

世界地理研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 48-59.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2026.04.20241110
收稿日期:2024-12-16
修回日期:2025-05-12
出版日期:2026-04-15
发布日期:2026-04-29
通讯作者:
贺灿飞
作者简介:管仲(1999—),男,硕士,研究方向为经济地理、能源经济,E-mail:gz12080124@126.com。
基金资助:
Zhong GUAN1(
), Xiangdong ZHU1, Canfei HE2(
)
Received:2024-12-16
Revised:2025-05-12
Online:2026-04-15
Published:2026-04-29
Contact:
Canfei HE
摘要:
光伏产业是全球能源转型的重要支撑,其贸易格局深受各国碳减排政策影响。本文基于2009—2020年中国光伏出口数据,将目的国碳减排纳入分析框架,利用面板数据计量模型探究其对中国光伏出口格局的影响机制。研究发现:①中国光伏出口主要集中在东部省份,长三角地区为主要出口源地,占全国比重达68%;②目的国碳减排提升市场需求,促进其从中国进口光伏产品;③目的国碳减排对中国光伏出口的正向影响在《巴黎协定》生效后增强,在中美贸易战之后减弱;④目的国碳减排对产业集聚度高、政策支持力度强的省份的光伏产品出口的促进作用更大;⑤光伏产业高度集聚的目的国在推动碳减排过程时,对中国光伏依赖度较低;⑥设立碳交易市场或对中国光伏设置贸易壁垒的国家,其碳减排对进口中国光伏的促进作用更强。因此,在优化光伏产业和贸易政策时,需将目的国碳减排的影响纳入考量。
管仲, 朱向东, 贺灿飞. 目的国碳减排对中国光伏出口格局的影响机制研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2026, 35(4): 48-59.
Zhong GUAN, Xiangdong ZHU, Canfei HE. The impact of destination countries' carbon emission reduction on the spatial pattern of Chinese PV export[J]. World Regional Studies, 2026, 35(4): 48-59.
| 变量类型 | 变量 | 含义 | 数据维度 | 数据源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 被解释变量 | PVijt | 省份i在t年向国家j光伏出口额 | 省份-目的国-年份 | 中国海关贸易数据库 |
| 核心解释变量 | CEIjt | 国家j在t年碳排放强度 | 目的国-年份 | 世界银行 |
| 中介变量 | Solar_Djt | 国家j在t年光伏电力消费量 | 目的国-年份 | 能源研究所 |
| 调节变量 | RCA_Pit | 省份i在t年光伏产业集聚 | 省份-年份 | 中国海关贸易数据库 |
| Solar_Pit | 省份i在t年光伏电力消费量 | 省份-年份 | 中国电力企业联合会 | |
| RCA_Djt | 国家j在t年光伏出口显著性比较优势 | 目的国-年份 | 联合国贸易数据库 | |
| Policyi | 省份i实施光伏政策激励强度 | 省份 | 北大法宝法律数据库 | |
| TPj | 国家j是否对中国光伏实施贸易保护 | 目的国 | 全球贸易预警组织 | |
| ETSj | 国家j是否建立碳交易市场 | 目的国 | 国际碳行动伙伴组织 | |
| 控制变量 | GDP_Djt | 国家j在t年GDP | 目的国-年份 | 世界银行 |
| IND_Djt | 国家j在t年第二产业比重 | 目的国-年份 | 世界银行 | |
| GDP_Pit | 省份i在的t年GDP | 省份-年份 | 中国国家统计局 | |
| IND_Pit | 省份i在t年第二产业比重 | 省份-年份 | 中国国家统计局 | |
| Distancej | 国家j首都距离北京的距离 | 目的国 | CEPII |
表1 变量汇总
Tab.1 Summary of variables
| 变量类型 | 变量 | 含义 | 数据维度 | 数据源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 被解释变量 | PVijt | 省份i在t年向国家j光伏出口额 | 省份-目的国-年份 | 中国海关贸易数据库 |
| 核心解释变量 | CEIjt | 国家j在t年碳排放强度 | 目的国-年份 | 世界银行 |
| 中介变量 | Solar_Djt | 国家j在t年光伏电力消费量 | 目的国-年份 | 能源研究所 |
| 调节变量 | RCA_Pit | 省份i在t年光伏产业集聚 | 省份-年份 | 中国海关贸易数据库 |
| Solar_Pit | 省份i在t年光伏电力消费量 | 省份-年份 | 中国电力企业联合会 | |
| RCA_Djt | 国家j在t年光伏出口显著性比较优势 | 目的国-年份 | 联合国贸易数据库 | |
| Policyi | 省份i实施光伏政策激励强度 | 省份 | 北大法宝法律数据库 | |
| TPj | 国家j是否对中国光伏实施贸易保护 | 目的国 | 全球贸易预警组织 | |
| ETSj | 国家j是否建立碳交易市场 | 目的国 | 国际碳行动伙伴组织 | |
| 控制变量 | GDP_Djt | 国家j在t年GDP | 目的国-年份 | 世界银行 |
| IND_Djt | 国家j在t年第二产业比重 | 目的国-年份 | 世界银行 | |
| GDP_Pit | 省份i在的t年GDP | 省份-年份 | 中国国家统计局 | |
| IND_Pit | 省份i在t年第二产业比重 | 省份-年份 | 中国国家统计局 | |
| Distancej | 国家j首都距离北京的距离 | 目的国 | CEPII |
图1 2009—2020年中国省份光伏出口均值及增长注:该图基于自然资源部标准地图服务网站下载的审图号为GS(2023)2767号的标准地图制作,底图无修改。
