Research progress on historic recreational space from the perspective of urban regeneration

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2024.10.20230472

Abstract

Abstract:

With steady advancement of stock renewal and cultural tourism integration policies, recreational space has become key topic of academic attention. Combined with new development requirements such as historic and cultural protection, inheritance, and revitalization, numerous studies have actively explored the regeneration path and evolution rules of urban historic recreational spaces. Under the background of clarifying its connotation and regeneration attributes, this paper selected relevant literatures in WOS and CNKI databases during past 20 years, used CiteSpace software to draw knowledge visualization maps, and carried out literature study in accordance with comprehensive and thematic principles to systematically review the research progress at home and abroad. It is found that: ①Since 2004, relevant researches can be divided into embryonic, fluctuating, and rapidly developing stages based on the number of publications and emerging keywords, and spread to natural and social sciences such as Urban and Rural Planning, Tourism, and Geography. ②Foreign research hotspots focus on urban development, heritage regeneration and social management, while domestic researches focus on design practices and applications such as protection and utilization, historical environment and spatial pattern. ③Main research contents at home and abroad are relatively overlapping, concentrating on the structure of material space form, perception of historic recreational imagery, evaluation of comprehensive value system, and strategy of regeneration planning and design. Based on these, this paper summarizes research inspirations and prospects the future direction of deepening domestic themes from the perspectives of ideal structural models, comprehensive historic recreational imagery, dynamic evaluation processes, interdisciplinary foundations, and localized regeneration paths.

Key words: historic recreational space, urban regeneration, research progress, knowledge mapping, integration of culture and tourism

摘要：

随着存量更新与文旅融合政策的稳步推进，游憩空间成为学界关注的重点话题，结合历史文化保护和活力重塑等新发展要求，积极探索城市历史游憩空间的再生路径与演化规律具有重要意义。在明确其内涵和再生属性的基础上，选取近20年内WOS和CNKI数据库中的相关文献，运用CiteSpace软件绘制知识图谱，依照综合性与专题性原则展开文献研读，系统梳理国内外研究进展。结果显示：①2004年至今，依据发文量和突现关键词，研究可分为萌芽、波动上升和快速发展阶段，并扩散至城乡规划、旅游和地理学等自然与社会科学领域；②国外研究热点聚焦城市发展、遗产再生和社会管理等人居环境复合，国内则侧重保护利用、历史环境和空间格局等设计实践应用；③国内外主要研究内容相对重合，集中于物质空间形态结构、历史游憩意象感知、综合价值体系评价和再生规划设计策略层面。基于此，从理想结构模式、综合性历史游憩意象、动态评价过程、交叉学科基础和本土化再生路径角度展望国内后续主题深化方向。

关键词: 历史游憩空间, 城市再生, 研究进展, 知识图谱, 文旅融合

Tongtong LIU, Yang ZHOU, Caiyun QIAN, Yang LIU. Research progress on historic recreational space from the perspective of urban regeneration[J]. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(10): 141-154.

刘彤彤, 周扬, 钱才云, 刘洋. 城市再生视角下历史游憩空间研究进展[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(10): 141-154.

