World Regional Studies ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 781-791.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.04.2020110
Previous Articles Next Articles
Shufang WANG(), Yuxin YAN(), Na YU
Received:
2020-03-03
Revised:
2020-07-31
Online:
2021-07-30
Published:
2021-08-06
Contact:
Yuxin YAN
通讯作者:
闫语欣
作者简介:
王淑芳(1979-),女,博士,副教授,硕导,主要从事全球化与地缘环境研究, E-mail: sfwang@tjnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
Shufang WANG, Yuxin YAN, Na YU. The formation mechanism of investment paradox countries along the Belt and Road[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(4): 781-791.
王淑芳, 闫语欣, 于娜. “一带一路”沿线国家投资悖论的形成机理研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(4): 781-791.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://sjdlyj.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.04.2020110
年份 | 排名 | 国家 | 投资金额/ 万美元 | 投资占比 | 年份 | 排名 | 国家 | 投资金额/ 万美元 | 投资占比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018年 | 1 | 印度尼西亚 | 186,482 | 10.42% | 2015年 | 1 | 俄罗斯 | 296,086 | 15.64% |
2 | 马来西亚 | 166,270 | 9.29% | 2 | 印度尼西亚 | 145,057 | 7.66% | ||
3 | 老挝 | 124,179 | 6.94% | 3 | 印度 | 70,525 | 3.73% | ||
4 | 越南 | 115,083 | 6.43% | 4 | 土耳其 | 62,831 | 3.32% | ||
5 | 柬埔寨 | 77,843 | 4.35% | 5 | 越南 | 56,017 | 2.96% | ||
6 | 泰国 | 73,729 | 4.12% | 6 | 老挝 | 51,721 | 2.73% | ||
7 | 俄罗斯 | 72,524 | 4.05% | 7 | 马来西亚 | 48,891 | 2.58% | ||
8 | 孟加拉国 | 54,365 | 3.04% | 8 | 柬埔寨 | 41,968 | 2.22% | ||
9 | 塔吉克斯坦 | 38,824 | 2.17% | 9 | 泰国 | 40,724 | 2.15% | ||
10 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 38,307 | 2.14% | 10 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 40,479 | 2.14% | ||
2017年 | 1 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 207,047 | 10.27% | 2014年 | 1 | 印度尼西亚 | 127,198 | 8.80% |
2 | 马来西亚 | 172,214 | 8.53% | 2 | 老挝 | 102,690 | 7.10% | ||
3 | 印度尼西亚 | 168,225 | 8.34% | 3 | 巴基斯坦 | 101,426 | 7.01% | ||
4 | 俄罗斯 | 154,842 | 7.68% | 4 | 泰国 | 83,946 | 5.80% | ||
5 | 老挝 | 121,995 | 6.05% | 5 | 俄罗斯 | 63,356 | 4.38% | ||
6 | 泰国 | 105,759 | 5.24% | 6 | 伊朗 | 59,286 | 4.10% | ||
7 | 越南 | 76,440 | 3.79% | 7 | 马来西亚 | 52,134 | 3.61% | ||
8 | 柬埔寨 | 74,424 | 3.69% | 8 | 蒙古 | 50,261 | 3.48% | ||
9 | 巴基斯坦 | 67,819 | 3.36% | 9 | 缅甸 | 34,313 | 2.37% | ||
10 | 缅甸 | 42,818 | 2.12% | 10 | 越南 | 33,289 | 2.30% | ||
2016年 | 1 | 马来西亚 | 182,996 | 11.93% | 2013年 | 1 | 印度尼西亚 | 156,338 | 11.87% |
2 | 印度尼西亚 | 146,088 | 9.52% | 2 | 俄罗斯 | 102,225 | 7.76% | ||
3 | 俄罗斯 | 129,307 | 8.43% | 3 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 81,149 | 6.17% | ||
4 | 越南 | 127,904 | 8.34% | 4 | 老挝 | 78,148 | 5.93% | ||
5 | 泰国 | 112,169 | 7.31% | 5 | 泰国 | 75,519 | 5.73% | ||
6 | 巴基斯坦 | 63,294 | 4.13% | 6 | 伊朗 | 74,527 | 5.66% | ||
7 | 柬埔寨 | 62,567 | 4.08% | 7 | 马来西亚 | 61,638 | 4.68% | ||
8 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 48,770 | 3.18% | 8 | 柬埔寨 | 49,933 | 3.79% | ||
9 | 伊朗 | 39,037 | 2.54% | 9 | 越南 | 48,050 | 3.64% | ||
