多尺度视角下侨乡文化的动态建构研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2023.06.2020678

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于多尺度的视角，以广东传统侨乡潮州市大吴村修德善堂在改革开放后重建并发展至今的历程为案例，解析侨乡文化的动态建构及其对“一带一路”建设的意义。研究使用深度访谈、文本分析和实地观察等质性研究方法，探讨了大吴善堂在海外华侨华人的帮助下通过强调地方意义得以重建、以加强以神缘为基础的海外善堂文化联系实现发展、最终在兼具本地慈善和跨国宗教功能的情况下建立跨国善堂文化网络独立核心地位的过程。研究发现，以大吴善堂为案例的侨乡文化在“海外-国家-地方”等多尺度行为主体的互动下不断进行重构，多尺度互动塑造了特定时空下侨乡文化的尺度表达特点。大吴的案例展现了多尺度行为主体互动的内涵和机理，展现了“一带一路”建设中利用兼具地方性和跨国性的侨乡文化资源、促进人文交流的方向，也补充了现有侨乡研究中尚未充分讨论的多尺度互动对侨乡文化尺度表达的塑造。

关键词: 多尺度动态, 侨乡文化, 海外华侨华人, 跨国文化网络, 一带一路

Abstract:

From a multi-scalar perspective, this paper explores the dynamics of Qiaoxiang culture and the potential contribution of Qiaoxiang culture to the Belt and Road Initiative. Shantang culture, one branch of Qiaoxiang culture, has been widely spread in Southeast Asia, and so the development of Xiude Shantang in Dawu Village of Chaozhou—a traditional Qiaoxiang region—in post-reform era provides empirical case study for this research. This research adopts qualitative methods including in-depth interviews, textual analysis, and observation in order to unpack the changing dynamics of Xiude Shantang since its re-emergence in Dawu Village in 1983. Xiude Shantang was re-built in Dawu with the help of its emigrants rather than its religious branches overseas. During this process, overseas Chinese and local people in Dawu both emphasized Dawu Shantang's place meaning as a symbol of hometown. Then Dawu Shantang further developed by strengthening its connections within transnational Shantang cultural networks based on its religious ties. The recent decade saw Dawu Shantang became economically independent from overseas Chinese and conducted charity work actively in Dawu, while it started playing a central role in transnational networks of Shantangs in Southeast Asia and China. This research finds out that the construction of Qiaoxiang culture is a multi-scalar and dynamic process. Actors at different scales such as transnational, national, and local scales all participate in this process. Their multi-scalar interaction shapes the scale-meaning of Qiaoxiang culture and drives the (re-)development of Qiaoxiang culture. The multi-scalar dynamics of Qiaoxiang culture shows the potential for utilizing Qiaoxiang culture to facilitate the Belt and Road Initiative in terms of transnational cultural exchange and communication. Exploring this topic enhances our understanding of multi-scalar interaction and multi-scale representation of local culture in Qiaoxiang that has not been fully discussed in current research in geography or Qiaoxiang studies.

Key words: multi-scalar dynamics, Qiaoxiang culture, overseas Chinese, transnational cultural networks, the Belt and Road Initiative

陈蕊, 刘逸, 杨锡铭. 多尺度视角下侨乡文化的动态建构研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(6): 131-141.

Rui CHEN, Yi LIU, Ximing YANG. Multi-scalar dynamics of Qiaoxiang culture:[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(6): 131-141.