Figures/Tables 9

References 45

1	吴志强, 吴承照. 城市旅游规划原理. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005.
	WU Z, WU C. Urban Recreation and Tourism Planning Studies. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2005.
2	万美强. 风景游憩林应成为城市公共绿地的主要形式. 城市规划, 1990(3): 64.
	WAN M. Landscape architecture should become the main form of urban public green space. City Planning Review, 1990(3): 64.
3	徐鑫, 黄杉, 梁影君. 杭州市京杭运河北段休闲游憩空间发展模式研究. 建筑学报, 2010(4): 99-101.
	XU X, HUANG S, LIANG Y. Approach to the pattern of space development of the health and recreation resort along the northern channel of Beijing-Hangzhou grand canal in Hangzhou. Architectural Journal, 2010(4): 99-101.
4	史密斯·斯蒂芬. 游憩地理学:理论与方法. 吴必虎, 译. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1992.
	SMITH S. Recreation Geography. Translated by WU B. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1992.
5	陈丹, 任翔宇, 杨凯,等. 上海苏州河滨水空间的社会服务功能探讨. 世界地理研究, 2016, 25(1): 151-158.
	CHEN D, REN X, YANG K, et al. Discussion on social service function of Suzhou creek waterfront in Shanghai. World Regional Studies, 2016, 25(1): 151-158.
6	廉欢, 王尔大. 历史古迹旅游景区游憩属性价值评价研究——以沈阳东陵公园为例. 地域研究与开发, 2019, 38(4): 92-97.
	LIAN H, WANG E. Value evaluation of recreational attributes of historical sites in tourist attractions: Taking the Shenyang Dongling park as an example. Areal Research and Development, 2019, 38(4): 92-97.
7	何慧妍, 王敏. 基于视觉方法的历史街区"微改造"空间感知研究. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(4): 189-200.
	HE H, WANG M. The spatial perception of micro-transformation in historic district based on visual methodology. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(4): 189-200.
8	张书颖, 刘家明, 朱鹤, 等. 国内外城市生态游憩空间研究进展. 人文地理, 2019, 34(5): 15-25.
	ZHANG S, LIU J, ZHU H, et al. Research progress on urban ecological recreational space at home and abroad. Human Geography, 2019, 34(5): 15-25.
9	孔惟洁. 城市历史空间模式与保护研究——以新绛历史文化名城为例. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2013.
	KONG W. A study on mode and conservation of historical urban space: Take Xinjiang historical and cultural city as example. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2013.
10	吴必虎, 董莉娜, 唐子颖. 公共游憩空间分类与属性研究. 中国园林, 2003(5): 49-51.
	WU B, DONG L, TANG Z. A study on categories and attributes of public urban recreational spaces. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2003(5): 49-51.
11	万丰登. 基于共生理念的城市历史建筑再生研究. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2017.
	WAN F. A study on the rehabilitation of urban historic buildings based on the symbiotic ideology. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2017.
12	阳建强, 陈月. 1949—2019年中国城市更新的发展与回顾. 城市规划, 2020, 44(2): 9-19.
	YANG J, CHEN Y. Review on the development of urban regeneration in China from 1949 to 2019. City Planning Review, 2020, 44(2): 9-19.
13	常青. 传统与创造——反思历史建成环境再生的理念与途径. 世界建筑, 2022(10): 6-17.
	CHANG Q. Tradition and invention: A reflection on the concept and approach to regeneration historic built environment. World Architecture, 2022(10): 6-17.
14	宋捷. 浅析历史街区更新型RBD与城市CBD的有机互动——以成都大慈寺历史街区为例. 现代城市研究, 2011, 26(1): 39-43.
	SONG J. A brief analysis about the interaction between RBD of historic districts renewal model and urban CBD: A case study of the renewal of Chengdu Daci temple historic district. Modern Urban Research, 2011, 26(1): 39-43.
15	张凯, 王亚昆, 赵博. 城市双修背景下古城历史风貌区更新策略研究——以开封市复兴坊街区为例. 城乡规划, 2019(3): 50-55.
	ZHANG K, WANG Y, ZHAO B. Study on renewal strategies of historic scenic areas of ancient cities under the background of city betterment and ecological restoration: A case study of Fuxingfang district in Kaifeng. Urban & Rural Planning, 2019(3): 50-55.
16	李睿, 李楚欣, 芮光晔. 城市历史景观视角下的历史文化街区保护规划编制方法研究——以广州逢源大街—荔湾湖历史文化街区为例. 规划师, 2020, 36(15): 66-72.
	LI R, LI C, RUI G. Compilation method of historical and cultural district from the perspective of HUL: A case study in Guangzhou. Planners, 2020, 36(15): 66-72.
17	徐刚, 马丽丽, 杨超. 非历史文化名城文化"景观空间体系"构建的规划探索——以汤阴老城更新详细城市设计为例. 城乡规划, 2018(1): 100-108.
	XU G, MA L, YANG C. Exploration on the construction of "cultural landscape space system" for the obscure cities with rich history and condensed culture: A case study on detailed urban renewal design of Tangyin town. Urban & Rural Planning, 2018(1): 100-108.
18	邹咏忱, 丁铮. 基于Q方法的大明宫遗址公园游憩功能感知评价. 中国城市林业, 2019, 17(6): 70-74.
	ZOU Y, DING Z. The evaluation of recreation function perception of Daming palace national heritage park based on Q methodology. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2019, 17(6): 70-74.
19	WANG F, LI J, YU F, et al. Space, function, and vitality in historic areas: The tourismification process and spatial order of Shichahai in Beijing. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2018, 20(3): 335-344.
20	李晓璐, 张志斌, 魏娟, 等. 基于空间分析法的滨水游憩资源分布特征研究——以兰州市黄河风情线为例. 资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(8): 996-1000.
	LI X, ZHANG Z, WEI J, et al. Research on distribution characteristics of recreational resources based on spatial analysis: A case study of the yellow river scenic zone in downtown Lanzhou. Resource Development & Market, 2017, 33(8): 996-1000.
21	周俭. 城市遗产及其保护体系研究——关于上海历史文化名城保护规划若干问题的思辨. 上海城市规划, 2016(3): 73-80.
	ZHOU J. Research on urban heritage and its conservation system: Speculation about the conservation and planning issues of Shanghai as a national famous historical and cultural city. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2016(3): 73-80.
22	聂铭, 邱守时, 杨光明, 等. 环滇池流域旅游空间布局整合与发展对策研究. 旅游研究, 2014, 6(4): 52-57.
