边界效应在经济学领域的应用进展述评

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.05.2021291

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

边界作为政治实体管辖地域的分界线，造成了社会经济空间的不连续性，进而形成了政治、经济和文化差异。边界是各种要素跨界自由流动的关键界面，其屏蔽或中介效应影响一国或地区社会经济发展的福利水平。采用文献综述法，在梳理边界效应的研究缘起与基本概念的基础上，从测度方法、研究尺度和研究结论三方面总结了边界效应研究的发展脉络，并论述了经济地理学、世界经济、区域经济学和产业经济学领域中边界效应研究的剖析视角与主要内容。基于边界效应研究视角的异质性，总结出边界效应的五种主要测度方法，即引力模型、“一价定律”法、李嘉图模型、可计算一般均衡模型和区域增长模型。最后，联系中国现实问题对边界效应研究的未来发展方向进行展望，即探索克服隐性边界壁垒的对策，加强边境地区边界效应的补偿模式研究，以及探究各级行政边界的协同优化机制。

关键词: 边界效应, 演进脉络, 引力模型, 李嘉图模型, 区域增长模型, 隐性边界壁垒

Abstract:

As the dividing line of the political entity's jurisdiction, the border causes the discontinuity of social and economic, and then forms political, economic and cultural differences. The border is a key interface for the free cross-border flow of elements, and its shielding or mediating effect affects the welfare level of a country or region's social and economic development. Using the literature review method, this paper sorted out the origins and basic concepts of the border effect, summarized the development context of the border effect from measurement method, research scale and analysis conclusion, and discussed the research perspective and main content of border effect in Economic Geography, World Economic, Regional Economics and Industrial Economics. Based on the heterogeneity of the research perspective, five main measurement methods of border effect were summarized, namely, the gravity model, the law of one price, the Ricardian model, the computable general equilibrium model and the regional growth model. Finally, this paper discusses the future research direction of border effect based on China's practical problems: exploring the countermeasures to overcome the implicit border barrier, strengthening the research on compensation modes of border effect in border areas, and exploring the collaborative optimization mechanism of administrative boundaries at all levels, to promote the high-quality development of China's economy.

Key words: border effect, evolution context, gravity model, Ricardian model, regional growth model, implicit border barrier

朱延福, 姚陈敏, 谢靖. 边界效应在经济学领域的应用进展述评[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(5): 169-180.

Yanfu ZHU, Chenmin YAO, Jing XIE. A review of the application of border effect in economics[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(5): 169-180.