Fig.1 Mean value and growth of Chinese PV export volume at provincial level from 2009 to 2020
| 变量 | 引力模型 | 中介效应检验 | 巴黎协定 | 中美贸易战 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| Dep.Var. | Value | Value | Solar_D | Value | Value | Value | Value | Value |
| CEI | -0.442*** | -0.944*** | -0.391*** | -0.823*** | -1.819*** | -2.554*** | -1.393*** | -0.803 |
| (0.0724) | (0.235) | (0.0790) | (0.234) | (0.433) | (0.413) | (0.337) | (0.653) | |
| Solar_D | 0.311*** | |||||||
| (0.0268) | ||||||||
| Distance | -1.458*** | |||||||
| (0.0823) | ||||||||
| IND_P | -0.813*** | -4.457*** | -6.724*** | -2.367*** | 8.205*** | -7.743*** | 3.571*** | -4.326*** |
| (0.173) | (0.471) | (0.158) | (0.502) | (1.143) | (0.863) | (0.779) | (1.079) | |
| GDP_P | 0.773*** | 0.660*** | 0.403*** | 0.534*** | 1.262*** | 0.714*** | 0.971*** | 0.247 |
| (0.0190) | (0.040) | (0.0134) | (0.0412) | (0.0939) | (0.0862) | (0.0653) | (0.153) | |
| IND_D | 0.525*** | 1.597*** | -2.516*** | 2.379*** | 0.644 | 5.189*** | 0.545 | 2.941*** |
| (0.175) | (0.436) | (0.147) | (0.439) | (0.788) | (0.819) | (0.574) | (1.063) | |
| GDP_D | 0.385*** | -0.246** | 0.141*** | -0.289*** | -0.206 | -0.165 | 0.00235 | -0.981 |
| (0.0175) | (0.111) | (0.0374) | (0.111) | (0.232) | (0.294) | (0.172) | (0.740) | |
| 常数项 | 25.20*** | 27.64*** | 39.99*** | 15.22*** | -12.72* | 40.98*** | 2.653 | 25.21*** |
| (1.298) | (2.961) | (0.996) | (3.134) | (6.898) | (5.053) | (4.782) | (7.335) | |
| 个体固定效应 | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 系数差异P值 | 1.591*** | 1.393*** | ||||||
| N | 13 286 | 13 286 | 13 286 | 13 286 | 7 754 | 5 532 | 9 974 | 3 312 |
| adj. R2 | 0.147 | 0.440 | 0.876 | 0.446 | 0.497 | 0.562 | 0.460 | 0.634 |
表2 目的国碳强度对中国光伏出口的影响
Tab.2 The impact of CEI on PV
| 变量 | 引力模型 | 中介效应检验 | 巴黎协定 | 中美贸易战 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| Dep.Var. | Value | Value | Solar_D | Value | Value | Value | Value | Value |
| CEI | -0.442*** | -0.944*** | -0.391*** | -0.823*** | -1.819*** | -2.554*** | -1.393*** | -0.803 |
| (0.0724) | (0.235) | (0.0790) | (0.234) | (0.433) | (0.413) | (0.337) | (0.653) | |
| Solar_D | 0.311*** | |||||||
| (0.0268) | ||||||||
| Distance | -1.458*** | |||||||
| (0.0823) | ||||||||
| IND_P | -0.813*** | -4.457*** | -6.724*** | -2.367*** | 8.205*** | -7.743*** | 3.571*** | -4.326*** |
| (0.173) | (0.471) | (0.158) | (0.502) | (1.143) | (0.863) | (0.779) | (1.079) | |
| GDP_P | 0.773*** | 0.660*** | 0.403*** | 0.534*** | 1.262*** | 0.714*** | 0.971*** | 0.247 |
| (0.0190) | (0.040) | (0.0134) | (0.0412) | (0.0939) | (0.0862) | (0.0653) | (0.153) | |
| IND_D | 0.525*** | 1.597*** | -2.516*** | 2.379*** | 0.644 | 5.189*** | 0.545 | 2.941*** |
| (0.175) | (0.436) | (0.147) | (0.439) | (0.788) | (0.819) | (0.574) | (1.063) | |