	NIE M, QIU S, YANG G, et al. A research on the development countermeasures and the tourism spatial layout's integration of the ring-Dianchi basin. Tourism Research, 2014, 6(4): 52-57.
23	YU L, LIU J, LI T. Important progress and future prospects for studies on urban public recreational space in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(11): 1923-1946.
24	WANG F, LIU Z, SHANG S, et al. Vitality continuation or over-commercialization? Spatial structure characteristics of commercial services and population agglomeration in historic and cultural areas. Tourism Economics, 2019, 25(8): 1302-1326.
25	QIAN Z, LI H. Urban morphology and local citizens in China's historic neighborhoods: A case study of the stele forest neighborhood in Xi'an. Cities, 2017, 71: 97-109.
26	冯维波. 城市游憩空间系统的结构模式. 建筑学报, 2010(S2): 150-153.
	FENG W. The structural pattern of urban recreation space system. Architectural Journal, 2010(S2): 150-153.
27	田逢军. 基于"游憩意象综合体"的城市游憩空间意象营造. 商业经济与管理, 2010(11): 91-96.
	TIAN F. A study on the building of urban recreation space image: Based on the concept of recreation image complex. Journal of Business Economics, 2010(11): 91-96.
28	杨俊. 南京城市历史文化景观时空演变及影响因素研究. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(11): 80-86.
	YANG J. Study on spatial and temporal changes and influencing factors of Nanjing urban historical and cultural landscape. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(11): 80-86.
29	徐磊青. 城市意象研究的主题、范式与反思——中国城市意象研究评述. 新建筑, 2012(1): 114-117.
	XU L. The rethinking of themes and paradigms: A review of urban image studies in China. New Architecture, 2012(1): 114-117.
30	牛玉, 汪德根. 基于游客视角的历史街区旅游发展模式影响机理及创新——以苏州平江路为例. 地理研究, 2015, 34(1): 181-196.
	NIU Y, WANG D. Influence mechanism and innovation of tourism development pattern of historic streets based on the perspective of tourists: A case of Pingjiang road of Suzhou. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(1): 181-196.
31	廖仁静, 李倩, 张捷, 等. 都市历史街区真实性的游憩者感知研究——以南京夫子庙为例. 旅游学刊, 2009, 24(1): 55-60.
	LIAO R, LI Q, ZHANG J, et al. Tourists' perceived study on the authenticity of urban historical blocks: Taking Confucius temple in Nanjing as an example. Tourism Tribune, 2009, 24(1): 55-60.
32	CHIEN M. An empirical study on the effect of attractiveness of ecotourism destination on experiential value and revisit intention. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2017, 15(2): 43-53.
33	JEON J, JO H. Effects of audio-visual interactions on soundscape and landscape perception and their influence on satisfaction with the urban environment. Building and Environment, 2020, 169: 106544.
34	梁立锋, 曾文霞, 宋悦祥, 等. 顾及人群集聚和情绪强度的城市综合活力评价及影响因素. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(10): 1854-1866.
	LIANG L, ZENG W, SONG Y, et al. Urban comprehensive vitality evaluation and influencing factors analysis considering population agglomeration and emotional intensity. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2022, 24(10): 1854-1866.
35	WU J, LU Y, GAO H, et al. Cultivating historical heritage area vitality using urban morphology approach based on big data and machine learning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2022, 91: 101716.
36	李金洁. 基于价值导向的历史空间景观及视觉影响评估方法研究——以嘉兴市月河历史文化街区为例. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2022.
	LI J. Research on the methodology of historic space landscape and visual impact assessment based on value orientation: A case study of moon river historical and cultural district in Jiaxing, China. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2022.
37	LI Y, ZHAO L, HUANG J, et al. Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: A review. Built Heritage, 2021, 5(1): 19-37.
38	WIEDMANN F, MIRINCHEVA V, SALAMA A, et al. Urban reconfiguration and revitalization: Public mega projects in Doha's historic centre. Open House International, 2013, 38(4): 27-36.
39	王建国. 历史文化街区适应性保护改造和活力再生路径探索——以宜兴丁蜀古南街为例. 建筑学报, 2021(5): 1-7.
	WANG J. Exploring the approaches of adaptive conservation, reconstruction and revitalization of historic districts: A case study of Gunanjie street in Dingshu, Yixing. Architectural Journal, 2021(5): 1-7.
40	MARTINIS S, KONTONI D. Sustainable urban planning interventions in the historical center of the Greek town of Kalavryta. Habitat International, 2017, 63: 131-148.
41	汪永臻, 曾刚. 空间视角下丝绸之路文化遗产廊道构建研究——以甘肃段为例. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(4): 862-871.
	WANG Y, ZENG G. Research on the construction of the silk road cultural heritage corridor from the spatial perspective: A case of Gansu section. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 862-871.
42	高璟, 吴必虎, 赵之枫. 基于文化地理学视角的传统村落旅游活化可持续路径模型建构. 地域研究与开发, 2020, 39(4): 73-78.
	GAO J, WU B, ZHAO Z. A sustainable path model for tourism-based revitalization of traditional villages based on a cultural geography perspective. Areal Research and Development, 2020, 39(4): 73-78.
43	LI X, ZHOU S. The trialectics of spatiality: The labeling of a historical area in Beijing. Sustainability, 2018, 10(5): 1542.
44	BUSTAD J, ANDEWS D. Remaking recreation: Neoliberal urbanism and public recreation in Baltimore. Cities, 2020, 103: 102757.
45	刘震, 戴泽钒, 楼嘉军, 等. 基于数字足迹的城市游憩行为空间特征研究——以上海为例. 世界地理研究, 2019, 28(5): 95-105.
	LIU Z, DAI Z, LOU J, et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics of urban recreation behavior based on digital footprints: A case study of Shanghai. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(5): 95-105.