图/表 2

参考文献 41

1	赖林冬. "一带一路"背景下东盟孔子学院的发展与创新.南洋问题研究,2017(3):37-52.
	LAI L. The development and innovation of the Confucius Institutes in ASEAN under the background of "One Belt One Road". Southeast Asian Affairs,2017(3):37-52.
2	熊燕军,陈雍. 从"经济侨乡"到"文化侨乡":侨乡可持续发展的新视角.华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(4):39-47.
	XIONG Y, CHEN Y. From "economic overseas Chinese hometown" to "cultural overseas chinese hometown":A new perspective. Journal of Huaqiao University (Humanities and Social Science),2018(4):39-47.
3	王敏,江荣灏,朱竑. 跨国宗族网络与侨乡地方意义的建构研究——以前美村为例.世界地理研究,2017,26(1):112-123.
	WANG M, JIANG R, ZHU H. Transnational lineage network and the construction of place meaning of Qiaoxiang:A case study on Qianmei Village. World Regional Studies,2017,26(1):112-123.
4	蒋婷,张朝枝. 开平碉楼与村落地方意义的游客阐释.世界地理研究,2019,28(3):194-201.
	JIANG T, ZHANG C. Tourist interpretation of place meaning in Kaiping Diaolou and Villages. World Regional Studies,2019,28(3):194-201.
5	朱爱东.文化认同与文化建构——侨乡民俗的传承与再造//周大鸣,柯群英.侨乡移民与地方社会.北京:民族出版社,2003.
	ZHU A. Cultural identity and culture construction--the heritage and recreation of folk custom in qiaoxiang//ZHOU D, KE Q. Qiaoxiang Emigrants and Local Society. Beijing: Publishing House of Minority Nationalities, 2003.
6	李志贤.宗教仪式、文化认同、商业网络:新加坡潮人善堂信仰与社群的多层面互动//林纬毅.民间文化与华人社会. 新加坡:亚洲研究学会,2006.
	LEE C. Rituals, cultural identity and business network: Teochew charity halls and ethnicity in Singapore// LIN W. Folk Culture and Chinese Society, Singapore: Singapore Society for Asian Study, 2006.
7	林悟殊. 泰国大峰祖师崇拜与华侨报德善堂研究. 台北:淑馨出版社,1996.
	LIN W. Studies in Chinese Worship of The Founder Dafeng & Poh Teck Tung Charity in Thailand. Taipei:Shushin Books Press,1996.
8	陈岱娜. 转型中的"侨"与跨国社会领域——以潮汕与马来西亚善堂的互动为例. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,38(5):138-143.
	CHEN D. The transformation of "Qiao" and the transnational social field:A case study of interaction between the Shantangs in the Chao-Shan region of Guangdong in China and Malaysia. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Science),2016,38(5):138-143.
9	陈志明,孟庆波. 善堂——中国、新加坡和马来西亚的慈善寺堂.华侨华人历史研究,2014(2):24-38.
	CHEN Z, MENG Q. Shantang: Charitable temples in China,Singapore,and Malaysia. Overseas Chinese History Studies,2014(2):24-38.
10	刘卫东,宋周莺,刘志高,等."一带一路"建设研究进展. 地理学报,2018,73(4):620-636.
	LIU W, SONG Z, LIU Z,et al. Progress in research on the Belt and Road Initiative. Acta Geographica Sinica,2018,73(4):620-636.
11	廖萌. 海外华侨华人与"海丝"核心区互动研究.经济视角,2019(1):99-108.
	LIAO M. Overseas Chinese and the interaction of the core area of "Haisi". Economic Vision,2019(1):99-108.
12	蔡明宏. 宗教外交中的中国图像与建设——以福建民间信仰与东南亚国家的文化互动为例.南洋问题研究,2018(3):86-96.
	CAI M. China's image and its construction in the diplomacy of religion:Cultural interaction between Fujian's folk beliefs and Southeast Asian countries. Southeast Asian Affairs,2018(3):86-96.
13	潮龙起,邓玉柱. 广东侨乡研究三十年:1978—2008.华侨华人历史研究,2009(2):61-71.
	CHAO L, DENG Y. Studies on Guangdong Qiaoxiang over the past three decades:a review. Overseas Chinese History Studies,2009(2):61-71.
14	SILVEY R. Power,difference and mobility:feminist advances in migration studies. Progress in Human Geography,2004,28(4):490-506.
15	KING R. Geography and migration studies:retrospect and prospect. Population Space and Place,2012,18(2):134-153.
16	MASSEY D B. For Space. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2005.
17	PHILLIPS D, ROBINSON D. Reflections on migration,community,and place. Population Space and Place,2015,21(5):409-420.
18	YU S. Mobilocality. Urban Geography,2018,39(4):563-586.
19	周春山,杨高. 西方国家移民聚居区研究进展及启示.人文地理,2017,32(1):1-8.
	ZHOU C, YANG G. Progress on immigrant communities in western countries and its implications for studies in China. Human Geography,2017,32(1):1-8.
20	TAN C, YEUNG H. The regionalization of Chinese business networks:a study of Singaporean firms in Hainan,China. The Professional Geographer,2000,52(3):437-454.
21	许桂灵,司徒尚纪. 广东华侨文化景观及其地域分异. 地理研究,2004(03):411-421.
	XU G, SITU S. Cultural landscape of overseas Chinese in Guangdong and its territorial distribution. Geographical Research,2004(03):411-421.
