World Regional Studies ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 107-119.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.01.2020307
Previous Articles Next Articles
Huan LIU1,2(), Deyou MENG1,2()
Received:
2020-05-22
Revised:
2020-09-01
Online:
2022-01-15
Published:
2022-01-25
Contact:
Deyou MENG
通讯作者:
孟德友
作者简介:
刘欢(1995-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为空间结构与区域发展,E-mail:1739525449@qq.com。
基金资助:
Huan LIU, Deyou MENG. Spatial heterogeneity of transport superiority degree and its impact factors of provincial capital cities in China in the background of high-speed railway construction[J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(1): 107-119.
刘欢, 孟德友. 高铁背景下省会城市交通优势度空间分异及影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(1): 107-119.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://sjdlyj.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2022.01.2020307
影响因素 | 编号 | 指标名称 | 单位 |
---|---|---|---|
社会发展 | X1 | 人均可支配收入 | 元 |
X2 | 地方一般公共预算支出 | 亿元 | |
自然条件 | X3 | 平均坡度 | 度 |
X4 | 平均高程 | 米 | |
交通设施 | X5 | 火车站数目 | 个 |
X6 | 高铁数目 | 个 | |
X7 | 动车数目 | 个 | |
X8 | 普通列车数目 | 个 | |
人力资源 | X9 | 年末全市常住人口 | 万人 |
X10 | 普通本专科学生 | 万人 |
Tab.1 Index system of impact factors of transport superiority degree
影响因素 | 编号 | 指标名称 | 单位 |
---|---|---|---|
社会发展 | X1 | 人均可支配收入 | 元 |
X2 | 地方一般公共预算支出 | 亿元 | |
自然条件 | X3 | 平均坡度 | 度 |
X4 | 平均高程 | 米 | |
交通设施 | X5 | 火车站数目 | 个 |
X6 | 高铁数目 | 个 | |
X7 | 动车数目 | 个 | |
X8 | 普通列车数目 | 个 | |
人力资源 | X9 | 年末全市常住人口 | 万人 |
X10 | 普通本专科学生 | 万人 |
地区 | 综合得分 | 排名 | 地区 | 综合得分 | 排名 | 地区 | 综合得分 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北京 | 59.30 | 1 | 长沙 | 35.27 | 11 | 福州 | 25.01 | 21 |
上海 | 52.17 | 2 | 西安 | 34.91 | 12 | 昆明 | 23.91 | 22 |
南京 | 48.92 | 3 | 成都 | 33.91 | 13 | 长春 | 22.18 | 23 |
武汉 | 45.14 | 4 | 杭州 | 33.55 | 14 | 南宁 | 19.73 | 24 |
郑州 | 44.94 | 5 | 合肥 | 33.18 | 15 | 哈尔滨 | 19.23 | 25 |
天津 | 44.08 | 6 | 济南 | 31.61 | 16 | 西宁 | 18.12 | 26 |
广州 | 39.58 | 7 | 南昌 | 30.48 | 17 | 呼和浩特 | 17.77 | 27 |
贵阳 | 38.89 | 8 | 沈阳 | 28.26 | 18 | 银川 | 16.16 | 28 |
石家庄 | 37.49 | 9 | 兰州 | 27.96 | 19 | 乌鲁木齐 | 13.33 | 29 |
重庆 | 35.54 | 10 | 太原 | 25.77 | 20 | 拉萨 | 9.79 | 30 |
Tab.2 Comprehensive score and ranking of transport superiority degree
地区 | 综合得分 | 排名 | 地区 | 综合得分 | 排名 | 地区 | 综合得分 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北京 | 59.30 | 1 | 长沙 | 35.27 | 11 | 福州 | 25.01 | 21 |
上海 | 52.17 | 2 | 西安 | 34.91 | 12 | 昆明 | 23.91 | 22 |
南京 | 48.92 | 3 | 成都 | 33.91 | 13 | 长春 | 22.18 | 23 |
武汉 | 45.14 | 4 | 杭州 | 33.55 | 14 | 南宁 | 19.73 | 24 |
郑州 | 44.94 | 5 | 合肥 | 33.18 | 15 | 哈尔滨 | 19.23 | 25 |
天津 | 44.08 | 6 | 济南 | 31.61 | 16 | 西宁 | 18.12 | 26 |
广州 | 39.58 | 7 | 南昌 | 30.48 | 17 | 呼和浩特 | 17.77 | 27 |
贵阳 | 38.89 | 8 | 沈阳 | 28.26 | 18 | 银川 | 16.16 | 28 |
石家庄 | 37.49 | 9 | 兰州 | 27.96 | 19 | 乌鲁木齐 | 13.33 | 29 |
重庆 | 35.54 | 10 | 太原 | 25.77 | 20 | 拉萨 | 9.79 | 30 |
指标 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
q值 | 0.5786 | 0.7614 | 0.2350 | 0.4870 | 0.3583 |
指标 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 |
q值 | 0.7551 | 0.2881 | 0.3962 | 0.6753 | 0.5836 |
Tab.3 GeoDetector detection results
指标 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
