World Regional Studies ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 123-133.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.07.20220213
Received:
2022-02-25
Revised:
2022-06-26
Online:
2023-07-15
Published:
2023-08-20
Contact:
Ge HONG
通讯作者:
洪歌
作者简介:
谢守红(1966—),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为区域经济、城市地理和产业经济等,E-mail:xieshouhong@163.com。
基金资助:
Shouhong XIE, Ge HONG. Research on spatial spillover effects of specialized market agglomeration to regional economic growth[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(7): 123-133.
谢守红, 洪歌. 专业市场集聚对区域经济增长的空间溢出效应研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(7): 123-133.
地区 | 年份 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
北京 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.08 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
天津 | 2.22 | 1.88 | 1.46 | 1.67 | 1.08 | 1.01 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
河北 | 1.30 | 1.23 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 1.48 | 1.51 | 1.51 |
山西 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.36 |
内蒙古 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
辽宁 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 1.40 | 1.39 | 1.26 | 1.28 | 1.30 | 1.43 | 1.41 | 1.42 |
吉林 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
黑龙江 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.60 |
上海 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 2.93 | 2.46 | 2.26 | 2.33 | 2.10 | 2.09 | 2.21 | 2.35 |
江苏 | 1.61 | 1.71 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.54 | 1.60 | 1.77 | 1.87 | 1.90 |
浙江 | 2.40 | 2.45 | 2.32 | 2.40 | 2.49 | 2.55 | 2.56 | 2.53 | 2.60 | 2.58 |
安徽 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.70 |
福建 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.31 |
江西 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
山东 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.07 |
河南 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.53 |
湖北 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.45 |
湖南 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.96 |
广东 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
广西 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.53 |
海南 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
重庆 | 1.73 | 1.75 | 1.56 | 1.53 | 1.49 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.41 |
四川 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 |
贵州 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.82 |
云南 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.18 |
西藏 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14 |
陕西 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.30 |
甘肃 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.36 |
青海 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.33 |
宁夏 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.64 |
新疆 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 1.52 | 1.41 | 1.37 |
Tab.1 Location entropy of specialized markets in China's provinces from 2010 to 2019
地区 | 年份 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
北京 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.08 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
天津 | 2.22 | 1.88 | 1.46 | 1.67 | 1.08 | 1.01 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
河北 | 1.30 | 1.23 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 1.48 | 1.51 | 1.51 |
山西 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.36 |
内蒙古 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
辽宁 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 1.40 | 1.39 | 1.26 | 1.28 | 1.30 | 1.43 | 1.41 | 1.42 |
吉林 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
黑龙江 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.60 |
上海 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 2.93 | 2.46 | 2.26 | 2.33 | 2.10 | 2.09 | 2.21 | 2.35 |
江苏 | 1.61 | 1.71 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.54 | 1.60 | 1.77 | 1.87 | 1.90 |
浙江 | 2.40 | 2.45 | 2.32 | 2.40 | 2.49 | 2.55 | 2.56 | 2.53 | 2.60 | 2.58 |
安徽 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.70 |
福建 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.31 |
江西 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
山东 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.07 |
河南 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.53 |
