World Regional Studies ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 181-192.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2025.01.20222218
Xue WU(), Yong YANG(
), Taiyu SHI
Received:
2022-09-15
Revised:
2023-03-19
Online:
2025-01-15
Published:
2025-02-07
Contact:
Yong YANG
通讯作者:
杨勇
作者简介:
邬雪(1995—),女,博士,主要从事区域旅游经济研究,E-mail:wuxue19950121@163.com。
基金资助:
Xue WU, Yong YANG, Taiyu SHI. Impact of the COVID-19 on spatial structure of tourism market:A case study of the Yangtze River Delta[J]. World Regional Studies, 2025, 34(1): 181-192.
邬雪, 杨勇, 施泰宇. 新冠疫情对旅游市场空间格局的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(1): 181-192.
时期 | 年/月 | Moran' I指数 | Z(I) | P(I) | 空间格局 | 时期 | 年/月 | Moran' I指数 | Z(I) | P(I) | 空间格局 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新冠疫情发生前 | 2019/1 | 0.177 | 2.128 | 0.033 | 弱集聚分布 | 新冠疫情影响下 | 2020/1 | 0.081 | 1.147 | 0.130 | 随机分布 |
2019/2 | 0.223 | 2.577 | 0.010 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/2 | 0.041 | 0.666 | 0.225 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/3 | 0.185 | 2.130 | 0.034 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/3 | 0.076 | 1.022 | 0.147 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/4 | 0.197 | 2.281 | 0.019 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/4 | 0.057 | 0.822 | 0.179 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/5 | 0.200 | 2.321 | 0.019 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/5 | 0.095 | 1.224 | 0.122 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/6 | 0.185 | 2.202 | 0.024 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/6 | 0.114 | 1.432 | 0.087 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/7 | 0.160 | 1.944 | 0.037 | 随机分布 | 2020/7 | 0.055 | 0.880 | 0.176 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/8 | 0.153 | 1.862 | 0.045 | 随机分布 | 2020/8 | 0.953 | 1.300 | 0.096 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/9 | 0.180 | 2.067 | 0.030 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/9 | 0.079 | 1.124 | 0.131 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/10 | 0.124 | 1.490 | 0.880 | 随机分布 | 2020/10 | 0.087 | 1.264 | 0.108 | 随机分布 |
Tab.1 Global autocorrelation Moran's I index
时期 | 年/月 | Moran' I指数 | Z(I) | P(I) | 空间格局 | 时期 | 年/月 | Moran' I指数 | Z(I) | P(I) | 空间格局 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新冠疫情发生前 | 2019/1 | 0.177 | 2.128 | 0.033 | 弱集聚分布 | 新冠疫情影响下 | 2020/1 | 0.081 | 1.147 | 0.130 | 随机分布 |
2019/2 | 0.223 | 2.577 | 0.010 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/2 | 0.041 | 0.666 | 0.225 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/3 | 0.185 | 2.130 | 0.034 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/3 | 0.076 | 1.022 | 0.147 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/4 | 0.197 | 2.281 | 0.019 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/4 | 0.057 | 0.822 | 0.179 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/5 | 0.200 | 2.321 | 0.019 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/5 | 0.095 | 1.224 | 0.122 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/6 | 0.185 | 2.202 | 0.024 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/6 | 0.114 | 1.432 | 0.087 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/7 | 0.160 | 1.944 | 0.037 | 随机分布 | 2020/7 | 0.055 | 0.880 | 0.176 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/8 | 0.153 | 1.862 | 0.045 | 随机分布 | 2020/8 | 0.953 | 1.300 | 0.096 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/9 | 0.180 | 2.067 | 0.030 | 弱集聚分布 | 2020/9 | 0.079 | 1.124 | 0.131 | 随机分布 | ||
2019/10 | 0.124 | 1.490 | 0.880 | 随机分布 | 2020/10 | 0.087 | 1.264 | 0.108 | 随机分布 |
城市 | 各月点入度 | 各月点出度 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
上海 | 37 | 17 | 18 | 25 | 27 | 31 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 37 | 26 | 31 | 37 | 35 | 38 | 38 | 40 | 40 | 36 |
