主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

WRS ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 1-11.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2019.04.2018851

    Next Articles

A comparative study of Sino-US science and technology competitiveness

DU Debin1,2, DUAN Dezhong1,2, XIA Qifan1,2   

  1. 1.East China Normal University, 1.Institute for Innovation and Strategic Studies, Shanghai 200062, China
    2.School of Urban and Regional Science, Shanghai 200241, China
  • Received:2019-01-20 Revised:2019-01-25 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-08-15
  • Supported by:
     

中美科技竞争力比较研究

杜德斌1,2, 段德忠1,2, 夏启繁1,2   

  1. 1.华东师范大学, 1.全球创新与发展研究院,上海 200062
    2.城市与区域科学学院, 上海 200241
  • 作者简介:杜德斌(1963-),男,教授,博导,研究方向为世界经济地理与科技创新政策,E-mail:dbdu@re.ecnu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市软科学研究领域重点课题(18692180200)。

Abstract: Based on the elaboration of national scientific competitiveness, this paper builds the national science competitiveness evaluation system from 5 aspects, including scientific human resource competitiveness, scientific and financial resources competitiveness, scientific research competitiveness, technological innovation competitiveness and technology internationalization competitiveness, with specific comparison of science and technology development between China and the United States. Studies show that even though China has enhanced the scientific competitiveness, the United States surpasses China in both overall competitiveness and individual area like scientific investment, scientific research, technical innovation, and globalization of science and technology. For China, there is still a long way to improve scientific competitiveness further. After analyzing the present situation and the development trend of the scientific competitiveness between China and the United States, the paper believes that China should not only learn from the powerful and advanced scientific nations like the United States with new reforming and opening, but also be aware of self-weaknesses. China should stick to the two-wheel driver of scientific innovation and systematic innovation, the organic combination of development speed and the innovation quality, the mutual promotion of individual innovation and the open innovation, the innovation strategy focusing on quality and result, the enhancement of basic scientific research, the breakthrough of critical and core technology, the attraction of advanced scientific and innovative talents , so that the national scientific competitiveness could accelerate rapidly and continuously.

 

Key words: scientific and technological competitiveness, China, United States, scientific human resource, scientific financial resources, scientific technology internationalization

摘要: 在界定国家科技竞争力内涵的基础上,从科技人力资源竞争力、科技财力资源竞争力、科学研究竞争力、技术创新竞争力和科技国际化竞争力五个方面建构了国家科技竞争力评价指标体系,从而详细对比了中美两国在科技发展上的差异。研究发现,无论是整体竞争力还是科技投入、科学研究、技术创新、科技国际化等单项竞争力,中国都与美国都存在不小差距,中国科技竞争力虽然加速提升,但仍显著落后于美国,中国科技发展任重道远。基于中美两国科技竞争力的现状对比及趋势研判,本文认为:中国进一步提升科技竞争力,加快建设世界科技强国,既需要对标先进、参照一流,进一步深化开放式创新,充分学习和借鉴美国等科技强国的成功经验,更需要立足自身、正视短板,坚持科技创新与制度创新双轮驱动、发展速度和创新质量有机统一、自主创新与开放创新相互促进,着力推动以质量和效益为核心的创新战略,加强基础科学研究,突破关键核心技术,集聚高端科创人才,以实现国家科技竞争力的持续稳步增强。

关键词: 科技竞争力, 中国, 美国, 科技人力资源, 科技财力资源, 科技国际化

CLC Number: