

World Regional Studies ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 130-142.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2025.09.20240757
Received:2024-09-09
Revised:2025-01-22
Online:2025-09-15
Published:2025-09-30
Contact:
Xiaohui HU
通讯作者:
胡晓辉
作者简介:董柯(1997—),男,博士研究生, 研究方向为经济地理与转型地理,E-mail: dongkgeo@zjnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:Ke DONG, Xiaohui HU. The diffusion of rural PV technology based on geographies of transitions: A case of S Village in Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province[J]. World Regional Studies, 2025, 34(9): 130-142.
董柯, 胡晓辉. 转型地理视角下农村光伏技术扩散研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(9): 130-142.
| 类别 | 代号和访谈对象 | 访谈时间 | 类别 | 代号和访谈对象 | 访谈时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S村村民 | V1:一组村民 | 2017.5.21 | S村光伏推广企业负责人村干部 | V12:二组村民(未安装) | 2017.5.22 |
| V2:一组村民 | 2017.5.21 | V13:二组村民(安装) | 2019.8.17 | ||
| V3:一组村民 | 2017.5.21 | V14:二组村民(未安装) | 2019.8.17 | ||
| V4:一组村民 | 2019.8.16 | V15:二组村民(安装) | 2021.5.15 | ||
| V5:一组村民 | 2019.8.16 | V16:二组村民(未安装) | 2021.5.15 | ||
| V6:一组村民 | 2021.5.15 | V17:二组村民(未安装) | 2021.5.15 | ||
| V7:一组村民 | 2021.5.15 | F1:产品推广企业 | 2017.5.23 | ||
| V8:二组村民(安装) | 2017.5.21 | F2:产品推广企业 | 2019.8.17 | ||
| V9:二组村民(安装) | 2017.5.21 | G1:S村村委 | 2017.5.21 | ||
| V10:二组村民(未安装) | 2017.5.22 | G2:S村村委 | 2021.5.15 | ||
| V11:二组村民(未安装) | 2017.5.22 |
Tab.1 On-site interview information
| 类别 | 代号和访谈对象 | 访谈时间 | 类别 | 代号和访谈对象 | 访谈时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S村村民 | V1:一组村民 | 2017.5.21 | S村光伏推广企业负责人村干部 | V12:二组村民(未安装) | 2017.5.22 |
| V2:一组村民 | 2017.5.21 | V13:二组村民(安装) | 2019.8.17 | ||
| V3:一组村民 | 2017.5.21 | V14:二组村民(未安装) | 2019.8.17 | ||
| V4:一组村民 | 2019.8.16 | V15:二组村民(安装) | 2021.5.15 | ||
| V5:一组村民 | 2019.8.16 | V16:二组村民(未安装) | 2021.5.15 | ||
| V6:一组村民 | 2021.5.15 | V17:二组村民(未安装) | 2021.5.15 | ||
| V7:一组村民 | 2021.5.15 | F1:产品推广企业 | 2017.5.23 | ||
| V8:二组村民(安装) | 2017.5.21 | F2:产品推广企业 | 2019.8.17 | ||
| V9:二组村民(安装) | 2017.5.21 | G1:S村村委 | 2017.5.21 | ||
| V10:二组村民(未安装) | 2017.5.22 | G2:S村村委 | 2021.5.15 | ||
| V11:二组村民(未安装) | 2017.5.22 |
TIS子系统 模式差异 | 创业试验 | 探索引导 | 知识开发与传播 | 资源调动 | 合法化 | 市场形成 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
政府主导模式 (一组) | 上级政府是创业试验主体,本地村民无技术体验 | 当地政府完成试点,但缺乏基于用户体验的社会进程和引导 | 涉及“租用屋顶”相关知识,不涉及光伏相关知识 | 上级政府主导,统购统装,村委积极配合落实 | 当地政府有效避开地方合法化过程,示范性差 | 当地政府试点行为,无用户使用和市场形成 |
企业主导模式 (二组) | 外来企业是创业试验主体,本地村民可实际技术体验 | 外来企业间竞争逐利,缺乏基于技术事实的转型探索引导 | 涉及“养老产品”相关知识,不推广光伏产品知识 | 外来企业主导,政府退出,缺乏多方资源调动 | 缺乏合法性,新产品嵌入社会空间失败 | 本地村民抵制推广,无市场形成 |
Tab. 2 The feature differences in TIS between two groups for PV technology diffusion in S village
TIS子系统 模式差异 | 创业试验 | 探索引导 | 知识开发与传播 | 资源调动 | 合法化 | 市场形成 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
政府主导模式 (一组) | 上级政府是创业试验主体,本地村民无技术体验 | 当地政府完成试点,但缺乏基于用户体验的社会进程和引导 | 涉及“租用屋顶”相关知识,不涉及光伏相关知识 | 上级政府主导,统购统装,村委积极配合落实 | 当地政府有效避开地方合法化过程,示范性差 | 当地政府试点行为,无用户使用和市场形成 |
企业主导模式 (二组) | 外来企业是创业试验主体,本地村民可实际技术体验 | 外来企业间竞争逐利,缺乏基于技术事实的转型探索引导 | 涉及“养老产品”相关知识,不推广光伏产品知识 | 外来企业主导,政府退出,缺乏多方资源调动 | 缺乏合法性,新产品嵌入社会空间失败 | 本地村民抵制推广,无市场形成 |
| [1] | BOSCHMA R, COENEN L, FRENKEN K, et al. Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 2017, 51(1): 31-45. |
| [2] | 贺灿飞, 李伟. 演化经济地理学与区域发展. 区域经济评论, 2020(1): 39-54. |
| HE C, LI W. Evolutionary economic geography and regional development. Regional Economic Review, 2020(1):39-54. | |
| [3] | 胡晓辉, 朱晟君, HASSINK R. 超越"演化":老工业区重构研究进展与范式反思. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5):1028-1044. |
| HU X, ZHU S, HASSINK R. Beyond the "evolutionary approach": A critical review and paradigmatic reflections on the restructuring of old industrial areas. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(5): 1028-1044. | |
| [4] | 余振, 黄平, 龚惠文. 绿色机会窗口与后发城市可持续性转型. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2022, 32(6): 94-103. |
| YU Z, HUANG P, GONG H. Green windows of opportunity and sustainability transitions in latecomer cities. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2022, 32(6):94-103. | |
| [5] | BINZ C, COENEN L, MURPHY J, et al. Geographies of transition:From topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2020, 34:1-3. |
