World Regional Studies ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 98-111.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2025.07.20230744
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-10-31
Revised:
2024-03-21
Online:
2025-07-15
Published:
2025-07-31
作者简介:
刘宝涛(1987—),男,副教授,博士,研究方向为城乡发展与土地利用,E-mail:liubaotao912@163.com。
基金资助:
Baotao LIU. Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of construction land transformation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration[J]. World Regional Studies, 2025, 34(7): 98-111.
刘宝涛. 京津冀城市群建设用地转型的时空演化与驱动因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2025, 34(7): 98-111.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://sjdlyj.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2025.07.20230744
系统 | 要素 | 属性 | 指标 | 单位 | 指标释义 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
建设 用地 转型 | 结构 转型 | 生产 结构 | 工业用地占比(X1) | % | 工业生产用地数量结构 |
物流及仓储用地占比(X2) | % | 物流仓储用地数量结构 | |||
生活 结构 | 居住用地占比(X3) | % | 居住生活用地数量结构 | ||
公共管理与公共服务用地占比(X4) | % | 公共管理与服务用地数量结构 | |||
生态 结构 | 人均公共绿地面积(X5) | m2/人 | 公共绿地人均份额数量结构 | ||
建成区绿化覆盖率(X6) | % | 公共绿地占比份额数量结构 | |||
功能 转型 | 生产 功能 | 地区生产总值增长率(X7) | % | 经济生产能力 经济生产潜力 | |
固定资产投资增长率(X8) | % | ||||
生活 功能 | 城镇人均居住面积(X9) | m2/人 | 生活保障功能 | ||
城镇人均道路面积(X10) | m2/人 | 生活支撑功能 | |||
生态 功能 | 水土资源平衡系数(X11) | m3/hm2 | 生态平衡功能 | ||
地均生态系统服务价值(X12) | 元/hm2 | 生态调节功能 | |||
效益 转型 | 生产 效益 | 地均地区生产总值(X13) | 104元//km2 | 地均生产效益 | |
人均地区生产总值(X14) | 元 | 人均生产效益 | |||
生活 效益 | 城镇居民人均可支配收入(X15) | 元 | 居民收入的生活效益 | ||
城镇居民人均消费支出(X16) | 元 | 居民消费的生活效益 | |||
生态 效益 | 工业固体废物综合利用率(X17) | % | 工业固废利用的生态效益 | ||
生活垃圾无害化处理率(X18) | % | 生活垃圾处理的生态效益 | |||
污水集中处理率(X19) | % | 废水集中处理的生态效益 |
Tab.1 Construction land transformation measurement system
系统 | 要素 | 属性 | 指标 | 单位 | 指标释义 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
建设 用地 转型 | 结构 转型 | 生产 结构 | 工业用地占比(X1) | % | 工业生产用地数量结构 |
物流及仓储用地占比(X2) | % | 物流仓储用地数量结构 | |||
生活 结构 | 居住用地占比(X3) | % | 居住生活用地数量结构 | ||
公共管理与公共服务用地占比(X4) | % | 公共管理与服务用地数量结构 | |||
生态 结构 | 人均公共绿地面积(X5) | m2/人 | 公共绿地人均份额数量结构 | ||
建成区绿化覆盖率(X6) | % | 公共绿地占比份额数量结构 | |||
功能 转型 | 生产 功能 | 地区生产总值增长率(X7) | % | 经济生产能力 经济生产潜力 | |
固定资产投资增长率(X8) | % | ||||
生活 功能 | 城镇人均居住面积(X9) | m2/人 | 生活保障功能 | ||
城镇人均道路面积(X10) | m2/人 | 生活支撑功能 | |||
生态 功能 | 水土资源平衡系数(X11) | m3/hm2 | 生态平衡功能 | ||
地均生态系统服务价值(X12) | 元/hm2 | 生态调节功能 | |||
效益 转型 | 生产 效益 | 地均地区生产总值(X13) | 104元//km2 | 地均生产效益 | |
人均地区生产总值(X14) | 元 | 人均生产效益 | |||
生活 效益 | 城镇居民人均可支配收入(X15) | 元 | 居民收入的生活效益 | ||
城镇居民人均消费支出(X16) | 元 | 居民消费的生活效益 | |||
生态 效益 | 工业固体废物综合利用率(X17) | % | 工业固废利用的生态效益 | ||
生活垃圾无害化处理率(X18) | % | 生活垃圾处理的生态效益 | |||
污水集中处理率(X19) | % | 废水集中处理的生态效益 |
年份 | 重心经度坐标 | 重心纬度坐标 | 长轴标准差/km | 短轴标准差/km | 方位角/° |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | 116°18′59″ | 39°3′16″ | 249.40 | 129.14 | 47.01 |
2010 | 116°14′58″ | 39°2′44″ | 247.06 | 135.67 | 47.14 |
