Measurement and spatio-temporal evolution of tourism poverty alleviation efficiency in Guangxi border ethnic areas

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.02.2019525

Abstract

Abstract:

Tourism poverty alleviation is an important part of poverty alleviation in China. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to measure the poverty alleviation efficiency of tourism in Guangxi border ethnic areas from 2011 to 2017, inter-phase dynamic analysis was conducted by combining Malmquist index.Results show that: 1)The comprehensive tourism poverty alleviation efficiency of each county fluctuates in the time series. In decomposition efficiency, tourism poverty alleviation comprehensive efficiency mainly depends on the pure technical efficiency.2)Overall tourism poverty alleviation Malmquist index of ethnic minority areas shows a gradual decline. In decomposition efficiency, scale efficiency change is the largest contribution to the index, pure technical efficiency change index, index of efficiency and technical progress is the main factor restricting tourism poverty alleviation efficiency from the point of space distribution.3) Comprehensive efficiency, pure technology efficiency and scale efficiency of tourism poverty alleviation in Guangxi border ethnic areas have spatial agglomeration.4) From the perspective of the distribution of poverty alleviation efficiency types, there are four types: potential type, development type, mature type and recession type. However, there are still a few counties which the effect of tourism poverty alleviation is not obvious.

Key words: tourism poverty alleviation efficiency, spatial-temporal evolution, DEA model, ethnic border area, Guangxi

摘要：

广西边境民族地区旅游扶贫是我国脱贫攻坚的重要组成部分。通过数据包络分析（DEA）测算广西边境民族地区2011—2017年的旅游扶贫效率，结合Malmquist指数进行跨期动态分析，并运用ArcGIS10.0进行时空演化特征分析。结果表明：1）广西边境民族地区旅游扶贫效率处于中等偏高水平，各县（市、区）旅游扶贫综合效率时空分布差异较大，主要受纯技术效率影响；2）广西边境民族地区整体旅游扶贫Malmquist指数总体处于逐步衰退的趋势，其中规模效率变化指数贡献最大，纯技术效率变化指数次之；3）从投入产出效率角度分析，广西边境民族地区旅游扶贫效率随时间的变化表现出空间集聚态势增强的趋势，聚集程度增加；4）旅游扶贫效率类型主要分为潜力型、发展型、成熟型和衰退型4种类型，少数县（市、区）旅游扶贫效果不明显。

关键词: 旅游扶贫效率, 时空演化, DEA模型, 边境民族地区, 广西

Shaogui XU, Shiqiao FANG, Yongping GAN, Xiaohua QIN. Measurement and spatio-temporal evolution of tourism poverty alleviation efficiency in Guangxi border ethnic areas[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(2): 367-377.

徐少癸, 方世巧, 甘永萍, 覃小华. 广西边境民族地区旅游扶贫效率测度与时空演化分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(2): 367-377.