湖北 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.45 |
湖南 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.96 |
广东 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
广西 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.53 |
海南 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
重庆 | 1.73 | 1.75 | 1.56 | 1.53 | 1.49 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.41 |
四川 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 |
贵州 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.82 |
云南 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.18 |
西藏 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14 |
陕西 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.30 |
甘肃 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.36 |
青海 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.33 |
宁夏 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.64 |
新疆 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 1.52 | 1.41 | 1.37 |
类型 | 2010年 | 2019年 |
---|---|---|
高集聚水平(区位熵>1.5) | 天津、上海、江苏、浙江、重庆 | 河北、上海、江苏、浙江 |
较高集聚水平(区位熵1~1.5) | 河北、辽宁、山东 | 北京、辽宁、山东、重庆、新疆 |
较低集聚水平(区位熵0.5~1) | 北京、黑龙江、安徽、福建、江西、湖南、广东、广西、甘肃、宁夏、新疆 | 天津、黑龙江、安徽、江西、河南、湖南、广西、四川、贵州、宁夏 |
低集聚水平(区位熵<0.5) | 山西、内蒙古、吉林、河南、湖北、海南、四川、贵州、云南、西藏、陕西、青海 | 山西、内蒙古、吉林、福建、湖北、广东、海南、云南、西藏、陕西、甘肃、青海 |
Tab.2 Specialized markets aggregation level classification
类型 | 2010年 | 2019年 |
---|---|---|
高集聚水平(区位熵>1.5) | 天津、上海、江苏、浙江、重庆 | 河北、上海、江苏、浙江 |
较高集聚水平(区位熵1~1.5) | 河北、辽宁、山东 | 北京、辽宁、山东、重庆、新疆 |
较低集聚水平(区位熵0.5~1) | 北京、黑龙江、安徽、福建、江西、湖南、广东、广西、甘肃、宁夏、新疆 | 天津、黑龙江、安徽、江西、河南、湖南、广西、四川、贵州、宁夏 |
低集聚水平(区位熵<0.5) | 山西、内蒙古、吉林、河南、湖北、海南、四川、贵州、云南、西藏、陕西、青海 | 山西、内蒙古、吉林、福建、湖北、广东、海南、云南、西藏、陕西、甘肃、青海 |
地区生产总值 | 专业市场区位熵 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年份 | I值 | P值 | 年份 | I值 | P值 |
2010 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2010 | 0.33 | 0.00 |
2011 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2011 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
2012 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2012 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
2013 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2013 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
2014 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2014 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
2015 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2015 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
2016 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2016 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
2017 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2017 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
2018 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2018 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
2019 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2019 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
Tab.3 GDP and specialized markets Global Moran Index from 2010 to 2019
地区生产总值 | 专业市场区位熵 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年份 | I值 | P值 | 年份 | I值 | P值 |
2010 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2010 | 0.33 | 0.00 |
2011 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2011 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
2012 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2012 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
2013 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2013 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
2014 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 2014 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
2015 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2015 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
2016 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2016 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
2017 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2017 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
2018 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2018 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
2019 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 2019 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
变量 | OLS回归 | 个体固定效应 | 时间固定效应 | 双向固定效应 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Qij | 0.08*** | 0.03 | 0.06*** | 0.05*** |
(-0.02) | (-0.02) | (-0.02) | (-0.02) | |
lnL | 0.63*** | 0.26*** | 0.59*** | 0.24*** |
