Characteristics of

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.01.2021760

Abstract

Abstract:

Promoting the coordinated development of "population-land-industry" in resource-based shrinking cities is the difficulty and challenge to realize regional high-quality development. This research constructed the evaluation index system of population, land and industrial development level, and used the coupling coordination model to analyze the "population-land-industry" coordinated development of 26 resource-based Shrinking Cities in China in 2008, 2013 and 2018. The results show that: (1) The development level of industrial system in resource-based cities is high, the development of land system is at the middle level, and the development of population system is low. The coordination degree of "population-land-industry" in each city is at the level of near imbalance and slight imbalance, but most cities have an upward trend; (2) There are obvious differences in the development level and coordination degree of population, land, and industry of different types of resource-based shrinking cities. From the development stage, the development level of grown-up cities is the highest, while that of recessionary cities is the lowest. In 2008 and 2013, the average coordination degree ranked as growing city > grown-up city > regenerative city > recessionary city, and in 2018, it is growing city> regenerative city > grown-up city > recessionary city. From the perspective of leading industries, the development level of oil&gas-based cities is the highest, while that of coal-based cities is the lowest. In the three years, the order of the average coordination degree is oil&gas-based city > nonmetal-based city > ferrous metal-based city > forestry-based city > coal-based cities. (3) The coordinated development model of "population-land-industry" in resource-based shrinking cities is dominated by population lag and land lag.

Key words: resource-based shrinking city, population-land-industry, coupling degree, coordinated development mode

摘要：

推动资源型收缩城市“人口-土地-产业”协调发展是实现区域高质量发展的难点与挑战。本文构建人口、土地、产业发展水平评价指标体系，采用耦合协调模型对中国26个资源型收缩城市2008、2013与2018年“人口-土地-产业”协调发展状况进行分析。结果表明：（1）资源型收缩城市产业系统发展水平较高，土地系统发展处于中间水平，人口系统发展水平较低。各城市“人口-土地-产业”协调度均处于濒临失调和轻度失调等级，但多数城市具有上升趋势。（2）不同类型资源型收缩城市“人口-土地-产业”发展水平和协调度存在明显差异；从发展阶段来看，成熟型城市3大系统发展水平最高，而衰退型城市最低，2008和2013年协调度均值的排序为成长型>成熟型>再生型>衰退型，2018年为成长型>再生型>成熟型>衰退型；从主导产业来看，油气类城市3大系统发展水平最高，而煤炭类城市最低，协调度均值的排序在3个年份中均为油气类>黑色金属类>非金属类>森工类>煤炭类。（3）资源型收缩城市“人口-土地-产业”的协调发展模式以人口滞后型与土地滞后型为主。

关键词: 资源型收缩城市, 人口-土地-产业, 耦合协调度, 协调发展模式

Haozhe ZHANG, Qingyuan YANG. Characteristics of "population-land-industry" coordinated development of resource-based shrinking cities in China[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(1): 163-177.

张浩哲, 杨庆媛. 中国资源型收缩城市“人口-土地-产业”耦合协调分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(1): 163-177.

