Research progress and prospect of urban space fragmentation

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.05.2019184

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of the concept of urban space fragmentation, this paper examines the relevant articles in the SCI,SSCI databases in 1998-2016 with the theme of urban space fragmentation research, and reviews contents, methods and progress of urban space fragmentation research. From the research topic, related research mostly focuses on land use, biodiversity conservation and environmental sustainable development. The application of remote sensing and GIS is the main technology trend. From the measurement method, the land function fragmentation and landscape fragmentation measurement are the main methods, and the landscape pattern analysis method is adopted, which involves the comprehensive application of various landscape dimensions or indices. From the perspective of urban space-related research, the phenomenon description is the main focus, focusing on urban internal space reorganization, exploring the performance, causes and countermeasures of different types of spatial fragmentation. In the future, urban spatial fragmentation research should integrate multi-disciplinary perspectives and methods, and study the connotation and measurement methods of urban space fragmentation from the related physical elements of spatially integrated operation, and combine the new technology and new methods of spatial big data mining application to carry out system integration.

Key words: urban space fragmentation, research progress, research prospects

摘要：

在辨析城市空间破碎化概念基础上，以空间破碎化在城市方面研究为主题对1998—2016年间SCI和SSCI数据库中相关文章进行文献计量，对城市空间破碎化研究的内容、方法和进展开展评述。从研究主题看，相关研究多以土地利用、生物多样性保护、环境可持续发展为主题展开，遥感和GIS技术应用是主要的技术趋势。从测度方法看，以土地功能碎化与景观破碎化测度为主，采用景观格局分析的方法，涉及多种景观维度或指数的综合运用。从城市空间相关的研究来看，以现象描述为主，主要着眼于城市内部空间重组，探讨不同类型空间破碎化的表现、产生原因和应对思考。未来城市空间破碎化研究应综合多学科的视角和方法，从空间上一体化运行的相关实体要素出发研究城市空间破碎化内涵、测度方法，结合空间大数据挖掘应用的新技术新方法开展系统综合的研究。

关键词: 城市空间破碎化, 研究进展, 研究展望

Peijuan ZHU, Meifang ZHANG, Qingyun HE. Research progress and prospect of urban space fragmentation[J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(5): 985-995.

朱佩娟, 张美芳, 贺清云. 城市空间破碎化研究进展及其展望[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(5): 985-995.

