Study on the coupling and coordination relationship of urban land use benefit in urban agglomeration on the west coast of Taiwan Strait

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.03.2019520

Abstract

Abstract:

It is of great significance to explore how to improve the comprehensive benefits of land use so as to realize sustainable development of regional land use. In this paper, a land use benefit evaluation index system is constructed from three subsystems of economic, social and ecological environmental benefits. The entropy method is used to explore the land use benefits of urban agglomeration on the west coast of the strait from 2008 to 2017, as well as its spatio-temporal evolution process and coupling and coordination relationship, so as to further identify the main factors that limit the improvement of coupling and coordination relationship among cities. Results show that, in the west coast urban agglomeration, high benefit units of comprehensive benefit of land use are mainly located in the center of the coastal gateway cities and city, and tend to be gathered, low units mainly gathered in the inland city and the southern coastal cities, and over the studying period, the number of low units had been shrinking. The economic benefits, social benefits and ecological benefit of urban land use showed continuous rise over time. The spatial patterns of the benefits were "high in the middle, and low in the west".The coupling and coordination degree of "economic-social-ecological environment" benefits of land use showed a trend of different degrees of growth. In recent years, the coupling and coordination degree had been increased, but the spatial heterogeneity of decreasing had shifted from coastal cities to inland cities, and the coupling and coordination development of land use is mainly restricted by complex factors.

Key words: land use efficiency, spatio-temporal evolution, coupling coordination relation, limiting factors, city cluster on the west coast of Taiwan Strait

摘要：

土地的高效利用和配置优化是城市化进程的现实需求，探究如何提高土地利用综合效益，从而实现对地区土地利用可持发展具有重要意义。从经济、社会、生态环境效益三个子系统构建土地利用效益评价指标体系，利用熵值法探究海峡西岸城市群2008—2017年的土地利用效益及其时空演化过程和耦合协调关系，进一步识别限制各城市耦合协调关系提升的主要因素。结果表明：（1）海峡西岸城市群城市土地利用综合效益存在持续上升的时序特征，空间上表现为“东高西低”，高效益单元主要分布于沿海门户城市及中心城市，且趋于聚集，低值单元主要长期分布于内陆城市和南部沿海城市，且范围不断缩减。（2）城市土地利用经济效益在时序上表现出持续上升的特征，空间上表现为“中高西低”，西部低值区范围明显变小；社会效益小幅增长，中东部形成“环状”中效益区；生态效益整体较低，中部低效益区范围扩张显著。（3）各城市土地利用“经济-社会-生态环境”效益耦合协调度呈不同程度增长趋势，近年以协调发展为主，耦合协调程度表现出由沿海向内陆城市递减的空间异质性，土地利用耦合协调发展主要受复合因素制约。

关键词: 土地利用效益, 时空演化, 耦合协调关系, 限制因素, 海峡西岸城市群

Jihui LIAO, Xianwei PENG, Quan WANG, Ping JIAN, Qingting WU. Study on the coupling and coordination relationship of urban land use benefit in urban agglomeration on the west coast of Taiwan Strait[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(3): 556-566.

廖佶慧, 彭贤伟, 王权, 简萍, 吴清婷. 海峡西岸城市群城市土地利用效益评价及其耦合协调关系研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(3): 556-566.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1 Location map of city clusters on the west coast of the Taiwan Strait

Tab.1 Evaluation index system of comprehensive land use benefits of urban agglomeration on the west coast of Taiwan Strait

系统层	子系统层	指标层	单位	属性	权重
城市土地综合利用效益	经济效益	城镇地均国内生产总值	万元/hm²	＋	0.14951
		单位建设用地面积财政收入	万元/hm²	＋	0.25332
		单位建设用地第二产业生产总值	万元/hm²	＋	0.14642
		单位建设用地第三产业生产总值	万元/hm²	＋	0.14410
		人均社会消费品零售额	元	＋	0.11652
		单位建设用地固定资产投资	万/hm²	＋	0.19013
	社会效益	人均居住面积	m²/人	＋	0.39792
		人均建设用地面积	m²/人	－	0.02081
		人均可支配收入	元/人	＋	0.21999
		在岗职工平均工资	元/人	＋	0.20662
		单位建设用地面积人口密度	人/hm²	－	0.02568
		人均道路面积	m²/人	＋	0.12898
	生态环境效益	建成区绿化率	%	＋	0.11759
		单位面积建设用地工业废水排放量	t/hm²	－	0.06713
		单位面积建设用地工业烟尘排放量	m³/hm²	－	0.15755
		污水处理率	%	＋	0.30206
		人均公园绿地面积	m²/人	＋	0.35568