2015 | 116°22′35″ | 39°7′54″ | 251.54 | 137.31 | 50.08 |
2020 | 116°20′1″ | 39°5′7″ | 251.60 | 132.13 | 48.50 |
Tab.2 The Transformation of construction land in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration center of gravity migration, standard deviation elliptical parameters
年份 | 重心经度坐标 | 重心纬度坐标 | 长轴标准差/km | 短轴标准差/km | 方位角/° |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | 116°18′59″ | 39°3′16″ | 249.40 | 129.14 | 47.01 |
2010 | 116°14′58″ | 39°2′44″ | 247.06 | 135.67 | 47.14 |
2015 | 116°22′35″ | 39°7′54″ | 251.54 | 137.31 | 50.08 |
2020 | 116°20′1″ | 39°5′7″ | 251.60 | 132.13 | 48.50 |
Fig.4 Center of gravity migration path and standard deviation ellipse of construction land transformation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration
驱动因素 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 2020年 |
---|---|---|---|---|
工业用地占比(X1) | 0.046 | 0.279 | 0.380 | 0.142 |
物流及仓储用地占比(X2) | 0.568 | 0.726 | 0.434 | 0.316 |
居住用地占比(X3) | 0.153 | 0.334 | 0.302 | 0.157 |
公共管理与公共服务用地占比(X4) | 0.659 | 0.565 | 0.377 | 0.071 |
人均公共绿地面积(X5) | 0.476 | 0.464 | 0.120 | 0.300 |
建成区绿化覆盖率(X6) | 0.046 | 0.715 | 0.173 | 0.223 |
地区生产总值增长率(X7) | 0.422 | 0.326 | 0.208 | 0.367 |
固定资产投资增长率(X8) | 0.449 | 0.410 | 0.169 | 0.234 |
城镇人均居住面积(X9) | 0.344 | 0.111 | 0.189 | 0.230 |
城镇人均道路面积(X10) | 0.453 | 0.201 | 0.056 | 0.528 |
水土资源平衡系数(X11) | 0.496 | 0.526 | 0.513 | 0.503 |
地均生态系统服务价值(X12) | 0.470 | 0.574 | 0.293 | 0.328 |
地均地区生产总值(X13) | 0.834 | 0.290 | 0.326 | 0.640 |
人均地区生产总值(X14) | 0.519 | 0.237 | 0.123 | 0.845 |
城镇居民人均可支配收入(X15) | 0.224 | 0.172 | 0.466 | 0.675 |
城镇居民人均消费支出(X16) | 0.199 | 0.582 | 0.270 | 0.410 |
工业固体废物综合利用率(X17) | 0.473 | 0.294 | 0.821 | 0.371 |
生活垃圾无害化处理率(X18) | 0.658 | 0.683 | 0.158 | 0.418 |
污水集中处理率(X19) | 0.497 | 0.397 | 0.387 | 0.609 |
Tab. 3 Detection of construction land transformation drivers in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration
驱动因素 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 2020年 |
---|---|---|---|---|
工业用地占比(X1) | 0.046 | 0.279 | 0.380 | 0.142 |
物流及仓储用地占比(X2) | 0.568 | 0.726 | 0.434 | 0.316 |
居住用地占比(X3) | 0.153 | 0.334 | 0.302 | 0.157 |
公共管理与公共服务用地占比(X4) | 0.659 | 0.565 | 0.377 | 0.071 |
人均公共绿地面积(X5) | 0.476 | 0.464 | 0.120 | 0.300 |
建成区绿化覆盖率(X6) | 0.046 | 0.715 | 0.173 | 0.223 |
地区生产总值增长率(X7) | 0.422 | 0.326 | 0.208 | 0.367 |
固定资产投资增长率(X8) | 0.449 | 0.410 | 0.169 | 0.234 |
城镇人均居住面积(X9) | 0.344 | 0.111 | 0.189 | 0.230 |
城镇人均道路面积(X10) | 0.453 | 0.201 | 0.056 | 0.528 |
水土资源平衡系数(X11) | 0.496 | 0.526 | 0.513 | 0.503 |
地均生态系统服务价值(X12) | 0.470 | 0.574 | 0.293 | 0.328 |
地均地区生产总值(X13) | 0.834 | 0.290 | 0.326 | 0.640 |
人均地区生产总值(X14) | 0.519 | 0.237 | 0.123 | 0.845 |
城镇居民人均可支配收入(X15) | 0.224 | 0.172 | 0.466 | 0.675 |
城镇居民人均消费支出(X16) | 0.199 | 0.582 | 0.270 | 0.410 |
工业固体废物综合利用率(X17) | 0.473 | 0.294 | 0.821 | 0.371 |