| [6] | YU Z, GIBBS D. Social ties, homophily and heterophily in urban sustainability transitions: User practices and solar water heater diffusion in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 2018b, 46(12): 236-244. |
| [7] | HUANG P, CASTÁN B. Interdependence between urban processes and energy transitions:The dimensions of urban energy transitions(DUET)framework. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2018, 28: 35-45. |
| [8] | MOURATO J, WIT F. The geography of urban sustainability transitions: A critical review. Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research, 2022: 563-576. |
| [9] | BINZ C, TRUFFER B, COENEN L. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring:Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 2016, 92(2): 172-200. |
| [10] | TRIPPL M, GRILLITSCH M, ISAKSEN A. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(5):687-705. |
| [11] | GEELS F. The role of cities in technological transitions: Analytical clarifications and historical examples// BULKELEYIN, H.et al. (eds.) Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010, 13-28. |
| [12] | 杨忍, 林元城. 论乡村数字化与乡村空间转型. 地理学报, 2023, 78(2): 456-473. |
| YANG R, LIN Y. Rural digitalization and rural spatial transformation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(2): 456-473. | |
| [13] | 胡晓辉, 董柯. 可持续性转型研究动态与经济地理学展望. 地理研究, 2022, 41(1): 18-33. |
| HU X, DONG K. A review on sustainability transitions and its research agendas in economic geography. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(1):18-33. | |
| [14] | LI X, LI E. Competitive advantage and rural industrial clustering: The case of steel measuring tape production in a Chinese village. China Review, 2007, 7(1): 27-52. |
| [15] | HUANG P, WESTMAN L, BROTO V. A culture-led approach to understanding energy transitions in China: The correlative epistemology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2021: 1-37. |
| [16] | 蔡丽茹, 吴昕晖, 杜志威. 环境友好型农业技术扩散的时空演化与影响因素—基于社会网络视角. 地理研究, 2022, 41(1): 63-78. |
| CAI L, WU X, DU Z. The spatio-temporal pattern of environmentally-friendly agricultural technology diffusion and its influencing factors: From the social network perspective. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(1): 63-78. | |
| [17] | 杨阳,曾刚,葛世帅,等.国内外绿色创新研究进展与展望.经济地理,2022,42(3):10-21. |
| YANG Y, ZENG G, GE S, et al. Progress and prospects of green innovation research at home and abroad.Economic Geography, 2022, 42(3): 10-21. | |
| [18] | COENEN L, HANSEN T, GLASMEIER A, et al. Regional foundations of energy transitions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2021, 14(2): 219-233. |
| [19] | FASTENRATH S, BRAUN B. Sustainability transition pathways in the building sector: Energy-efficient building in Freiburg (Germany). Applied Geography, 2018, 90: 339-349. |
| [20] | 余振, 龚惠文, 胡晓辉. 可持续性转型地理研究综述与展望. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3): 1-16. |
| YU Z, GONG H, HU X. The geography of sustainability transitions: A sympathetic critique and research agenda. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3): 498-510. | |
| [21] | KÖHLER J, GEELS F, KERN F, et al. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2019, 31: 1-32. |
| [22] | GEELS F. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 2002, 31(8): 1257-1274. |
| [23] | BERGEK A, JACOBSSON S, CARLSSON B, et al. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 2008, 37(3): 407-429. |
| [24] | COOKE P. Transition regions: Regional-national eco-innovation systems and strategies. Progress in Planning, 2011, 76(3): 105–146. |
| [25] | PLANKO J, CRAMER J, CHAPPIN M, et al. Strategic collective system building to commercialize sustainability innovations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 2328-2341. |
| [26] | HANSEN T, COENEN L. The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17(12): 92-109. |
| [27] | MURPHY J. Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17(12): 73-91. |
| [28] | 刘卫东, 金凤君, 张文忠. 中国经济地理学研究进展与展望. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(12): 1479-1487. |