22	许桂灵,司徒尚纪. 中西规划与建筑文化在广东五邑侨乡的交融. 热带地理,2005(1):87-91.
	XU G, SITU S. On the blending of Chinese and western urban planning and architecture culture in the WuYi Mother-Towns of overseas Chinese in Guangdong. Tropical Geography,2005(1):87-91.
23	PIERCE J, MARTIN D G, MURPHY J T. Relational place-making:the networked politics of place. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,2011,36(1):54-70.
24	MOORE A. Rethinking scale as a geographical category:from analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography,2008,32(2):203-225.
25	MACKINNON D. Reconstructing scale:towards a new scalar politics. Progress in Human Geography,2011,35(1):21-36.
26	马学广,李鲁奇. 国外人文地理学尺度政治理论研究进展.人文地理,2016,31(2):6-12.
	MA X, LI L. A review of overseas research on politics of scale in Human Geography. Human Geography,2016,31(2):6-12.
27	刘卫东. "一带一路"战略的科学内涵与科学问题.地理科学进展,2015,34(5):538-544.
	LIU W. Scientific understanding of the Belt and Road Initiative of China and related research themes. Progress In Geography,2015,34(5):538-544.
28	王丰龙,张衔春,杨林川,等. 尺度理论视角下的"一带一路"战略解读.地理科学,2016,36(4):502-511.
	WANG F, ZHANG X, YANG L,et al. Rescaling and scalar politics in the 'One Belt,One Road' Strategy. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2016,36(4):502-511.
29	陈蕊. 关于侨乡优势的思考——广东潮州大吴村旅外乡亲捐资公益事业调研报告.华侨华人历史研究,2005(4):63-69.
	CHEN R. Donation,development and public welfare in Qiaoxiang:A case study of Dawu in Chaozhou. Overseas Chinese History Studies,2005(4):63-69.
30	TAN C. Shantang: Charitable temples in China, Singapore, and Malaysia. Asian Ethnology, 2012,71(1):75-107.
31	苏庆华. 新、马潮人的宋大峰崇祀与善堂:以修德善堂养心社为例.华侨华人文献学刊(第二辑),2016(2): 127-147.
	SU Q. The cult of Song Da-feng and Charitable Halls of Teochews in Singapore and Malysia. Journal of World Confederation of Institutes and Libraries for Overseas Chinese Studies, 2016(2):127-147.
32	朱竑,钱俊希,陈晓亮. 地方与认同:欧美人文地理学对地方的再认识.人文地理,2010,25(6):1-6.
	ZHU H, QIAN J, CHEN X. Place and identity:the rethink of place of European-American human geography. Human Geography,2010,25(6):1-6.
33	李凡,朱竑,黄维. 从地理学视角看城市历史文化景观集体记忆的研究.人文地理,2010,25(4):60-66.
	LI F, ZHU H, HUANG W. A geographical study on the collective memory of urban historical cultural landscape. Human Geography,2010,25(4):60-66.
34	庄国土. 1978年以来中国政府对华侨华人态度和政策的变化.南洋问题研究,2000(3):1-13.
	ZHUANG G. Changes in the attitudes and policies toward overseas & ethnic Chinese adopted by the Chinese government since 1978. Southeast Asian Affairs,2000(3):1-13.
35	黄秀波,刘俊. 民间信仰空间建构与认同边界:广东惠州巽寮湾案例.人文地理,2014,29(5):49-55.
	HUANG X, LIU J. The construction and identity boundaries of folk belief space:Taking 'DA MA'and 'XIAO MA'as comparative cases studies in XunLiao Bay, HuiZhou,Guangdong Province. Human Geography,2014,29(5):49-55.
36	杨洁勉. 中国外交70年:实践创新和理论建设. 国际问题研究,2019(5):6-19.
	YANG J. China's 70-year diplomacy: practice innovation and theoretic building. International Studies, 2019(5):6-19.
37	周秋光,曾桂林. 中国慈善立法:历史、现状及建议. 南京社会科学,2014(12):141-149.
	ZHOU Q, ZENG G. History and status of Chinese charity legislation and ponder proposal.NanJing Journal Of Social Sciences,2014(12):141-149.
38	王惠. 海外移民与宗教仪式回传——甲午年新加坡修德善堂养心社宋大峰祖师金像百年回銮. 华侨华人历史研究,2016(3): 59-67.
	WANG H. Overseas Chinese and Ritual Returning Patterns:Reports about the Returning of Song Da Feng by Seu Teck Sean Tong from Singapore, September 2014. Overseas Chinese History Studies,2016(3): 59-67.
39	宋玉,黄剑锋. 国内外乡村记忆地理研究进展与展望. 世界地理研究,2019,28(6):166-177.
	SONG Y, HUANG J. Research progress and prospect of rural memory geography at home and abroad. World Regional Studies,2019,28(6):166-177.
40	范正义. 当前海外华人民间信仰跨地区交往和结盟现象研究. 世界宗教文化,2014(1):62-65.
	FAN Z. On communication and alignment of Contemporary Chinese Belief abroad across different areas. The World Religious Cultures,2014(1):62-65.
41	黎相宜. 道义、交换与移民跨国实践——基于衰退型侨乡海南文昌的个案研究. 华侨华人历史研究,2015(3):55-63.
	LI X. Morality,exchange and transnational migration:a case study on Wenchang:Hainan,a declined Qiaoxiang. Overseas Chinese History Studies,2015(3):55-63.