| GDP_D | 0.385*** | -0.246** | 0.141*** | -0.289*** | -0.206 | -0.165 | 0.00235 | -0.981 |
| (0.0175) | (0.111) | (0.0374) | (0.111) | (0.232) | (0.294) | (0.172) | (0.740) | |
| 常数项 | 25.20*** | 27.64*** | 39.99*** | 15.22*** | -12.72* | 40.98*** | 2.653 | 25.21*** |
| (1.298) | (2.961) | (0.996) | (3.134) | (6.898) | (5.053) | (4.782) | (7.335) | |
| 个体固定效应 | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 系数差异P值 | 1.591*** | 1.393*** | ||||||
| N | 13 286 | 13 286 | 13 286 | 13 286 | 7 754 | 5 532 | 9 974 | 3 312 |
| adj. R2 | 0.147 | 0.440 | 0.876 | 0.446 | 0.497 | 0.562 | 0.460 | 0.634 |
| 变量 | 调节效应 | 省份异质性 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 政策激励强 | 政策激励弱 | ||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
| Dep.Var. | Value | Value | Value | Value | Value |
| CEI | -0.488* | -0.593** | -3.004*** | -1.561*** | -0.205 |
| (0.268) | (0.242) | (0.325) | (0.285) | (0.401) | |
| RCA_P | 0.594*** | 2.647*** | |||
| (0.0374) | (0.356) | ||||
| CEI×RCA_P | -0.282*** | ||||
| (0.0441) | |||||
| Solar_P | 0.217*** | -2.033*** | |||
| (0.0290) | (0.169) | ||||
| CEI×Solar_P | 0.284*** | ||||
| (0.0206) | |||||
| IND_P | -1.501** | -4.281*** | -1.314* | -12.57*** | -2.400*** |
| (0.686) | (0.468) | (0.688) | (0.809) | (0.681) | |
| GDP_P | 0.316*** | 0.675*** | 0.297*** | 0.375*** | 0.539*** |
| (0.0538) | (0.0397) | (0.0540) | (0.0483) | (0.100) | |
| IND_D | 2.192*** | 1.666*** | 2.667*** | 0.221 | 4.217*** |
| (0.483) | (0.432) | (0.485) | (0.532) | (0.736) | |
| GDP_D | -0.413*** | -0.244** | -0.559*** | -0.570*** | 0.152 |
| (0.131) | (0.110) | (0.132) | (0.154) | (0.160) | |
| 常数项 | 10.63*** | 23.35*** | 29.51*** | 70.82*** | 4.266 |
| (3.782) | (2.983) | (4.037) | (4.309) | (4.809) | |
| 个体固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 系数差异P值 | — | — | — | -1.607*** | |
| N | 10 850 | 13 286 | 10 850 | 7 994 | 5 292 |
| adj. R2 | 0.477 | 0.449 | 0.474 | 0.470 | 0.375 |
表3 调节效应与异质性分析(省份维度)
Tab.3 Moderating effects and heterogeneity analysis (Provincial level)
| 变量 | 调节效应 | 省份异质性 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 政策激励强 | 政策激励弱 | ||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
| Dep.Var. | Value | Value | Value | Value | Value |
| CEI | -0.488* | -0.593** | -3.004*** | -1.561*** | -0.205 |
| (0.268) | (0.242) | (0.325) | (0.285) | (0.401) | |
| RCA_P | 0.594*** | 2.647*** | |||
| (0.0374) | (0.356) | ||||
| CEI×RCA_P | -0.282*** | ||||
| (0.0441) | |||||
| Solar_P | 0.217*** | -2.033*** | |||
| (0.0290) | (0.169) | ||||
| CEI×Solar_P | 0.284*** | ||||
| (0.0206) | |||||
| IND_P | -1.501** | -4.281*** | -1.314* | -12.57*** | -2.400*** |
| (0.686) | (0.468) | (0.688) | (0.809) | (0.681) | |