Tab.2 Classification of coupling coordination degree

取值范围	耦合协调程度	取值范围	耦合协调程度	取值范围	耦合协调程度
0.00＜D≤0.10	极度失调	0.40＜D≤0.50	濒临失调	0.70＜D≤0.80	中级协调
0.10＜D≤0.20	严重失调	0.50＜D≤0.60	勉强协调	0.80＜D≤0.90	良好协调
0.20＜D≤0.30	中度失调	0.60＜D≤0.70	初级协调	0.90＜D≤1.00	优质协调
0.30＜D≤0.40	轻度失调

Fig.2 Evolution of comprehensive benefits of land use in urban agglomeration on the west coast of Taiwan Strait

Fig.3 Evolution of urban land use economic benefits in urban agglomeration on the west coast of Taiwan Strait

Fig.4 Evolution of social benefits of urban land use in urban agglomeration on the west coast of Taiwan Strait

Fig.5 Evolution of spatial pattern of urban land use ecological environmental benefits in urban agglomeration on the west coast of the Taiwan Strait

Fig.6 Evolution of spatial pattern of coupling and coordination of benefits of "economic, social and ecological environment" in urban land use in urban agglomeration on the west coast of the Taiwan Strait

Fig.7 Change of coupling and coordination degree of "economic-social-ecological environment" benefits of urban land use in urban agglomeration on the west coast of the Taiwan Strait

Tab.3 Classification of restrictive factors in the coupling and coordination relationship of "economic- social- ecological" benefits of urban land use in urban agglomeration on the west coast of the Taiwan Strait

类型划分	影响因素	分类依据	2016年包含的城市
单一因素影响型	经济效益滞后	$u 1 < u ¯ 1, u 2 > u ¯ 2, u 3 > u ¯ 3$	厦门市、泉州市
	社会效益滞后	$u 1 > u ¯ 1, u 2 < u ¯, 2 u 3 > u ¯ 3$	漳州市
	生态环境效益滞后	$u 1 > u ¯ 1, u 2 > u ¯ 2, u 3 < u ¯ 3$	福州市、温州市
复合因素影响型	经济社会效益滞后	$u 1 < u ¯ 1, u 2 < u ¯ 2, u 3 > u ¯ 3$	抚州市、梅州市、鹰潭市、汕头市
	经济生态效益滞后	$u 1 < u ¯ 1, u 2 > u ¯ 2, u 3 < u ¯ 3$	衢州市、丽水市
	社会生态效益滞后	$u > 1 u ¯ 1, u 2 < u ¯ 2, u 3 < u ¯ 3$	龙岩市、三明市、南平市、宁德市
	全面滞后	$u 1 < u ¯ 1, u 2 < u ¯ 2, u 3 < u ¯ 3$	上饶市、潮州市、揭阳市、赣州市

类型划分	影响因素	分类依据	2016年包含的城市
单一因素影响型	经济效益滞后	$u 1 < u ¯ 1, u 2 > u ¯ 2, u 3 > u ¯ 3$	厦门市、泉州市
	社会效益滞后	$u 1 > u ¯ 1, u 2 < u ¯, 2 u 3 > u ¯ 3$	漳州市
	生态环境效益滞后	$u 1 > u ¯ 1, u 2 > u ¯ 2, u 3 < u ¯ 3$	福州市、温州市
复合因素影响型	经济社会效益滞后	$u 1 < u ¯ 1, u 2 < u ¯ 2, u 3 > u ¯ 3$	抚州市、梅州市、鹰潭市、汕头市
	经济生态效益滞后	$u 1 < u ¯ 1, u 2 > u ¯ 2, u 3 < u ¯ 3$	衢州市、丽水市
	社会生态效益滞后	$u > 1 u ¯ 1, u 2 < u ¯ 2, u 3 < u ¯ 3$	龙岩市、三明市、南平市、宁德市
	全面滞后	$u 1 < u ¯ 1, u 2 < u ¯ 2, u 3 < u ¯ 3$	上饶市、潮州市、揭阳市、赣州市