南京 | 40 | 30 | 37 | 39 | 37 | 39 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 34 | 21 | 27 | 35 | 34 | 29 | 35 | 36 | 40 | 37 |
无锡 | 23 | 16 | 22 | 32 | 31 | 31 | 33 | 35 | 34 | 35 | 27 | 13 | 18 | 21 | 21 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 31 | 26 |
苏州 | 35 | 25 | 31 | 36 | 37 | 37 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 35 | 19 | 23 | 29 | 32 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 39 | 35 |
杭州 | 34 | 21 | 24 | 36 | 29 | 36 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 30 | 19 | 24 | 30 | 26 | 30 | 29 | 31 | 37 | 31 |
宁波 | 23 | 13 | 20 | 27 | 23 | 23 | 37 | 39 | 38 | 36 | 23 | 12 | 17 | 21 | 17 | 19 | 22 | 21 | 23 | 21 |
舟山 | 15 | 11 | 17 | 26 | 21 | 23 | 37 | 40 | 38 | 30 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 14 | 8 |
合肥 | 33 | 6 | 16 | 30 | 26 | 28 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 37 | 31 | 15 | 26 | 34 | 32 | 32 | 35 | 39 | 39 | 37 |
黄山 | 38 | 37 | 39 | 39 | 40 | 39 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 9 | 9 |
Tab.3 Changes in the centrality of some cities in the Yangtze River Delta
城市 | 各月点入度 | 各月点出度 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
上海 | 37 | 17 | 18 | 25 | 27 | 31 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 37 | 26 | 31 | 37 | 35 | 38 | 38 | 40 | 40 | 36 |
南京 | 40 | 30 | 37 | 39 | 37 | 39 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 34 | 21 | 27 | 35 | 34 | 29 | 35 | 36 | 40 | 37 |
无锡 | 23 | 16 | 22 | 32 | 31 | 31 | 33 | 35 | 34 | 35 | 27 | 13 | 18 | 21 | 21 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 31 | 26 |
苏州 | 35 | 25 | 31 | 36 | 37 | 37 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 35 | 19 | 23 | 29 | 32 | 32 | 33 | 36 | 39 | 35 |
杭州 | 34 | 21 | 24 | 36 | 29 | 36 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 30 | 19 | 24 | 30 | 26 | 30 | 29 | 31 | 37 | 31 |
宁波 | 23 | 13 | 20 | 27 | 23 | 23 | 37 | 39 | 38 | 36 | 23 | 12 | 17 | 21 | 17 | 19 | 22 | 21 | 23 | 21 |
舟山 | 15 | 11 | 17 | 26 | 21 | 23 | 37 | 40 | 38 | 30 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 14 | 8 |
合肥 | 33 | 6 | 16 | 30 | 26 | 28 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 37 | 31 | 15 | 26 | 34 | 32 | 32 | 35 | 39 | 39 | 37 |
黄山 | 38 | 37 | 39 | 39 | 40 | 39 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 9 | 9 |
子群 | 新冠疫情发生之前 | 新冠疫情影响之下 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
二级层面 | 三级层面 | 二级层面 | 三级层面 | |
Ⅰ | 上海、台州、丽水、温州、衢州、舟山、嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、金华 | 上海 | 上海、南京、杭州、苏州、无锡、宁波、舟山、黄山 | 上海、南京、杭州、苏州 |
台州、丽水、温州、衢州、舟山、嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、金华 | 无锡、宁波、舟山、黄山 | |||
Ⅱ | 无锡、南京、杭州、苏州、宁波、连云港、镇江、扬州、常州、黄山 | 无锡、南京、杭州、苏州 | 嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、台州、温州、丽水、衢州、金华 | 嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、台州、温州 |
宁波、连云港、镇江、扬州、常州、黄山 | 丽水、衢州、金华 | |||
Ⅲ | 盐城、淮安、南通、宿迁、泰州、徐州、合肥 | 盐城、淮安、南通、宿迁、泰州 | 盐城、南通、镇江、扬州、常州、泰州、连云港、淮安、徐州、宿迁 | 盐城、南通、镇江、扬州、常州、泰州 |
徐州、合肥 | 连云港、淮安、徐州、宿迁 | |||
Ⅴ | 芜湖、淮南、蚌埠、滁州、亳州、宣城、六安、池州、宿州、淮北、马鞍山、阜阳、安庆、铜陵 | 芜湖、淮南、蚌埠、滁州、亳州、宣城、六安 | 芜湖、合肥、宣城、铜陵、滁州、池州、马鞍山、宿州、淮北、亳州、阜阳、蚌埠、淮南、安庆、六安 | 芜湖、合肥、宣城 |
池州、宿州、淮北、马鞍山、阜阳、安庆、铜陵 | 铜陵、滁州、池州、马鞍山、宿州、淮北、亳州、阜阳、蚌埠、淮南、安庆、六安 |
Tab.4 Cohesive subgroup analysis of tourism market in the Yangtze River Delta
子群 | 新冠疫情发生之前 | 新冠疫情影响之下 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
二级层面 | 三级层面 | 二级层面 | 三级层面 | |
Ⅰ | 上海、台州、丽水、温州、衢州、舟山、嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、金华 | 上海 | 上海、南京、杭州、苏州、无锡、宁波、舟山、黄山 | 上海、南京、杭州、苏州 |
台州、丽水、温州、衢州、舟山、嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、金华 | 无锡、宁波、舟山、黄山 | |||
Ⅱ | 无锡、南京、杭州、苏州、宁波、连云港、镇江、扬州、常州、黄山 | 无锡、南京、杭州、苏州 | 嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、台州、温州、丽水、衢州、金华 | 嘉兴、湖州、绍兴、台州、温州 |
宁波、连云港、镇江、扬州、常州、黄山 | 丽水、衢州、金华 | |||
Ⅲ | 盐城、淮安、南通、宿迁、泰州、徐州、合肥 | 盐城、淮安、南通、宿迁、泰州 | 盐城、南通、镇江、扬州、常州、泰州、连云港、淮安、徐州、宿迁 | 盐城、南通、镇江、扬州、常州、泰州 |
徐州、合肥 | 连云港、淮安、徐州、宿迁 | |||