| GDP_P | 0.316*** | 0.675*** | 0.297*** | 0.375*** | 0.539*** |
| (0.0538) | (0.0397) | (0.0540) | (0.0483) | (0.100) | |
| IND_D | 2.192*** | 1.666*** | 2.667*** | 0.221 | 4.217*** |
| (0.483) | (0.432) | (0.485) | (0.532) | (0.736) | |
| GDP_D | -0.413*** | -0.244** | -0.559*** | -0.570*** | 0.152 |
| (0.131) | (0.110) | (0.132) | (0.154) | (0.160) | |
| 常数项 | 10.63*** | 23.35*** | 29.51*** | 70.82*** | 4.266 |
| (3.782) | (2.983) | (4.037) | (4.309) | (4.809) | |
| 个体固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 系数差异P值 | — | — | — | -1.607*** | |
| N | 10 850 | 13 286 | 10 850 | 7 994 | 5 292 |
| adj. R2 | 0.477 | 0.449 | 0.474 | 0.470 | 0.375 |
| 变量 | 调节效应 | 目的国异质性 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 建立碳市场 | 未建立碳市场 | 对中国贸易保护 | 无贸易保护 | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
| Dep.Var. | Value | Value | Value | Value | Value |
| CEI | -0.981*** | -5.885*** | -1.052*** | -8.183*** | -1.125*** |
| (0.235) | (0.555) | (0.284) | (0.644) | (0.271) | |
| RCA_D | -2.510** | ||||
| (1.014) | |||||
| CEI×RCA_D | 0.368*** | ||||
| (0.123) | |||||
| IND_P | -4.253*** | 1.307* | -7.486*** | 4.215*** | -7.212*** |
| (0.471) | (0.747) | (0.599) | (0.869) | (0.552) | |
| GDP_P | 0.663*** | -0.0482 | 0.862*** | -0.219*** | 0.840*** |
| (0.0398) | (0.0688) | (0.0494) | (0.0780) | (0.0462) | |
| IND_D | 1.293*** | 1.876 | 1.536*** | 3.631** | 1.511*** |
| (0.435) | (1.349) | (0.458) | (1.574) | (0.446) | |
| GDP_D | -0.238** | -0.387*** | 0.709* | -0.257** | 0.234 |
| (0.111) | (0.114) | (0.402) | (0.118) | (0.303) | |
| 常数项 | 27.92*** | 46.94*** | 38.47*** | 48.22*** | 38.57*** |
| (2.948) | (5.932) | (3.756) | (6.368) | (3.517) | |
| 个体固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 系数差异P值 | — | 2.285*** | 2.712*** | ||
| N | 13 286 | 5 034 | 8 252 | 3 936 | 9 350 |
| adj. R2 | 0.445 | 0.493 | 0.438 | 0.480 | 0.460 |
表4 调节效应与异质性分析结果(目的国维度)
Tab.4 Results of moderating effects and heterogeneity analysis (Destination countries)
| 变量 | 调节效应 | 目的国异质性 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 建立碳市场 | 未建立碳市场 | 对中国贸易保护 | 无贸易保护 | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
| Dep.Var. | Value | Value | Value | Value | Value |
| CEI | -0.981*** | -5.885*** | -1.052*** | -8.183*** | -1.125*** |
| (0.235) | (0.555) | (0.284) | (0.644) | (0.271) | |
| RCA_D | -2.510** | ||||
| (1.014) | |||||
| CEI×RCA_D | 0.368*** | ||||
| (0.123) | |||||
| IND_P | -4.253*** | 1.307* | -7.486*** | 4.215*** | -7.212*** |
| (0.471) | (0.747) | (0.599) | (0.869) | (0.552) | |
| GDP_P | 0.663*** | -0.0482 | 0.862*** | -0.219*** | 0.840*** |
| (0.0398) | (0.0688) | (0.0494) | (0.0780) | (0.0462) | |
| IND_D | 1.293*** | 1.876 | 1.536*** | 3.631** | 1.511*** |
| (0.435) | (1.349) | (0.458) | (1.574) | (0.446) | |
