Research on the construction of the Silk Road Cultural Heritage Corridor from the spatial perspective

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.04.2021233

Abstract

Abstract:

In the context of the national "One Belt, One Road" construction strategy, taking the Gansu section of the Silk Road as an example, mathematical statistics and descriptions of cultural heritage in the region are carried out, and the nearest neighbor distance index and location entropy model are used to measure the spatial distribution of cultural heritage. The spatial scope composition of heritage corridors and the spatial distribution characteristics of regional heritage elements were discussed, and the spatial layout of heritage corridors was analyzed with the help of relevant land information software tools. From a spatial perspective, three differences from "point, line, and surface" were proposed. Combine the cultural heritage corridors of the Gansu section of the Silk Road at different levels, and rely on different projects, different methods and different ideas to protect different levels of heritage in different categories, and finally achieve the strategic goal of the overall protection of the Gansu section of the Silk Road to realize the regional culture. The multiple goals of coordinated development of, economy, society, ecology, etc., provide intellectual support for Gansu Province's "Belt and Road" construction.

Key words: heritage corridor, cultural heritage, spatial structure, Gansu section of the Silk Road

摘要：

在国家“一带一路”建设背景下，以丝绸之路甘肃段为例，对该区域文化遗产进行数理统计和描述，采取最邻近距离指数和区位熵模型对文化遗产空间分布进行测度，对文化遗产廊道空间范围构成和区域遗产要素空间分布特征进行了讨论，并借助GIS软件分析了遗产廊道的空间布局，从空间视角，提出了从“点、线、面”三个不同层次组合丝绸之路甘肃段文化遗产廊道，并依托不同项目、不同方法以及不同思路对不同层次的遗产分门别类展开保护，最终达到了丝绸之路甘肃段遗产整体保护的战略目标，以实现区域文化、经济、社会、生态等协调发展的多重目标，为甘肃省进行“一带一路”建设提供智力支持。

关键词: 遗产廊道, 文化遗产, 空间结构, 丝绸之路甘肃段

Yongzhen WANG, Gang ZENG. Research on the construction of the Silk Road Cultural Heritage Corridor from the spatial perspective[J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 862-871.

汪永臻, 曾刚. 空间视角下丝绸之路文化遗产廊道构建研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(4): 862-871.