Figures/Tables 13

References 47

1	朱江丽,李子联.长三角城市群产业-人口-空间耦合协调发展研究.中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(2):75-82.
	ZHU J, LI Z. Study on the coordinated development of industry population space coupling of urban agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(2): 75-82.
2	沈建法.中国人口迁移,流动人口与城市化——现实,理论与对策.地理研究,2019,38(1):33-44.
	SHEN J. Population migration, floating population and urbanization in China: Reality, theory and countermeasures. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 33-44.
3	DING R, LICHTENBERG E. Land and urban economic growth in China. Journal of Regional Science, 2011, 51(2): 299-317.
4	杨忍,刘彦随,龙花楼.中国环渤海地区人口-土地-产业非农化转型协同演化特征. 地理研究,2015,34(3):475-486.
	YANG R, LIU Y, LONG H. Characteristics of co evolution of population land industrial non-agricultural transformation in the Bohai Rim region of China. Macroeconomics, 2015, 34(3): 475-486.
5	王常君,曲阳阳,吴相利.资源枯竭型城市的经济-人口收缩治理研究——基于黑龙江省资源枯竭型城市的现实分析.宏观经济研究,2019(8):156-169.
	WANG C, QU Y, WU X. Study on the governance of economic population contraction in resource exhausted cities: A realistic analysis of resource exhausted cities in Heilongjiang Province. Macroeconomics, 2019(8): 156-169.
6	杨东峰,龙瀛,杨文诗,等.人口流失与空间扩张:中国快速城市化进程中的城市收缩悖论.现代城市研究,2015(9):20-25.
	YANG D, LONG Y, YANG W, et al. Population loss and spatial expansion: Paradox of urban shrinkage in the process of rapid urbanization in China. Modern Urban Research, 2015(9): 20-25.
7	周宏浩,陈晓红.中国资源型城市精明发展与环境质量的耦合关系及响应机制.自然资源学报,2019,34(8):1620-1632.
	ZHOU H, CHEN X. Coupling relationship and response mechanism between smart development and environmental quality of resource-based cities in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(8): 1620-1632.
8	徐博.收缩城市与精明发展——收缩型中小城市政府治理与市场效率的内在逻辑匹配及改革创新空间.经济学家,2019(12):34-45.
	XU B. Shrinking Cities and smart development: The internal logical matching between government governance and market efficiency and the space for reform and innovation in shrinking small and medium-sized cities. Economist, 2019(12): 34-45.
9	HÄUßERMANN H, SIEBEL W. Die schrumpfende stadt und die stadtsoziologie. Soziologische Stadtforschung,1988(29):78-94.
10	RIENIETS T. Shrinking cities: causes and effects of urban population losses in the Twentieth Century. Nature & Culture, 2009, 4(3): 231-254.
11	MALLACH A, HAASE A, HATTORI K. The shrinking city in comparative perspective: Contrasting dynamics and responses to urban shrinkage. Cities, 2017, 69(9):102-108.
12	ALVES D, BARREIRA A, GUIMARÃES M, et al. Historical trajectories of currently shrinking Portuguese cities: A typology of urban shrinkage. Cities, 2016, 52(3): 20-29.
13	RECKIEN D, MARTINEZ C. Why do cities shrink?. European Planning Studies, 2011, 19(8): 1375-1397.
14	FRAZIER A, BAGCHI S, KNIGHT J. The spatio-temporal impacts of demolition land use policy and crime in a shrinking city. Applied Geography, 2013, 41(7): 55-64.
15	SOUSA S, PINHO P. Planning for shrinkage: Paradox or paradigm. European Planning Studies, 2015, 23(1): 12-32.
16	HOLLANDER J. Can a city successfully shrink? Evidence from survey data on neighbohood quality. Urban Affairs Review, 2010, 45(1):129-141.
17	RADZIMSKI A. Changing policy responses to shrinkage: The case of dealing with housing vacancies in Eastern Germany. Cities, 2016, 50(2): 197-205.
18	HOLLANDER J, NEMETH J. The bounds of smart decline: A foundational theory for planning shrinking cities. Housing Policy Debate, 2011, 21(3): 349-367.
19	刘贵文,谢芳芸,洪竞科,等.基于人口经济数据分析我国城市收缩现状.经济地理,2019,39(7):50-57.
	LIU G, XIE F, HONG J, et al. Analysis of China's urban shrinkage based on population economic data. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(7): 50-57.
20	孙青,张晓青,路广.中国城市收缩的数量、速度和轨迹.城市问题,2019(8):24-29.
	SUN Q, ZHANG X, LU G. Quantity, speed and trajectory of urban contraction in China. Urban Problems, 2019(8): 24-29.
21	刘春阳,杨培峰.中外收缩城市动因机制及表现特征比较研究.现代城市研究,2017(3):64-71.
	LIU C, YANG P. Comparative study on the motivation mechanism and performance characteristics of shrinking cities at home and abroad. Modern Urban Research, 2017(3): 64-71.
22	杨东峰,殷成志.如何拯救收缩的城市:英国老工业城市转型经验及启示.国际城市规划,2013,28(6):50-56.
	YANG D, YIN C. How to save shrinking cities: Experience and Enlightenment from the transformation of old industrial cities in Britain. Urban Planning International, 2013, 28(6): 50-56.
23	孟祥凤,王冬艳,李红.老工业城市收缩与城市紧凑相关性研究——以吉林四平市为例.经济地理,2019,39(4):67-74.
	MENG X, WANG D, LI H. Study on the correlation between old industrial city contraction and urban compactness: A case study of Siping City, Jilin Province. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(4): 67-74.
24	赵家辉,李诚固,马佐澎,等.城市精明收缩与我国老工业基地转型.城市发展研究,2017,24(1):135-138.
	ZHAO J, LI C, MA Z, et al. Smart urban contraction and transformation of China's old industrial base. Urban Development Studies, 2017, 24(1): 135-138.
25	杨晓娟,肖宁,赵柏伊.收缩语境下资源型城市县域空间规划策略与实践——以陕西省略阳县为例.规划师,2019,35(16):82-88.
	YANG X, XIAO N, ZHAO B. County spatial planning strategy and practice of resource-based cities in the context of contraction: A case study of Lueyang County, Shaanxi Province. Planners, 2019, 35(16): 82-88.
26	吴浩,王秀,周宏浩,等.东北三省资源型收缩城市经济效率与生计脆弱性的时空分异与协调演化特征.地理科学,2019,39(12):1962-1971.
	WU H, WANG X, ZHOU H, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and coordinated evolution characteristics of economic efficiency and livelihood vulnerability of resource-based Shrinking Cities in the three northeastern provinces. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1962-1971.