生活垃圾无害化处理率(X18) | 0.658 | 0.683 | 0.158 | 0.418 |
污水集中处理率(X19) | 0.497 | 0.397 | 0.387 | 0.609 |
因子 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 | X15 | X16 | X17 | X18 | X19 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.322 | ||||||||||||||||||
X2 | 0.888 | 0.253 | |||||||||||||||||
X3 | 0.857 | 0.613 | 0.358 | ||||||||||||||||
X4 | 0.819 | 0.752 | 1.000 | 0.494 | |||||||||||||||
X5 | 0.995 | 0.752 | 0.879 | 0.751 | 0.570 | ||||||||||||||
X6 | 0.962 | 0.784 | 0.969 | 0.812 | 0.972 | 0.317 | |||||||||||||
X7 | 0.910 | 0.752 | 0.938 | 0.664 | 0.710 | 0.702 | 0.393 | ||||||||||||
X8 | 0.948 | 0.542 | 0.733 | 0.686 | 0.760 | 0.983 | 0.761 | 0.343 | |||||||||||
X9 | 0.820 | 1.000 | 0.902 | 0.745 | 0.977 | 0.870 | 0.825 | 0.839 | 0.655 | ||||||||||
X10 | 0.845 | 0.887 | 0.728 | 0.960 | 0.967 | 0.964 | 0.834 | 0.979 | 0.784 | 0.504 | |||||||||
X11 | 0.571 | 0.831 | 0.825 | 0.902 | 0.922 | 0.982 | 0.933 | 0.566 | 0.983 | 0.881 | 0.202 | ||||||||
X12 | 0.571 | 0.748 | 0.833 | 0.709 | 0.703 | 0.976 | 0.754 | 0.555 | 0.900 | 0.946 | 0.257 | 0.246 | |||||||
X13 | 0.907 | 0.987 | 0.888 | 0.750 | 0.942 | 0.987 | 0.989 | 0.547 | 0.863 | 0.946 | 0.578 | 0.553 | 0.509 | ||||||
X14 | 0.960 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.907 | 0.918 | 0.738 | 0.655 | 0.878 | 0.863 | 0.960 | 0.939 | 0.843 | 0.864 | 0.547 | |||||
X15 | 0.955 | 0.969 | 0.742 | 0.960 | 0.834 | 0.608 | 0.593 | 0.583 | 0.960 | 0.764 | 0.522 | 0.522 | 0.543 | 0.685 | 0.245 | ||||
X16 | 0.937 | 0.921 | 0.930 | 0.888 | 0.888 | 0.911 | 0.939 | 0.974 | 0.960 | 0.951 | 0.936 | 0.927 | 0.901 | 0.926 | 0.894 | 0.748 | |||
X17 | 0.483 | 0.992 | 0.941 | 0.766 | 0.709 | 0.983 | 0.871 | 0.944 | 0.860 | 0.956 | 0.468 | 0.527 | 0.948 | 0.993 | 0.993 | 0.976 | 0.367 | ||
X18 | 0.893 | 0.874 | 0.994 | 0.868 | 0.983 | 0.995 | 0.989 | 0.874 | 0.942 | 0.916 | 0.896 | 0.983 | 0.989 | 0.959 | 1.000 | 0.977 | 0.907 | 0.703 | |
X19 | 0.924 | 0.987 | 0.999 | 0.828 | 0.979 | 0.853 | 0.957 | 0.868 | 0.806 | 0.989 | 0.938 | 0.944 | 0.933 | 0.957 | 1.000 | 0.960 | 0.944 | 0.932 | 0.743 |
Tab. 4 Interaction detection results of construction land transformation drivers in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration
因子 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 | X15 | X16 | X17 | X18 | X19 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.322 | ||||||||||||||||||
X2 | 0.888 | 0.253 | |||||||||||||||||
X3 | 0.857 | 0.613 | 0.358 | ||||||||||||||||
X4 | 0.819 | 0.752 | 1.000 | 0.494 | |||||||||||||||
X5 | 0.995 | 0.752 | 0.879 | 0.751 | 0.570 | ||||||||||||||
X6 | 0.962 | 0.784 | 0.969 | 0.812 | 0.972 | 0.317 | |||||||||||||
X7 | 0.910 | 0.752 | 0.938 | 0.664 | 0.710 | 0.702 | 0.393 | ||||||||||||
X8 | 0.948 | 0.542 | 0.733 | 0.686 | 0.760 | 0.983 | 0.761 | 0.343 | |||||||||||