(-0.02) | (-0.06) | (-0.04) | (-0.07) | |
lnK | 0.40*** | 0.19*** | 0.53*** | 0.28*** |
(-0.03) | (-0.04) | (-0.07) | (-0.04) | |
lnOpen | 0.11*** | 0.01 | 0.07*** | 0.01 |
(-0.01) | (-0.01) | (-0.01) | (-0.01) | |
lnISI | 0.01*** | 0 | 0.02*** | -0.01* |
(0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | |
lnTech | 0.11*** | -0.02 | 0.07*** | -0.02* |
(-0.02) | (-0.01) | (-0.02) | (-0.01) | |
常数 | -0.63** | |||
(-0.29) | ||||
R2 | 0.967 | 0.755 | 0.973 | 0.704 |
Log-likelihood | (532.198) | (139.042) | (558.005) |
Tab.4 Regression results of model under three fixed effects
变量 | OLS回归 | 个体固定效应 | 时间固定效应 | 双向固定效应 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Qij | 0.08*** | 0.03 | 0.06*** | 0.05*** |
(-0.02) | (-0.02) | (-0.02) | (-0.02) | |
lnL | 0.63*** | 0.26*** | 0.59*** | 0.24*** |
(-0.02) | (-0.06) | (-0.04) | (-0.07) | |
lnK | 0.40*** | 0.19*** | 0.53*** | 0.28*** |
(-0.03) | (-0.04) | (-0.07) | (-0.04) | |
lnOpen | 0.11*** | 0.01 | 0.07*** | 0.01 |
(-0.01) | (-0.01) | (-0.01) | (-0.01) | |
lnISI | 0.01*** | 0 | 0.02*** | -0.01* |
(0) | (0) | (0) | (0) | |
lnTech | 0.11*** | -0.02 | 0.07*** | -0.02* |
(-0.02) | (-0.01) | (-0.02) | (-0.01) | |
常数 | -0.63** | |||
(-0.29) | ||||
R2 | 0.967 | 0.755 | 0.973 | 0.704 |
Log-likelihood | (532.198) | (139.042) | (558.005) |
相关检验 | Z值 | P值 |
---|---|---|
Global Moran I Error | 15.549 | 0.000 |
LM-error | 219.361 | 0.000 |
robust LM-error | 194.243 | 0.000 |
LM-lag | 25.474 | 0.000 |
robust LM-lag | 0.356 | 0.551 |
LR检验 | Prob>chi2=0.0000(比较SDM和SAR) | |
Prob>chi2=0.0000(比较SDM和SEM) | ||
联合显著性检验 | Prob>chi2=0.0000 | |
Hausman检验 | Prob>chi2=0.0000 |
Tab.3 Related test results
相关检验 | Z值 | P值 |
---|---|---|
Global Moran I Error | 15.549 | 0.000 |
LM-error | 219.361 | 0.000 |
robust LM-error | 194.243 | 0.000 |
LM-lag | 25.474 | 0.000 |
robust LM-lag | 0.356 | 0.551 |
LR检验 | Prob>chi2=0.0000(比较SDM和SAR) | |
Prob>chi2=0.0000(比较SDM和SEM) | ||
联合显著性检验 | Prob>chi2=0.0000 | |
Hausman检验 | Prob>chi2=0.0000 |
变量 | 直接效应 | 间接效应 | 总效应 |
---|---|---|---|
Qij | 0.060*** | 0.075 | 0.135 |
(-0.01) | (-0.33) | (-0.15) | |
lnL | 0.232*** | -0.09 | 0.142 |
(0) | (-0.71) | (-0.62) | |
lnK | 0.341*** | 0.781*** | 1.122*** |
(0) | (0) | (0) | |
lnOpen | 0.024** | 0.135*** | 0.159*** |
(-0.05) | (0) | (0) | |
lnISI | -0.008*** | -0.037*** | -0.045*** |
(-0.01) | (0) | (0) | |
lnTech | -0.029* | -0.068 | -0.096* |
(-0.06) | (-0.11) | (-0.06) | |
spatial rho | 0.409***(0) | ||
0.002***(0) | |||
R2 | 0.704 |
Tab.5 SDM model spatial effect decomposition
变量 | 直接效应 | 间接效应 | 总效应 |
---|---|---|---|
Qij | 0.060*** | 0.075 | 0.135 |
(-0.01) | (-0.33) | (-0.15) | |
lnL | 0.232*** | -0.09 | 0.142 |
(0) | (-0.71) | (-0.62) | |
lnK | 0.341*** | 0.781*** | 1.122*** |
(0) | (0) | (0) | |
lnOpen | 0.024** | 0.135*** | 0.159*** |
(-0.05) | (0) | (0) | |
lnISI | -0.008*** | -0.037*** | -0.045*** |
(-0.01) | (0) | (0) | |
lnTech | -0.029* | -0.068 | -0.096* |
(-0.06) | (-0.11) | (-0.06) | |
spatial rho | 0.409***(0) | ||
0.002***(0) | |||
R2 | 0.704 |
1 | BROMLEY R. Markets in the developing countries: A review. Geography,1971(56):124-132. |
2 | BESTOR,T.C. Tsukiji:The Fish Market at the Center of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press,2004. |
3 | MICHELE D. Market Day in Provence. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2006. |
4 | COE N, LEE Y. The strategic localization of transnational retailers: The case of Samsung-Tesco in South Korea. Economic Geography,2006,82(1):61-88. |
5 | WRIGLEY N, CURRAH A. Globalizing retail and the new economy: The organizational challenge of e-commerce for the retail TNCs. Geoforum,2006,37(3):340-351. |
6 | WILSON B. Race in commodity exchange and consumption: Separate but equal. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,2005,95(3):587-606. |
7 | ATHREYE S. Specialized markets and the behavior of firms: Evidence from the United Kingdom's regional economies. Journal of Economy Geography,2005,5(5):523-543. |
8 | CLARKE I. Retail restructuring and consumer choice: Long-term local changes in consumer behavior: Portmouth,1980-2002. Environment and Planning A,2006,38(1):25-46. |
9 | 金祥荣,柯荣住.对专业市场的一种交易费用经济学解释. 经济研究,1997(4):74-79. |
JIN X, KE R. An economic explanation of transaction costs in specialized markets. Economic Research, 1997(4):74-79. | |
10 | 郑勇军.浙江农村工业化中的专业市场制度研究.浙江社会科学,1998(6):11-17. |