Figures/Tables 7

References 24

1	Benxiang Zeng, Ryan Chris. Assisting the poor in China through tourism development: A review of research. Tourism Management, 2012, 33(2): 239-248.
2	Schilcher, Daniela. Growth versus equity: The continuum of pro-poor tourism and neoliberal governance. Current Issues in Tourism,2007, 10(2): 166-193.
3	Lepp A. Residents' attitudes towards tourism in Bigodi village, Uganda. Tourism Management, 2007, 28(3):876-885.
4	Nyaupane G P, Poudel S. Linkages among biodiversity, livelihood, and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, 38(4):1344-1366.
5	Rid W, Ezeuduji I O, Pr-Bstl-Haider U. Segmentation by motivation for rural tourism activities in the Gambia. Tourism Management, 2014, 40(2): 102-116.
6	党红艳,金媛媛. 旅游精准扶贫效应及其影响因素消解——基于山西省左权县的案例分析. 经济问题, 2017, 39(6): 113-118.
	Dang H, Jin Y. Analysis on the effect of pro-poor tourism and its influencing factors:Zuoquan County in Shanxi Province as an examphe. On Economic Problems, 2017, 39(6): 113-118.
7	黄炜,孟霏,白雪琴,等. 集中连片特困区乡村旅游满意度影响机制实证研究——以武陵山片区张家界、凤凰为例. 资源开发与市场, 2017, 33(1): 110-115.
	Huang W, Meng F, Bai X, et al. Study on rural tourism satisfaction influence mechanism of concentrated destitute areas of empirical——Taking Fenghuang and Zhangjiajie in Wuling Mountain Area as an example. Resource Development & Market, 2017, 33(1): 110-115.
8	罗章,王烁. 精准扶贫视阈下乡村旅游内生脱贫机制——以重庆市"木根模式"为例. 农村经济, 2018, 51(1): 51-55.
	Luo Z, Wang S. Endogenous poverty alleviation mechanism of rural tourism from the perspective of targeted poverty alleviation -- A case study of "Wood Root Model" in Chongqing. Rural Economy, 2018, 51(1): 51-55.
9	邓维杰,何海燕,朱淑婷. 乡村旅游精准扶贫的困境与对策. 农村经济, 2017, 51(12): 44-49.
	Deng W, He H, Zhu S. Predicament and countermeasures of precise poverty alleviation in rural tourism. Rural Economy, 2018, 51(1): 51-55.
10	吴靖南. 乡村旅游精准扶贫实现路径研究. 农村经济, 2017, 51(3): 99-103.
	Wu J. Research on the realization path of targeted poverty alleviation in rural tourism. Rural Economy, 2017, 51(3): 99-103.
11	徐少癸,甘永萍,方世巧. 边境地区生态文化旅游扶贫路径探索——以广西龙州县为例. 云南地理环境研究, 2018, 30(4): 18-24.
	Xu S, Gan Y, Fang S. Exploring the poverty alleviation path of eco-culture tourism in border areas——Case study of Longzhou County of Guangxi. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 2018, 30(4): 18-24.
12	吴忠军,曹宏丽,侯玉霞,等. 旅游精准扶贫机制调适与路径研究. 中南林业科技大学学报:社会科学版, 2017, 11(3): 40-46.
	Wu Z, Cao H, Hou Y, et al. Adjustment and path of the tourism accurate poverty alleviation mechanism. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology: Social Sciences, 2017, 11(3): 40-46.
13	李佳,田里,王磊. 连片特困民族地区旅游精准扶贫机制研究——以四川藏区为例. 西南民族大学学报:人文社科版, 2017, 38(6): 116-121.
	Li J, Tian L, Wang L. Study on targeted poverty alleviation mechanism of tourism in contiguous poverty-stricken ethnic minority areas -- A case study of Tibetan Areas in Sichuan Province. Journal of Southwest Minzu University:Humanities and Social Science,2017, 38(6): 116-121.
14	李小民,郭英之,张秦. 精准扶贫背景下少数民族居民旅游增权参与模型机理实证研究——基于贵州肇兴侗寨的调研. 贵州民族研究, 2017, 38(11): 40-46.
	Li X, Guo Y, Zhang Q. An empirical study on model mechanism of ethnic minority residents' tourism empowerment participation against the background of targeted poverty: Based on the investigation in Zhao Xing Dong Village, Guizhou. Guizhou Ethnic Studies, 2017, 38(11): 40-46.
15	胡柳. 乡村旅游精准扶贫研究. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2016.
	Hu L. The research on rural tourism accurate poverty alleviation.Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2016.
16	郑岩,宿伟玲. 我国推进旅游扶贫工作的相关政策文件解读. 农村经济与科技, 2017, 28(24): 34-35.
	Zheng Y, Su W. Interpretation of relevant policy documents on promoting poverty alleviation through tourism in China. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2017, 28(24): 34-35.
17	舒小林.新时期民族地区旅游引领产业群精准扶贫机制与政策研究.西南民族大学学报:人文社科版,2016,37(8): 130-136.
	Shu X.Research on precise poverty alleviation mechanism and policy of tourism leading industrial clusters in ethnic areas in the new era.Journal of Southwest Minzu University:Humanities and Social Science,2016,37(8): 130-136.
18	龙祖坤,杜倩文,周婷. 武陵山区旅游扶贫效率的时间演进与空间分异. 经济地理, 2015, 35(10): 210-217.
	Long Z, Du Q, Zhou T. The evolution of time and space differentiation of Wuling Mountain Area tourism poverty alleviation efficiency. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(10): 210-217.
19	曹妍雪,马蓝. 基于三阶段DEA的我国民族地区旅游扶贫效率评价. 华东经济管理, 2017, 31(9): 91-97.
	Cao Y, Ma L. Evaluation on the efficiency of tourism poverty alleviation in China's ethnic regions based on the Three-stage DEA. East China Economic Management, 2017, 31(9): 91-97.
20	黄渊基. 连片特困地区旅游扶贫效率评价及时空分异——以武陵山湖南片区20个县(市、区)为例. 经济地理, 2017, 37(11): 229-235.
	Huang Y. The efficiency evaluation and spatio-temporal differentiation of tourism poverty alleviation in extremely difficult areas——A case study of 20 counties in Wuling Mountain Area of Hunan Province. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(11): 229-235.
21	刘静静. 珠江—西江经济带(广西)乡村旅游绿色扶贫研究——以崇左市龙州县为例. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2018.
	Liu J.The research of rural tourism and green poverty alleviation in Zhujiang-Xijiang Economic Belt of Guangxi——Based on Longzhou County in Chongzuo City.Guilin: Guangxi Normal University,2018.
22	刘子霏. 乡村振兴战略背景下广西边境地区旅游扶贫SWOT分析——以那坡县为例. 乡村科技, 2019, 20(30): 30-32.
	Liu Z. SWOT analysis of tourism poverty alleviation in border areas of Guangxi under the background of rural revitalization strategy——A case study of Napo County. Rural science and technology, 2019, 20(30): 30-32.
23	王茂松,郭英之. 旅游扶贫效率评价模型构建及实证研究——来自中国的经验证据. 社会科学家, 2018, 22(6): 88-97.
	Wang M, Guo Y. Establishment of evaluation model and empirical research on poverty alleviation efficiency of tourism ——Empirical evidence from China. Social Scientist, 2018, 22(6): 88-97.
24	鄢慧丽,王强,熊浩,等. 海南省少数民族地区旅游扶贫效率测度与时空演化分析. 中国软科学, 2018, 22(8): 63-76.
	Yan H, Wang Q, Xiong H, et al. Research on the measurement of tourism poverty alleviation efficiency and its spatial-temporal evolution in Hainan's ethnic minority areas. China Soft Science, 2018, 22(8): 63-76.