27	吴浩,王秀,陈晓红.资源型收缩城市空间效率与民生质量的耦合协调研究——以黑龙江省鸡西市为例.哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报,2018,34(1):97-103.
	WU H, WANG X, CHEN X. Study on the coupling and coordination of spatial efficiency and people's livelihood quality in resource-based shrinking cities -- Taking Jixi City, Heilongjiang Province as an example. Natural Science Journal of Harbin Normal University, 2018, 34(1): 97-103.
28	吴康,孙东琪.城市收缩的研究进展与展望.经济地理,2017,37(11):59-67.
	WU K, SUN D. Progress in urban shrinkage research. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(11): 59-67.
29	张浩哲,杨庆媛.中国收缩城市土地利用效率及其影响因素研究.人文地理,2021,36(3):108-116.
	ZHANG H, YANG Q. Study on land use efficiency and its influencing factors of Shrinking Cities in China . Human Geography, 2021, 36(3): 108-116.
30	CHEN W, CHEN W, NING S, et al. Exploring the industrial land use efficiency of China's resource-based cities. Cities, 2019(93): 215-223.
31	方方.京津冀县域人口-土地-产业要素耦合测度及空间分异.世界地理研究,2018,27(1):51-59.
	FANG F. Coupling measurement and spatial differentiation of population land industry factors in Beijing Tianjin Hebei County. World Regional Studies, 2018, 27(1): 51-59.
32	李涛,廖和平,杨伟,等.重庆市"土地、人口、产业"城镇化质量的时空分异及耦合协调性.经济地理,2015,35(5):65-71.
	LI T, LIAO H, YANG W, et al. Spatial and temporal differentiation and coupling coordination of urbanization quality of "land, population and industry" in Chongqing. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(5): 65-71.
33	张翼.人口结构调整与人口均衡型社会的建设.人口研究,2010,34(5): 22-27.
	ZHANG Y. Population structure adjustment and the construction of population balanced society. Population Research, 2010, 34(5): 22-27.
34	陈妍,梅林.东北地区资源型城市人口分布与影响因素的定量分析.地理科学,2018,38(3):402-409.
	CHEN Y, MEI L. quantitative analysis of population distribution and influencing factors of resource-based cities in Northeast China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(3): 402-409.
35	张颖,王群,王万茂.中国产业结构与用地结构相互关系的实证研究.中国土地科学,2007(2):4-11.
	ZHANG Y, WANG Q, WANG W. Empirical study on the relationship between industrial structure and land use structure in China. China Land Science, 2007(2): 4-11.
36	匡远配,唐文婷.中国产业结构优化度的时序演变和区域差异分析.经济学家,2015(9): 40-47.
	KUANG Y, TANG W. Time series evolution and regional difference analysis of China's industrial structure optimization. Economist, 2015(9): 40-47.
37	孙晓华,郑辉.资源型地区经济转型模式:国际比较及借鉴.经济学家,2019(11):104-112.
	SUN X, ZHENG H. Economic transformation model of resource-based areas: International Comparison and reference. Economist, 2019(11): 104-112.
38	李汝资,宋玉祥,李雨停,等.吉林省资源型城市转型阶段识别及其特征成因分析.地理科学,2016,36(1):90-98.
	LI R, SONG Y, LI Y, et al. Identification of transformation stage of resource-based cities in Jilin Province and analysis of its characteristics and causes. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(1): 90-98.
39	BERNT M, HAASE A, GROSSMANN K, et al. How does(n't) Urban Shrinkage get onto the Agenda? Experiences from Leipzig, Liverpool, Genoa and Bytom. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2014, 38(5): 1749-1766.
40	周瑞瑞,米文宝,李俊杰,等.宁夏县域城镇居民生活质量空间分异及解析.干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(7):14-21.
	ZHOU R, MI W, LI J, et al. Spatial differentiation and analysis of quality of life of urban residents in county areas of Ningxia. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(7): 14-21.
41	谭俊涛,张新林,刘雷,等.中国资源型城市转型绩效测度与评价.经济地理,2020,40(7):57-64.
	TAN J, ZHANG X, LIU L, et al. Measurement and evaluation of transformation performance of China's resource-based cities. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(7): 57-64.
42	崔丹,卜晓燕,徐祯,等.中国资源型城市高质量发展综合评估及影响机理.地理学报,2021,76(10):2489-2503.
	CUI D, BU X, XU Z, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and impact mechanism of high-quality development of resource-based cities in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(10): 2489-2503.
43	仇方道,张春丽,郭梦梦,等.中国再生性资源型城市创新能力与工业转型耦合协调分析.地理科学,2020,40(7):1092-1103.
	QIU F, ZHANG C, GUO M, et al. Analysis on coupling and coordination between innovation capability and industrial transformation of China's renewable resource-based cities. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(7): 1092-1103.
44	汪涛,张家明,禹湘,等.资源型城市的可持续发展路径——以太原市创建国家可持续发展议程示范区为例.中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(3):24-32.
	WANG T, ZHANG J, YU X, et al. Sustainable development path of Resource-based Cities--Taking the establishment of national sustainable development agenda demonstration area in Taiyuan as an example . China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(3): 24-32.
45	张鹏岩,杨丹,李二玲,等.人口城镇化与土地城镇化的耦合协调关系——以中原经济区为例.经济地理,2017,37(8):145-154.
	ZHANG P, YANG D, LI E, et al. Coupling and coordination between population urbanization and Land Urbanization -- Taking Zhongyuan economic zone as an example . Economic Geography, 2017, 37(8): 145-154.
46	程明洋,刘彦随,蒋宁.黄淮海地区乡村人-地-业协调发展格局与机制.地理学报,2019,74(8):1576-1589.
	CHENG M, LIU Y, JIANG N. Pattern and mechanism of rural man land industry coordinated development in Huang Huai Hai area . Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1576-1589.
47	YU J, LI J, ZHANG W. Identification and classification of resource-based cities in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(8): 1300-1314.

