

World Regional Studies ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 173-187.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2025.12.20240330
Received:2024-05-24
Revised:2024-09-14
Online:2025-12-15
Published:2025-12-23
Contact:
Guoxin TAN
通讯作者:
谈国新
作者简介:赵静(1986—),女,讲师,博士,研究方向为文化遗产保护与更新,E-mail:zhaojing_zjb@163.com。
基金资助:Jing ZHAO, Guoxin TAN. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of coupled synergies between cultural resource advantages and recreational development vitality in Northwest Yunnan Province[J]. World Regional Studies, 2025, 34(12): 173-187.
赵静, 谈国新. 滇西北文化资源优势与游憩发展活力耦合协同性的空间分异及影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(12): 173-187.
| 子系统 | 准则层 | 指标层 | 权重 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 文化资源集聚 | 非物质文化资源集聚 | 非物质文化遗产集聚度指数 | 0.395 4 |
| 物质文化资源集聚 | 历史文化名城名镇名村集聚度指数 国家级文保单位集聚度指数 博物馆集聚度指数 传统村落集聚度指数 | 0.117 8 0.065 0 0.055 6 0.366 2 | |
| 游憩发展活力 | 游憩资源禀赋优势 | 高等级景区数量 | 0.104 3 |
| 游憩设施规模 | 风景名胜区POI数量 休闲服务设施POI数量 | 0.181 9 0.181 9 | |
| 游憩接待水平 | 住宿设施POI数量 | 0.251 8 | |
| 游憩吸引力 | 旅游接待总人次 旅游总收入 | 0.139 0 0.141 2 |
Tab.1 Comprehensive indicator system for cultural resource advantage and recreation development vitality
| 子系统 | 准则层 | 指标层 | 权重 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 文化资源集聚 | 非物质文化资源集聚 | 非物质文化遗产集聚度指数 | 0.395 4 |
| 物质文化资源集聚 | 历史文化名城名镇名村集聚度指数 国家级文保单位集聚度指数 博物馆集聚度指数 传统村落集聚度指数 | 0.117 8 0.065 0 0.055 6 0.366 2 | |
| 游憩发展活力 | 游憩资源禀赋优势 | 高等级景区数量 | 0.104 3 |
| 游憩设施规模 | 风景名胜区POI数量 休闲服务设施POI数量 | 0.181 9 0.181 9 | |
| 游憩接待水平 | 住宿设施POI数量 | 0.251 8 | |
| 游憩吸引力 | 旅游接待总人次 旅游总收入 | 0.139 0 0.141 2 |
| D值 | 协调等级 | 类别 |
|---|---|---|
| (0.0~0.1) | 极度失调 | 失调衰退 |
| [0.1~0.2) | 严重失调 | |
| [0.2~0.3) | 中度失调 | |
| [0.3~0.4) | 轻度失调 | |
| [0.4~0.5) | 濒临失调 | 过度发展 |
| [0.5~0.6) | 勉强协调 | |
| [0.6~0.7) | 初级协调 | 协调发展 |
| [0.7~0.8) | 中级协调 | |
| [0.8~0.9) | 良好协调 | |
| [0.9~1.0) | 优质协调 |
Tab.2 Coupling harmonization levels and categories
| D值 | 协调等级 | 类别 |
|---|---|---|
| (0.0~0.1) | 极度失调 | 失调衰退 |
| [0.1~0.2) | 严重失调 | |
| [0.2~0.3) | 中度失调 | |
| [0.3~0.4) | 轻度失调 | |
| [0.4~0.5) | 濒临失调 | 过度发展 |
| [0.5~0.6) | 勉强协调 | |
| [0.6~0.7) | 初级协调 | 协调发展 |
| [0.7~0.8) | 中级协调 | |
| [0.8~0.9) | 良好协调 | |
| [0.9~1.0) | 优质协调 |
| 相对发展度 | 类型 | 类型说明 |
|---|---|---|
| 0<P<0.7 | Ⅰa(严重滞后) | 区域文化资源要素集聚程度滞后于区域内游憩发展活力,说明文化资源匮乏或发掘程度不足,文旅融合需要优先解决文化资源的集聚优势问题 |
| 0.7≤P<1 | Ⅰb(轻度滞后) | |
| 1≤P<2 | Ⅱ(同步) | 区域文化资源要素集聚与区域游憩发展活力同步,说明区域内具备文旅融合的基底优势,需重点关注二者的耦合协调关系 |
| 2≤P<3 | Ⅲa(轻度超前) | 文化资源集聚程度优先于区域游憩发展活力水平,说明区域文化资源丰沛且挖掘充分,但是区域游憩的整体发展水平有待改善,游憩优势未能对文化资源的创造性转化提供触发动能 |
| P≥3 | Ⅲb(绝对超前) |
Tab.3 Relative priority grading and type
| 相对发展度 | 类型 | 类型说明 |
|---|---|---|
| 0<P<0.7 | Ⅰa(严重滞后) | 区域文化资源要素集聚程度滞后于区域内游憩发展活力,说明文化资源匮乏或发掘程度不足,文旅融合需要优先解决文化资源的集聚优势问题 |
| 0.7≤P<1 | Ⅰb(轻度滞后) | |
| 1≤P<2 | Ⅱ(同步) | 区域文化资源要素集聚与区域游憩发展活力同步,说明区域内具备文旅融合的基底优势,需重点关注二者的耦合协调关系 |
| 2≤P<3 | Ⅲa(轻度超前) | 文化资源集聚程度优先于区域游憩发展活力水平,说明区域文化资源丰沛且挖掘充分,但是区域游憩的整体发展水平有待改善,游憩优势未能对文化资源的创造性转化提供触发动能 |
| P≥3 | Ⅲb(绝对超前) |
| 文化资源 | Z | P | 分布类型 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 非遗 | 1 753.2 | 5 769.4 | 0.303 8 | -33.97 | 0.000*** | 集聚 |
