Abstract:

Based on the global patent cooperation data in WIPO database, we construct global science and technology innovation network of Shanghai from 2010 to 2019 and the global science and technology innovation network of 32 first level science and technology cities in the world in 2019. On this basis, we use social network analysis and functional polycentric iterative analysis to explore the evolution and status of Shanghai's participation in global science and technology cooperation. The results show that: in the past 10 years, Shanghai has played a relatively important role in the global science and technology innovation network, but it has not improved its position in the science and technology innovation network to a great extent. Among the 32 cities in the world, Shanghai ranks the sixth in the strength of innovation connection, and the first in the breadth of innovation connection. At present, the science and technology innovation connection between Shanghai and other cities can be characterized as wide diversity but not in-depth. Ranking the 32 cities through polycentric iterative analysis, we can find that the innovation status of each city in the global science and technology innovation local network is characterized by polycentricity high-low distribution; Shanghai, London and Rotterdam are in the third level; among the top six cities in the innovation strength connection, Shanghai has become "marginal", and there is a big gap between Shanghai and the top five cities.

Key words: Shanghai, science and technology innovation network, social network analysis, functional polycentricity, WIPO

摘要：

基于WIPO数据库中全球专利合作数据，构建2010—2019年上海参与全球科技创新网络以及2019年全球32个第一等级科技型城市间的科技创新网络；并在此基础上运用社会网络分析、功能多中心迭代分析，探究上海参与全球科技合作的地位。研究发现：10年间上海在全球科技创新网络中已经扮演了相对重要的角色，但并未明显提升自身在科技创新网络中的地位。上海在全球32个城市创新联系强度排名第六，在创新联系广度上排名第一，上海现阶段与其他城市间的科技创新联系表现为广泛多元而不深入的特点。通过功能多中心迭代分析对32个城市进行分级，可以发现网络中各城市的创新地位表现为多中心高低分布特点；上海与伦敦、鹿特丹的地位相当，位于第三等级；在创新联系强度排名前6名的城市中已属于“边缘型”，与前5名城市的科技创新联系强度存在较大差距。

关键词: 上海, 科技创新网络, 社会网络分析, 功能多中心, WIPO