Figures/Tables 6

References 20

1	FABOS J G.Introduction and overview:the greenway movement uses and potentials of greenways . Landscape Urban Plan, 1995,33 (1-3):1-13.
2	VILES R L, ROSIER D J. How to use roads in the creation of greenways:case studies in three New Zealand landscape.Land-scrape Urban Planning, 2001(55):15-27.
3	俞孔坚,李伟,李迪华,等.快速城市化地区遗产廊道适宜性分析方法探讨—以台州市为例. 地理研究,2005,24(1):69-76.
	YU K, LI W, LI D, et al. Discussion on the suitability analysis method of heritage corridor in rapidly urbanized areas—Taking Taizhou City as an example. Geographical research, 2005, 24(1): 69-76.
4	张镒,柯彬彬.我国遗产廊道研究述评 . 世界地理研究,2016,25 (1): 166-174.
	ZHANG Y, KE B. Review of research on heritage corridors in China . World geographic research, 2016, 25 (1): 166-174.
5	朱强.京杭大运河江南段工业遗产廊道构建.北京:北京大学,2007.
	ZHU Q. Construction of industrial heritage corridor in Jiangnan section of Beijing Hangzhou Grand Canal. Beijing: Peking University, 2007.
6	俞孔坚,朱强,李迪华.中国大运河工业遗产廊道构建:设想及原理(上篇) . 建设科技,2007(13):39-41.
	YU K, ZHU Q, LI D. Construction of China Grand Canal Industrial Heritage Corridor: assumption and principle (Part I). Construction technology, 2007(13):28-31.
7	朱强,俞孔坚,李迪华,等. 大运河工业遗产廊道的保护层次 . 城市环境设计,2007 (5):16-20.
	ZHU Q, YU K, LI D, et al. Protection level of industrial heritage corridor of the Grand Canal . Urban environmental design, 2007 (5): 16-20.
8	奚雪松,陈琳.美国伊利运河国家遗产廊道的保护与可持续利用方法及其启示. 国际城市规划,2013(4): 100-107.
	XI X, CHEN L. protection and sustainable utilization of the national heritage corridor of the Erie Canal in the United States and Its Enlightenment. International urban planning, 2013(4): 100-107.
9	乔大山,冯兵,翟慧敏.桂林遗产保护规划新方法初探—构建漓江遗产廊道.旅游学刊,2007, 22(11):28-31.
	QIAO D, FENG B, ZHAI H.A preliminary study on the new method of Guilin heritage protection planning -- the construction of Lijiang River heritage corridor Journal of tourism, 2007, 22 (11): 28-31.
10	奚雪松.实现整体保护与可持续利用的大运河遗产廊道构建——概念、途径与设想.北京:电子工业出版社,2012.
	XI X. Construction of Grand Canal Heritage Corridor to realize overall protection and Sustainable Utilization -- concept, approach and assumption . Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2012.
11	李小波.三峡文物考古成果的旅游转化途径与三峡遗产廊道的时空构建. 旅游科学,2006, 20 (1):12-17.
	LI X. Tourism transformation approach of cultural relics and archaeological achievements of the Three Gorges and space-time construction of the Three Gorges heritage corridor. Tourism science, 2006, 20 (1): 12-17.
12	王丽萍.文化遗产廊道构建的理论与实践——以滇藏茶马古道为例.贵州民族研究,2011,32(5):61-66.
	WANG L. Theory and practice of Cultural Heritage Corridor Construction -- Taking Yunnan Tibet tea horse ancient road as an example . Guizhou ethnic studies, 2011, 32 (5): 61-66.
13	张镒,柯彬彬.空间视角下海上丝绸之路文化遗产廊道构建研究——广东沿海地区为例.云南地理环境研究,2016,28(3):22-30.
	ZHANG Y, KE B. Study on the construction of the cultural heritage corridor of the maritime Silk Road from a spatial perspective -- Taking the coastal areas of Guangdong as an example. Research on the geographical environment of Yunnan, 2016, 28 (3): 22-30.
14	王镜,蔡佳佳,原燕妮. 丝绸之路遗产诠释与重游意愿影响关系研究. 世界地理研究,2020,29(6):1260-1271.
	WANG J, CAI J, YUAN Y.A study on the relationship between the Silk Road's heritage interpretation and the willingness to revisit.World Regional Studies,2020,29(6):1260-1271.
15	李和平,王卓. 基于 Gls 空间分析的抗战遗产廊道体系探究. 城市发展研究,2017,24(7):86-93.
	LI H, WANG Z. Research on Anti Japanese War heritage corridor system based on GLS spatial analysis . Urban development research, 2017,24 (7): 86-93.
16	黄远水,陈钢华,伍弦.福建省旅游景区空间结构研究—基于国家 3A 级以上旅游景区的统计分析.经济地理,2010, 30 (7):1195-1199.
	HUANG Y, CHEN G, WU X. Study on the spatial structure of scenic spots in Fujian Province - based on the statistical analysis of national 3A or above scenic spots . Economic geography, 2010, 30 (7): 1195-1199.
17	WEBBER M J. Entropy-maximising location models for nonindependent events. Environment and Planning A, 1975,7(1):99-108.
18	JADBABAIE A, LIN J. Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules.Automatic; Control,IEEE Transactions on,2003,48 (6):988-1001.
19	PAPADIMITRIOU C, BECK J L, AU S K. Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating.Journal of Vibration and Control, 2000, 6(5):781-800.
20	李蕊蕊,赵伟,陈静. 福建省非物质文化遗产结构及地理空间分布特征. 地域研究与开发,2014,33(6):97-102.
	LI R ZHAO W, CHEN J. Structure and geographical spatial distribution characteristics of intangible cultural heritage in Fujian Province . Regional research and development, 2014,33 (6): 97-102.

地级市	面积 /km²	点数/ 个	点密度/ 个·（km²）^-1	实际最邻近距离/km	理论最邻近距离/km	最邻近指数	空间分布类型
兰州	13 200	114	0.008636	3.64	5.38	0.68	集聚性
定西	19 600	113	0.005765	2.21	6.59	0.34	集聚性
天水	14 300	139	0.00972	4.46	5.07	0.88	集聚性
平凉	11 000	112	0.010182	3.24	4.96	0.65	集聚性
庆阳	27 119	134	0.004941	6.65	7.11	0.94	集聚性
临夏	8 169	68	0.008324	2.44	5.48	0.45	集聚性
甘南	45 000	104	0.002311	4.93	10.40	0.47	集聚性
陇南	28 000	109	0.003893	3.97	8.01	0.50	集聚性
武威	32 300	102	0.003158	3.80	8.90	0.43	集聚性
张掖	38 600	99	0.002565	4.54	9.87	0.46	集聚性
嘉峪关	2 935	12	0.004089	4.69	7.82	0.60	集聚性
酒泉	168 000	129	0.000768	5.47	18.04	0.30	集聚性
金昌	8 896	30	0.003372	44.32	8.61	5.15	均匀性
白银	21 200	62	0.002925	5.58	9.25	0.60	集聚性