| 传统村落 | 7 102.2 | 10 086.3 | 0.704 1 | -8.26 | 0.000*** | 集聚 |
| 文保单位 | 10 583.7 | 20 818.1 | 0.508 3 | -6.65 | 0.000*** | 集聚 |
| 博物馆 | 90 065.2 | 27 819.3 | 3.237 5 | 22.65 | 0.000*** | 离散 |
| 历史文化名城名镇名村 | 39 528.7 | 42 494.7 | 0.93 | -0.46 | 0.64 | 随机均匀 |
| 5类文化资源 | 1 641.4 | 4 765.9 | 0.344 4 | -38.73 | 0.000*** | 集聚 |
Tab.4 Nearest neighbor index and distribution type of cultural resources
| 文化资源 | Z | P | 分布类型 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 非遗 | 1 753.2 | 5 769.4 | 0.303 8 | -33.97 | 0.000*** | 集聚 |
| 传统村落 | 7 102.2 | 10 086.3 | 0.704 1 | -8.26 | 0.000*** | 集聚 |
| 文保单位 | 10 583.7 | 20 818.1 | 0.508 3 | -6.65 | 0.000*** | 集聚 |
| 博物馆 | 90 065.2 | 27 819.3 | 3.237 5 | 22.65 | 0.000*** | 离散 |
| 历史文化名城名镇名村 | 39 528.7 | 42 494.7 | 0.93 | -0.46 | 0.64 | 随机均匀 |
| 5类文化资源 | 1 641.4 | 4 765.9 | 0.344 4 | -38.73 | 0.000*** | 集聚 |
| 名称 | 发展优先度 | 相对发展类型 | 耦合协调度D | 状态 | 名称 | 发展优先度 | 相对发展类型 | 耦合协调度D | 状态 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 古城区 | 1.602 | 同步 | 0.869 | 良好协调 | 永平县 | 6.074 | 绝对超前 | 0.266 | 中度失调 |
| 玉龙纳西族自治县 | 0.622 | 严重滞后 | 0.492 | 濒临失调 | 云龙县 | 6.827 | 绝对超前 | 0.268 | 中度失调 |
| 永胜县 | 0.687 | 严重滞后 | 0.352 | 轻度失调 | 洱源县 | 3.048 | 绝对超前 | 0.330 | 轻度失调 |
| 华坪县 | 0.351 | 严重滞后 | 0.144 | 严重失调 | 剑川县 | 9.833 | 绝对超前 | 0.465 | 濒临失调 |
| 宁蒗彝族自治县 | 0.848 | 轻度滞后 | 0.289 | 中度失调 | 鹤庆县 | 3.718 | 绝对超前 | 0.331 | 轻度失调 |
| 大理市 | 0.784 | 轻度滞后 | 0.953 | 优质协调 | 泸水市 | 1.121 | 同步 | 0.256 | 中度失调 |
| 漾濞彝族自治县 | 8.438 | 绝对超前 | 0.214 | 中度失调 | 福贡县 | 5.485 | 绝对超前 | 0.138 | 严重失调 |
| 祥云县 | 3.615 | 绝对超前 | 0.374 | 轻度失调 | 贡山独龙族怒族自治县 | 1.204 | 同步 | 0.209 | 中度失调 |
| 宾川县 | 3.321 | 绝对超前 | 0.415 | 濒临失调 | 兰坪白族普米族自治县 | 0.965 | 轻度滞后 | 0.169 | 严重失调 |
| 弥渡县 | 10.636 | 绝对超前 | 0.387 | 轻度失调 | 香格里拉市 | 0.366 | 严重滞后 | 0.434 | 濒临失调 |
| 南涧彝族自治县 | 7.274 | 绝对超前 | 0.313 | 轻度失调 | 德钦县 | 2.074 | 轻度超前 | 0.254 | 中度失调 |
| 巍山彝族回族自治县 | 12.093 | 绝对超前 | 0.415 | 濒临失调 | 维西傈僳族自治县 | 2.982 | 轻度超前 | 0.286 | 中度失调 |
Tab.5 Measurement results of relative development degree and coupling coordination degree in Northwest Yunnan province
| 名称 | 发展优先度 | 相对发展类型 | 耦合协调度D | 状态 | 名称 | 发展优先度 | 相对发展类型 | 耦合协调度D | 状态 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 古城区 | 1.602 | 同步 | 0.869 | 良好协调 | 永平县 | 6.074 | 绝对超前 | 0.266 | 中度失调 |
| 玉龙纳西族自治县 | 0.622 | 严重滞后 | 0.492 | 濒临失调 | 云龙县 | 6.827 | 绝对超前 | 0.268 | 中度失调 |
| 永胜县 | 0.687 | 严重滞后 | 0.352 | 轻度失调 | 洱源县 | 3.048 | 绝对超前 | 0.330 | 轻度失调 |
| 华坪县 | 0.351 | 严重滞后 | 0.144 | 严重失调 | 剑川县 | 9.833 | 绝对超前 | 0.465 | 濒临失调 |
| 宁蒗彝族自治县 | 0.848 | 轻度滞后 | 0.289 | 中度失调 | 鹤庆县 | 3.718 | 绝对超前 | 0.331 | 轻度失调 |
| 大理市 | 0.784 | 轻度滞后 | 0.953 | 优质协调 | 泸水市 | 1.121 | 同步 | 0.256 | 中度失调 |
| 漾濞彝族自治县 | 8.438 | 绝对超前 | 0.214 | 中度失调 | 福贡县 | 5.485 | 绝对超前 | 0.138 | 严重失调 |
| 祥云县 | 3.615 | 绝对超前 | 0.374 | 轻度失调 | 贡山独龙族怒族自治县 | 1.204 | 同步 | 0.209 | 中度失调 |
| 宾川县 | 3.321 | 绝对超前 | 0.415 | 濒临失调 | 兰坪白族普米族自治县 | 0.965 | 轻度滞后 | 0.169 | 严重失调 |
| 弥渡县 | 10.636 | 绝对超前 | 0.387 | 轻度失调 | 香格里拉市 | 0.366 | 严重滞后 | 0.434 | 濒临失调 |
| 南涧彝族自治县 | 7.274 | 绝对超前 | 0.313 | 轻度失调 | 德钦县 | 2.074 | 轻度超前 | 0.254 | 中度失调 |