| LIU W, JIN F, ZHANG W. Progress in economic geography (2006-2011). Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(12): 1479-1487. | |
| [29] | 胡晓辉, 张旭亮, 杨宇. 可持续转型的地理视角及其分析框架优化. 地理研究, 2023, 42(4): 1117-1129. |
| HU X, ZHANG X, YANG Y. Geographical perspectives of sustainability transitions: Towards an advanced analytical framework. Geographical Research, 2023,42(4):1117-1129. | |
| [30] | YU Z, GIBBS D. Sustainability transitions and leapfrogging in latecomer cities: The development of solar thermal energy in Dezhou, China. Regional Studies, 2018a, 52(1): 68-79. |
| [31] | HU X., TANG W., ZHANG X . et al. Small sacrifice for the greater good: Decoding just transition on the Chinese ground from a spatial perspective. Social Inclusion, 2024, 12: 7549. |
| [32] | 余振. 结构、计会与能动性:后发区域绿色路径发展. 地理研究, 2024,43(1):1-16. |
| YU. Structure, opportunity, and agency: Green path development in latecomer regions. Geographical Research, 2024,43(1):1-16. | |
| [33] | 许吉黎,黄耿志,张虹鸥,等.可持续性转型视角下区域新兴产业形成的研究进展与展望.经济地理,2022,42(12):142-151. |
| XU J, HUANG G, ZHANG H, et al. Research progress and prospects of regional emerging industry formation in the perspective of sustainability transition. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(12): 142-151. | |
| [34] | HUGGINS R, THOMPSON P. Human agency, network dynamics and regional development: The behavioural principles of new path creation. Regional Studies, 2022, 57(1):1-13. |
| [35] | 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 乡村重构的理论认知 . 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 581-590. |
| LONG H, TU S. Theoretical thinking of rural restructuring. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 581-590. | |
| [36] | HUANG P, YU Z. Aligning industry interests with urban priorities to foster energy transitions: Insights from two Chinese cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2021, 14(2): 341-359. |
| [37] | 费孝通. 乡土中国. 北京:人民出版社,2015:26-30. |
| FEI X. The Foundations of Chinese Society. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2015:26-30. | |
| [38] | 杨海坤,曹寻真.中国乡村自治的历史根源、现实问题和前景展望.江淮论坛,2010(3): 117-126. |
| YANG H, CAO X. The historical root causes, practical problems and prospects of China's rural autonomy.Jiang-huai Tribune,2010(3): 117-126. | |
| [39] | 李二玲. 中国农业产业集群演化过程及创新发展机制——以 "寿光模式" 蔬菜产业集群为例. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 617-627. |
| LI E. The formation, evolution and innovative development of agricultural clusters in China: Case of the cluster nature of "Shouguang Mode". Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 617-627. | |
| [40] | 朱向东, 贺灿飞, 朱晟君. 贸易保护如何改变中国光伏出口目的国格局? 地理研究,2019, 38(11):2565-2577. |
| ZHU X, HE C, ZHU S. How does protectionism change the pattern of the destinations of Chine photovoltaic export? Geographical Research, 2019, 38(11):2565-2577. | |
| [41] | SENGERS F, WIECZOREK A J, RAVEN R. Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 145: 153-164. |
| [42] | HYYSALO S, JUNTUNEN J, MARTISKAINEN M. Energy Internet forums as acceleration phase transition intermediaries. Research Policy, 2018, 47(5): 872-885. |
| [43] | VON H, PARADISO J. User innovation and hacking. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2008, 7(3): 66-69. |
| [44] | HIENERTH C, VON H, JENSEN M. User community vs. producer innovation development efficiency: A first empirical study. Research policy, 2014, 43(1): 190-201. |
| [45] | VON H. Free Innovation.Cambridge The MIT Press, 2016. |
| [46] | SMITH A, RAVEN R. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research policy, 2012, 41(6): 1025-1036. |
| [47] | MAH D N, CHEUNG D, LAM V, et al. Trust gaps in energy transitions: Japan's National Deliberative Poll after Fukushima. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2021, 39: 249-269. |
| [48] | 贺灿飞, 毛熙彦, 彭建. 环境经济地理研究的理论演进与展望 .经济地理,2021,41(10):70-78. |
| HE C, MAO X, PENG J. Theoretical thinking in environmental economic geography:Evolution and prospects. Economic Geography, 2021,41(10):70-78. |
| No related articles found! |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