参考文献 60

1	LAINE J. 当代全球化背景下的边界和边界景观. 地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1531-1539.
	LAINE J. Borders and borderscapes under contemporary globalization. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(12): 1531-1539.
2	廖开怀,何金廖,蔡云楠,等. 国外政治地理学边界理论研究进展与评述. 世界地理研究,2020,29(2):264-274.
	LIAO K, HE J, CAI Y, et al. A review of international political geography studies on border theories. World Regional Studies,2020,29(2):264-274.
3	LEOPOLD A. Game Management. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press,1987.
4	GÖRENTAŞ B. Coğrafya ve sınır. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi,2018(37):322-328.[GERENTASB. Geography and border. Marmara Journal of Geography,2018(37):322-328.]
5	宋伟. 论"边缘效应". 社会科学研究,1991(6):103-106.
	SONG W. Discussion on "edge effect". Social Science Research,1991(6):103-106.
6	FRIEDMANN H, BEECHER W. Nesting birds and the vegetation substrate. American Midland Naturalist,1942,28(1):269.
7	BARJAK F, HEIMPOLD G. Development problems and policies at the German border with Poland. Dublin: 39th Congress of the European Regional Science Association,1999.
8	GIERSCH H. Economic union between nations and the location of industries. The Review of Economic Studies,1949,17(2):87-97.
9	MCCALLUM J. National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. The American Economic Review,1995,85(3):615-623.
10	LIU X, WHALLEY J, XIN X. Non-tradable goods and the border effect puzzle. Economic Modelling,2010,27(5):909-914.
11	WEI S. Intra-national versus international trade: How stubborn are nations in global integration?. Massachusetts: NBER Working Paper,1996.
12	ENGEL C, ROGERS J. How wide is the border?. The American Economic Review,1996,86(5):1112-1125.
13	PARSLEY D, WEI S. Explaining the border effect: The role of exchange rate variability, shipping costs, and geography. Journal of International Economics,2001,55(1):87-105.
14	COUGHLIN C, NOVY D. Is the international border effect larger than the domestic border effect? Evidence from US trade. Cesifo Economic Studies,2013,59(2):249-276.
15	王成龙,刘慧,张梦天. 边界效应研究进展及展望. 地理科学进展,2016,35(9):1109-1118.
	WANG C, LIU H, ZHANG M. Progress and prospects of border effect research. Progress in Geography,2016,35(9):1109-1118.
16	李铁立,姜怀宇. 次区域经济合作机制研究:一个边界效应的分析框架. 东北亚论坛,2005,14(3):90-94.
	LI T, JIANG H. The research on mechanism of sub-regional economic cooperation: An analyzing framework from the view of border-affect. Northeast Asia Forum,2005,14(3):90-94.
17	CHANG K, HAYAKAWA K. Border barriers in agricultural trade and the impact of their elimination: Evidence from East Asia. The Developing Economies,2010,48(2):232-246.
18	HEAD K, MAYER T. Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook//GOPINATH G, HELPMAN E, ROGOFF K. Handbook of International Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier,2014.
19	HEAD K, MAYER T. Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU. Review of World Economics,2000,136(2):284-314.
20	ANDERSON J, WINCOOP E. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review,2003,93(1):170-192.
21	YI K. A simple explanation for the border effect. New York: Federal Reserve Bank,2003.
22	WOLF H. Patterns of intra- and inter-state trade. Massachusetts: NBER Working Paper,1997.
23	黄新飞,舒元,郑华懋. 中国城市边界效应下降了吗?——基于一价定律的研究. 经济学(季刊),2013,12(4):1369-1386.
	HUANG X, SHU Y, ZHENG H. Is the border effect of cities in China declining? Estimation based on law of One Price. China Economic Quarterly,2013,12(4):1369-1386.
24	MORSHED A. Is there really a "border effect"?. Journal of International Money and finance,2007,26(7):1229-1238.
25	HEAD K, MAYER T. Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. Paris: CEPII,2002.
26	KANDOGAN Y. Falling walls and lifting curtains: Analysis of border effects in transition countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development,2008,17(1):85-104.
27	EVANS C. The economic significance of national border effects. American Economic Review,2003,93(4):1291-1312.
28	GORODNICHENKO Y, TESAR L. A re-examination of the border effect. Massachusetts: NBER Working Paper,2005.
29	MILLIMET D, OSANG T. Do state borders matter for US intranational trade? The role of history and internal migration. Canadian Journal of Economics,2007,40(1):93-126.
30	KRUGMAN P. Space: The final frontier. Journal of economic perspectives,1998,12(2):161-174.
31	NIEBUHR A, STILLER S. Integration effects in border regions—A survey of economic theory and empirical studies. Hamburg: HWWA Discussion Paper,2002.
32	HANSON G. US-Mexico integration and regional economies: Evidence from border-city pairs. Massachusetts: NBER Working Paper,1996.
33	LI Y. Borders and distance in knowledge spillovers: Dying over time or dying with age?—Evidence from patent citations. European Economic Review,2014,71(10):152-172.