References 27

1	张荣天,焦华富.泛长三角城市土地利用效益测度及时空格局演化.地理与地理信息科学,2014,30(6):75-81.
	Zhang R, Jiao H. Measurement of urban land use efficiency and evolution of spatial and temporal pattern in the Pan-Yangtze River Delta. Geography and geographic information science,2014,30(6):75-81.
2	Walter C.,Stützel H. A new method for assessing the sustainability of land-use systems(ii): evaluating impact indicators. Ecol. Econ. 2009,68 (5): 1288-1300.
3	花莉,张成,马宏瑞,等.秸秆生物质炭土地利用的环境效益研究.生态环境学报,2010,19(10):2489-2492.
	Hua L, Zhang C, Ma H, et al. Environmental benefits of land use of straw biomass charcoal. Journal of Ecological Environment, 2010, 19(10): 2489-2492.
4	Adriaan van Niekerk. A comparison of land unit delineation techniques for land evaluation in the Western Cape, South Africa. Land Use Policy,2010,27(3):937-945.
5	李灿,张凤荣,朱泰峰,等.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析.农业工程学报,2013,29(5):217-227.
	Li C Zhang F, Zhu T, et al. Land use performance Evaluation and correlation analysis based on entropy Weight TOPSIS model. Journal of agricultural engineering, 2013,29(5):217-227.
6	杨俊,王占岐,金贵,等.基于AHP与模糊综合评价的土地整治项目实施后效益评价.长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(8):1036-1042.
	Yang J, Wang Z, Jin G, et al. Based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of land remediation project after the implementation of the benefit evaluation. Resources and environment of the Yangtze river basin,2013,22(8):1036-1042.
7	武文豪,李玉恒,刘彦随.黄骅市围填海造地与城市土地利用效益耦合测度.地域研究与开发,2018,37(1):143-147+169.
	Wu W, Li Y, Liu Y. Coupling measurement of land reclamation and urban land use efficiency in Huanghua City. Regional Research and Development, 2016,37(1):143-147+169.
8	雷勋平,Robin Qiu,刘勇.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断.农业工程学报,2016,32(13):243-253.
	Lei X, Robin Q, Liu Y. Regional Land use performance evaluation and obstacle factor diagnosis based on entropy weight TOPSIS model. Journal of agricultural engineering,2016,32(13):243-253.
9	宋成舜,谈兵,韩冰华,等.基于变异系数TOPSIS法的土地利用效益测度研究——以武汉城市圈为例.水土保持研究,2015,22(1):286-291.
	Song C, Tan B, Han B, et al. Study on land use efficiency measurement based on variation coefficient TOPSIS Method -- A case study of Wuhan Urban Circle. Soil and water conservation research,2015,22(1):286-291.
10	韩璐,谢俊奇.小波神经网络在土地利用效益分析中的应用——以兰州市为例.资源科学,2011,33(1):153-157.
	Han L, Xie J. Application of wavelet neural network in land use benefit analysis -- A case study of Lanzhou city. Resource science,2011,33(1):153-157.
11	Kazemi Hossein, Akinci Halil. A land use suitability model for rainfed farming by Multi-criteria Decision-making Analysis (MCDA) and Geographic Information System (GIS). Ecological Engineering,2018,116.
12	白硕,杨永春,史坤博,等.中国西部河谷型城市土地利用效益与城市化耦合协调发展研究.世界地理研究,2016,25(6):87-95.
	Bai S, Yang Y, Shi K, et al. Research on the coupling and coordinated development of land use benefit and urbanization in valley cities in western China. World geography research,2016,25(6):87-95.
13	唐杰.基于耦合协调度的土地利用经济效益空间差异分析.世界农业,2018(5):182-188.
	Tang J. Spatial difference analysis of land use economic benefits based on coupling coordination degree. World Agriculture,2018(5):182-188.
14	梁红梅,刘卫东,刘会平,等.深圳市土地利用社会经济效益与生态环境效益的耦合关系研究.地理科学,2008(5):636-641.
	Liang H, Liu W, Liu H, et al. Study on the Coupling relationship between social economic benefit and ecological environment benefit of Land use in Shenzhen city. Geographic Sciences,2008(5):636-641.
15	许承琪,徐海鹏,金少红,等.藏南农牧交错带农牧互作模式下土地利用效益耦合度分析.草业学报,2018,27(10):194-203.
	Xu C, Xu H, Jin S, et al. Coupling degree analysis of land use benefit under the mode of farming-pastoral interaction in the farming-pastoral ecotone of South Tibet. Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2012,27(10):194-203.
16	杨清可,段学军,李平星等.江苏省土地开发度与利用效益的空间特征及协调分析.地理科学,2017,37(11):1696-1704.