Figures/Tables 8

References 51

1	朱佩娟, 贺清云, 朱翔, 等. 论城市空间破碎化研究. 地理研究, 2018,37(3):480-494.
	Zhu P, He Q, Zhu X, et al.Research on urban space fragmentation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(3): 480-494.
2	Gu C, Liu F W G. The structure of social space in Beijing in 1998: A socialist city in transition. Urban Geography, 2005,26(2):167-192.
3	Li Z, Wu F. Tenure-based residential segregation in post-reform Chinese cities: A case study of Shanghai. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2008,33(33):404-419.
4	郑卫, 邢尚青. 我国小城镇空间碎化现象探析. 城市发展研究, 2012,19(03):96-100.
	Zheng W, Xing S. The research on space broken of Chinese towns. Urban Development Studies, 2012,19(03):96-100.
5	刘云刚, 苏海宇. 基于社会地图的东莞市社会空间研究. 地理学报, 2016,71(08):1283-1301.
	Liu Y, Su H. Social space analysis based on social atlas:A case study of Dongguan city. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(08):1283-1301.
6	方创琳, 王少剑, 王洋. 中国低碳生态新城新区:现状、问题及对策. 地理研究, 2016(9):1601-1614.
	Fang C, Wang S, Wang Y.Current situation and countermeasures of Chinese low-carbon eco-metro area development. Geographical Research, 2016(09): 1601-1614
7	Ribeiro M C, Muylaert R D L, Dodonov P, et al. Dealing with fragmentation and road effects in highly degraded and heterogeneous landscapes. 2016.
8	韦亚平, 张晨, 张宗彝, 等. 一种测度城镇建设用地碎化的指数方法. 城市规划, 2011,35(06):41-49.
	Wei Y, Zhang C, Zhang Z, et al. An index method of assessing construction-land fragmentation in urban areas. City Planning Review, 2011,35(06):41-49.
9	Rotem-Mindali O. Retail fragmentation vs. urban livability: Applying ecological methods in urban geography research. Applied Geography, 2012,35(1-2):292-299.
10	夏倩. 基于景观指数分析的城市绿道网络构建研究. 长沙：湖南大学, 2013.
	Xia Q. The study on the construction of city greenway networkbased on the analysis of landscape index.Changsha： Hunan University, 2013.
11	Coy M. Gated communities and urban fragmentation in Latin America: the Brazilian experience. GeoJournal, 2006,66(1-2):121-132.
12	Feng D, Breitung W, Zhu H. Space of fragmentation:A study of the linkages between gated communities and their neighborhoods in Guangzhou,China. Geographical Research, 2011,30(1):61-70.
13	Janoschka, Michael. El nuevo modelo de la ciudad latinoamericana: FragmentacióN y privatización. Eure Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Urbano Regionales, 2002,28(85):11-20.
14	马克明,傅伯杰.北京东灵山地区景观格局及破碎化评价. 植物生态学报, 2000(3):320-326.
	Ma K, Fu B. Landscape pattern and fragmentation in Donglingshan montane region. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2000(3): 320-326.
15	Munroe D K, Croissant C, York A M. Land use policy and landscape fragmentation in an urbanizing region: Assessing the impact of zoning. Applied Geography, 2005,25(2):121-141.
16	Zipperer W C, Foresman T W, Walker S P, et al. Ecological consequences of fragmentation and deforestation in an urban landscape: a case study. Urban Ecosystems, 2012,15(3):533-544.
17	Roberts S A, Hall G B, Calamai P H. Analysing forest fragmentation using spatial autocorrelation, graphs and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2000,14(2):185-204.
18	刘世梁, 刘琦, 王聪, 等. 基于地理加权回归的漫湾库区景观破碎化及影响因子分析. 地理科学, 2014(07):856-862.
	Liu S, Liu Q, Wang C, et al. Landscape fragmentation and affecting factors of manwan reservoir based on geographically weighted regression. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014(07): 856-862.
19	Krellenberg K, Welz J, Link F, et al. Urban vulnerability and the contribution of socio-environmental fragmentation: Theoretical and methodological pathways. Progress in Human Geography, 2016.
20	Johnson L B. Analyzing spatial and temporal phenomena using geographical information systems. Landscape Ecology, 1990,4(1):31-43.
21	Hidding M C, Teunissen A T J. Beyond fragmentation: new concepts for urban-rural development. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2002,58(2):297-308.
22	Labbé D, Boudreau J A. Understanding the causes of urban fragmentation in Hanoi: The case of new urban areas. International Development Planning Review, 2011,33(3):273-291.
23	Mohamed, Adel A S. Towards more sustainable urban forms in the city of Benghazi : A study of urban fragmentation at the neighbourhood level. University of Westminster, 2013.
24	李鑫, 欧名豪, 肖长江, 等. 基于景观指数的细碎化对耕地生产效率影响研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012(6):707-713.
	Li X Ou M, Xiao C, et al. Study on impacts of landsacpe fragmentation to cultivated land production efficiency. resources and environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012(06): 707-713.
25	赵清, 郑国强, 黄巧华. 南京城市森林景观格局特征与空间结构优化. 地理学报, 2007(08):870-878.
	Zhao Q, Zheng G, Huang Q. Characteristics of urban forest landscape pattern and optimization of urban forest spatial structure: A case study of Nanjing City. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007(08):870-878.
26	刘红玉, 李兆富, 李晓民. 湿地景观破碎化对东方白鹳栖息地的影响——以三江平原东北部区域为例. 自然资源学报, 2007(05):817-823.
	Liu H, Li Z, Li X. Effects of wetland landscape fragmentation on habitats of oriental white storks—A case study on Northeastern Sanjiang Plain, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007(05):817-823.
27	罗震东. 分权与碎化――中国都市区域发展的阶段与趋势研究: 2007年中国城市规划年会, 哈尔滨, 2007.
	Luo Z. Decentralization and fragmentation: Research on the stage and trend of urban development in China: 2007 China Urban Planning Annual Conference, Harbin, 2007.
28	洪世键, 张京祥. “碎化”与整合:大都市区管治理论演进探讨. 城市发展研究, 2008(06):113-118.
	Hong S, Zhang J. Fragmentation and governance: Study on the theoretical evolution of metropolitan governance. Urban Development Studies, 2008(06): 113-118.
29	楚静, 王兴中. 大都市郊区化中的社区碎化与治理. 世界地理研究, 2011(01):96-101.
	Chu J, Wang X. The community fragmentation and governance of metropolitan suburbanization. World Geography Research, 2011(01): 96-101.
30	蒋涤非. 城市形态活力论. 南京：东南大学出版社, 2007.
	Jiang Difei. The theory of urban formal vitality. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2007.
31	贾雁飞, 孔令龙. 南京鼓楼周边地区城市空间形象碎化解读: 规划创新—2010中国城市规划年会, 重庆, 2010.
	Jia Y, Kong L. Interpretation of the fragmentation of urban space in the surrounding area of Nanjing Gulou: Planning Innovation - 2010 China Urban Planning Annual Conference, Chongqing, China.
32	张天新, 刘凤. 城市边缘区空间破碎化的指标体系及其应用研究——以北京市海淀区上地、清河街道为例. 城市发展研究, 2014,21(5).
	Zhang T, Liu F. Space fragmentation index system and its application in the urban fringe area:A case study of Shangdi and Qinghe Streets in Beijing. Urban Development Studies, 2014, 21(5).
33	Low S. Towards a theory of urban fragmentation: A cross-cultural analysis of fear, privatization, and the state. Cybergeo European Journal of Geography, 2006：349.
34	Bereitschaft B, Debbage K. Regional variations in urban fragmentation among U.S. Metropolitan and Megapolitan Areas. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2014,7(2):119-147.
35	Li T I, Shilling F, Thorne J, et al. Fragmentation of China's landscape by roads and urban areas. Landscape Ecology, 2010,25(6):839-853.
36	Jaeger J A G. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: New measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 2000,15(2):115-130.
37	Luck M, Wu J. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: A case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology, 2002,17(4):327-339.
38	Turner M G. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1989,20(20):171-197.
39	Burton E. Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2002,29(2):219-250.
40	Bentley J W. Wouldn't you like to have all of your land in one place? land fragmentation in Northwest Portugal. Human Ecology, 1990,18(1):51-79.
41	Krellenberg K, Link F, Welz J, et al. Supporting local adaptation: The contribution of socio-environmental fragmentation to urban vulnerability. Applied Geography, 2014,55(12):61-70.
42	Apan A A, Raine S S, Paterson M S. Quantifying landscape fragmentation in the Lockyer Valley Catchment, Queensland: 1973–1997: The 28th Annual Conference of Aurisa, Hyatt Coolum Resort, 2000.
43	由畅, 周永斌, 于丽芬. 景观破碎化数量分析方法概述.中国农学通报,2006,22(05):146-151.
	You C, Zhou Y, Yu L. An introduction of quantitative methods in landscape pattern fragmentation. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006,22(05):146-151.
44	王慧芳, 周恺. 2003-2013年中国城市形态研究评述. 地理科学进展, 2014(05):689-701.
	Wang H, Zhou W. Review of urban form,structure and morphology in China during 2003-2013. Advances in Geography, 2014(05): 689-701.
45	孙博, 程淑佳, 于国政, 等. 景观生态学视角下长春城市功能空间耦合特征研究. 地理科学, 2017(04):519-527.
	Sun B, Cheng S, Yu G, et al. Coupling characteristics of urban functional space in Changchun city from the perspective of landscape ecology. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017(04):519-527.
46	Hansen W G. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959,25(2):73-76.
47	Herzele A V, Wiedemann T. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2003,63(2):109-126.
48	Boarnet M G, Day K, Alfonzo M, et al. The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006,30(2):153.
49	Ye Y, Nes A V. Quantitative tools in urban morphology: Combining space syntax, spacematrix and mixed-use index in a GIS framework. Urban Morphology, 2014,18(2):97-118.
50	龙瀛, 周垠. 街道活力的量化评价及影响因素分析——以成都为例. 新建筑, 2016(1).
	Long Y, Zhou Y. Quantitative evaluation on street vibrancy and its impact factors:A case study of Chengdu. New Architecture, 2016(1).
51	尹海伟, 徐建刚. 上海公园空间可达性与公平性分析. 城市发展研究, 2009,16(6):71-76.
	Yin H, Xu J.Spatial accessibility and equity of parks in Shanghai. Urban Development Studies, 2009,16(6):71-76.