| GDP_D | -0.238** | -0.387*** | 0.709* | -0.257** | 0.234 |
| (0.111) | (0.114) | (0.402) | (0.118) | (0.303) | |
| 常数项 | 27.92*** | 46.94*** | 38.47*** | 48.22*** | 38.57*** |
| (2.948) | (5.932) | (3.756) | (6.368) | (3.517) | |
| 个体固定效应 | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| 系数差异P值 | — | 2.285*** | 2.712*** | ||
| N | 13 286 | 5 034 | 8 252 | 3 936 | 9 350 |
| adj. R2 | 0.445 | 0.493 | 0.438 | 0.480 | 0.460 |
| [1] | WEN D, GAO W, QIAN F,et al. Development of solar photovoltaic industry and market in China, Germany, Japan and The United States of America using incentive policies. Energy Exploration and Exploitation, 2021, 39(5): 1429-1456. |
| [2] | 王帮俊, 喻攀. 光伏产业政策效力和效果评估——基于中国2010-2020年政策文本的量化分析. 软科学, 2022, 36(8): 9-16. |
| WANG B, YU P. Evaluation on the policy efficacy and effect of photovotalic industry: Quantitive analysis of China's policy texts from 2010 to 2020. Soft Science, 2022, 36(8): 9-16. | |
| [3] | 王宏伟, 朱雪婷, 殷晨曦. 中国光伏产业发展及电价补贴政策影响研究. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(7): 90-112. |
| WANG H, ZHU X, YIN C. Research on the development and the Feed-in Tariff policy impact of China's photovoltaic industry. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2022, 39(7): 90-112. | |
| [4] | 孙传旺, 占妍泓, 徐梦洁. 电力需求响应信号与新能源制造企业绩效. 管理世界, 2024, 40(12): 185-203. |
| SUN C, ZHAN Y, XU M. Electricity demand response signals and the performance of new energy manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40(12): 185-203. | |
| [5] | GRAU T, HUO M, NEUHOFF K. Survey of photovoltaic industry and policy in Germany and China. Energy Policy, 2011, 51: 20-37. |
| [6] | 朱向东, 贺灿飞, 毛熙彦, 等. 贸易保护背景下中国光伏产业空间格局及其影响因素. 经济地理, 2018, 38(3): 98-105. |
| ZHU X, HE C, MAO X, et al. The spatial pattern of China PV industry under the background of trade protectionism. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(3): 98-105. | |
| [7] | WU T, ZHOU W, YAN X, et al. Optimal policy design for photovoltaic power industry with positive externality in China. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2016, 115: 22-30. |
| [8] | 练文华, 张晓平, 吴爱萍, 等. 中国光伏装备制造业空间布局演化及影响因素分析. 地理研究, 2024, 43(3): 679-700. |
| LIAN W, ZHANG X, WU A, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of photovoltaic equipment manufacturing industry in China and its influencing factors. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(3): 679-700. | |
| [9] | BINZ C, ANADON L. Unrelated diversification in latecomer contexts: Emergence of the Chinese solar photovoltaics industry. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2018, 28: 14-34. |
| [10] | 丁嘉铖, 孔德明, 肖宸瑄, 等. 产业链视角下全球光伏产业贸易格局演变特征研究. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(7): 1-17. |
