World Regional Studies ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1-13.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.10.20222367
Liehui WANG1,2,3(), Rui CHEN1, Sheng ZHANG1
Received:
2022-11-03
Revised:
2023-01-28
Online:
2023-10-15
Published:
2023-10-25
作者简介:
王列辉(1978—),男,教授,博士,研究方向为交通地理学、城市地理学、历史地理学,E-mail:lhwang@re.ecnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
Liehui WANG, Rui CHEN, Sheng ZHANG. Industrial transfer and maritime transport growth pattern between ASEAN and China, Japan, S.Korea[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(10): 1-13.
王列辉, 陈锐, 张圣. 中日韩-东盟国家间产业转移与海上运输增长格局研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(10): 1-13.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://sjdlyj.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.10.20222367
变量 | 集装箱运输 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
OLS((1) | PPML(1) | OLS(2) | PPML(2) | |
lnDVA_INT | 0.443*** | 0.189*** | 0.072* | 0.037* |
(0.044) | (0.019) | (0.039) | (0.019) | |
lnGDP1 | 1.004*** | 0.335*** | ||
(0.222) | (0.092) | |||
lnGDP2 | 0.767*** | 0.304*** | ||
(0.223) | (0.088) | |||
lnDISTANCE | -0.577*** | -0.194*** | ||
(0.027) | (0.011) | |||
lnInFDI1 | -0.001 | -0.000 | ||
(0.009) | (0.003) | |||
lnInFDI2 | -0.000 | 0.000 | ||
(0.009) | (0.003) | |||
GoverEff1 | -0.046 | -0.023 | ||
(0.273) | (0.089) | |||
GoverEff2 | 0.025 | 0.008 | ||
(0.272) | (0.088) | |||
FTA | -0.841*** | -0.227*** | ||
(0.104) | (0.029) | |||
常数 | -0.252 | -0.293** | -36.640*** | -13.680*** |
(0.312) | (0.147) | (8.747) | (3.902) | |
时间固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
起始国家固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
目的国家固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
观测值 | 1 014 | 1 014 | 1 014 | 1 014 |
Tab.1 Basis regression results based on OLS and PPML methods
变量 | 集装箱运输 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
OLS((1) | PPML(1) | OLS(2) | PPML(2) | |
lnDVA_INT | 0.443*** | 0.189*** | 0.072* | 0.037* |
(0.044) | (0.019) | (0.039) | (0.019) | |
lnGDP1 | 1.004*** | 0.335*** | ||
(0.222) | (0.092) | |||
lnGDP2 | 0.767*** | 0.304*** | ||
(0.223) | (0.088) | |||
lnDISTANCE | -0.577*** | -0.194*** | ||
(0.027) | (0.011) | |||
lnInFDI1 | -0.001 | -0.000 | ||
(0.009) | (0.003) | |||
lnInFDI2 | -0.000 | 0.000 | ||
(0.009) | (0.003) | |||
GoverEff1 | -0.046 | -0.023 | ||
(0.273) | (0.089) | |||
GoverEff2 | 0.025 | 0.008 | ||
(0.272) | (0.088) | |||
FTA | -0.841*** | -0.227*** | ||
(0.104) | (0.029) | |||
常数 | -0.252 | -0.293** | -36.640*** | -13.680*** |
(0.312) | (0.147) | (8.747) | (3.902) | |
时间固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
起始国家固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
目的国家固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
观测值 | 1 014 | 1 014 | 1 014 | 1 014 |
变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
删除新加坡和中国香港 | 滞后一期 | 滞后二期 | 滞后三期 | 滞后四期 | |||||
lnDVA_INT | 0.068** | ||||||||
(0.033) | |||||||||
lnDVA_INT_lag1 | 0.178*** | 0.0210 | |||||||
(0.020) | (0.019) | ||||||||
lnDVA_INT_lag2 | 0.173*** | 0.009 | |||||||
(0.022) | (0.021) | ||||||||
lnDVA_INT_lag3 | 0.218*** | 0.051** | |||||||
(0.026) | (0.025) | ||||||||
lnDVA_INT_lag4 | 0.210*** | 0.031 | |||||||
(0.028) | (0.027) | ||||||||
常数 | -14.700*** | -0.191 | -2.167 | -0.154 | -11.820*** | -0.486** | -16.560*** | -0.408* | -18.310 |
(4.802) | (0.152) | (2.382) | (0.170) | (4.123) | (0.196) | (5.931) | (0.214) | (11.200) | |
控制变量 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 |
时间固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
起始国家固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
目的国家固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
观测值 | 653 | 855 | 855 | 731 | 731 | 608 | 608 | 488 | 488 |
Tab.2 Lag effects analysis results based on the PPML method