| 巍山彝族回族自治县 | 12.093 | 绝对超前 | 0.415 | 濒临失调 | 维西傈僳族自治县 | 2.982 | 轻度超前 | 0.286 | 中度失调 |
Fig.4 Spatial distribution of the coupled coordination degree of cultural resource aggregation and recreation development dynamics in counties of northwest Yunnan province
| 一级指标 | 二级指标 | 变量 | 单位 | q值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发展生境适宜性 | 适游期 | X1 | 天 | 0.127 |
| 平均海拔 | X2 | m | 0.085 | |
| 地形起伏度 | X3 | | 0.300 | |
| NDVI | X4 | 无量纲 | 0.411* | |
| 水网密度 | X5 | km/km2 | 0.356 | |
| 森林覆盖率 | X6 | % | 0.242 3 | |
| 可达性 | OD成本时间 | X7 | 分钟 | 0.567*** |
| 公路里程数 | X8 | km | 0.345 9 | |
| 路网密度 | X9 | km/km2 | 0.235 4 | |
| 社会经济发展程度 | 县域GDP | X10 | 万元 | 0.475 8** |
| 人口密度 | X11 | 人/ km2 | 0.440 9* | |
| 县级财政收入 | X12 | 万元 | 0.497 6** | |
| 县级财政支出 | X13 | 万元 | 0.236 0 | |
| 县域城镇化 | X14 | % | 0.394 2* | |
| 城镇可支配收入 | X15 | 万元 | 0.386 7* | |
| 农村可支配收入 | X16 | 万元 | 0.573 4*** |
Tab.6 Impact factor detection results
| 一级指标 | 二级指标 | 变量 | 单位 | q值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 发展生境适宜性 | 适游期 | X1 | 天 | 0.127 |
| 平均海拔 | X2 | m | 0.085 | |
| 地形起伏度 | X3 | | 0.300 | |
| NDVI | X4 | 无量纲 | 0.411* | |
| 水网密度 | X5 | km/km2 | 0.356 | |
| 森林覆盖率 | X6 | % | 0.242 3 | |
| 可达性 | OD成本时间 | X7 | 分钟 | 0.567*** |
| 公路里程数 | X8 | km | 0.345 9 | |
| 路网密度 | X9 | km/km2 | 0.235 4 | |
| 社会经济发展程度 | 县域GDP | X10 | 万元 | 0.475 8** |
| 人口密度 | X11 | 人/ km2 | 0.440 9* | |
| 县级财政收入 | X12 | 万元 | 0.497 6** | |
| 县级财政支出 | X13 | 万元 | 0.236 0 | |
| 县域城镇化 | X14 | % | 0.394 2* | |
| 城镇可支配收入 | X15 | 万元 | 0.386 7* | |
| 农村可支配收入 | X16 | 万元 | 0.573 4*** |
| [1] | 龙云, 江金波, 徐强, 等. 文旅融合政策创新体系研究——基于中央政策文本的"主体-路径-工具"三维框架分析. 旅游学刊, 2024,39(05): 31-44. |
| LONG Y, JIANG J, XU Q, et al. Research on the policy innovation system of cultural and tourism integration in China: A three-dimensional framework analysis based on central policy texts on subjects, paths, and tools. Tourism Tribune, 2024, 39(05): 31-44. | |
| [2] | 范周.中国文化产业和旅游业发展报告:2022年总结及2023年趋势.深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,40(02):47-57. |
| FAN Z. Report on the development of China's cultural industry and tourism:The summary of 2022 and tendency of 2023. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences), 2023,40(02):47-57. | |
| [3] | 王兆峰, 谢佳亮. 中国文化和旅游融合发展效率时空动态演化及其驱动机制. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(1): 34-51. |
| WANG Z, XIE J. Spatiotemporal dynamic evolution of the cultural tourism integration development efficiency and its driving mechanism in China .Tourism Tribune, 2024, 39(1): 34-51. | |
| [4] | 戴斌.文旅融合新动能与旅游经济未来方向.人民论坛,2024(11):62-67. |
| DAI B. New dynamics of culture and tourism integration and future direction of tourism economy. People's Forum,2024(11):62-67. | |
| [5] | 化祥雨, 金祥荣, 吕海萍, 等. 高质量发展耦合协调时空格局演化及影响因素:以浙江省县域为例.地理科学,2021,41(2):223-231. |
| HUA X, JIN X, Lyu H, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern evolution and influencing factors of high quality development coupling coordination: Case on counties of Zhejiang province.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2021,41(2):223-231. | |