10 | 老挝 | 32,758 | 2.14% | 10 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 47,882 | 3.63% | ||
11 | 缅甸 | 47,533 | 3.60% | ||||||
12 | 蒙古 | 38,879 | 2.95% |
Tab.1 Countries with high risk and high investment along the Belt and Road in 2013-2018
年份 | 排名 | 国家 | 投资金额/ 万美元 | 投资占比 | 年份 | 排名 | 国家 | 投资金额/ 万美元 | 投资占比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018年 | 1 | 印度尼西亚 | 186,482 | 10.42% | 2015年 | 1 | 俄罗斯 | 296,086 | 15.64% |
2 | 马来西亚 | 166,270 | 9.29% | 2 | 印度尼西亚 | 145,057 | 7.66% | ||
3 | 老挝 | 124,179 | 6.94% | 3 | 印度 | 70,525 | 3.73% | ||
4 | 越南 | 115,083 | 6.43% | 4 | 土耳其 | 62,831 | 3.32% | ||
5 | 柬埔寨 | 77,843 | 4.35% | 5 | 越南 | 56,017 | 2.96% | ||
6 | 泰国 | 73,729 | 4.12% | 6 | 老挝 | 51,721 | 2.73% | ||
7 | 俄罗斯 | 72,524 | 4.05% | 7 | 马来西亚 | 48,891 | 2.58% | ||
8 | 孟加拉国 | 54,365 | 3.04% | 8 | 柬埔寨 | 41,968 | 2.22% | ||
9 | 塔吉克斯坦 | 38,824 | 2.17% | 9 | 泰国 | 40,724 | 2.15% | ||
10 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 38,307 | 2.14% | 10 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 40,479 | 2.14% | ||
2017年 | 1 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 207,047 | 10.27% | 2014年 | 1 | 印度尼西亚 | 127,198 | 8.80% |
2 | 马来西亚 | 172,214 | 8.53% | 2 | 老挝 | 102,690 | 7.10% | ||
3 | 印度尼西亚 | 168,225 | 8.34% | 3 | 巴基斯坦 | 101,426 | 7.01% | ||
4 | 俄罗斯 | 154,842 | 7.68% | 4 | 泰国 | 83,946 | 5.80% | ||
5 | 老挝 | 121,995 | 6.05% | 5 | 俄罗斯 | 63,356 | 4.38% | ||
6 | 泰国 | 105,759 | 5.24% | 6 | 伊朗 | 59,286 | 4.10% | ||
7 | 越南 | 76,440 | 3.79% | 7 | 马来西亚 | 52,134 | 3.61% | ||
8 | 柬埔寨 | 74,424 | 3.69% | 8 | 蒙古 | 50,261 | 3.48% | ||
9 | 巴基斯坦 | 67,819 | 3.36% | 9 | 缅甸 | 34,313 | 2.37% | ||
10 | 缅甸 | 42,818 | 2.12% | 10 | 越南 | 33,289 | 2.30% | ||
2016年 | 1 | 马来西亚 | 182,996 | 11.93% | 2013年 | 1 | 印度尼西亚 | 156,338 | 11.87% |
2 | 印度尼西亚 | 146,088 | 9.52% | 2 | 俄罗斯 | 102,225 | 7.76% | ||
3 | 俄罗斯 | 129,307 | 8.43% | 3 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 81,149 | 6.17% | ||
4 | 越南 | 127,904 | 8.34% | 4 | 老挝 | 78,148 | 5.93% | ||
5 | 泰国 | 112,169 | 7.31% | 5 | 泰国 | 75,519 | 5.73% | ||
6 | 巴基斯坦 | 63,294 | 4.13% | 6 | 伊朗 | 74,527 | 5.66% | ||
7 | 柬埔寨 | 62,567 | 4.08% | 7 | 马来西亚 | 61,638 | 4.68% | ||
8 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 48,770 | 3.18% | 8 | 柬埔寨 | 49,933 | 3.79% | ||
9 | 伊朗 | 39,037 | 2.54% | 9 | 越南 | 48,050 | 3.64% | ||
10 | 老挝 | 32,758 | 2.14% | 10 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 47,882 | 3.63% | ||
11 | 缅甸 | 47,533 | 3.60% | ||||||
12 | 蒙古 | 38,879 | 2.95% |
排序 | 国家 | 投资存量/ 万美元 | 占比 | 投资悖论频次 | 排序 | 国家 | 投资存量/ 万美元 | 占比 | 投资悖论频次 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 新加坡 | 5009383 | 28.99% | 0 | 14 | 巴基斯坦 | 424682 | 2.46% | 3 |
2 | 俄罗斯 | 1420822 | 8.22% | 6 | 15 | 乌兹别克斯坦 | 368988 | 2.14% | 0 |
3 | 印度尼西亚 | 1281128 | 7.42% | 6 | 16 | 蒙古 | 336507 | 1.95% | 2 |
4 | 马来西亚 | 838724 | 4.85% | 6 | 17 | 伊朗 | 323429 | 1.87% | 3 |