Ⅴ | 芜湖、淮南、蚌埠、滁州、亳州、宣城、六安、池州、宿州、淮北、马鞍山、阜阳、安庆、铜陵 | 芜湖、淮南、蚌埠、滁州、亳州、宣城、六安 | 芜湖、合肥、宣城、铜陵、滁州、池州、马鞍山、宿州、淮北、亳州、阜阳、蚌埠、淮南、安庆、六安 | 芜湖、合肥、宣城 |
池州、宿州、淮北、马鞍山、阜阳、安庆、铜陵 | 铜陵、滁州、池州、马鞍山、宿州、淮北、亳州、阜阳、蚌埠、淮南、安庆、六安 |
1 | 何建民. 世界各国疫情防控主要模式及文化和旅游恢复发展路径. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(2): 6-8. |
HE J. The main models of epidemic prevention and control in the world and the path of cultural and tourism recovery development. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(2): 6-8. | |
2 | 陈岩英, 谢朝武. 常态化疫情防控下的旅游发展:转型机遇与战略优化. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(2): 5-6. |
CHEN Y, XIE C. Tourism development under normalized epidemic prevention and control: Transformation opportunities and strategic optimization. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(2): 5-6. | |
3 | 夏杰长, 丰晓旭. 新冠肺炎疫情对旅游业的冲击与对策. 中国流通经济, 2020, 34(3): 3-10. |
XIA J, FENG X. The impact of novel coronavirus outbreak on tourism industry and the countermeasures. China Business and Market, 2020, 34(3): 3-10. | |
4 | YANG Y, ZHANG C, RICKLY J. A review of early COVID-19 research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research's Curated Collection on coronavirus and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 2021(91): 1-17. |
5 | 杨勇. 常态化疫情防控下旅游经济研究的新问题与新机遇. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(2): 3-4. |
YANG Y. New problems and opportunities of tourism economy research under the normalized epidemic prevention and control. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(2): 3-4. | |
6 | ZHANG C, WANG L, RICKLY J. Non-interaction and identity change in COVID-19 tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 2021(89): 1-14. |
7 | BAE S, CHANG P. The effect of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) risk perception on behavioural intention towards 'untact' tourism in South Korea during the first wave of the pandemic (March 2020). Current Issues in Tourism, 2021, 24(7): 1017-1035. |
8 | PHAM T, DWYER L, SU J, et al. COVID-19 impacts of inbound tourism on Australian economy. Annals of Tourism Research, 2021, 88(4): 103179. |
9 | SHARMA G, THOMAS A, PAUL J. Reviving tourism industry post-COVID-19: A resilience-based framework. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2021(37): 100786. |
10 | 程励, 赵晨月. 新冠肺炎疫情背景下游客户外景区心理承载力影响研究——基于可视化行为实验的实证. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(8): 27-40. |
CHENG L, ZHAO C. The influencing factors of psychological carrying capacity of tourists in outdoor scenic areas in the context of COVID-19—Empirical study based on a visual behavior experiment. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(8): 27-40. | |
11 | 冯晓华, 黄震方. 疫情常态化防控下游客旅游行为意向研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(4): 203-208. |
FENG X, HUANG Z. Research on tourism behavior intention of tourists under the normal epidemic prevention and control. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(4): 203-208. | |
12 | ŠKARE M, SORIANO D, PORADA-ROCHOŃ M. Impact of COVID-19 on the travel and tourism industry. Technological forecasting and social change, 2021, 163: 120469. |
13 | SOBAIH A, ELSHAER I, HASANEIN A, et al. Responses to COVID-19: The role of performance in the relationship between small hospitality enterprises' resilience and sustainable tourism development. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2021(94): 102824. |
14 | 刘培学, 王欢颖, 陈伟, 等. 新冠疫情对旅游景区客源市场需求的空间分异影响——以南京夫子庙景区为例. 地理科学, 2022, 42(7): 1250-1259. |
LIU P, WANG H, CHEN W, et al. Spatially divergent impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on source markets of tourism destination: A case study of the Confucius Temple in Nanjing. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(7): 1250-1259. | |
15 | 王章郡, 周小曼, 方忠权. 基于新冠疫情冲击的城市旅游流网络结构韧性评估——以重庆市中心城区为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(11): 148-157. |