q值 | 0.5786 | 0.7614 | 0.2350 | 0.4870 | 0.3583 |
指标 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 |
q值 | 0.7551 | 0.2881 | 0.3962 | 0.6753 | 0.5836 |
因子 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.579 | |||||||||
X2 | 0.869 | 0.761 | ||||||||
X3 | 0.857 | 0.860 | 0.235 | |||||||
X4 | 0.892 | 0.920 | 0.673 | 0.487 | ||||||
X5 | 0.839 | 0.809 | 0.568 | 0.749 | 0.358 | |||||
X6 | 0.952 | 0.940 | 0.953 | 0.996 | 0.818 | 0.755 | ||||
X7 | 0.957 | 0.945 | 0.814 | 0.922 | 0.888 | 0.966 | 0.288 | |||
X8 | 0.991 | 0.892 | 0.920 | 0.853 | 0.821 | 0.992 | 0.734 | 0.396 | ||
X9 | 0.937 | 0.890 | 0.930 | 0.853 | 0.827 | 0.933 | 0.964 | 0.977 | 0.675 | |
X10 | 0.929 | 0.910 | 0.926 | 0.990 | 0.754 | 0.931 | 0.924 | 0.922 | 0.958 | 0.584 |
Tab.4 Detection of interaction results
因子 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.579 | |||||||||
X2 | 0.869 | 0.761 | ||||||||
X3 | 0.857 | 0.860 | 0.235 | |||||||
X4 | 0.892 | 0.920 | 0.673 | 0.487 | ||||||
X5 | 0.839 | 0.809 | 0.568 | 0.749 | 0.358 | |||||
X6 | 0.952 | 0.940 | 0.953 | 0.996 | 0.818 | 0.755 | ||||
X7 | 0.957 | 0.945 | 0.814 | 0.922 | 0.888 | 0.966 | 0.288 | |||
X8 | 0.991 | 0.892 | 0.920 | 0.853 | 0.821 | 0.992 | 0.734 | 0.396 | ||
X9 | 0.937 | 0.890 | 0.930 | 0.853 | 0.827 | 0.933 | 0.964 | 0.977 | 0.675 | |
X10 | 0.929 | 0.910 | 0.926 | 0.990 | 0.754 | 0.931 | 0.924 | 0.922 | 0.958 | 0.584 |
交互作用与判断依据 | 因素 |
---|---|
双因子增强 q(X1∩X2)>Max(q(X1),q(X2)) | X1∩X2、X1∩X4、X1∩X5、X1∩X6、X1∩X8、X1∩X9、X1∩X10、X2∩X3、X2∩X3、X2∩X4、X2∩X5、X2∩X6、X2∩X7、X2∩X8、X2∩X9、X2∩X10、X3∩X4、X3∩X5、X3∩X6、X3∩X9、X4∩X5、X4∩X6、X4∩X8、X4∩X9、X4∩X10、X5∩X6、X5∩X9、X5∩X10、X6∩X7、X6∩X8、 X6∩X9、X6∩X10、X7∩X9、X8∩X9、X8∩X10、X9∩X10 |
非线性增强 q(X1∩X2)>q(X1)+q(X2) | X1∩X3、X1∩X7、X3∩X7、X3∩X8、X3∩X10、X4∩X7、X5∩X7、X5∩X8、X7∩X8、X7∩X10 |
Tab.5 Detection of interaction types
交互作用与判断依据 | 因素 |
---|---|
双因子增强 q(X1∩X2)>Max(q(X1),q(X2)) | X1∩X2、X1∩X4、X1∩X5、X1∩X6、X1∩X8、X1∩X9、X1∩X10、X2∩X3、X2∩X3、X2∩X4、X2∩X5、X2∩X6、X2∩X7、X2∩X8、X2∩X9、X2∩X10、X3∩X4、X3∩X5、X3∩X6、X3∩X9、X4∩X5、X4∩X6、X4∩X8、X4∩X9、X4∩X10、X5∩X6、X5∩X9、X5∩X10、X6∩X7、X6∩X8、 X6∩X9、X6∩X10、X7∩X9、X8∩X9、X8∩X10、X9∩X10 |
非线性增强 q(X1∩X2)>q(X1)+q(X2) | X1∩X3、X1∩X7、X3∩X7、X3∩X8、X3∩X10、X4∩X7、X5∩X7、X5∩X8、X7∩X8、X7∩X10 |
影响因素 | 最小值 | 上四分位 | 中值 | 下四分位 | 最大值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | 0.0003 | 0.0004 |
X3 | -0.0184 | -0.0090 | -0.0031 | 0.0007 | 0.0057 |
X4 | -0.0010 | -0.0006 | -0.0004 | -0.0002 | 0.0008 |
X5 | 1.0012 | 1.3085 | 1.3595 | 1.4198 | 1.5030 |
X6 | 0.0221 | 0.0225 | 0.0231 | 0.0235 | 0.0300 |
X7 | -0.0072 | -0.0004 | 0.0011 | 0.0030 | 0.0165 |
X8 | 0.0266 | 0.0331 | 0.0349 | 0.0374 | 0.0437 |
X10 | 0.0274 | 0.0359 | 0.0420 | 0.0507 | 0.0769 |
Bandwidth | 28.9507 | ||||
AICc | 227.3801 | ||||
R2 | 0.7742 | ||||
R2Adjusted | 0.6461 |
Tab.6 Statistical results of GWR regression coefficients
影响因素 | 最小值 | 上四分位 | 中值 | 下四分位 | 最大值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | 0.0003 | 0.0004 |
X3 | -0.0184 | -0.0090 | -0.0031 | 0.0007 | 0.0057 |
X4 | -0.0010 | -0.0006 | -0.0004 | -0.0002 | 0.0008 |
X5 | 1.0012 | 1.3085 | 1.3595 | 1.4198 | 1.5030 |
X6 | 0.0221 | 0.0225 | 0.0231 | 0.0235 | 0.0300 |
X7 | -0.0072 | -0.0004 | 0.0011 | 0.0030 | 0.0165 |