5 | 老挝 | 830976 | 4.81% | 6 | 18 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 259456 | 1.50% | 3 |
6 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 734108 | 4.25% | 3 | 19 | 塔吉克斯坦 | 194483 | 1.13% | 1 |
7 | 阿拉伯 | 643606 | 3.73% | 0 | 20 | 土耳其 | 173368 | 1.00% | 1 |
8 | 柬埔寨 | 597368 | 3.46% | 5 | 21 | 吉尔吉斯坦 | 139308 | 0.81% | 0 |
9 | 泰国 | 594670 | 3.44% | 6 | 22 | 科威特 | 109184 | 0.63% | 0 |
10 | 越南 | 560543 | 3.24% | 6 | 23 | 埃及 | 107926 | 0.62% | 0 |
11 | 缅甸 | 468006 | 2.71% | 3 | 24 | 孟加拉国 | 87023 | 0.50% | 1 |
12 | 印度 | 466280 | 2.70% | 1 | 25 | 菲律宾 | 83002 | 0.48% | 0 |
13 | 以色列 | 461998 | 2.67% | 0 | - | - | - | - | - |
Tab.2 National investment stock ranking along the Belt and Road and the frequency of investment paradox, 2018
排序 | 国家 | 投资存量/ 万美元 | 占比 | 投资悖论频次 | 排序 | 国家 | 投资存量/ 万美元 | 占比 | 投资悖论频次 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 新加坡 | 5009383 | 28.99% | 0 | 14 | 巴基斯坦 | 424682 | 2.46% | 3 |
2 | 俄罗斯 | 1420822 | 8.22% | 6 | 15 | 乌兹别克斯坦 | 368988 | 2.14% | 0 |
3 | 印度尼西亚 | 1281128 | 7.42% | 6 | 16 | 蒙古 | 336507 | 1.95% | 2 |
4 | 马来西亚 | 838724 | 4.85% | 6 | 17 | 伊朗 | 323429 | 1.87% | 3 |
5 | 老挝 | 830976 | 4.81% | 6 | 18 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 259456 | 1.50% | 3 |
6 | 哈萨克斯坦 | 734108 | 4.25% | 3 | 19 | 塔吉克斯坦 | 194483 | 1.13% | 1 |
7 | 阿拉伯 | 643606 | 3.73% | 0 | 20 | 土耳其 | 173368 | 1.00% | 1 |
8 | 柬埔寨 | 597368 | 3.46% | 5 | 21 | 吉尔吉斯坦 | 139308 | 0.81% | 0 |
9 | 泰国 | 594670 | 3.44% | 6 | 22 | 科威特 | 109184 | 0.63% | 0 |
10 | 越南 | 560543 | 3.24% | 6 | 23 | 埃及 | 107926 | 0.62% | 0 |
11 | 缅甸 | 468006 | 2.71% | 3 | 24 | 孟加拉国 | 87023 | 0.50% | 1 |
12 | 印度 | 466280 | 2.70% | 1 | 25 | 菲律宾 | 83002 | 0.48% | 0 |
13 | 以色列 | 461998 | 2.67% | 0 | - | - | - | - | - |
国家 | 双边政治关系系数 | 国家 | 双边政治关系系数 | 国家 | 双边政治关系系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
巴基斯坦 | 8.92 | 塔吉克斯坦 | 7.50 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 7.12 |
俄罗斯 | 8.38 | 马来西亚 | 7.42 | 蒙古 | 7.00 |
柬埔寨 | 8.12 | 孟加拉国 | 7.38 | 越南 | 6.77 |
哈萨克斯坦 | 8.08 | 印度尼西亚 | 7.27 | 土耳其 | 6.77 |
老挝 | 8.00 | 伊朗 | 7.27 | 印度 | 5.81 |
泰国 | 7.92 | 缅甸 | 7.19 |
Tab.3 Coefficient of bilateral political relations between China and countries with investment paradox
国家 | 双边政治关系系数 | 国家 | 双边政治关系系数 | 国家 | 双边政治关系系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
巴基斯坦 | 8.92 | 塔吉克斯坦 | 7.50 | 沙特阿拉伯 | 7.12 |
俄罗斯 | 8.38 | 马来西亚 | 7.42 | 蒙古 | 7.00 |
柬埔寨 | 8.12 | 孟加拉国 | 7.38 | 越南 | 6.77 |
哈萨克斯坦 | 8.08 | 印度尼西亚 | 7.27 | 土耳其 | 6.77 |
老挝 | 8.00 | 伊朗 | 7.27 | 印度 | 5.81 |
泰国 | 7.92 | 缅甸 | 7.19 |
1 | Chaisse J, Matsushita M. China's 'Belt And Road' Initiative: Mapping the world trade normative and strategic implications. Journal of World Trade,2018,52(1):163-185. |
2 | 祖煜,李宗明. "一带一路"背景下我国对沿线国家的直接投资效率及对东道国治理水平的影响. 经济体制改革, 2018(04):159-164. |
Zu Y, Li Z. The impact of outward FDI on the interference of China's direct investment efficiency and host country governance under the Belt and Road scenario. Reform of Economic System,2018(04):159-164. | |