| [6] | 王镜, 邱爽, 张又萍, 等.基于要素、效应、环境的区域文旅融合发展评价与类型划分——以河南省为例.经济地理,2024,44(04):201-209. |
| WANG J, QIU S, ZHANG Y,et al. Integrated development of culture and tourism in Henan province based on the element, effect and environment system. ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, ,2024,44(04):201-209. | |
| [7] | 黄震方, 张子昂, 李涛, 等.数字赋能文旅深度融合的理论逻辑与研究框架.旅游科学,2024,38(01):1-16. |
| HUANG Z, ZHANG Z, LI T, al et,Digital empowerment for the deep integration of culture and tourism :Theoretical logic and research framework. Tourism Science, 2024,38(01):1-16. | |
| [8] | RICHARDS G.Cultural tourism: A review of recent research and trends.Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management,2018,36:12-21. |
| [9] | SHAWABKEH R AL, ALHADDAD M, FUGARA A AL,et al.Toward sustainable urban growth: Spatial modeling for the impact of cultural and natural heritage on city growth and their role in developing sustainable tourism.Alexandria Engineering Journal,2023,69:639-676. |
| [10] | LIU Z, WANG A, WEBER K,et al.Categorisation of cultural tourism attractions by tourist preference using location-based social network data: The case of Central, Hong Kong.Tourism Management,2022,90:104488. |
| [11] | LEE C, AHMAD M S, PETRICK J F,et al.The roles of cultural worldview and authenticity in tourists' decision-making process in a heritage tourism destination using a model of goal-directed behavior.Journal of Destination Marketing & Management,2020,18:100500. |
| [12] | MOORE K, BUCHMANN A, MÅNSSON M,et al.Authenticity in tourism theory and experience. Practically indispensable and theoretically mischievous?.Annals of Tourism Research,2021,89:103208. |
| [13] | GRAVAGNUOLO A, ANGRISANO M, BOSONE M,et al.Participatory evaluation of cultural heritage adaptive reuse interventions in the circular economy perspective: A case study of historic buildings in Salerno (Italy).Journal of Urban Management,2024,13(1):107-139. |
| [14] | LI H, KINOSHITA T, CHEN J,et al.What promotes residents' donation behavior for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage projects? An application of the extended theory of planned behavior.Sustainable Cities and Society,2024,102:105213. |
| [15] | LI S, ZHANG P, WOOD E.Familiarity and novelty in aesthetic appreciation: The case of intangible cultural heritage in China.Annals of Tourism Research,2024,105:103696. |
| [16] | 郭鹏飞,李积普,杨璐,等. 福建沿海"海丝"文化旅游资源空间结构与开发潜力分析. 世界地理研究,2022,31(1):214-224. |
| GUO P, LI J, YANG L,et al.Analysis of spatial structure and development potential of cultural tourism resources on Maritime Silk Road in Fujian coastal area.World Regional Studies,2022,31(1):214-224. | |
| [17] | 于秋阳, 王倩, 颜鑫.长三角城市群文旅融合:耦合协调、时空演进与发展路径研究.华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,54(02):159-172. |
| YU Q, WANG Q, YUAN X. Integration between culture and tourism of the city cluster in the Yangtze River Delta:On coupling coordination,time-spatial evolution and development path. Journal Of East China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2022,54(02):159-172. | |