X8 | 0.0266 | 0.0331 | 0.0349 | 0.0374 | 0.0437 |
X10 | 0.0274 | 0.0359 | 0.0420 | 0.0507 | 0.0769 |
Bandwidth | 28.9507 | ||||
AICc | 227.3801 | ||||
R2 | 0.7742 | ||||
R2Adjusted | 0.6461 |
1 | 金凤君,王成金,李秀伟.中国区域交通优势的甄别方法及应用分析.地理学报,2008,63(8): 787-798. |
JIN F, WANG C, LI X. Discrimination method and its application analysis of regional transport superiority. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008,63(8): 787-798. | |
2 | 谯博文,王艳慧,段福洲.连片特困区交通优势度评价及其与贫困关系研究——以武陵山片区及其周边四省为例.资源开发与市场,2014,30(8): 924-928. |
QIAO B, WANG Y, DUAN F.Assessment on transport superiority and relation with poverty in contiguous poor areas: a case study of wuling mountain area and its surrounding four provinces. Resource Development & Market, 2014,30(8):924-928. | |
3 | 吴威,曹有挥,曹卫东,等.长三角地区交通优势度的空间格局.地理研究,2011,30(12): 2199-2208. |
WU W, CAO Y, CAO W, et al. The pattern of transportation superiority in yangtze river delta.Geographical Research,2011,30(12): 2199-2208. | |
4 | 孟德友,沈惊宏,陆玉麒.中原经济区县域交通优势度与区域经济空间耦合.经济地理,2012,32(6): 7-14. |
MENG D, SHEN J, LU Y.Spatial coupling between transportation superiority and economy in central plain economic zone. Economic Geography, 2012,32(6): 7-14. | |
5 | 钟业喜,郭卫东,毛炜圣,等. 闽新轴带城市铁路网络及可达性演变研究.长江流域资源与环境,2019, 28(5): 1015-1024. |
ZONG Y, GUO W, MAO W, et al. Urban railway network and accessibility evolution research of the"Min Xin Axis Belt". Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019,28(5): 1015-1024. | |
6 | 王成新,王格芳,刘瑞超,等.区域交通优势度评价模型的建立与实证——以山东省为例.人文地理,2010, 25(1): 73-76. |
WANG C, WANG G, LIU R, et al.Empirical research on evaluation model of transport superiority degree: a case study of shandong province. Human Geography, 2010,25(1): 73-76. | |
7 | 孟德友,沈惊宏,陆玉麒.河南省县域交通优势度综合评价及空间格局演变.地理科学,2014,34(3): 280-287. |
MENG D, SHEN J, LU Y. Evolvement of spatial pattern of county level transportation superiority in henan, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(3): 280-287. | |
8 | 程佳佳,王成金,刘卫东.西北地区交通优势度格局及空间分异.地球科学进展,2016,31(2): 192-205. |
CHENG J J, WANG C, LIU W.Distribution configuration and spatial differentiation of transport superiority degree in northwest china. Advances in Earth Science, 2016,31(2): 192-205. | |
9 | 闵敏,苗长虹,胡志强,等.基于地形修正的河南省县域交通优势度评价及与经济发展的空间耦合研究.地域研究与开发,2018,37(5): 37-42. |
MIN M, MIAO C, HU Z, et al. Research of coupling-coordination degree between transportation superiority degree that considered topographic correction factor and regional economy of counties in henan province. Areal Research and Development, 2018,37(5): 37-42. | |
10 | 周鹏,白永平,马卫.县域交通优势度与经济潜能测度及空间格局演变研究.地域研究与开发,2015, 34(5): 42-46. |
ZHOU P, BAI Y MA W. The measuring and evolvement of spatial pattern of transportation superiority degree and economic potential at county level. Areal Research and Development, 2015,34(5): 42-46. | |
11 | 王武林,杨文越,曹小曙.武陵山区公路交通优势度与县域经济水平协调度研究.人文地理,2019, 34(6): 99-109. |
WANG W, YANG W, CAO X.Research on coordination degree between road transport superiority degree and county economic level in wuling mountain area. Human Geography, 2019,34(6): 99-109. | |
12 | 郭向阳,穆学青,明庆忠,等.旅游地快速交通优势度与旅游流强度的空间耦合分析.地理研究,2019, 38(5): 1119-1135. |