地级市	面积 /km²	点数/ 个	点密度/ 个·（km²）^-1	实际最邻近距离/km	理论最邻近距离/km	最邻近指数	空间分布类型
兰州	13 200	114	0.008636	3.64	5.38	0.68	集聚性
定西	19 600	113	0.005765	2.21	6.59	0.34	集聚性
天水	14 300	139	0.00972	4.46	5.07	0.88	集聚性
平凉	11 000	112	0.010182	3.24	4.96	0.65	集聚性
庆阳	27 119	134	0.004941	6.65	7.11	0.94	集聚性
临夏	8 169	68	0.008324	2.44	5.48	0.45	集聚性
甘南	45 000	104	0.002311	4.93	10.40	0.47	集聚性
陇南	28 000	109	0.003893	3.97	8.01	0.50	集聚性
武威	32 300	102	0.003158	3.80	8.90	0.43	集聚性
张掖	38 600	99	0.002565	4.54	9.87	0.46	集聚性
嘉峪关	2 935	12	0.004089	4.69	7.82	0.60	集聚性
酒泉	168 000	129	0.000768	5.47	18.04	0.30	集聚性
金昌	8 896	30	0.003372	44.32	8.61	5.15	均匀性
白银	21 200	62	0.002925	5.58	9.25	0.60	集聚性

序号	地区	世界文化遗产	文保单位	历史文化名城	历史文化名镇	历史文化名村	历史文化街区	中国传统村落
1	兰州	0.00	0.92	0.85	4.31	0.00	2.60	1.00
2	定西	0.00	1.18	0.94	0.69	0.00	0.00	0.28
3	天水	1.28	0.95	1.12	1.23	3.85	2.07	0.67
4	陇南	0.00	0.68	0.00	2.07	1.63	0.44	3.79
5	白银	0.00	0.90	1.26	0.00	2.88	0.00	2.24
6	平凉	0.00	1.15	0.69	0.50	1.58	0.00	0.41
7	庆阳	0.00	1.18	0.59	0.43	1.34	0.00	0.17
8	张掖	0.00	1.12	1.54	0.00	0.00	1.42	0.46
9	武威	0.00	1.14	1.67	1.22	0.00	1.54	0.00
10	嘉峪关	12.74	0.83	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
11	金昌	0.00	1.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
12	酒泉	4.97	1.02	1.63	0.00	0.00	1.34	0.00
13	甘南	0.00	0.68	0.90	1.97	0.00	1.11	3.79
14	临夏	3.32	0.95	1.45	0.00	0.00	1.79	0.86

序号	地区	世界文化遗产	文保单位	历史文化名城	历史文化名镇	历史文化名村	历史文化街区	中国传统村落
1	兰州	0.00	0.92	0.85	4.31	0.00	2.60	1.00
2	定西	0.00	1.18	0.94	0.69	0.00	0.00	0.28
3	天水	1.28	0.95	1.12	1.23	3.85	2.07	0.67
4	陇南	0.00	0.68	0.00	2.07	1.63	0.44	3.79
5	白银	0.00	0.90	1.26	0.00	2.88	0.00	2.24
6	平凉	0.00	1.15	0.69	0.50	1.58	0.00	0.41
7	庆阳	0.00	1.18	0.59	0.43	1.34	0.00	0.17
8	张掖	0.00	1.12	1.54	0.00	0.00	1.42	0.46
9	武威	0.00	1.14	1.67	1.22	0.00	1.54	0.00
10	嘉峪关	12.74	0.83	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
11	金昌	0.00	1.25	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
12	酒泉	4.97	1.02	1.63	0.00	0.00	1.34	0.00
13	甘南	0.00	0.68	0.90	1.97	0.00	1.11	3.79
14	临夏	3.32	0.95	1.45	0.00	0.00	1.79	0.86

[1]	Zhenfu LI, Zhao DENG, Yiran ZHANG. Research on the whole tree-shaped life spatial structure of the port hinterland based on the "Big Tree Theory" [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(3): 136-143.
[2]	Yong HUANG, Hang ZHAO, Guolei CHEN. The identification and influence mechanism of spatial structure for medical points in mountainous cities: [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(2): 125-135.
[3]	Minghui XIE, Gengzhi HUANG, Xu ZHANG. Spatial structure and impacting factors of the urban networks in China based on the perspective of cultural performance consumption [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(6): 1332-1344.
[4]	Pengfei GUO, Jipu LI, Lu YANG, Hongbin XIE. Analysis of spatial structure and development potential of cultural tourism resources on Maritime Silk Road in Fujian coastal area [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(1): 214-224.
[5]	Peiwen ZHANG, Fumin DU, Xue WANG, Yu WANG, Lu LI. Spatial structure evolution and analysis of Chinese passenger aviation network in the last decade [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(6): 1253-1264.
[6]	Yujie LI, Liming XIAO. Analysis on the spatial structure characteristics and influencing factors of China's Green Financial Network: From the perspective of enterprise-city network retranslation model [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(1): 101-113.
[7]	Chang LIU, Yuqiao FENG. Spatial distribution characteristics of cross-cultural communication of intangible cultural heritage in Europe——A case study of Shadow Play [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(4): 867-874.
[8]	Huiming ZONG, Ruihui LV. Organization network of Chinese automobile logistics and its influencing factors from the perspective of enterprises data [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(1): 130-139.
[9]	Renfeng MA, Tengfei WANG. Progress of research on the influence of urban spatial structure on the location of emerging industry in China [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 141-152.
[10]	. Smart City Difference Analysis Of Urban Development In Our Country [J]. WRS, 2017, 26(2): 82-90.