X9 | 0.820 | 1.000 | 0.902 | 0.745 | 0.977 | 0.870 | 0.825 | 0.839 | 0.655 | ||||||||||
X10 | 0.845 | 0.887 | 0.728 | 0.960 | 0.967 | 0.964 | 0.834 | 0.979 | 0.784 | 0.504 | |||||||||
X11 | 0.571 | 0.831 | 0.825 | 0.902 | 0.922 | 0.982 | 0.933 | 0.566 | 0.983 | 0.881 | 0.202 | ||||||||
X12 | 0.571 | 0.748 | 0.833 | 0.709 | 0.703 | 0.976 | 0.754 | 0.555 | 0.900 | 0.946 | 0.257 | 0.246 | |||||||
X13 | 0.907 | 0.987 | 0.888 | 0.750 | 0.942 | 0.987 | 0.989 | 0.547 | 0.863 | 0.946 | 0.578 | 0.553 | 0.509 | ||||||
X14 | 0.960 | 1.000 | 0.843 | 0.907 | 0.918 | 0.738 | 0.655 | 0.878 | 0.863 | 0.960 | 0.939 | 0.843 | 0.864 | 0.547 | |||||
X15 | 0.955 | 0.969 | 0.742 | 0.960 | 0.834 | 0.608 | 0.593 | 0.583 | 0.960 | 0.764 | 0.522 | 0.522 | 0.543 | 0.685 | 0.245 | ||||
X16 | 0.937 | 0.921 | 0.930 | 0.888 | 0.888 | 0.911 | 0.939 | 0.974 | 0.960 | 0.951 | 0.936 | 0.927 | 0.901 | 0.926 | 0.894 | 0.748 | |||
X17 | 0.483 | 0.992 | 0.941 | 0.766 | 0.709 | 0.983 | 0.871 | 0.944 | 0.860 | 0.956 | 0.468 | 0.527 | 0.948 | 0.993 | 0.993 | 0.976 | 0.367 | ||
X18 | 0.893 | 0.874 | 0.994 | 0.868 | 0.983 | 0.995 | 0.989 | 0.874 | 0.942 | 0.916 | 0.896 | 0.983 | 0.989 | 0.959 | 1.000 | 0.977 | 0.907 | 0.703 | |
X19 | 0.924 | 0.987 | 0.999 | 0.828 | 0.979 | 0.853 | 0.957 | 0.868 | 0.806 | 0.989 | 0.938 | 0.944 | 0.933 | 0.957 | 1.000 | 0.960 | 0.944 | 0.932 | 0.743 |
[1] | 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与土地资源管理.地理研究,2015,34(9):1607-1618. |
LONG H. Land use transition and land management. Geographical Research, 2015,34(9):1607-1618. | |
[2] | 瞿诗进,胡守庚,李全峰.中国城市建设用地转型阶段及其空间格局.地理学报,2020,75(7):1539-1553. |
QU S, HU S, LI Q. Stages and spatial patterns of urban built-up land transition in China.Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(7):1539-1553. | |
[3] | 张德荣."中等收入陷阱"发生机理与中国经济增长的阶段性动力.经济研究,2013,48(9):17-29. |
ZHANG D. The Mechanism of Middle-income Trap and the potential factors influencing China's Economic Growth. Economic Research Journal,2013,48(9):17-29. | |
[4] | 李全峰,胡守庚,瞿诗进.1990-2015年长江中游地区耕地利用转型时空特征.地理研究,2017,36(8):1489-1502. |
LI Q, HU S, QU S. Spatiotemporal characteristics of cultivated land use transition in the Middle Yangtze River from 1990 to 2015. Geographical Research,2017,36(8):1489-1502. | |
[5] | 刘彦随,刘玉.中国农村空心化问题研究的进展与展望.地理研究,2010,29(1):35-42. |
LIU Y, LIU Y. Progress and prospect on the study of rural hollowing in China. Geographical Research, 2010,29(1):35-42. | |
[6] | QU Y, LONG H. The economic and environmental effects of land use transitions under rapid urbanization and the implications for land use management. Habitat International, 2018, 82 : 113-121. |
[7] | 张婕,吴寿敏,张云.长三角城市群绿色发展水平测度与分析.河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,22(4):53-60. |