[1]	尹旭, 李鹏, 封志明, 游珍, 肖池伟. 2000—2019年越南人口时空分异特征及其演变类型[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(5): 941-952.
[2]	吴丽君, 朱宇, 颜俊, 柯文前, 林李月. “一带一路”沿线国家或地区间人口迁移的空间格局及其演化特征[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(2): 249-258.
[3]	孙曼, 宋涛, 计启迪. 边境城镇的产业演化及其机制研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(2): 388-398.
[4]	马丽君, 邓思凡. “一带一路”对国民出境沿线国家旅游需求的促进效应[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(1): 41-52.
[5]	车冰清, 孙东琪, 朱传耿. “一带一路”建设背景下中国区域空间响应差异及形成机制[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 903-912.
[6]	濮蓉, 陶卓民, 李涛. “一带一路”沿线主要国家旅游竞争力与旅游服务出口协调度时空演变[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 948-956.
[7]	穆焱杰, 杨永春. 中国西部城市国际货运班列的线路特征、货物类型及货源组织[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 769-780.
[8]	王淑芳, 闫语欣, 于娜. “一带一路”沿线国家投资悖论的形成机理研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 781-791.
[9]	姚峪岩, 张翼飞, 金紫洋, 蒋烨. “一带一路”绿色贸易合作与竞争格局研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 792-801.
[10]	岳启发, 赵筱青, 李思楠, 谭琨, 普军伟, 王茜. “一带一路”背景下博多河流域景观格局变化及生态风险评价研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 839-850.
[11]	刘承良, 杜德斌, 李源. 服务“一带一路”的世界地理课程思政“金字塔”教学模式[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 873-881.
[12]	胡志丁, 葛岳静, 杜德斌, 刘玉立. 走向伟大复兴的中国地缘战略：国家周边论[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(3): 443-453.
[13]	胡建梅, 郝杰, 张意博, 张超. 中国对外援助的空间演化分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(3): 454-464.
[14]	公丕萍, 姜超. “一带一路”建设对沿线国家经济增长的影响效果与中介路径[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(3): 465-477.
[15]	韩梦瑶, 刘卫东, 刘慧. 中国跨境风电项目的建设模式、梯度转移及减排潜力研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(3): 490-500.