变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
删除新加坡和中国香港 | 滞后一期 | 滞后二期 | 滞后三期 | 滞后四期 | |||||
lnDVA_INT | 0.068** | ||||||||
(0.033) | |||||||||
lnDVA_INT_lag1 | 0.178*** | 0.0210 | |||||||
(0.020) | (0.019) | ||||||||
lnDVA_INT_lag2 | 0.173*** | 0.009 | |||||||
(0.022) | (0.021) | ||||||||
lnDVA_INT_lag3 | 0.218*** | 0.051** | |||||||
(0.026) | (0.025) | ||||||||
lnDVA_INT_lag4 | 0.210*** | 0.031 | |||||||
(0.028) | (0.027) | ||||||||
常数 | -14.700*** | -0.191 | -2.167 | -0.154 | -11.820*** | -0.486** | -16.560*** | -0.408* | -18.310 |
(4.802) | (0.152) | (2.382) | (0.170) | (4.123) | (0.196) | (5.931) | (0.214) | (11.200) | |
控制变量 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 |
时间固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
起始国家固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
目的国家固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
观测值 | 653 | 855 | 855 | 731 | 731 | 608 | 608 | 488 | 488 |
变量 | 中日韩与东盟 | 中日韩内部 | 东盟内部 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
lnDVA_INT | 0.116** | 0.033 | 0.244*** | 0.143*** | 0.203*** | 0.103** |
(0.050) | (0.059) | (0.025) | (0.017) | (0.040) | (0.049) | |
控制变量 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 |
时间固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
城市对固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
常数 | 0.087 | -21.770*** | -0.643*** | 3.155 | -0.355 | -44.370*** |
(0.400) | (6.846) | (0.232) | (2.561) | (0.260) | (14.350) | |
N | 330 | 330 | 160 | 160 | 332 | 337 |
Tab.3 Results 1 of heterogeneity test based on the PPML method
变量 | 中日韩与东盟 | 中日韩内部 | 东盟内部 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
lnDVA_INT | 0.116** | 0.033 | 0.244*** | 0.143*** | 0.203*** | 0.103** |
(0.050) | (0.059) | (0.025) | (0.017) | (0.040) | (0.049) | |
控制变量 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 |
时间固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
城市对固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
常数 | 0.087 | -21.770*** | -0.643*** | 3.155 | -0.355 | -44.370*** |
(0.400) | (6.846) | (0.232) | (2.561) | (0.260) | (14.350) | |
N | 330 | 330 | 160 | 160 | 332 | 337 |
变量 | 韩国和东盟 | 中国和东盟 | 日本和东盟 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
观测值 | 431 | 445 | 432 | |||
lnDVA_INT | 0.195*** | 0.078* | 0.210*** | 0.107** | 0.218*** | 0.133*** |
(0.036) | (0.042) | (0.034) | (0.043) | (0.034) | (0.041) | |
常数 | -0.441* | -32.370*** | -0.400 | -20.350** | -0.551** | -39.710*** |
(0.251) | (7.677) | (0.248) | (10.180) | (0.232) | (12.090) | |
控制变量 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 |
时间固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
城市对固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
Tab.4 Results 2 of heterogeneity test based on the PPML method
变量 | 韩国和东盟 | 中国和东盟 | 日本和东盟 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
观测值 | 431 | 445 | 432 | |||
lnDVA_INT | 0.195*** | 0.078* | 0.210*** | 0.107** | 0.218*** | 0.133*** |
(0.036) | (0.042) | (0.034) | (0.043) | (0.034) | (0.041) | |
常数 | -0.441* | -32.370*** | -0.400 | -20.350** | -0.551** | -39.710*** |
(0.251) | (7.677) | (0.248) | (10.180) | (0.232) | (12.090) | |
控制变量 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 | 否 | 是 |
时间固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
城市对固定 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 | 是 |
1 | 胡俊文.国际产业转移的基本规律及变化趋势.国际贸易问题,2004(05):56-60. |
HU J. Basic laws and changing trends of international industrial transfer. Journal of International Trade, 2004(05): 56-60. | |
2 | 刘振中,严慧珍.四次国际产业大转移的主要特征及启示.宏观经济管理,2022(08):72-81. |
LIU Z, YAN H. The main characteristics and enlightenment of the four international industrial transfers.Macroeconomic Management, 2022(08):72-81. | |
3 | 董小君.通过国际转移化解过剩产能:全球五次浪潮、两种模式及中国探索.经济研究参考,2014(55):3-18. |