3 | Johnston L A. The Belt and Road Initiative: What is in it for China?. Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies,2019,6(1):40-58. |
4 | 姚战琪,夏杰长. 中国对外直接投资对"一带一路"沿线国家攀升全球价值链的影响. 南京大学学报:哲学·人文科学·社会科学,2018,55(04):35-46. |
Yao Z, Xia J. The impact of China's OFDI on the climbing of global value chain in countries along the "One Belt and One Road" route. Journal of Nanjing University:Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences,2008,55(04):35-46. | |
5 | 刘磊,刘晓宁,张猛. 中国对"一带一路"国家直接投资与产能过剩治理——基于中国省际面板数据的实证研究. 经济问题探索,2018(05):167-177. |
Liu L, Liu X, Zhang M. China's "One Belt and One Road" national direct investment and management of overcapacity -- An empirical study based on China's inter-provincial panel data. Inquiry into Economic Issues,2018(05):167-177. | |
6 | 王颖,吕婕,唐子仪. 中国对"一带一路"沿线国家直接投资的影响因素研究——基于东道国制度环境因素. 国际贸易问题,2018(1):83-91. |
Wang Y, Lu J, Tang Z. An empirical study of the determinants of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment in the Belt and Road countries—From the perspective of host country's institutional environment. Journal of International Trade,2018(1):83-91. | |
7 | 王丰龙,司月芳,曾刚. 地缘战略视角下"一带一路"倡议对中国对外直接投资的影响研究. 人文地理,2019,34(01):72-79. |
Wang F, Si Y, Zeng G. Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on Chinese OFDI: A geopolitical strategic perspective. Human geography,2019,34 (01):72-79. | |
8 | 李世杰,曹雪菲,周宁. 政治风险影响我国直接投资"一带一路"国家的实证分析. 江淮论坛, 2019(06):127-133. |
Li S, Cao X, Zhou N. Empirical analysis on the influence of political risk on "One Belt and One Road" countries of China's direct investment. Jianghuai Tribune,2019(06):127-133. | |
9 | 田晖,宋清,楚恬思. 制度因素与我国对外直接投资区位关系研究——"一带一路"倡议的调节效应. 经济地理, 2018,38(12):32-39. |
Tian H, Song Q, Chu T. Institutional factors and China's outward foreign direct investment: The adjustment effect of the Belt and Road initiative. Economic Geography, 2018,38(12):32-39. | |
10 | 崔岩,于津平. "一带一路"国家基础设施质量与中国对外直接投资——基于面板门槛模型的研究. 世界经济与政治论坛,2017(05):135-152. |
Cui Y, Yu J. National infrastructure quality along the Belt and Road and China's OFDI -- a study based on the panel threshold model. World Economic and Political Forum,2017(05):135-152. | |
11 | Kayalvizhi P N, Thenmozhi M. Does quality of innovation, culture and governance drive FDI? Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review,2018,34: 175-191. |
12 | 王娟娟,杨冰如. 中国在"一带一路"区域的投资结构变化及发展趋势. 中国流通经济,2020,34(1):90-99. |
Wang J, Yang B. The structure change and development trend of China's investment in the district of the Belt and Road Initiative. China Business And Market,2020,34(1):90-99. | |
13 | 王培志,潘辛毅,张舒悦. 制度因素,双边投资协定与中国对外直接投资区位选择——基于"一带一路"沿线国家面板数据. 经济与管理评论,2018(1):5-17. |
Wang P, Pan X, Zhang S. Institutional factors, bilateral investment treaties and China's OFDI location selection——Based on the panel data of countries along "The Belt and Road". Review of Economy and Management, 2018,34(01):5-17. | |