34	QUATRARO F, USAI S. Are knowledge flows all alike? Evidence from European regions. Regional Studies,2017,51(8):1246-1258.
35	CHEN N. Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: Why do national borders matter?. Journal of International Economics,2004,63(1):93-118.
36	COMBES P, LAFOURCADE M, MAYER T. Can business and social networks explain the border effect puzzle?. London: CEPR Discussion Paper,2003.
37	杨文毅,王磊,张伊娜. 城际消费流的边界效应研究——以长江中游城市群为例. 财贸经济,2019,40(7):127-142.
	YANG W, WANG L, ZHANG Y. Research on the border effect of inter-city consumption flows: A case study of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Finance & Trade Economics,2019,40(7):127-142.
38	DAUMAL M, ZIGNAGO S. Measure and determinants of border effects of Brazilian states. Papers in Regional Science,2010,89(4):735-758.
39	BALAGUER J, RIPOLLÉS J. Revisiting the importance of border effect in sub-national regions. Evidence from a quasi-experimental design. Papers in Regional Science,2018,97(4):1113-1130.
40	OLPER A, RAIMONDI V. Explaining national border effects in the QUAD food trade. Journal of Agricultural Economics,2008,59(3):436-462.
41	ANDERSON J, BORCHERT I, MATTOO A, et al. Dark costs, missing data: Shedding some light on services trade. European Economic Review,2018,105(3):193-214.
42	FELBERMAYR G, GRÖSCHL J. Within US trade and the long shadow of the American secession. Economic Inquiry,2014,52(1):382-404.
43	ANDERSON J. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review,1979,69(1):106-116.
44	TINBERGEN J. Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund,1962.
45	BERGSTRAND J. The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics,1985,67(3):474-481.
46	WHALLEY J, XIN X. Home and regional biases and border effects in Armington type models. Economic Modelling,2009,26(2):309-319.
47	GHAZALIAN P. Canada's beef exports: Border effects and prospects for market access. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics,2019,67(1):53-74.
48	BALISTRERI E, HILLBERRY R. Structural estimation and the border puzzle. Journal of International Economics,2007,72(2):451-463.
49	GORODNICHENKO Y, TESAR L. Border effect or country effect? Seattle may not be so far from Vancouver after all. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics,2009,1(1):219-241.
50	EVANS C. Border effects and the availability of domestic products abroad. Canadian Journal of Economics,2006,39(1):211-246.
51	YI K. Vertical specialization and the border effect puzzle. Philadelphia: FRBP Working Paper, 2005.
52	YI K. Can multistage production explain the home bias in trade?. American Economic Review,2010,100(1):364-393.
53	PHILIPPIDIS G, SANJUÁN A. An examination of Morocco's trade options with the EU. Journal of African economies,2006,16(2):259-300.
54	WINCHESTER N. Is there a dirty little secret? Non-tariff barriers and the gains from trade. Journal of Policy Modeling,2009,31(6):819-834.
55	CAPELLO R, CARAGLIU A, FRATESI U. Measuring border effects in European cross-border regions. Regional Studies,2018,52(7):986-996.
56	CAPELLO R, CARAGLIU A, FRATESI U. Compensation modes of border effects in cross-border regions. Journal of Regional Science,2018,58(4):759-785.
57	FONTAGNÉ L, MAYER T, ZIGNAGO S. Trade in the Triad: How easy is the access to large markets?. Canadian Journal of Economics,2005,38(4):1401-1430.
58	BAUD M, SCHENDEL W. Toward a comparative history of borderlands. Journal of World History,1997,8(2):211-242.
59	李彦,屠年松. 交通可达性、边界效应与中国跨境贸易发展——基于沿边地区的空间计量分析. 财贸经济,2020,41(4):144-161.
	LI Y, TU N. Transportation accessibility, boundary effect and cross-border trade development in China--Based on the spatial econometric analysis in border areas. Finance & Trade Economics,2020,41(4):144-161.
60	唐为. 分权、外部性与边界效应. 经济研究,2019,54(3):103-118.
	TANG W. Decentralization, externalities and border effects. Economic Research Journal,2019,54(3):103-118.

[1]	吴迪, 王宇鹏, 王诺. 基于资源场引力模型的世界铝土矿流动格局演变分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(3): 52-63.
[2]	张艺川, 胡萌, 李红. 基于CiteSpace的引力模型研究进展及其热点问题综述[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(1): 130-140.
[3]	梁茂林, 彭邦文, 骆华松, 洪菊花. 中国与周边国家地缘经济关系测度与时空格局演变分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(1): 43-53.
[4]	刘玄宇, 程国宇, 刘云刚. 地缘经济视角下中日资源贸易关系测度与分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(6): 1227-1239.
[5]	王瑞莉, 刘玉, 王成新, 李梦程, 唐永超, 薛明月. 黄河流域经济联系及其网络结构演变研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(3): 527-537.
[6]	蒋小荣, 杨永春, 汪胜兰. 甘肃省面向“一带一路”沿线出口贸易格局演变及其影响因素分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(5): 1029-1039.
[7]	谢诗光. 浙江省县际经济联系网络结构演化分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(4): 738-749.
[8]	董春，张玉，刘纪平，叶剑，许萍. 基于交通系统可达性的城市空间相互作用模型重构方法研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2013, 22(05): 34-42.