| [18] | 翁钢民, 李凌雁.中国旅游与文化产业融合发展的耦合协调度及空间相关分析.经济地理,2016,36(01):178-185. |
| WENG G, LI L. The coupling coordination degree and spatial correlation analysis on integrational development of tourism industry and cultural industry in China. Economic Geography, 2016,36(01):178-185. | |
| [19] | 董文静, 王昌森, 张震.中国文化产业与旅游产业耦合发展的时空演化及空间关联格局.西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,43(03):23-33. |
| DONG W, WANG C, ZHANG Z. Spatial and temporal evolution and spatial correlation pattern of the coupled development of cultural industry and tourism industry in China. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2022,43(03):23-33. | |
| [20] | 王克岭, 谭心, 何洁丽.空间视角下传统村落与非物质文化遗产联通格局及整合策略-以金沙江流域为例.世界地理研究,2024,33(12):163-175. |
| WANG K, TAN X, HE J. The interconnection pattern and integration strategy of traditional villages and intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of space-taking Jinsha River Basin as an example. World Regional Studies,2024,33(12):163-175. | |
| [21] | 贺一雄, 郝丽莎, 李瑞.江苏省古迹文化旅游的文旅融合发展特征分析——基于旅游景观的三维融合测度视角.地理与地理信息科学,2023,39(01):136-144. |
| HE Y, HAO L, LI R. Development characteristics of culture-tourism integration for cultural tourism of historic sites in Jiangsu province: From the perspective of three-dimension integration measurement of tourism landscape geography and geo-information science. 2023,39(01):136-144. | |
| [22] | 张新成, 高楠, 王琳艳.中国文化和旅游产业融合质量的时空演化特征及形成机制研究.统计与决策,2023,39(07):96-100. |
| ZHANG X, GAO N, WANG L. Research on the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and formation mechanism of the integration quality of culture and tourism industries in China. Statistics and Decision Making,2023,39(07):96-100 | |
| [23] | 张新成, 高楠, 王琳艳, 等.文化和旅游产业融合质量的时空动态、驱动机制及培育路径.旅游科学,2023,37(01):22. |
| ZHANG X, GAO N, WANG L, SONG X. Temporal and Spatial Dynamics,Driving Mechanism and Cultivation Path of the Integrated Quality of Culture and Tourism Industry. Tourism Science, 2023,37(01):22. | |
| [24] | 侯兵, 杨君, 余凤龙.面向高质量发展的文化和旅游深度融合:内涵、动因与机制.商业经济与管理,2020(10):86-96. |
| HOU B, YANG J, YU F. Deep integration of culture and tourism for high-quality development: connotation, motivation and mechanism. Business Economics and Management,2020(10):86-96. | |
| [25] | 岳菊, 戴湘毅.区域文化遗产与旅游发展耦合机制及协调效应——基于京津冀地区的实证分析.经济地理,2024,44(01):230-240. |
| YUE J, DAI X. Coupling mechanism and coordination effect between regional cultural heritage and tourism development: An empirical study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. Economic Geography, 2024,44(01):230-240. | |
| [26] | 迪庆概况|迪庆藏族自治州人民政府.http://www.diqing.gov.cn/dqgk.html,2024-07-13. |
| Overview of Diqing|Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture People's Government. http://www.diqing.gov.cn/dqgk.html,2024-07-13 . | |
| [27] | 怒江概况 - 怒江傈僳族自治州人民政府.https://www.nujiang.gov.cn/html/njgk/,2024-07-13. |