14 | 张述存. "一带一路"战略下优化中国对外直接投资布局的思路与对策. 管理世界,2017(4):1-9. |
Zhang S. Thoughts and countermeasures of optimizing the layout of China's OFDI under the "One Belt And One Road" strategy. Management world,2017(4):1-9. | |
15 | 黎绍凯,张广来. 我国对"一带一路"沿线国家直接投资布局与优化选择:兼顾投资动机与风险规避. 经济问题探索,2018(09):111-124. |
Li S, Zhang G. China's direct investment layout and optimization selection for countries along the "One Belt And One Road" route: considering both investment motivation and risk aversion. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2018(09):111-124. | |
16 | Liu Y, Lee C B. The geopolitics of Chinese overseas investment in transport infrastructure and SWOT-PEST analysis under the'One Belt One Road'Initiatives. International Commerce and Information Review,2019,21(3):87-108. |
17 | 李锋. "一带一路"沿线国家的投资风险与应对策略. 中国流通经济,2016,30(2):115-121. |
Li F. FDI risks in the countries along the Belt and Road and the countermeasures. China Business and Market, 2016,30(2): 115-121. | |
18 | 李原,汪红驹. "一带一路"沿线国家投资风险研究. 河北经贸大学学报,2018,39(04):45-55. |
Li Y, Wang H. Research on investment risk in countries along the "The Belt and Road". Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business, 2018,39(04):45-55. | |
19 | 刘海猛,胡森林,方恺,等. "一带一路"沿线国家政治-经济-社会风险综合评估及防控. 地理研究, 2019,38(12): 2966-2984. |
Liu H, Hu S, Fang K, et al. A comprehensive assessment of political, economic and social risks and their prevention for the countries along the Belt and Road. Geographical Research, 2019,38(12):2966-2984. | |
20 | 李加林,张元钊. 新形势下中国企业对外投资风险与管控措施. 亚太经济,2019(04):88-94. |
Li J, Zhang Y. Risk and control measures of Chinese enterprises' foreign investment in the new situation. Asia-pacific Economic Review, 2019(04):88-94. | |
21 | 李晓莉. 21世纪海上丝绸之路沿线国家投资环境分析. 学术探索,2017(04):73-81. |
Li X. Analysis on the investment environment of main countries along the 21st century Maritime Silk Road. Academic Exploration, 2017(04):73-81. | |
22 | 统计信息.2018年中国石油及石油产品进出口情况. 当代石油石化, 2019,27(04): 54.[China's import and export of petroleum and petroleum products in 2018. Petroleum & Petrochemical Today, 2019,27(04):54.] |
23 | 刘伟,侯立娟,王亚舒. 缅甸天然气市场展望及中国企业投资合作建议. 国际石油经济, 2019,27(08): 90-98. |
Liu W, Hou L, Wang Y. The outlook for Myanmar's gas market and the investment suggestion for Chinese enterprises. International Petroleum Economics,2019,27(08):90-98. | |
24 | 谢文心. "一带一路"建设下中蒙经贸合作与发展. 经济问题, 2017(02):14-18. |
Xie W. An analysis of economic and Sina-Mongolian trade corporation under Building the Belt and Road. On Economic Problems, 2017(02):14-18. | |
25 | 任梦茹,陈俊华,宋永通. "一带一路"背景下的中国与伊朗贸易结构与潜力分析. 世界地理研究, 2019,28(05):54-64. |
Ren M, Chen J, Song Y. An analysis of trade structure and potential between China and Iran under the background of the "Belt and Road" Initiative. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(05):54-64. | |