类型	评价指标	单位	测算公式	指标说明
投入指标	人均旅游综合收入	万元/人	旅游总收入/总人口	反映旅游业发展成效以及潜力
投入指标	人均接待游客数量	人	接待游客人数/总人口	反映旅游业发展的带动效应
产出指标	人均GDP	元	GDP/总人口	反映当地经济发展程度
	农村居民人均可支配收入旅游贡献额	万元	农村居民人均可支配收入×旅游经济贡献率	反映农村居民旅游收入水平
	城镇化率	%	城镇人口/总人口	反映社会经济发展水平
	森林覆盖率	%	绿地和森林面积/国土总面积	反映旅游区域生态环境程度

类型	评价指标	单位	测算公式	指标说明
投入指标	人均旅游综合收入	万元/人	旅游总收入/总人口	反映旅游业发展成效以及潜力
投入指标	人均接待游客数量	人	接待游客人数/总人口	反映旅游业发展的带动效应
产出指标	人均GDP	元	GDP/总人口	反映当地经济发展程度
	农村居民人均可支配收入旅游贡献额	万元	农村居民人均可支配收入×旅游经济贡献率	反映农村居民旅游收入水平
	城镇化率	%	城镇人口/总人口	反映社会经济发展水平
	森林覆盖率	%	绿地和森林面积/国土总面积	反映旅游区域生态环境程度