系统	评价目标	指标/单位	属性	系统	评价目标	指标/单位	属性
人口	人口数量	城镇人口密度 /万人	+	土地	土地增量	城市建设用地增长率/%	－
	人口数量	城镇常住人口流失率 /%	－		产出水平	地均二、三产业产值/ （万元/km²）	+
	人口结构	每万人中大学生数 /（人/万人）	+			地均财政收入/ （万元/km²）	+
		老年人口占比/%	－			人均城市绿地面积/（m²/人）	+
		采掘业从业人员占比/%	－	产业	产业产出	二、三产业总产值/万元	+
	人口生活	城镇登记失业率/%	－		产业结构	产业合理化水平	+
		职工平均工资/（万元/人）	+			产业高级化水平/%	+
		每万人专任教师数/（人/万人）	+			资源型产业产值占GDP的比重/%	+
		每万人医疗卫生床位数/（张/万人）	+			高新技术产业产值占GDP比重/%	+
		每万人图书馆藏书/（册/人）	+		产业创新性	R&D经费支出占GDP比重/%	+
		城镇居民人均住房面积 /（m²/人）	+		产业创新性	每万人专利授予数/ （件/万人）	+
		城乡居民基本养老保险参保率/%	+		产业外向性	外商直接投资占GDP的比重/%	+
土地	土地存量	城市建设用地占市辖区面积比重/%	+		产业发展可持续性	单位工业增加值耗电量/（万kW·h/万元）	－
	土地存量	工业用地占城市建设用地比重/%	－			单位工业增加值废水排放量/（t/万元）	－
	投入水平	地均固定资产投资额/（万人/km²）	+			单位工业增加值SO₂排放量/（t/万元）	－
	投入水平	地均二、三产业从业人员 /（万人/km²）	+			工业固体废物利用率/%	+