GUO X, MU X, MING Q, et al. Spatial coupling between rapid traffic superiority degree and tourist flow intensity in tourist destinations. Geographical Research, 2019,38(5): 1119-1135. | |
13 | 刘安乐,杨承玥,鲁芬,等.滇中城市群交通网络与旅游业耦合发展研究.世界地理研究,2017, 26(1): 65-76. |
LIU A, YANG C, LU F, et. al. Study on coordinated development of transportation network and tourism in central yunnan urban agglomeration. World Regional Studies, 2017,26(1): 65-76. | |
14 | 崔学刚, 方创琳, 张蔷.山东半岛城市群高速交通优势度与土地利用效率的空间关系.地理学报, 2018, 73(6): 1149-1161. |
CUI X, FANG C, ZHANG Q.Spatial relationship between high- speed transport superiority degree and land-use efficiency in shandong peninsula urban agglomeration. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(6): 1149-1161. | |
15 | 李柏敏,韦福安,陈严武,等. 广西县域农村发展与交通优势度的空间协同性及互动效应研究.农业现代化研究, 2019, 40(2): 243-252. |
LI B, WEI F, CHEN Y, et al.Spatial integration and interaction between transportation advantage and rural development in guangxi province. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2019,40(2): 243-252. | |
16 | 戢晓峰,姜莉,陈方.云南省县域城镇化与交通优势度的时空协同性演化分析.地理科学, 2017, 37(12): 1875-1884. |
JI X, JIANG L, CHEN F.Spatio-temporal cooperative evolution analysis of transportation superiority and county urbanization in yunnan province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(12): 1875. | |
17 | 王振坡,翟婧彤,王丽艳.区域协同下城市交通优势度与产业对接耦合关系——基于天津市的实证分析. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2016, 36(10): 49-60. |
WANG Z, ZHAI J, WANG L. The coupling relationship between urban traffic advantages and industrial connection in perspective of regional collaborati case study of tianjin. Modern Finance and Economics-Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, 2016,36(10): 49-60. | |
18 | 刘晓萌,黄承锋.重庆市主城区组团粘连式扩展的交通影响研究.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,37(4): 96-108. |
LIU X, HUANG C. Transport effect of group adhesion expansion in chongqing urban area. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science), 2018,37(4): 96-108. | |
19 | 林慧,李慧宇,杜国强,等.城市道路交通影响因素相关性分析.山西建筑, 2019,45(8): 23-24. |
LIN H, LI H, DU G. 2019. Correlation analysis of influencing factors in urban road traffic. Shanxi Architecture, 45(8): 23-24. | |
20 | 向云波,张勇,袁开国,等.湘江流域县域发展水平的综合评价及特征分析.经济地理,2011, 31(7): 34-39. |
XIANG Y, ZHANG Y, YUAN K, et al. Analysis on characteristics and comprehensive evaluation of couty's development level in the xiangjiang river basin. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(7): 34-39. | |
21 | 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器: 原理与展望.地理学报,2017, 72(1): 116-134. |
WANG J XU C. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(1): 116-134. | |
22 | 刘彦随,李进涛.中国县域农村贫困化分异机制的地理探测与优化决策.地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 161-173. |
LIU Y, LI J. The spatial characteristics and formation mechanism of the county urbanization in china. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(01): 161-173. | |
23 | 武鹏.山阳县农村贫困化空间分异及其影响因素.西安:西北大学, 2018. |
WU P. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors analysis of rural poverty of shanyang county in shaanxi province.Xi'an: Northwest University,2018. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||