WANG Z, ZHOU X, FANG Z. Evaluation on the resilience of urban tourism flow network structure under the impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A case of Chongqing. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(11): 148-157. | |
16 | 戢晓峰, 于淼, 陈方, 等. 新冠疫情前后自驾旅游流空间结构特征及影响:以云南省为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(12): 184-190. |
JI X, YU M, CHEN F, et al. Influence of the COVID-19 on the spatial structure of self-driving tourist flow during the golden week of Spring Festival: Case of Yunnan province. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022, 36(12): 184-190. | |
17 | 刘海朦, 胡静, 吕丽, 等. 基于网络关注度的新冠疫情对武汉旅游时空格局的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(2): 194-202. |
LIU H, HU J, LV L, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on spatio-temporal pattern of tourism in Wuhan: A network attention based study. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(2): 194-202. | |
18 | 赵梓渝, 赵世瑶, 韩钟辉, 等. COVID-19疫情对北京市节日休闲区域人口热力影响研究. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(7): 1073-1085. |
ZHAO Z, ZHAO S, ZHAO Z, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on population heat map in leisure areas in Beijing on holidays. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(7): 1073-1085. | |
19 | 黄松, 李燕林, 王梦飞. 城市间旅游线路信息测度及其流空间特征——基于2019—2021年在线平台大数据. 经济地理, 2022, 42(11): 204-215. |
HUANG S, LI Y, WANG M. Measurement of tourist route information between cities and its flow space characteristics: Based on big data of the online travel platforms from 2019 to 2021. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(11): 204-215. | |
20 | 徐阳, 彭澎, 陆锋, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情前后游客出行行为的时空特征研究——以中国香港为例. 地理研究, 2022, 41(12): 3199-3213. |
XU Y, PENG P, LU F, et al. Exploring spatio-temporal characteristics of tourist travel behavior before and after COVID-19: A case study in Hong Kong, China. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(12): 3199-3213. | |
21 | SIGALA M. Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research. Journal of business research, 2020(117): 312-321. |
22 | ALTSHULER A, SCHMIDT J. Does and how resilience matter? Global implications for the tourism industry in the context of COVID-19. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 2021, 13(3): 431-436. |
23 | 张佑印, 顾静. 天津滨海新区旅游市场空间结构及游客行为研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(6): 191-197. |
ZHANG Y, GU J. Analysis of spatial structure of tourism market and tourists' behavior of Tianjin Binhai New Development Area. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2013, 27(6): 191-197. | |
24 | 刘逸, 陈海龙, 曹轶涵. 基于旅游评论数据的旅游地客源市场空间结构探析与理论修正. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(5): 113-124. |
LIU Y, CHEN H, CAO Y. Analysis and theoretical modification of the spatial structure of tourist source market based on tourism review data. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(5): 113-124. | |
25 | 刘昌雪. 产业服务型商务酒店客源市场空间结构特征——以苏州工业园区某高档商务国际连锁酒店为例. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(2): 61-68. |
LIU C. Characteristics of spatial structure of tourist market of service-oriented business hotel: A case of an upscale international business hotel chain. Tourism Tribune, 2015, 30(2): 61-68. | |
26 | 阮文奇, 李勇泉. 自然灾害型危机事件对客源地旅游需求的影响及空间差异——九寨沟地震后的时空异质性分析. 经济地理, 2018, 38(8): 214-223. |
RUAN W, LI Y. The impact and spatial difference of natural disaster crisis on tourist demand. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(8): 214-223. | |
27 | 史庆斌, 谢永顺, 韩增林, 等. 东北城市间旅游经济联系的空间结构及发展模式. 经济地理, 2018, 38(11): 211-219. |
SHI Q, XIE Y, HAN Z, et al. Spatial structure and spatial development patterns of urban tourism economic connections in Northeast China. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(11): 211-219. | |
28 | 付琼鸽, 刘大均, 胡静, 等. 湖北省旅游流网络结构的特征与优化. 经济地理, 2015, 35(3): 191-196. |
FU Q, LIU D, HU J, et al. Network structure and optimization research on the Hubei province tourist flow. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(3): 191-196. | |