系统	评价目标	指标/单位	属性	系统	评价目标	指标/单位	属性
人口	人口数量	城镇人口密度 /万人	+	土地	土地增量	城市建设用地增长率/%	－
	人口数量	城镇常住人口流失率 /%	－		产出水平	地均二、三产业产值/ （万元/km²）	+
	人口结构	每万人中大学生数 /（人/万人）	+			地均财政收入/ （万元/km²）	+
		老年人口占比/%	－			人均城市绿地面积/（m²/人）	+
		采掘业从业人员占比/%	－	产业	产业产出	二、三产业总产值/万元	+
	人口生活	城镇登记失业率/%	－		产业结构	产业合理化水平	+
		职工平均工资/（万元/人）	+			产业高级化水平/%	+
		每万人专任教师数/（人/万人）	+			资源型产业产值占GDP的比重/%	+
		每万人医疗卫生床位数/（张/万人）	+			高新技术产业产值占GDP比重/%	+
		每万人图书馆藏书/（册/人）	+		产业创新性	R&D经费支出占GDP比重/%	+
		城镇居民人均住房面积 /（m²/人）	+		产业创新性	每万人专利授予数/ （件/万人）	+
		城乡居民基本养老保险参保率/%	+		产业外向性	外商直接投资占GDP的比重/%	+
土地	土地存量	城市建设用地占市辖区面积比重/%	+		产业发展可持续性	单位工业增加值耗电量/（万kW·h/万元）	－
	土地存量	工业用地占城市建设用地比重/%	－			单位工业增加值废水排放量/（t/万元）	－
	投入水平	地均固定资产投资额/（万人/km²）	+			单位工业增加值SO₂排放量/（t/万元）	－
	投入水平	地均二、三产业从业人员 /（万人/km²）	+			工业固体废物利用率/%	+

协调度	协调等级	协调度	协调等级
(0.90, 1.00]	优质协调	(0.40, 0.50]	濒临失调
(0.80, 0.90]	良好协调	(0.30, 0.40]	轻度失调
(0.70, 0.80]	中级协调	(0.20, 0.30]	中度失调
(0.60, 0.70]	初级协调	(0.10, 0.20]	严重失调
(0.50, 0.60]	勉强协调	[0, 0.10]	极度失调

协调度	协调等级	协调度	协调等级
(0.90, 1.00]	优质协调	(0.40, 0.50]	濒临失调
(0.80, 0.90]	良好协调	(0.30, 0.40]	轻度失调
(0.70, 0.80]	中级协调	(0.20, 0.30]	中度失调
(0.60, 0.70]	初级协调	(0.10, 0.20]	严重失调
(0.50, 0.60]	勉强协调	[0, 0.10]	极度失调

统计量	年份	最大值	最小值	平均值	标准误	离散系数
人口指数	2008	0.667	0.238	0.438	0.022	0.258
	2013	0.668	0.206	0.421	0.023	0.277
	2018	0.686	0.281	0.454	0.030	0.335
土地指数	2008	0.679	0.267	0.468	0.017	0.183
	2013	0.721	0.255	0.498	0.024	0.246
	2018	0.689	0.287	0.464	0.023	0.248
产业指数	2008	0.850	0.382	0.470	0.018	0.198
	2013	0.760	0.323	0.503	0.017	0.175
	2018	0.679	0.366	0.514	0.016	0.155
综合指数	2008	0.624	0.294	0.420	0.013	0.162
	2013	0.587	0.296	0.421	0.014	0.166
	2018	0.582	0.308	0.437	0.015	0.178