DONG X.Resolving excess capacity through international transfer: Five global waves, two models and China's exploration.Review of Economic Research,2014(55):3-18. | |
4 | 孙早,侯玉琳.工业智能化与产业梯度转移:对"雁阵理论"的再检验.社会科学文摘,2021(09):46-48. |
SUN Z, HOU Y. Industrial intelligence and industrial gradient transfer: Retesting the "wild goose array theory".Social Sciences Diges,2021(09):46-48. | |
5 | 谢雨蓉,高咏玲,王庆云.经济全球化背景下的国际物流格局演变.宏观经济研究,2020(02):102-111. |
XIE Y, GAO Y, WANG Q. Evolution of international logistics pattern in the context of economic globalization.Macroeconomic Management, 2020(02): 102-111. | |
6 | FAN F, ZHANG X, YANG W, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of china's ports in the international container transport network under upgraded industrial structure. Transportation Journal, 2021, 60(1): 43-69. |
7 | CHEN D, YANG Z. Investment in container ports along the maritime silk road in the context of international industry transfer: The case of the port of Colombo. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2019, 21(2): 241-257. |
8 | 胡明骏.越南纺织服装产业发展对集装箱海运货流的影响.中国水运,2021(01):109-111. |
HU M.The impact of vietnam's textile and garment industry development on container shipping freight flow.China Water Transport,2021(01): 109-111. | |
9 | 张辉.全球价值链理论与我国产业发展研究.中国工业经济,2004(05):38-46. |
ZHANG H.Theory of global value chains and industrial development. China Industrial Economics, 2004(05): 38-46. | |
10 | 刘景卿,于佳雯,车维汉.FDI流动与全球价值链分工变化——基于社会网络分析的视角.财经研究,2019,45(03):100-113. |
LIU J, YU J, CHE W. FDI Flow and the division of labor in GVC: An understanding from the perspective of social network analyses.Journal of Finance and Economics,2019,45(03): 100-113. | |
11 | 杨阳.全球价值链嵌入对中国制造业绿色全要素生产率的影响研究.南京:东南大学,2021. |
YANG Y.The impact of global value chain embedding on china's manufacturing green total factor productivity.Nanjing:Southeast University,2021. | |
12 | MEMEDOVIC O, OJALA L, RODRIGUE J, et al. Fuelling the global value chains: what role for logistics capabilities? International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation, and Development, 2008, 1(3): 353. |
13 | 冯锐,高菠阳,闫佳琪,等.世界主要国家及地区制造业GVC地位时空格局演化——基于TiVA数据库的研究.地理研究,2022,41(4):1054-1071. |
FENG R, GAO B, YAN J,et al.Spatiotemporal evolution of the global value chain position of manufacturing countries and areas: Research based on TiVA database.Geographical Research,2022,41(4):1054-1071. | |
14 | 姚作林,金凤君,陈卓.全球产业转移与GVC区域竞争——基于中国与中南半岛四国的分析.地理研究,2021,40(02):326-342. |
YAO Z, JIN F, CHEN Z.Global industrial transfer and GVC regional competition:An analysis based on China and four Indo-ChinaPeninsula countries. Geographical Research,2021,40(02):326-342. | |
15 | 彭水军,吴腊梅.中国在全球价值链中的位置变化及驱动因素.世界经济,2022,45(05):3-28. |
PENG S, WU L.Evolution of China's GVC position and driving forces. The Journal of World Economy, 2022,45(05): 3-28. | |
16 | DUCRUET C, NOTTEBOOM T. The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: spatial structure and regional dynamics. Global Networks, 2012, 12(3): 395-423. |
17 | LIU C, WANG J, ZHANG H. Spatial heterogeneity of ports in the global maritime network detected by weighted ego network analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 2017, 45(1): 89-104. |
18 | DUCRUET C. Port specialization and connectivity in the global maritime network. Maritime Policy & Management, 2022, 49(1): 1-17. |
19 | 邱志萍,廖秋敏.海运连通性与中国国际贸易增长——基于联合国LSBCI数据的分析.地域研究与开发,2022,41(01):1-5. |
QIU Z, LIAO Q.Impact of Industrial Robot on Regional Industrial Structure in China.Areal Research and Development,2022,41(01):1-5. | |
20 | 徐建伟.全球产业链分工格局新变化及对我国的影响.宏观经济管理,2022(06):22-29. |
XU J.New change in the pattern of division of labor in the global industrial chain and their impact on China.Macroeconomic Management, 2022(06):22-29. | |
21 | 周岩.中国融入全球价值链的空间差异与协调发展研究.南京:东南大学,2021. |
