主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国地理学会
承办单位:华东师范大学

世界地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 608-620.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2020.03.2018477

• 文化与社会 • 上一篇    下一篇

珠三角流动人口社会融入与生活满意度期望

罗利佳(), 周春山(), 吴沛钊   

  1. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-21 修回日期:2019-01-11 出版日期:2020-05-30 发布日期:2020-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 周春山
  • 作者简介:罗利佳(1994-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为城市地理学、人口地理与城乡规划,E-mail: luolj3@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(17BRK010)

A SEM-based study on migrants’ assimilation and life satisfaction expectation in Pearl River Delta

Lijia LUO(), Chunshan ZHOU(), Peizhao WU   

  1. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Received:2018-10-21 Revised:2019-01-11 Online:2020-05-30 Published:2020-06-12
  • Contact: Chunshan ZHOU

摘要:

近年来有关流动人口社会融入和生活满意度的研究成为我国学者广泛关注的研究主题,较高的社会融入水平已成为流动人口获得生活满意度的根本。基于珠三角流动人口问卷调研数据建立两个结构方程模型,探究社会融入各维度及其影响因素的路径效应,进一步分析社会融入如何影响流动人口实现“生活满意度期望”,即感受到本地生活满意度高于老家的路径机制。结果显示:珠三角地区社会融入可分为经济融入和非经济融入两部分,但经济融入的基础作用不凸显;个体、家庭与制度等因素对社会融入各维度存在较大影响差异;社会融入影响“生活满意度期望”可归纳为“经济融入-生活满意度期望”的直接影响路径和“非经济融入-生活满意度-生活满意度期望”的间接影响路径;提高流动人口市民化和社会融入水平,不仅要关注流动人口的经济收入问题,还应注重流动人口与本地人邻里关系建设,以形成良性的城市更新与和谐的社区环境。

关键词: 流动人口, 社会融入, 生活满意度期望, 结构方程模型, 珠三角

Abstract:

In recent years, the research on assimilation and life satisfaction of migrant population groups has become an active topic between Chinese scholars, while the higher level of assimilation has become the basic of life satisfaction of migrants. This paper has established two structural equation models based on migrant population samples data in the Pearl River Delta. With these models, we could study the path effects of assimilation’s dimensions and its influencing factors. Besides, we also could figure out how assimilation affects life satisfaction expectation, in other word, research the path differences in assimilation dimensions that affect migrants, who have a higher life satisfaction than living in their hometown. The results show that: 1) Assimilation can be divided into two independent parts: economic integration and non-economic integration in the Pearl River Delta. The basic role of the economic integration is not prominent. 2) Individual, family, and institution have different influence on assimilation. 3) Assimilation of the migrant population affects the life satisfaction expectation with two paths. One of models is from economic integration to life satisfaction expectation directly and the other is from non-economic integration to life satisfaction, and eventually move in life satisfaction expectation. 4) The promotion of citizenization and assimilation of migrant population groups needs to pay attention to the income of migrants as well as attach importance to the construction of harmonious relationship of natives and migrants, which can lead to a healthy community environment and a better urban renewal.

Key words: migrants, assimilation, life satisfaction expectation, Structure Equation Modeling, Pearl River Delta