26 | 陈初昇,刘晓丹,衣长军. 海外华商网络、东道国制度环境对中国OFDI的影响——基于"一带一路"研究视角. 福建师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2017(01):79-86+169. |
Chen C, liu X, Yi C. Impact of overseas Chinese network and institutional environment on China's OFDI: A study from the countries of "One Belt And One Road". Journal of Fujian normal university:philosophy and social sciences edition,2017 (01) : 79-86 + 169. | |
27 | 尚海龙,吴显春,刘丽蓉. 华侨华人分布格局研究. 佛山科学技术学院学报:自然科学版, 2014,32(03): 36-40. |
Shang H, Wu X, Liu L. Studies on the spatial distribution pattern of overseas. Journal of Foshan University: Natural Science Edition, 2014,32(03):36-40. | |
28 | 张冬冬. 华侨华人:构建人类命运共同体的独特力量. 人民论坛, 2018(17):136-137. |
Zhang D. Overseas Chinese: A unique force for building a community of shared future for mankind. People's Tribune, 2018(17):136-137. | |
29 | 中华人民共和国和印度尼西亚共和国关于加强两国全面战略伙伴关系的联合声明. 人民日报, 2015-03-27.[Joint statement of the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Indonesia on strengthening the comprehensive strategic partnership between the two countries. People's Daily, 2015-03-27.] |
30 | 王望波,庄国土. 2009年海外华侨华人概述. 世界知识出版社, 2011. |
Wang W, Zhuang G. Overview of overseas Chinese in 2009. World Affairs Press,2011. | |
31 | 邢雯靖. 文化差异对中国OFDI的影响--基于"一带一路"国家研究. 安徽财经大学,2019. |
Xing W. Influence of cultural differences on China's OFDI: a study based on the "Belt and Road" countries. Anhui University of Finance and Economics,2019. | |
32 | 王谦,汪昕. "一带一路"国家文化因素与中国OFDI. 现代管理科学,2019(09):12-15. |
Wang Q, Wang X. National cultural factors of the Belt and Road initiative and China's OFDI. Modern Management Science, 2019 (09) : 12-15. | |
33 | 葛振宇,湛泳. 中国对美国直接投资的影响因素研究. 亚太经济,2015(02):85-91. |
Ge Z, Zhan Y. Study on the influence factors of Chinese Direct Investment in America. Asia-pacific Economic Review, 2015 (02) : 85-91. | |
34 | 陈胤默,孙乾坤,张晓瑜. 孔子学院促进中国企业对外直接投资吗——基"一带一路"沿线国家面板数据的分析. 国际贸易问题,2017(08):84-95. |
Chen Y, Sun Q, Zhang X. Will confucius institute promote Outward Foreign Direct Investment?— Based on the panel data of the countries along "The Belt and Road". Journal of International Trade, 2017 (08) : 84-95. | |
35 | 吴崇伯,张媛. "一带一路"对接"全球海洋支点"—新时代中国与印度尼西亚合作进展及前景透视.厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2019(05):98-108. |
Wu C, Zhang Y. Promoting the synergy between the belt and road initiative and the global maritime axis vision: Recent progress and prospects of cooperation between China and Indonesia. Journal of Xiamen University:Arts & Social Sciences, 2019(05):98-108. |
[1] | Xu YIN, Peng LI, Zhiming FENG, Zhen YOU, Chiwei XIAO. Characteristics of spatio-temporal differences and evolution types of Vietnamese population from 2000 to 2019 [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(5): 941-952. |
[2] | Man SUN, Tao SONG, Qidi JI. Research on the industrial evolution and its mechanism in border towns [J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(2): 388-398. |