| DING J, KONG D, XIAO C, et al. Characteristics of the evolution of the global photovoltaic industry trade pattern from the industrial chain perspective. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(7): 1-17. | |
| [11] | GEREFFI G. Global value chains and international competition. The Antitrust bulletin, 2011, 56(1): 37-96. |
| [12] | 程云洁, 刘旭. 碳中和目标下全球多晶硅贸易网络结构的动态演进及驱动力研究. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(9): 1-16. |
| CHENG Y, LIU X. Study on the global polysilicon trade networks' dynamic evolution and its driving forces under the global carbon neutrality target. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(9): 1-16. | |
| [13] | ZHU X, HE C, GU Z. How do local policies and trade barriers reshape the export of Chinese photovoltaic products? Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 278: 123995. |
| [14] | 朱向东, 贺灿飞, 朱晟君. 贸易保护如何改变中国光伏出口目的国格局?. 地理研究, 2019, 38(11): 2565-2577. |
| ZHU X, HE C, ZHU S. How does protectionism change the pattern of the destinations of Chinese photovoltaic export? Geographical Research, 2019, 38(11): 2565-2577. | |
| [15] | GAO S, SONG Z. Trade frictions on China's photovoltaic trade and their reshaping effects. Renewable Energy, 2025, 244: 122708. |
| [16] | ZHU X, HE C, GU Z. Benefit from local or destination? The export expansion of Chinese photovoltaic industry under trade protection. Energy Economics, 2021, 104:105690. |
| [17] | ZHU X, GU Z, HE C, et al. The impact of the belt and road initiative on Chinese PV firms' export expansion. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 26: 25763-25783. |
| [18] | 王旭, 梁沁仪, 解其昌. 能源转型的地缘政治影响研究进展. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(5): 31-44. |
| WANG X, LIANG Q, XIE Q. Research progress on the geopolitical impacts of energy transition. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(5): 31-44. | |
| [19] | 杨宇, 郭越. 地理学视角下的能源-社会互动格局与逻辑——«能源与社会:思辨性透视»解读与评述. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(8): 77-86. |
| YANG Y, GUO Y. The landscape and logic of energy-society interactions from a geographical perspective: Interpretation and review of Energy and Society: A Critical Perspective . World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(8): 77-86. | |
| [20] | SADORSKY P. Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(10): 4021-4028. |
| [21] | APERGIS N, PAYNE J. Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from the Commonwealth of Independent States. Energy Economics, 2009, 31(5): 641-647. |
| [22] | FU X, YANG Y, DONG W, et al. Spatial structure, inequality and trading community of renewable energy networks: A comparative study of solar and hydro energy product trades. Energy Policy, 2017, 106: 22-31. |