ZHOU Y.Spatial differences and coordinated development of China's integration into the global value chain. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2021. | |
22 | GIPOULOUX F. The Asian Mediterranean: Port Cities and Trading Networks in China, Japan, and South Asia, 13th-21st Century. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011. |
23 | DUCRUET C, LEE S, NG A. Port competition and network polarization in the East Asian maritime corridor. Territory in Movement Journal of Geography and Planning, 2011, 10: 60-74. |
24 | GU H, JIE Y, LAO X. Health service disparity, push-pull effect, and elderly migration in aging China. Habitat International, 2022, 125: 102581. |
25 | SILVA J, TENREYRO S. The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006, 88(4): 641-658. |
26 | 倪红福.全球价值链位置测度理论的回顾和展望.中南财经政法大学学报,2019(03):105-117. |
NI H.A review of the theory and application of position in global value chain.Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,2019(03):105-117. | |
27 | 王直,魏尚进,祝坤福.总贸易核算法:官方贸易统计与全球价值链的度量.中国社会科学,2015(09):108-127. |
WANG Z, WEI S, ZHU K.Total trade accounting: official trade statistics and measurement of global value chain.Social Sciences in China.,2015(09):108-127. | |
28 | 新浪财经.中韩贸易三十年:交易额增40倍,从互补走向竞合. (2022-08-28)[2022-09-09].. |
Finance Sina. Thirty years of China South Korea trade: The trading volume has increased 40 times, from complementarity to competition and cooperation (2022-08-28)[2022-09-09].. | |
29 | 中华人民共和国驻大韩民国大使馆.邢海明大使就中韩建交三十周年接受韩国«亚洲经济»«亚洲日报»专访. (2022-08-22)[2022-09-10].. |
Chinese Embassy in the Republic of Korea. Ambassador Xing Haiming received an exclusive interview with the Asia Economic Journal and the Asia Daily of South Korea on the 30th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea.(2022-08-22)[2022-09-10].. | |
30 | 陈继勇,杨格.新冠疫情对东亚产业链的影响分析.亚太经济,2020(02):12-20. |
CHEN J, YANG G.Analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the industrial chain in Eastearn Asia.Asia Pacific economy,2020(02):12-20. | |
31 | 马颖德.新加坡:连接东盟市场的桥梁. (2015-12-09)[2022-09-10].. |
MA Y.Singapore: The bridge connecting the ASEAN market.(2015-12-09)[2022-09-10]. . | |
32 | HAWKSFORD.新加坡:通往东盟的门户.(2019-07-15)[2022-09-10].. |
HAWKSFORD.Singapore: The gateway to ASEAN.(2019-07-15)[2022-09-10].. | |
33 | 日本经济新闻社. 从贸易和投资看中日在东南亚的影响力. (2022-05-30)[2022-09-11]. . |
Shimbun Nikkei.The Influence of China and Japan in Southeast Asia from the perspective of trade and investment. (2022-05-30)[2022-09-11].. | |
34 | 联合国工业发展组织.2022工业发展报告:后疫情时代工业化的未来.2022. |
United Nations Industrial Development Organization.2022 industrial development report:The future of industrialization in the post epidemic era.2022. | |
35 | 于文金,邹欣庆,朱大奎.南海经济圈的提出与探讨.地域研究与开发,2008(1):6-10. |
YU W, ZHOU X, ZHU D.The advance and discussion of the concept of economic circle of South China Sea.Areal Research and Development,2008(1): 6-10. | |
36 | 侯惠丹.中国南海经济圈构建的战略研究.海口:海南大学,2018. |
HOU H.Research on the strategy of building China's south sea economic circle. Haikou:Hainan University, 2018. | |
37 | 金凤君,姚作林,陈卓.环南海区域发展特征与一体化经济区建设前景.地理学报,2021,76(02):428-443. |
JIN F, YAO Z, CHEN Z. Development characteristics and construction prospects for an integrated economic zone in the South China Sea Region.Acta Geographica Sinica,2021,76(02):428-443. |
[1] | Mengyao HUANG, Yexi ZHONG, Weisheng MAO. Spatial transfer characteristics and influencing factors of innovation in manufacturing industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(3): 112-123. |
[2] | Jianwei ZHANG, Ruiqi HUANG, Mengmeng LI, Yanhua Wang, Haining JIANG. Inequality pattern of industrial transfer and output of innovation and its influencing factors in Henan-Anhui-Hunan-Jiangxi Region [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(5): 1017-1028. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||