ZHANG J, WU S, ZHANG Y. Measurement and Analysis of green development level of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Journal of Hehai University(Philosophy and Social Sciences),2020,22(4):53-60. | |
[8] | MATHER A. The Forest Transition. Area, 1992, 24(4):367-379. |
[9] | ALAN GRAINGER. National land use morphology:Patterns and possibilities. Geography, 1995, 80(3) : 235-245. |
[10] | A.S.MATHER. Forest transition theory and the reforesting of Scotland. Scottish Geographical Journal, 2004, 120(1-2) : 83-98. |
[11] | YEO I, HUANG C. Revisiting the forest transition theory with historical records and geospatial data: A case study from Mississippi (USA). Land Use Policy, 2013, 32(3):1-13. |
[12] | DAVID BARTON BRAY, PETER KLEPEIS. Deforestation, forest transitions, and institutions for sustainability in Southeastern Mexico, 1900-2000. Environment and History, 2005, 11(2) : 195-223. |
[13] | MATHER A. Recent asian forest transitions in relation to forest-transition theory. International Forestry Review, 2007, 9(1) : 491-502. |
[14] | JAESOO BAE, WON JOO RIN, KIM Y.S.Forest transition in South Korea: Reality, path and drivers.Land Use Policy,2012,29(1):198-207. |
[15] | 龙花楼,李秀彬.区域土地利用转型分析——以长江沿线样带为例.自然资源学报,2002,17(2):144-149. |
LONG H, LI X. Analysis on regional land use transition: A case study in Transect of the Yangtze River. Journal of Natural Resources,2002,17(2):144-149. | |
[16] | 龙花楼.土地利用转型——土地利用/覆被变化综合研究的新途径.地理与地理信息科学,2003,18(1):87-90. |
LONG H. Land use transition:A new integrated approach of land use/cover change study. Geography and Geo-Information Science,2003,18(1):87-90. | |
[17] | 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展.地理科学进展,2012,31(2):131-138. |
LONG H. Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography,2012,31(2):131-138. | |
[18] | 龙花楼.中国农村宅基地转型的理论与证实.地理学报,2006(10):1093-1100. |
LONG H. Rural housing land transition in China:Theory and verification.Acta Geographica Sinica,2006(10):1093-1100. | |
[19] | 郭丽英,狄黎平,李刚,等.GIS支持下黄土高原土地利用转型探测研究:以陕西延安宝塔区为例.Journal of Geographical Sciences,2015,25(12):1467-1478. |
GUO L, DI L, LI G,et al.GIS-based detection of land use transformation in the Loess Plateau: A case study in Baota District, Shaanxi Province,China.Journal of Geographical Sciences,2015,25(12):1467-1478. | |
[20] | 宋小青,吴志峰,欧阳竹.1949年以来中国耕地功能变化.地理学报,2014,69(4):435-447. |
SONG X, WU Z, OU Y. Changes of cultivated land function in China since 1949.Acta Geographica Sinica,2014,69(4):435-447. | |
[21] | 龙花楼,李秀彬.长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型.地理学报,2005,60(2):179-188. |
LONG H, LI X. Rural housing land transition in Transect of the Yangtse River.Acta Geographica Sinica,2005,60(2):179-188. | |
[22] | VERBURG P, VELDKAMP A. Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19(1):77-98. |