| Overview of Nujiang - Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture People's Government. https://www.nujiang.gov.cn/html/njgk/,2024-07-13 . | |
| [28] | 程慧, 徐琼, 郭尧琦.我国旅游资源开发与生态环境耦合协调发展的时空演变.经济地理,2019,39(7):233-240. |
| CHENG H, XU Q, GUO Y. Temporal and spatial evolution of the coupling coordinated development between tourism resources development and ecological environment in China. Economic Geography, 2019,39(7):233-240. | |
| [29] | 孔雪松, 府梦雪, 江平.中国特色乡村空间格局与旅游空间协同优化分区.地理学报,2023,78(10):2554-2573. |
| KONG X, FU M, JIANG P. Spatial pattern and optimization zoning of characteristic villages based on tourism space in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023,78(10):2554-2573. | |
| [30] | 李明峰, 李文明, 李鹏鹏.少数民族特色村寨保护与旅游发展的耦合协调演化——以福建省华安县官畲村为例.地域研究与开发,2023,42(05):107-111. |
| LI M, LI W, LI P. Coupling influencing factors: Empirical test based on provincial panel data, Areal Research and Development, 2023,42(05):107-111. | |
| [31] | 柴寿升,张雪唱,单军. 城市旅游化与交通资源协同发展水平测度及演化特征.中国人口·资源与环境,2023,33(10):175-186. |
| CHAI S S, ZHANG X C, SHAN J. Measurement and evolution characteristics of the synergistic development of urban tourismification and transportation resources. China population,resources and environment,2023,33(10):175-186. | |
| [32] | 王邵军, 李晓冰.黄河流域高质量发展目标下非物质文化遗产与旅游业耦合协调发展研究——以山东省沿黄九市为例.东岳论丛,2023(11):132-147. |
| WANG S, LI X. Research on the coupled and coordinated development of intangible cultural heritage and tourism underhigh-quality development of the Yellow River Basin——Taking the nine cities along the Yellow River in Shandong province as an example. Dong Yue Tribune, 2023(11):132-147. | |
| [33] | 冉钊, 高建华, 杨捷, 等.中国商业健身资源集聚的格局演化及其形成机理.地理学报,2023,78(06):1573-1590. |
| RAN Z, GAO J, YANG J, et al. Evolution and formation mechanism of the agglomeration pattern of commercial fitness resources in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023,78(06):1573-1590. | |
| [34] | 陈鑫,周加贝,廖远涛,等. 长三角地区碳排放-城市高质量发展水平耦合协调演变及影响因素分析. 世界地理研究,2024,33(3):103-115. |
| CHEN X, ZHOU J, LIAO Y, et al.Coupling evolution and influencing factors of carbon emissions-urban high quality development level in Yangtze River Delta.World Regional Studies,2024,33(3):103-115. | |
| [35] | 王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正.自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810. |
| WANG S, KONG W, REN L, et al. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China Journal of Natural Resources, 2021,36(3):793-810. | |
| [36] | 廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系——以珠江三角洲城市群为例.热带地理,1999(02):76-82. |
| LIAO C. Quantitaitve judgement and classification system for coordinated development of environment amd economy——A case study of the city group in the pearl river delta. Tropical Geography, 1999(02):76-82. | |
| [37] | 王劲峰, 徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望.地理学报,2017,72(01):116-134. |
| WANG J, XU C. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(01):116-134. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