[3] | Bingqing CHE, Dongqi SUN, Chuangeng ZHU. Differences and formation mechanisms of regional spatial response in China under the Belt and Road Initiative: An application of massive cooperation events data [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(5): 903-912. |
[4] | Yanjie MU, Yongchun YANG. Route characteristics, cargo types and source organization of international freight trains in western China [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(4): 769-780. |
[5] | Yuyan YAO, Yifei ZHANG, Ziyang JIN, Ye JIANG. Study on the green trade cooperation and competition pattern of the "Belt and Road" [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(4): 792-801. |
[6] | Chengliang LIU, Debin DU, Yuan LI. The teaching model of world geography ideological and political course serving the "Belt and Road" [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(4): 873-881. |
[7] | Zhiding HU, Yuejing GE, Debin DU, Yuli LIU. China's geopolitical strategy on the way to the great rejuvenation: The National Neighborland Theory [J]. World Regional Studies, 2021, 30(3): 443-453. |
[8] | Yao ZHU, Yongguang ZOU, Qianghong LI, Zhiqiang LI. Spatio-temporal characteristics of Chinese outbound travel safety perception events from network relation perspective [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(6): 1304-1312. |
[9] | Xiaorong JIANG, Yongchun YANG, Shenglan WANG. Analysis of export trade’s spatial pattern evolution and influencing factors of Gansu Province with "the Belt and Road" areas [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(5): 1029-1039. |
[10] | Yu DU, Huiming ZONG. The evolution and influencing factors of spatial pattern of trade between Chongqing and ASEAN countries under the background of “The Belt and Road Initiative” [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(4): 697-707. |
[11] | Yuliya SUVALOVA, Luqi LI, Xiang KONG. Study on Turkmenistan’s Foreign Direct Investment environment [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(2): 327-336. |
[12] | Wanpeng CAO, Yongchun YANG, Xiaorong JIANG, Enlong LI. The policy responses to the Belt and Road Initiative in five provinces (districts) of Northwest China based on industry perspective [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(2): 346-357. |
[13] | Dahe QIN, Guoyou ZHANG, Changqing SONG, Fengjun JIN, Desheng XUE, Debin DU, Yulin LU, Changhong MIAO, Yuejing GE, Zhifeng WU, Jianzhong LIU, Zhenke ZHANG, Yungang LIU. more than ever [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(1): 1-7. |
[14] | Xiaoping ZHANG, Shanshan GAO, Mingxing CHEN, Weidong LIU. A preliminary discussion [J]. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(1): 8-17. |
[15] | ZHANG Jiaqi, CHEN Shuang, GAO Qun, Ismael A. Kimirei. Urban sprawl under the rapid growth of informal settlements [J]. WRS, 2019, 28(3): 32-42. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||