WOS文献关键词	频次	中心性	CNKI文献关键词	频次	中心性
城市（city）	60	0.15	保护与更新	151	0.58
文化遗产（cultural heritage）	38	0.11	历史街区	134	0.42
旅游（tourism）	32	0.12	历史文化名城	27	0.04
遗产（heritage）	32	0.10	公共空间	26	0.05
保护（conservation）	29	0.09	工业遗产	21	0.04
治理（governance）	28	0.13	历史文化资源	20	0.06
空间（space）	25	0.10	保护与利用	19	0.05
工业遗产（industrial heritage）	21	0.09	活化	16	0.03
城市再生（urban regeneration）	21	0.02	风景园林	16	0.05
管理（management）	19	0.12	空间句法	13	0.03

WOS文献关键词	频次	中心性	CNKI文献关键词	频次	中心性
城市（city）	60	0.15	保护与更新	151	0.58
文化遗产（cultural heritage）	38	0.11	历史街区	134	0.42
旅游（tourism）	32	0.12	历史文化名城	27	0.04
遗产（heritage）	32	0.10	公共空间	26	0.05
保护（conservation）	29	0.09	工业遗产	21	0.04
治理（governance）	28	0.13	历史文化资源	20	0.06
空间（space）	25	0.10	保护与利用	19	0.05
工业遗产（industrial heritage）	21	0.09	活化	16	0.03
城市再生（urban regeneration）	21	0.02	风景园林	16	0.05
管理（management）	19	0.12	空间句法	13	0.03