代表学者	城市空间破碎化的定义
Brown^[7], Johnson^[20]	一个“打破或分离成碎片”的状态，或“分离成部分，形成新的个人或单位”的过程
Graham^[8]	在信息化时代，城市空间呈现出一种单体均质而整体异质的破碎状态
Hidding^[21]	空间分裂成碎片的现象，如土地的碎片化、区域的分割、空间结构的支离破碎等
Coy^[9]	一种城市空间非整合状态，受消费者需求多样化和居住区在市场化过程中自然分层的影响，城市富裕居民聚居的隔离社区不断增加
Jenks^[10]	空间各自为政，表现出极化和叠加的社会空间分化，是一种“支离破碎”的状态与形成过程
Labbé^[22]，Mohamed^[23]	表现为空间、功能和社会隔离，并导致片区的衰落

代表学者	城市空间破碎化的定义
Brown^[7], Johnson^[20]	一个“打破或分离成碎片”的状态，或“分离成部分，形成新的个人或单位”的过程
Graham^[8]	在信息化时代，城市空间呈现出一种单体均质而整体异质的破碎状态
Hidding^[21]	空间分裂成碎片的现象，如土地的碎片化、区域的分割、空间结构的支离破碎等
Coy^[9]	一种城市空间非整合状态，受消费者需求多样化和居住区在市场化过程中自然分层的影响，城市富裕居民聚居的隔离社区不断增加
Jenks^[10]	空间各自为政，表现出极化和叠加的社会空间分化，是一种“支离破碎”的状态与形成过程
Labbé^[22]，Mohamed^[23]	表现为空间、功能和社会隔离，并导致片区的衰落

