Impact of high-speed railway development on regional innovation from the perspective of spatial effect

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.02.2019534

Abstract

Abstract:

On the basis of explaining the impact mechanism of high-speed railway on regional innovation, this paper uses ESDA, SDM and partial differentiation are used to measure the direct and indirect effects of time-space compression caused by the opening of high-speed rail on regional innovation output, and the heterogeneity is analyzed by regional regression. The results show that innovation output in China has a significant spatial correlation, and the degree of agglomeration is increasing. The "core periphery" region is basically formed, and innovation activities have certain locking characteristics. Among them, R&D personnel input, FDI, government financial expenditure on science and technology, and residents' consumption are important factors affecting regional innovation output. There are spatial differences in the impact of the opening of high-speed rail on innovation Qualitatively, the full-time equivalent of R&D personnel has the greatest impact on the eastern region, while the northeast and central regions rely on R&D personnel and R&D capital investment at the same time. The western region is not affected by polarization, but has a positive spillover effect due to space-time compression.

Key words: regional innovation, temporal distance, spatial panel Durbin model, effect decomposition, high-speed railway

摘要：

探究高速铁路对区域创新的影响机制将深远影响我国区域经济发展。运用ESDA、SDM和求偏微分等方法，测算了由高铁开通带来的时空压缩对区域创新产出产生的直接效应和间接效应，并通过分地区回归对异质性进行了深入分析。结果表明：我国创新产出具有显著的空间相关性，且集聚程度不断增强，“核心-外围”区域基本形成，创新活动具有一定的锁定特征；其中，R&D人员投入、FDI、政府财政科技支出和居民消费支出是影响区域创新产出的重要因素；高铁开通对创新的影响存在空间异质性，R&D人员全时当量对东部地区的影响最大，东北和中部地区则同时依赖于R&D人员和R&D资本投入，西部地区并未受到极化影响，反而因时空压缩产生了正向溢出效应。

关键词: 区域创新, 时间距离, 空间面板杜宾模型, 效应分解, 高铁

Guoyan LIU, Tao LI. Impact of high-speed railway development on regional innovation from the perspective of spatial effect[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(2): 355-366.

刘国燕, 李涛. 高铁影响下的中国区域创新时空演化与效应分解[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(2): 355-366.

Figures/Tables 7

References 21

1	Romer P M. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94 (5): 1002–37.
2	Crescenzi R, Rodriguez-Pose A, Storper M. The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India. Journal of Economic Geography, 2012, 12 (5): 1055-85.
3	王庆喜, 王巧娜, 徐维祥. 我国高技术产业省际知识溢出:基于地理和技术邻近的分析. 经济地理, 2013, 33(5): 111-116+136.
	Wang J,Wang Q,Xu W. Technological and geographical proximity effects on knowledge spillovers: Evidence from Chinese provincial High-tech industries. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(5): 111-116+136.
4	何舜辉, 杜德斌, 焦美琪, 等. 中国地级以上城市创新能力的时空格局演变及影响因素分析. 地理科学, 2017, 37(7): 1014-1022.
	He S,Du D,Jiao M, et, al. Spatial-Temporal characteristics of urban innovation capability and impact factors analysis in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(7): 1014-1022.
5	王雨飞, 倪鹏飞. 高速铁路影响下的经济增长溢出与区域空间优化. 中国工业经济, 2016(2): 21-36.
	Wang Y,Ni P.Economic growth spillover and spatial optimization of High-speed railway. China Industrial Economics,2016(2): 21-36.
6	Storper M, Venables. A. J. Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography. 2004, 4(4): 351-70.
7	Bernstein S, Giroud X, Townsend R R. The impact of venture capital monitoring. Journal of Finance, 2016, 71(4): 1591-1622.
8	董艳梅, 朱英明. 高铁建设能否重塑中国的经济空间布局——基于就业、工资和经济增长的区域异质性视角. 中国工业经济, 2016(10): 92-108.
	Dong Y, Zhu Y. Can High-speed rail construction reshape the layout of China's economic space——Based on the perspective of regional heterogeneity of employment, wage and economic growth China. Industrial Economics, 2016(10): 92-108.
9	Boarnet M G. Spillovers and the locational effects of public infrastructure. Journal of Regional Science, 1998, 38(3): 381-403.
10	Oosterhaven. J, Elhorst. J. P. Indirect economic benefits of transport infrastructure investments. Across the Border. Building Upon a Quarter Century of Transport Research in the Benelux, De Boeck, Antwerpen, 2003(8): 143-162.
11	Grossman G, Rossi-Hansberg E. Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring. American Economic Review, 1978, 98(5): 1978-1997.
12	Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 577-598.
13	Keebl D, Tyler P. Enterprising behavior and the urban-rural shift. Urban Studies, 1995, 32: 975-97.
14	Shirley C, Winston C. Firm Inventory behavior and the returns from highway infrastructure investments. Journal of Urban Economics, 2004, 55(2): 398-415.
15	Lin Yatang. Travel costs and urban specialization patterns: Evidence from China's high speed railway system. Journal of Urban Economics, 2017(98): 98-123.
16	Rouwendal J, Meijer E. Preferences for Housing, Jobs, and Commuting: A Mixed Logit Analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 2001(41): 475-505.
17	Romp W, Oosterhaven J. Indirect economic effects of new infrastructure: a comparison of dfutch high-speed rail variants. Appeared in Tijdschrift Economische en Sociate Geografie, 2003, 94(4): 439-452.
18	Lesage J, Pace R. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. New York: CRC Press, 2009.
19	孙枫, 汪德根, 牛玉. 高速铁路与汽车和航空的竞争格局分析. 地理研究, 2017, 36(1): 171-187.
	Sun F,Wang D,Niu Y. Competition patterns of high-speed rail versus highways and aviation. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(1): 171-187.
20	王鹤, 周少君. 城镇化影响房地产价格的"直接效应"与"间接效应"分析——基于我国地级市动态空间杜宾模型. 南开经济研究, 2017(2): 3-22.
	Wang H, Zhou S. The analysis of the "direct effect" and "indirect effect" of urbanization affects on real estate prices: Based on the dynamic spatial durbin model of prefecture-level cities. Nankai Economic Studies, 2017(2): 3-22.
21	苏屹, 安晓丽, 王心焕, 等. 人力资本投入对区域创新绩效的影响研究——基于知识产权保护制度门限回归. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(5): 771-781.
	Su Y,An X,Wang X, et, al. Impact of innovation human capital investment on innovation performance of regional innovation system based on intellectual property protection intensity threshold regression. Studies in Science of Science, 2017, 35(5): 771-781.