WOS文献突现词	强度	年份	CNKI文献突现词	强度	年份
社群（community）	2.06	2012	可持续发展	2.40	2005
经济发展（economic development）	1.85	2012	城市发展	2.77	2006
城市再生（urban regeneration）	1.83	2012	历史文化遗产	2.66	2012
城市（urban）	2.01	2015	保护与利用	2.48	2012
历史街区（historic district）	1.73	2008	旅游开发	2.05	2012
旅游（tourism）	2.76	2016	景观设计	2.87	2014
空间句法（space syntax）	2.80	2017	滨水空间	2.77	2016
区域（areas）	1.53	2017	工业遗产	2.45	2017
管理（management）	2.79	2012	遗产保护	2.13	2018
历史城市景观（historic urban landscape）	2.57	2019	活化	4.40	2019
遗产保护（heritage conservation）	1.53	2015	空间句法	2.50	2019
城市设计（urban design）	1.94	2020	历史建筑	2.03	2019
前景（future）	1.94	2020	文旅融合	4.07	2020
可持续发展（sustainable development）	1.79	2020	风景园林	2.42	2020
认知（perceptions）	1.71	2020	更新与改造	2.25	2020

WOS文献突现词	强度	年份	CNKI文献突现词	强度	年份
社群（community）	2.06	2012	可持续发展	2.40	2005
经济发展（economic development）	1.85	2012	城市发展	2.77	2006
城市再生（urban regeneration）	1.83	2012	历史文化遗产	2.66	2012
城市（urban）	2.01	2015	保护与利用	2.48	2012
历史街区（historic district）	1.73	2008	旅游开发	2.05	2012
旅游（tourism）	2.76	2016	景观设计	2.87	2014
空间句法（space syntax）	2.80	2017	滨水空间	2.77	2016
区域（areas）	1.53	2017	工业遗产	2.45	2017
管理（management）	2.79	2012	遗产保护	2.13	2018
历史城市景观（historic urban landscape）	2.57	2019	活化	4.40	2019
遗产保护（heritage conservation）	1.53	2015	空间句法	2.50	2019
城市设计（urban design）	1.94	2020	历史建筑	2.03	2019
前景（future）	1.94	2020	文旅融合	4.07	2020
可持续发展（sustainable development）	1.79	2020	风景园林	2.42	2020
认知（perceptions）	1.71	2020	更新与改造	2.25	2020

[1]	Ning LIU, Qing LIU, Guicai LI. Research progress and prospect of population migration in counties, towns and villages in China [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(2): 166-178.
[2]	Wenya WANG, Mingfeng WANG, Yinghao ZHANG, Fan WANG. Research progress of internet and digital rural in China [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(2): 70-81.
[3]	Weijie LUO, Pei TANG, Wei TAO. The general situation, progress and prospect for the research on the geographies of home: Visualized quantitative study based on CiteSpace and Bibliometric [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(12): 155-171.
[4]	Yichuan ZHANG, Meng HU, Hong LI. A review of the progress and hot issues of Gravity Model based on the CiteSpace: A comparative analysis of literature from the economic geography perspective [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(1): 130-140.
[5]	Yuqing ZHANG, Chengcheng ZHAN. Progress and prospects of feminist geography research [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 881-893.
[6]	Yue QIN, Changle XU. Research review and prospect of the linkage of urban agglomerations in foreign countries [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(3): 582-590.
[7]	Qianyi MA, Yushan DUAN, Rong WU. A review and prospect of international studies of children's geographies [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(1): 177-188.
[8]	Bo JING, Tongsheng LI, Yiping ZHU, Wenhao CHENG. Research progress of Human-Earth System in the mountainous areas in China [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(6): 1230-1240.
[9]	Yu YANG, Qian YAO, Yong SHI, Jianxin SUN, Wenhua WANG, Di SUN, Jie YIN. A review of international tourism risk: Statistical analysisbased on Web of Science [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(6): 1237-1247.
[10]	Peijuan ZHU, Meifang ZHANG, Qingyun HE. Research progress and prospect of urban space fragmentation [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(5): 985-995.
[11]	Meiting ZHAO, Yongjie WANG, Junlin SHEN, Ronghao JIANG, Min WANG. The urban regeneration approach from perspective of non-representational theory——Taking Guangzhou creative start-up space as example [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(4): 834-844.
[12]	Luyi TONG. A review on definitions and measurements for urban expansion [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(4): 762-772.
[13]	Kaihuai LIAO, Jinliao HE, Yunnan CAI, Werner BREITUNG. A review of international political geography studies on border theories [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(2): 264-274.
[14]	Yu SONG, Jianfeng HUANG. Research progress and prospect of rural memory geography [J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(6): 166-177.
[15]	TANG Bo, QIU Jin‘an. Knowledge structure of emergency shelters research: An analysis based on WoS and Citespace map [J]. WRS, 2019, 28(4): 85-95.