作者	TP	TC1	TC1/TP	代表作（发表年份）	TC	研究领域
Lindenmayer,DB	31	2146	69.23	General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation (2006)	280	生物多样性与保护;环境科学与生态学
Fahrig, L	25	1493	59.72	Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes (2011)	382	环境科学与生态学
Radeloff,VC	24	1369	57.04	The wildland-urban interface in the United States (2005)	429	环境科学与生态学
Crooks, KR	23	1190	51.74	Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation (2002)	360	生物多样性与保护;环境科学与生态学
Nagendra,H	21	1211	57.67	From pattern to process: landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change (2004)	176	农业;环境科学与生态学
Riitters,KH	21	937	44.62	Fragmentation of continental United States forests (2002)	185	环境科学与生态学
Salvati, L	21	189	9.00	To grow or to sprawl? Land cover relationships in a mediterranean city region and implications for land use management (2013)	47	城市研究
Cousins,SAO	19	680	35.79	Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs (2001)	129	环境科学与生态学;自然地理学;地质学
Southworth, J	19	232	12.21	Roads as drivers of change: trajectories across the tri-national frontier in map,the southwestern Amazon (2011)	46	遥感
Mac Nally,R	18	732	40.67	Distribution of an uran amphibians in massively altered landscapes in south-eastern Australia: effects of climate change in an aridifying region (2009)	30	环境科学与生态学;自然地理学
Peres,CA	17	993	58.41	Biodiversity conservation in human-modified Amazonian forest landscapes (2010)	76	生物多样性与保护;环境科学与生态学
Steffan-Dewenter,I	17	3647	214.53	The interplay of pollinator diversity,pollination services and landscape change (2008)	62	生物多样性与保护;环境科学与生态学
McAlpine,CA	16	486	30.38	Increasing world consumption of beef as a driver of regional and global change: A call for policy action based on evidence from Queensland Colombia and Brazil (2009)	95	环境科学与生态学;地理学

作者	TP	TC1	TC1/TP	代表作（发表年份）	TC	研究领域
Lindenmayer,DB	31	2146	69.23	General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation (2006)	280	生物多样性与保护;环境科学与生态学
Fahrig, L	25	1493	59.72	Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes (2011)	382	环境科学与生态学
Radeloff,VC	24	1369	57.04	The wildland-urban interface in the United States (2005)	429	环境科学与生态学
Crooks, KR	23	1190	51.74	Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation (2002)	360	生物多样性与保护;环境科学与生态学
Nagendra,H	21	1211	57.67	From pattern to process: landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change (2004)	176	农业;环境科学与生态学
Riitters,KH	21	937	44.62	Fragmentation of continental United States forests (2002)	185	环境科学与生态学
Salvati, L	21	189	9.00	To grow or to sprawl? Land cover relationships in a mediterranean city region and implications for land use management (2013)	47	城市研究
Cousins,SAO	19	680	35.79	Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs (2001)	129	环境科学与生态学;自然地理学;地质学
Southworth, J	19	232	12.21	Roads as drivers of change: trajectories across the tri-national frontier in map,the southwestern Amazon (2011)	46	遥感
Mac Nally,R	18	732	40.67	Distribution of an uran amphibians in massively altered landscapes in south-eastern Australia: effects of climate change in an aridifying region (2009)	30	环境科学与生态学;自然地理学
Peres,CA	17	993	58.41	Biodiversity conservation in human-modified Amazonian forest landscapes (2010)	76	生物多样性与保护;环境科学与生态学
Steffan-Dewenter,I	17	3647	214.53	The interplay of pollinator diversity,pollination services and landscape change (2008)	62	生物多样性与保护;环境科学与生态学
McAlpine,CA	16	486	30.38	Increasing world consumption of beef as a driver of regional and global change: A call for policy action based on evidence from Queensland Colombia and Brazil (2009)	95	环境科学与生态学;地理学

研究机构	数量	基金资助	数量
中国科学院	126	国家自然科学基金委员会	166
美国昆士兰大学	85	美国国家科学基金会	150
美国威斯康辛大学	67	加拿大自然科学与工程理事会	61
美国地质调查局	62	澳大利亚研究委员会	54
北京师范大学	54	欧洲联盟	48
墨西哥国立大学	49	美国国家航空航天局	44
佛罗里达大学	48	巴西国家科学技术发展委员会	38
美国森林服务	46	巴西高教基金委	30
澳大利亚国立大学	45	瑞典环境、农业科学和空间研究委员会	25
赫尔辛基大学	45	芬兰科学院	22