中部和非洲南部地区;“部分自由”国家数量总体明显增加,基本分布在亚洲南部、东南部,非洲东部、西部和南部;“不自由”国家数量总体略有减少,从欧洲东部、亚洲和非洲大部分地区压缩至亚非大部分地区。②“自由”等级标准差指数表现出明显上升趋势,而其变异系数表现出波动下降趋势。③总体上,欧亚非大陆具有相似“自由”等级的国家集聚程度在不断增强,其中,高值集聚出现波动增强;局部上,冷点、次冷点区域呈现“联成一片”的态势,热点、次热点区域则有“东进”的趋势。④社会经济、外部扩散、文化宗教、政治制度、西方行为等因素影响显著,且在整体和局部影响机制上呈现明显差异。⑤“自由之家”为突出和强调西方在国际政治领域的标准制定权和话语权,其“自由”等级指数具有极强的意识形态属性和战略意图。

关键词: 批判性分析, 欧亚非大陆, 自由主义民主, “自由”等级, 格局演变

Abstract:

Liberal democracy as the ideology of Western exporting wantonly to seek world hegemony, it is of great importance to analyze profoundly liberal democracy conditions of Afro-Eurasia for revealing the true purpose of the export of Western democracy. On the basis of analyzing the relationship between the essence of liberal democratic logic, we explored the spatial evolution characteristics in Afro-Eurasia. In addition, we also built the factor system to discover the "free" ratings pattern spatial evolution impact mechanism under different scales. Some conclusions can be drawn as follows: (1) The number of "free" country increases markedly, whose spatial distribution diffused from Southern, Western and Northern Europe, Southern and Northeast Asia to Eastern and Central Europe, Southern Africa; The number of "partly free" country increases obviously, whose spatial distribution is Southern and Southeast Asia, Eastern, Western and Southern Africa; The number of "not free" country declines slightly, whose spatial distribution shifts from Eastern Europe, most part of Asia and Africa to most part of Asia and Africa. (2) The Standard Deviation of "free" ratings in Afro-Eurasia increases, but the Coefficient of Variation of "free" ratings in Afro-Eurasia declines fluctuatingly. (3) On the whole, the degree of agglomeration of countries with "free" ratings is becoming stronger in Afro—Eurasia, and the degree of agglomeration with high values shows fluctuation strong; On the local, the cold and sub-cold spots display the continuous distribution; The hot and sub—hot spots appear a "moving to east" tendency. (4) The factors including social—economy, external diffusion, culture-religion, political system and western behavior have remarkable impacts, which lead to different impact mechanism in whole and in local. (5) "Freedom House" emphasizes the Western standards and discourse power in the field of international politics, and its "free" ratings has a strong ideological attribute and strategic intention.

Key words: critical analysis, Afro-Eurasia, liberal democracy, "free" ratings, pattern evolution