| [23] | ZHI Q, SUN H, LI Y, et al. China's solar photovoltaic policy: An analysis based on policy instruments. Applied energy, 2014, 129: 308-319. |
| [24] | 余东华, 吕逸楠. 政府不当干预与战略性新兴产业产能过剩——以中国光伏产业为例. 中国工业经济, 2015(10): 53-68. |
| YU D, LV Y. Government improper intervention and overcapacity of strategic emerging industries——A case study of Chinese photovotalic industry. China Industrial Economics, 2015(10): 53-68. | |
| [25] | 李铁证, 符正平. 我国光伏产业集群发展存在的问题及策略分析. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 16(6): 590-595. |
| LI T, FU Z. An analysis of cluster development in China's photovotalic industry: Problems and strategies. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 2014, 16(6): 590-595. | |
| [26] | ICAP. Emissions Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2020. Berlin, 2020. |
| [27] | WANG M, XIE Z. International trade barriers, export and industrial resilience: An empirical study based on the EU and USA antidumping and countervailing policies on photovoltaic products. Energy Policy, 2025, 201: 114556. |
| [1] | 吕娟, 吕雁琴, 陈静, 杨平. 由“新”降碳:数字技术创新对旅游碳排放强度的影响[J]. 世界地理研究, 2026, 35(4): 136-152. |
| [2] | 许美霞, 胡洋, 廖亚辉, 毛翰臣. 难民流动对非洲之角国家地缘冲突的影响研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(11): 33-45. |
| [3] | 胡建梅, 刘凤玲. 中国对非教育援助的空间格局及其影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(11): 46-58. |
| [4] | 赵沁娜, 李航. 碳交易试点政策对碳排放强度的影响效应与作用机制[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(1): 94-111. |
| [5] | 丁嘉铖, 孔德明, 肖宸瑄, 郝丽莎. 产业链视角下全球光伏产业贸易格局演变特征研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(7): 1-17. |
| [6] | 胡彬, 刘军. 肯尼亚人口分布空间格局演化及影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(6): 64-75. |
| [7] | 邵文忠, 武友德, 熊理然, 樊艳翔, 牛福长, 刘晶丽. 全球稻米贸易的空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(12): 1-13. |
| [8] | 殷为华, 陈雨婷. 长三角文化创意产业竞争力及空间格局演化研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(12): 107-118. |
| [9] | 商宁, 曹开军. 新疆景区交通可达性与旅游流空间耦合研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(12): 176-188. |
| [10] | 党牛, 王强, 庄星辉. 俄乌地缘政治冲突对欧洲能源安全格局的短期影响研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(12): 29-41. |
| [11] | 郭红星, 邓智团. 中国区域创新高地空间格局的多尺度分析——高新技术企业视角[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(12): 79-93. |
| [12] | 孔凡沛, 胡洋, 李安林. 1992—2021年刚果(金)武装冲突的时空演化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(10): 31-42. |
| [13] | 郭卫东, 钟业喜, 李炜. 基于不同交通方式的中国城市间人口流动网络比较研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(7): 102-112. |
| [14] | 初楠臣, 张平宇, 吴相利, 徐爽, 史晓楠. 俄罗斯新冠肺炎疫情的扩散:过程、格局与影响因素研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(3): 41-51. |
| [15] | 吴小妮, 管卫华, 张惠, 吴连霞. 成渝城市群网络关注度的空间分异及影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(11): 130-140. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||