ZHENG Y. A study on the specialized markets system in Zhejiang's rural industrialization. Zhejiang Social Science, 1998(6):11-17. | |
11 | 陆立军,王祖强.专业市场:地方型市场的演进. 上海:上海人民出版社,2008. |
LU L, WANG Z. Professional Markets: the Evolution of Local Markets. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2008. | |
12 | 于斌斌,陆立军.专业市场与电子商务双渠道融合的微观机理与实证分析.研究与发展管理,2017,29(3): 141-150. |
Yu B, LU Micro-mechanism and empirical analysis on double channel integration between specialized market and e-commerce. Research and Development Management,2017,29(3): 141-150. | |
13 | 段文奇,冯笑笑.专业市场平台化发展战略的设计方法研究.商业经济与管理,2014(11):12-18. |
DUAN W, FENG X. Design method of the platform development strategies for specialized markets: A case study of Yongkang Chinese technology hardware city. Business Economics and Management, 2014(11):12-18. | |
14 | 陆立军,郑小碧. 基于共同演化的专业市场与产业集群互动机理研究:理论与实证. 中国软科学, 2011(6):117-129. |
LU L, ZHENG X. Study on mechanism of the interaction between specialized market and industrial clusters based on Co-evolution: Theory and evidence. China Soft Science, 2011(6):117-129. | |
15 | 佘明龙,郭玉华.专业市场与产业集群耦合联动机理研究.重庆工商大学学报,2006(3):59-62. |
SHE M, GUO Y. Research on the mechanism of coupling and linkage between professional markets and industrial clusters. Journal of Chongqing University of Commerce and Industry, 2006(3):59-62. | |
16 | 刘乃全,任光辉.区域经济发展中的专业市场与产业集群互动.上海经济研究,2011(1):23-34. |
LIU N, REN G. The interaction of the professional market and industry clusters in regional economic development: An analysis from the perspective of impact factor. Shanghai Economic Research, 2011(1):23-34. | |
17 | 陈红儿,赵降英.中国农村专业市场向现代化迈进.宏观经济管理,2000(3):42-45. |
CHEN H, ZHAO D. China's rural specialty markets towards modernization. Macroeconomic Management, 2000(3):42-45. | |
18 | 朱磊,诸葛燕.温州城市化机制研究. 经济地理,2002(6):32-37. |
ZHU L, ZHU G. The study on urbanization mechanism of Wenzhou city. Economic Geography, 2002(6):32-37. | |
19 | 张海霞,汪宇明,张旭亮,等.中国的专业市场推动型区域发展模式探讨.开发研究,2008(2):31-36. |
ZHANG H, WANG Y, ZHANG X, et al. Exploring the professional market-driven regional development model in China. Development Research, 2008(2):31-36. | |
20 | 张旭亮,宁越敏.中国商品交易市场发展时空差异及其形成机理探析.地理科学,2010,30(8):481-488. |
ZHANG X, NING Y. The spatial and temporal difference and formation mechanism of the Chinese commodity trading markets development,2010,30(8):481-488. | |
21 | 马汉武,陶静,罗荣华.专业市场对区域经济发展的影响.商业研究,2012(8):20-24. |
MA H, TAO J, LUO R. The impact of professional markets on regional economic development. Business Research,2012(8):20-24. | |
22 | 彭继增,邹志锋,孙中美.产业转移、专业市场与特色城镇化互动的实证分析.江西社会科学,2014(08):61-68. |
PENG J, ZOU Z, SUN Z. An empirical analysis of the interaction between industrial transfer, professional market and characteristic urbanization. Jiangxi Social Science,2014(08):61-68. | |
23 | 朱海英.中国专业市场效率及其影响因素研究——基于SFA模型. 华东经济管理,2016,30(11):79-85. |
ZHU H. Study on technical efficiency and its influencing factors of Chinese professional market—Based on SFA model. East China Economic Management, 2016,30(11):79-85. | |
24 | 王钰,疏爽.物流产业集聚对区域经济增长的空间溢出效应研究——基于长三角城市群的实证分析.中南大学学报(社会科学版),2021,27(1):76-89. |
WANG Y, SHU S. On the spatial spillover effect of logistics industry agglomeration on regional economic growth: Based on the empirical analysis of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Journal of Central South University (Social Science Edition),2021,27(1):76-89. | |
25 | 吴炎芳.金融集聚对区域经济增长的空间溢出效应研究——基于空间计量模型的三大城市群对比分析.经济问题,2020(8):61-69. |
WU Y. Research on the spatial spillover effect of financial agglomeration on regional economic growth—Comparative analysis of three major urban agglomerations based on spatial econometric models. Economic Issues, 2020(8):61-69. | |
26 | 王珍珍,陈功玉.我国物流产业集聚对制造业工业增加值影响的实证研究——基于省级面板数据的分析.上海财经大学学报,2009,11(6):49-56. |
WANG Z, CHEN G. Empirical study of the impact of logistics industrial cluster on industrial added value in China—Analysis based on provincial panel data. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2009,11(6):49-56. | |
27 | 叶萌,祝合良.标准化对我国物流业经济增长的影响——基于C-D生产函数及主成分分析法的实证研究. 中国流通经济,2018,32(6):25-36. |
YE M, ZHU H. Research on the impact of standardization on the economic growth of China's logistics industry—An empirical analysis based on C-D production function and principal component analysis. China Circulation Economy,2018,32(6):25-36. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||