[23] | ALO C, JR R. Identifying systematic land-cover transitions using remote sensing and GIS: The fate of forests inside and outside protected Areas of Southwestern Ghana. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 2008, 35(2):280-295. |
[24] | XU J, SHARMA R, FANG J, et al. Critical linkages between land-use transition and human health in the Himalayan region. Environment International, 2008, 34(2):239-247. |
[25] | LIU Y, LONG H, LI T,et al. Land use transitions and their effects on water environment in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China. Land Use Policy, 2015, 47:293-301. |
[26] | 吕晓,黄贤金,张全景.城乡建设用地转型研究综述.城市规划,2015,39(04):105-112. |
LYU X, HUANG X, ZHANG Q.A Literature review on urban-rural construction land transition.City Planning Review,2015,39(4):105-112. | |
[27] | 许凤娇,吕晓,陈昌玲.山东省城乡建设用地转型的时空格局.自然资源学报,2017,32(9):1554-1567. |
XU F,LYU X, CHEN C. Spatio-temporal pattern of urban and rural construction land transformation in Shandong Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(9):1554-1567. | |
[28] | 姚尧,李江风,杨媛媛.长江中游城市群城市建设用地利用社会经济功能转型与协调性评价研究.地域研究与开发,2018,37(5):128-133. |
YAO Y, LI J, YANG Y. Study on social economic function transformation and coordination evaluation of urban construction land use in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River.Areal Research and Development,2018,37(5):128-133. | |
[29] | 刘永清,张光宇. 论土地利用系统工程——原理,方法和体系. 系统工程,1997,15(2):8-12. |
LIU Y, ZHANG G. Discussion on land use system engineering:Principles,Methods and Systems. Systems Engineering, 1997,15(2):8-12. | |
[30] | 梁勤欧. 城市土地利用系统复杂性研究. 国土资源科技管理,2003, 20(2):40-43. |
LIANG Q. A Research into the complexity of urban land use system.Management Geological Science and Technology, 2003, 20(2):40-43. | |
[31] | 蔡为民,唐华俊,陈佑启,等.土地利用系统健康评价的框架与指标选择.中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14 (1):31-35. |
CAI W, TANG H, CHEN Y,et al. Framework of conception and option of health assessment index in land use system.China Polulation, Resources and Environment, 2004,14 (1):31-35. | |
[32] | 朱晓华,蔡运龙,蒋为国,等.自组织的土地利用系统.中国土地科学,2005,19(2):21-28. |
ZHU X, CAI Y, JIANG W,et al. Self-organized character of land use system.China Land Science,2005,19(2):21-28. | |
[33] | 班春峰,刘友兆,黄琪,等.基于集对分析的江苏省土地利用协调性研究.中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(9):57-63. |
BAN C, LIU Y, HUANG Q,et al.. Coordination of land-use based on the set pair analysis in Jiangsu Province.China Polulation, Resources and Environment,2011,21(9):57-63. | |
[34] | 刘彦随.区域土地利用系统优化调控的机理与模式.资源科学,1999,21(4):63-68. |
LIU Y. Optimal regulation mechanism and models of regional land use system. Resources Science, 1999, 21(4): 63-68. | |
[35] | 刘宝涛.长三角城市群建设用地转型时空分异及驱动因子识别.南通大学学报(社会科学版),2023,39(3):43-56. |
LIU B. Spatio-temporal differentiation and driving factors identification of construction land transformation in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Journal of Nantong University(Social Sciences Edition), 2023,39(3):43-56. | |