29 | 侯贺平, 王靓, 任婉倩, 等. 基于数字足迹的河南省A级景区旅游流网络特征研究. 地域研究与开发, 2022, 41(1): 91-97. |
HOU H, WANG J, REN W, et al. Research on characteristics of tourism flow networks of A-level scenic spots in Henan Province based on digital footprint. Area Research and Development, 2022, 41(1): 91-97. | |
30 | 李彬彬, 陈冬冬, 张莹, 等. 基于2-模网络分析的安徽省国内旅游市场格局研究. 经济与管理, 2018, 32(1): 66-72. |
LI B, CHEN D, ZHANG Y, et al. Study on the pattern of domestic tourism market in Anhui province based on 2-mode network analysis. Economic and Management, 2018, 32(1): 66-72. | |
31 | 王公为, 李国精, 乌铁红. 内蒙古国内旅游市场的空间结构研究——基于区域结构的视角. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(5): 197-202. |
WANG G, LI G, WU T. Spacial structure of domestic tourism market in Inner Mongolia, Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(5): 197-202. | |
32 | 黄鑫楠, 孙斌栋, 张婷麟. 地理距离对互联网社会中网络信息传播的影响. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 722-735. |
HUANG X, SUN B, ZHANG T. The influence of geographical distance on the dissemination of internet information in the internet society. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 722-735. | |
33 | 冯晓兵. 中国民宿网络关注时空特征及影响因素研究. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(1): 154-165. |
FENG X. A study on the spatial and temporal characteristics of network attention and its influencing factors of China's homestay. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(1): 154-165. | |
34 | 赵书虹, 白梦. 云南省品牌旅游资源竞争力与旅游流耦合协调特征及其影响因素分析. 地理科学, 2020, 40(11): 1878-1888. |
ZHAO S, BAI M. Coupling coordination characteristics and its influencing factors of brand tourism resources competitiveness and tourism flow in Yunnan Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2020,40(11): 1878-1888. | |
35 | 戢晓峰, 李康康, 陈方. 节假日旅游流时空分异及其形成机制——以云南省为例. 经济地理, 2018, 38(3): 200-207. |
JI X, LI K, CHEN F. Study on spatial and temporal differentiation of holiday tourism flow and its formation mechanism: A case study of Yunnan Province. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(3): 200-207. | |
36 | 杜家禛, 徐菁, 靳诚. 基于百度指数的长江三角洲虚拟旅游流流动特征和影响因素分析. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(2): 290-301. |
DU J, XU J, JIN C. Regional virtual tourism flow and its influencing factors based on Baidu Index: A case study in Yangtze River Delta. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(2): 290-301. | |
37 | 刘大均, 陈君子, 贾垚焱. 8·8九寨沟地震对区域旅游流地理分布及其流动的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(7): 201-208. |
LIU D, CHEN J, JIA Y. Influence of Jiuzhaigou earthquake on the geographical distribution and flow of regional tourist flows. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(7): 201-208. | |
38 | 王圣云, 宋雅宁, 温湖炜, 等. 双向联系视域下长江经济带城市群网络结构——基于时间距离和社会网络分析方法. 经济地理, 2019, 39(2): 73-81. |
WANG S, SONG Y, WEN H, et al. Network structure analysis of urban agglomeration in the Yangtze River Economic Belt under the perspective of bidirectional economic connection: Based on time distance and social network analysis method. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(2): 73-81. | |
39 | 郑伯铭, 刘安乐, 韩剑磊, 等. 云南省旅游经济联系网络结构演化与协同发展模式建构. 经济地理, 2021, 41(2): 222-231. |
ZHENG B, LIU A, HAN J, et al. The structural evolution of Yunnan Tourism economic contact network and the construction of cooperative development model. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(2): 222-231. | |
40 | 王庆生, 刘诗涵. 新冠肺炎疫情对国内游客旅游意愿与行为的影响.地域研究与开发, 2020, 39(4): 1-5. |
WANG Q, LIU S. Impact of COVID-19 epidemic situation on the travel intention and behavior of domestic tourists. Area Research and Development, 2020, 39(4): 1-5. | |
41 | NEUBURGER L, EGGER R. Travel risk perception and travel behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020: A case study of the DACH region. Current Issues in Tourism, 2021, 24(7): 1003-1016. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||