县（市、区）	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	均值	排名
右江区	0.234	0.319	0.360	1.000	0.319	0.376	0.376	0.426	15
田阳县	0.255	0.249	0.506	0.619	0.798	0.884	0.838	0.593	12
田东县	0.238	0.433	0.828	0.920	1.000	1.000	0.975	0.771	9
平果县	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1
德保县	0.485	1.000	0.780	0.840	0.892	0.948	1.000	0.849	7
凌云县	0.659	0.632	0.898	0.953	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.877	5
乐业县	1.000	1.000	0.831	1.000	0.998	0.911	0.815	0.936	2
靖西市	0.329	0.500	0.819	1.000	1.000	0.627	0.606	0.697	11
江州区	0.401	0.690	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.870	6
扶绥县	0.354	0.882	1.000	0.986	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.889	3
宁明县	0.241	0.607	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.841	0.813	8
龙州县	0.190	0.380	0.618	0.904	1.000	0.433	0.411	0.562	13
大新县	0.316	0.270	0.377	0.698	0.944	0.396	0.405	0.487	14
凭祥市	0.088	0.099	0.167	0.617	0.163	0.170	0.185	0.213	18
防城区	0.145	0.220	0.358	0.393	0.484	0.636	0.731	0.424	16
港口区	0.300	0.852	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.879	4
上思县	0.723	0.469	0.605	1.000	0.819	0.829	0.920	0.766	10
东兴市	0.490	0.089	0.213	0.294	0.301	0.229	0.286	0.272	17
均值	0.414	0.538	0.687	0.846	0.818	0.747	0.744	0.685

县（市、区）	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	均值	排名
右江区	0.234	0.319	0.360	1.000	0.319	0.376	0.376	0.426	15
田阳县	0.255	0.249	0.506	0.619	0.798	0.884	0.838	0.593	12
田东县	0.238	0.433	0.828	0.920	1.000	1.000	0.975	0.771	9
平果县	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1
德保县	0.485	1.000	0.780	0.840	0.892	0.948	1.000	0.849	7
凌云县	0.659	0.632	0.898	0.953	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.877	5
乐业县	1.000	1.000	0.831	1.000	0.998	0.911	0.815	0.936	2
靖西市	0.329	0.500	0.819	1.000	1.000	0.627	0.606	0.697	11
江州区	0.401	0.690	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.870	6
扶绥县	0.354	0.882	1.000	0.986	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.889	3
宁明县	0.241	0.607	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.841	0.813	8
龙州县	0.190	0.380	0.618	0.904	1.000	0.433	0.411	0.562	13
大新县	0.316	0.270	0.377	0.698	0.944	0.396	0.405	0.487	14
凭祥市	0.088	0.099	0.167	0.617	0.163	0.170	0.185	0.213	18
防城区	0.145	0.220	0.358	0.393	0.484	0.636	0.731	0.424	16
港口区	0.300	0.852	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	1.000	0.879	4
上思县	0.723	0.469	0.605	1.000	0.819	0.829	0.920	0.766	10
东兴市	0.490	0.089	0.213	0.294	0.301	0.229	0.286	0.272	17
均值	0.414	0.538	0.687	0.846	0.818	0.747	0.744	0.685

维度	地区/时间	Effch	Techch	Pech	Sech	Tfpch	排名
空间	右江区	1.082	0.832	0.869	1.245	0.900	5
	田阳县	1.219	0.715	1.179	1.034	0.872	10
	田东县	1.265	0.713	1.176	1.076	0.903	4
	平果县	1	0.688	1	1	0.688	18
	德保县	1.128	0.781	1.123	1.005	0.881	8
	凌云县	1.072	0.826	1.071	1.001	0.885	7
	乐业县	0.966	0.908	1	0.966	0.878	9
	靖西市	1.107	0.663	1.099	1.007	0.734	17
	江州区	1.165	0.732	1	1.165	0.852	15
	扶绥县	1.189	0.845	1.011	1.176	1.004	1
	宁明县	1.232	0.681	1.032	1.193	0.839	16
	龙州县	1.137	0.760	0.950	1.197	0.864	12
	大新县	1.042	0.836	0.993	1.050	0.871	11
	凭祥市	1.131	0.794	1.002	1.129	0.898	6
	防城区	1.310	0.746	1.166	1.124	0.977	2
	港口区	1.222	0.745	1	1.222	0.910	3
	上思县	1.041	0.829	0.994	1.047	0.863	13
	东兴市	0.914	0.936	1	0.914	0.855	14
	均值	1.119	0.776	1.034	1.082	0.868
时间	2011—2012	1.272	0.801	1.022	1.245	1.018
	2012—2013	1.396	0.535	1.219	1.145	0.747
	2013—2014	1.324	0.807	1.087	1.218	1.068
	2014—2015	0.916	0.857	1.058	0.866	0.785
	2015—2016	0.901	0.910	0.892	1.009	0.820
	2016—2017	1.010	0.809	0.955	1.058	0.817
	均值	1.119	0.776	1.034	1.082	0.868