[36] | 赵亚莉,刘友兆,龙开胜.城市土地开发强度变化的生态环境效应.中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(7):23-29. |
ZHAO Y, LIU Y, LONG K.Eco-environmental effects of urban land development intensity change across capital cities in China. China Polulation, Resources and Environment,2014,24(7):23-29. | |
[37] | 李寒冰,金晓斌,吴可,等.土地利用系统对区域可持续发展的支撑力评价:方法与实证.自然资源学报,2022,37(1):166-185. |
LI H, JIN X, WU K, et al. Evaluation of the support capacity of land use system on regional sustainable development: Methods and empirical evidence. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(1): 166-185. | |
[38] | 张晓琳,金晓斌,范业婷,等.1995-2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析.自然资源学报,2019,34(4):689-706. |
ZHANG X, JIN X, FAN Y, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination status of the land use function transition in Jiangsu Province from 1995 to 2015. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 689-706. | |
[39] | 韩冬.京津冀城市群协调发展的时空分异特征及其影响因素.城市问题,2021(5):4-13. |
HAN D. Spatial and temporal divergence characteristics of coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration and its influencing factors. Urban Issues,2021(5):4-13. | |
[40] | 蓝希,刘小琼,郭炎,等."长江经济带"战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价.长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(7):1433-1443. |
LAN X, LIU X, GUO Y,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of urban water environmental carrying capacity in Wuhan under the context of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Strategic. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2018,27(7):1433-1443. | |
[41] | 侯松,甄延临,曹秀婷,等.高质量发展背景下城市群治理评价体系构建及应用:以长三角城市群为例.经济地理,2022,42(2):35-44. |
HOU S, ZHEN Y, CAO X,et al.Evaluation index system of urban agglomeration governance under the background of high-quality development:A Case of the Yangtze River Delta. Economic Geography,2022,42(2):35-44. | |
[42] | HWANG C, YOON K.Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications.Springer:Berlin Heidelberg, 1981. |
[43] | 李雪铭,郭玉洁,田深圳,等.辽宁省城市人居环境系统耦合协调度时空格局演变及驱动力研究.地理科学,2019,39(8):1208-1218. |
LI X, GUO Y, TIAN S,et al. The spatio-temporal pattern evolution and driving force of the coupling coordination degree of urban human settlements system in Liaoning Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2019,39(8):1208-1218. | |
[44] | 蒋正云,胡艳.中国新型城镇化高质量发展时空格局及异质性演化分析.城市问题,城市问题, 2021, (03):4-16. |
JIANG Z, HU Y. Analysis of the spatio-temporal pattern and heterogeneous evolution of high-quality development of new urbanization in China. Urban Issues,2021, (03):4-16. | |
[45] | 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望.地理学报,2017, 72(1):116-134. |
WANG J, XU C. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||