年份	Moran's I	年份	Moran's I	年份	Moran's I	年份	Moran's I
2002	0.3025^***	2006	0.3504^***	2010	0.3835^***	2014	0.3889^***
2003	0.3219^***	2007	0.3355^***	2011	0.3841^***	2015	0.4068^***
2004	0.3622^***	2008	0.3376^***	2012	0.4083^***	2016	0.3978^***
2005	0.3413^***	2009	0.3499^***	2013	0.4020^***	2017	0.4164^***

年份	Moran's I	年份	Moran's I	年份	Moran's I	年份	Moran's I
2002	0.3025^***	2006	0.3504^***	2010	0.3835^***	2014	0.3889^***
2003	0.3219^***	2007	0.3355^***	2011	0.3841^***	2015	0.4068^***
2004	0.3622^***	2008	0.3376^***	2012	0.4083^***	2016	0.3978^***
2005	0.3413^***	2009	0.3499^***	2013	0.4020^***	2017	0.4164^***

象限	2010年	2017年
象限1：HH	山东、河南、江苏、安徽、湖北、浙江、湖南、福建、广东、辽宁、天津、陕西、河北、上海、北京	山东、河南、江苏、安徽、湖北、浙江、江西、湖南、福建、广东、辽宁、天津、陕西、重庆、河北、上海、北京
象限2：LH	黑龙江、山西、江西、宁夏、贵州、海南、广西、内蒙古、吉林	宁夏、山西、云南、贵州、广西、海南、吉林、内蒙古
象限3：LL	新疆、云南、西藏、甘肃、青海	黑龙江、西藏、新疆、青海、甘肃
象限4：HL	重庆、四川	四川

象限	2010年	2017年
象限1：HH	山东、河南、江苏、安徽、湖北、浙江、湖南、福建、广东、辽宁、天津、陕西、河北、上海、北京	山东、河南、江苏、安徽、湖北、浙江、江西、湖南、福建、广东、辽宁、天津、陕西、重庆、河北、上海、北京
象限2：LH	黑龙江、山西、江西、宁夏、贵州、海南、广西、内蒙古、吉林	宁夏、山西、云南、贵州、广西、海南、吉林、内蒙古
象限3：LL	新疆、云南、西藏、甘肃、青海	黑龙江、西藏、新疆、青海、甘肃
象限4：HL	重庆、四川	四川

变量	系数		t值
C	-4.086^***		-10.876
R&DP	0.373^***		6.813
R&DE	0.020		0.354
PGDP	-0.313^***		-2.936
FDI	0.003^***		7.382
GOV	-0.001^**		-2.284
CON	0.395^***		2.874
FIN	0.885^***		16.702
R²	0.957	Durbin-Watson	1.675
sigma^2	0.144	loglikols	-218.944
LM test no spatial Lag	14.149^***	LM test no spatial error	9.894^***
robust LM test no spatial lag	9.238^***	robust LM test no spatial error	4.982^**