	Yang Q, Duan X, Li P, et al. Spatial characteristics and coordination analysis of land development degree and utilization efficiency in Jiangsu Province. Geography Science, 2017,37(11):1696-1704.
17	朱文娟,孙华.2000～2015年苏州市土地利用效益动态测度及障碍追踪分析.土壤通报,2019,50(2):290-297.
	Zhu W, Sun H. Dynamic Measurement and Obstacle Tracking Analysis of Land use benefits in Suzhou from 2000 to 2015. Soil bulletin,2019,50(2):290-297.
18	田俊峰,王彬燕,王士君.东北三省城市土地利用效益评价及耦合协调关系研究.地理科学,2019,39(2):305-315.
	Tian J, Wang B, Wang S. Study on urban land Use Benefit Evaluation and Coupling Coordination in three provinces of Northeast China. Geographic sciences,2019,39(2):305-315.
19	李佳欣,杨庆媛.长江经济带2005—2015年土地利用效益及耦合协调发展.江苏农业科学,2019,47(3):319-326.
	Li J, Yang Q. The coordinated development of land use efficiency and coupling in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2005 to 2015. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019,47(3):319-326.
20	史进,黄志基,贺灿飞,等.中国城市群土地利用效益综合评价研究.经济地理,2013,33(2):76-81.
	Shi J, Huang Z, He C, et al. Study on the comprehensive evaluation of land use efficiency in Chinese urban agglomerations. Economic geography,2013,33(2):76-81.
21	齐昕,林木西.城市群协调发展中金融潜能的同域影响与溢出效应研究——基于中国十大城市群的实证数据.武汉金融,2018(7):59-64.
	Qi X, Lin X. Research on co-regional influence and spillover effect of financial potential in coordinated development of urban agglomerations -- Based on empirical data of China's Ten Urban Agglomerations. Wuhan Finance,2018(7):59-64.
22	彭建,蒋依依,李正国,等.快速城市化地区土地利用效益评价——以南京市江宁区为例.长江流域资源与环境,2005(3):304-309.
	Peng J, Jiang Y, Li Z, et al. Evaluation of land use efficiency in rapidly urbanized areas -- A case study of Jiangning District, Nanjing City. Resources and Environment of the Yangtze River Basin, 2005(3):304-309.
23	杨万钟.经济地理学导论.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2004.
	Yang W. Introduction to economic geography. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press,2004.
24	龚天平.环境保护如何进入经济伦理.伦理学研究,2013(4):84-89.
	Gong P. How environmental protection enters into economic ethics. Ethics Research,2013(4):84-89.
25	刘耀彬,李仁东,宋学锋.中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析.自然资源学报,2005(1):105-112.
	Liu Y, Li R, Song X. Analysis of coupling degree between urbanization and ecological environment in China. Journal of Natural Resources,2005(1):105-112.
26	Illingworth Valerie. The penguin dictionary of physics. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1996:92-93.
27	王虎成,王月红,何天祥.城市群外向型经济发展水平评价模型.湖南商学院学报,2013,20(1):15-18.
	Wang H, Wang Y, He T. Evaluation model of export-oriented economy development level in urban agglomeration. Journal of Hunan College Of Commerce,2013,20(1):15-18.

[1]	Jingya XU, Zhouying SONG. The evolution of China's mobile phone export trade pattern and its influencing factors [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(3): 17-27.
[2]	Xiang ZHANG, Chenjiao MA, Xia DONG, Zhaohui WANG, Xingming LI. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of international chain hotels' transnational expansion: A case study of Marriott Hotel Group [J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(1): 31-42.
[3]	Hong ZHANG, Wen DENG, Yi WANG. Analyses on the spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of land use in India during 2000—2020 [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(4): 786-799.
[4]	Xibo WU, Fengyu CHENG, Gusong LUO. Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of car markets along the Belt and Road， 2005-2017 [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(4): 814-824.
[5]	Gang XIAO. Spatio-temporal pattern of the city-level differences of tourism innovation in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(4): 825-833.
[6]	Pingping HU, Youde WU, Cansong LI. Spatial-temporal differentiation and development trend of political conflict in Myanmar since democratic reform [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(4): 675-685.